Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

tenth-circuit-upholds-stringent-&amp Case Commentaries

Corporate Venue Statute Applies to LLCs: Alabama Supreme Court Overrules WMS and Aligns LLC Venue with § 6-3-7

Corporate Venue Statute Applies to LLCs: Alabama Supreme Court Overrules WMS and Aligns LLC Venue with § 6-3-7

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Corporate Venue Statute Applies to LLCs: Alabama Supreme Court Overrules WMS and Aligns LLC Venue with § 6-3-7 Introduction In Ex parte Phillip H. Rivers, Steven Nobles, Todd Martin, Stan Roberts,...
Ex parte Thompson: Post-Deposition Inaction Defeats Relation Back — Due Diligence Requires Timely Discovery and Prompt Substitution Under Rule 9(h)

Ex parte Thompson: Post-Deposition Inaction Defeats Relation Back — Due Diligence Requires Timely Discovery and Prompt Substitution Under Rule 9(h)

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Ex parte Thompson: Post-Deposition Inaction Defeats Relation Back — Due Diligence Requires Timely Discovery and Prompt Substitution Under Rule 9(h) Introduction In Ex parte Grisby Jacob Thompson, the...
When a Continuance Extends Rule 59.1: Alabama Supreme Court Requires Continuance Motions and Orders to Appear in the Appellate Record

When a Continuance Extends Rule 59.1: Alabama Supreme Court Requires Continuance Motions and Orders to Appear in the Appellate Record

Date: Sep 30, 2025
When a Continuance Extends Rule 59.1: Alabama Supreme Court Requires Continuance Motions and Orders to Appear in the Appellate Record Introduction In Teresa Williams and Barney’s Childcare and...
No Preservation Bar to “Failure to Charge an Offense” in De Novo Municipal Appeals; Rule 13.2 Supplants Pre‑Rules Ordinance‑Averment Requirements

No Preservation Bar to “Failure to Charge an Offense” in De Novo Municipal Appeals; Rule 13.2 Supplants Pre‑Rules Ordinance‑Averment Requirements

Date: Sep 30, 2025
No Preservation Bar to “Failure to Charge an Offense” in De Novo Municipal Appeals; Rule 13.2 Supplants Pre‑Rules Ordinance‑Averment Requirements Case: Ex parte John Sandifer; Ex parte Curtis Tanner;...
When Parties Waive Appeals, Even Erroneous Sealing Orders Stand: Third Circuit Holds Indefinite Post‑Judgment Sealing Orders Are Final Collateral Orders but Unreviewable by a Waiving Party

When Parties Waive Appeals, Even Erroneous Sealing Orders Stand: Third Circuit Holds Indefinite Post‑Judgment Sealing Orders Are Final Collateral Orders but Unreviewable by a Waiving Party

Date: Sep 28, 2025
When Parties Waive Appeals, Even Erroneous Sealing Orders Stand: The Third Circuit Confirms Indefinite Post‑Judgment Sealing Orders Are Final Collateral Orders but Unreviewable by a Waiving Party...
Reaffirming Sovereign and Judicial Immunity and Plausibility Pleading in Domestic‑Relations–Adjunct RICO/§ 1983 Suits: Fake v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (3d Cir. 2025)

Reaffirming Sovereign and Judicial Immunity and Plausibility Pleading in Domestic‑Relations–Adjunct RICO/§ 1983 Suits: Fake v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 28, 2025
Reaffirming Sovereign and Judicial Immunity and Plausibility Pleading in Domestic‑Relations–Adjunct RICO/§ 1983 Suits: Fake v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (3d Cir. 2025) Note: This Third Circuit...
Post-Deprivation Prison Grievance Procedures Satisfy Due Process for Temporarily Withheld Inmate Funds; Supervisory Liability Requires Personal Involvement, Not Grievance Denials (Bell v. Superintendent Benner Township SCI)

Post-Deprivation Prison Grievance Procedures Satisfy Due Process for Temporarily Withheld Inmate Funds; Supervisory Liability Requires Personal Involvement, Not Grievance Denials (Bell v. Superintendent Benner Township SCI)

Date: Sep 28, 2025
Post-Deprivation Prison Grievance Procedures Satisfy Due Process for Temporarily Withheld Inmate Funds; Supervisory Liability Requires Personal Involvement, Not Grievance Denials Introduction This...
Actual Fraud or Nothing: Market-Tested Sale Findings and Appellate Record Limits Defeat § 1144 Revocation in Virgin Orbit

Actual Fraud or Nothing: Market-Tested Sale Findings and Appellate Record Limits Defeat § 1144 Revocation in Virgin Orbit

Date: Sep 28, 2025
Actual Fraud or Nothing: Market-Tested Sale Findings and Appellate Record Limits Defeat § 1144 Revocation in Virgin Orbit Introduction This commentary analyzes the Third Circuit’s non-precedential...
CAFA Amount in Controversy Fixed at Filing—Even If Federal Claims Are Later Dismissed; Third Circuit Reaffirms Panzarella’s “Use” Requirement for TCPA ATDS Liability

CAFA Amount in Controversy Fixed at Filing—Even If Federal Claims Are Later Dismissed; Third Circuit Reaffirms Panzarella’s “Use” Requirement for TCPA ATDS Liability

Date: Sep 28, 2025
CAFA Amount in Controversy Fixed at Filing—Even If Federal Claims Are Later Dismissed; Third Circuit Reaffirms Panzarella’s “Use” Requirement for TCPA ATDS Liability Introduction In Michael Anthony...
Imposters Can “Occupy” a Position of Trust: Fourth Circuit Reaffirms §3B1.3’s Reach Post‑Kisor and Upholds Probation’s Authority to Set Treatment Details

Imposters Can “Occupy” a Position of Trust: Fourth Circuit Reaffirms §3B1.3’s Reach Post‑Kisor and Upholds Probation’s Authority to Set Treatment Details

Date: Sep 28, 2025
Imposters Can “Occupy” a Position of Trust: Fourth Circuit Reaffirms §3B1.3’s Reach Post‑Kisor and Upholds Probation’s Authority to Set Treatment Details Introduction In United States v. Brewer, the...
Mandamus Is Not a Vehicle to Challenge § 636(b) Referrals or Routine Case-Management Orders: In re Huber (10th Cir. 2025)

Mandamus Is Not a Vehicle to Challenge § 636(b) Referrals or Routine Case-Management Orders: In re Huber (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 28, 2025
Mandamus Is Not a Vehicle to Challenge § 636(b) Referrals or Routine Case-Management Orders: In re Huber (10th Cir. 2025) Introduction In In re Huber, No. 25-4109 (10th Cir. Sept. 26, 2025), the...
“Found In” Means Each Discovery Is a Separate § 1326 Offense—No Intervening Removal Required (United States v. Herrera‑Salazar, 10th Cir. 2025)

“Found In” Means Each Discovery Is a Separate § 1326 Offense—No Intervening Removal Required (United States v. Herrera‑Salazar, 10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 28, 2025
“Found In” Means Each Discovery Is a Separate § 1326 Offense—No Intervening Removal Required Case: United States v. Herrera‑Salazar, No. 24‑7029 (10th Cir. Sept. 26, 2025) (nonprecedential Order and...
United States v. Stacy: Tenth Circuit Opens §1292(a)(1) Path to Enjoin DOJ Spending Under the Medical Marijuana Appropriations Rider and Limits Protection to At Least Substantial Compliance with State Law

United States v. Stacy: Tenth Circuit Opens §1292(a)(1) Path to Enjoin DOJ Spending Under the Medical Marijuana Appropriations Rider and Limits Protection to At Least Substantial Compliance with State Law

Date: Sep 28, 2025
United States v. Stacy: Tenth Circuit Opens §1292(a)(1) Path to Enjoin DOJ Spending Under the Medical Marijuana Appropriations Rider and Limits Protection to At Least Substantial Compliance with...
No Continuing Violation for FDCPA Suits Based on Debt-Collection Litigation; Post-Complaint Filings Do Not Restart the One-Year Clock

No Continuing Violation for FDCPA Suits Based on Debt-Collection Litigation; Post-Complaint Filings Do Not Restart the One-Year Clock

Date: Sep 27, 2025
No Continuing Violation for FDCPA Suits Based on Debt-Collection Litigation; Post-Complaint Filings Do Not Restart the One-Year Clock Case: Helisha Moore v. Cohn, Lifland, Pearlman, Hermann & Knoph...
Davis v. Curtis: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Continuing Court‑Martial Jurisdiction After ETS and Strict “Full and Fair Consideration” Limits on § 2241 Review

Davis v. Curtis: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Continuing Court‑Martial Jurisdiction After ETS and Strict “Full and Fair Consideration” Limits on § 2241 Review

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Continuing Court‑Martial Jurisdiction After ETS and the Strict Dodson Gatekeeper for Military Habeas Review: Commentary on Davis v. Curtis (10th Cir. Sept. 25, 2025) Introduction In Davis v. Curtis,...
No Interlocutory Appeal From Denial of Motion to Dismiss Criminal Contempt: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms “Substance Over Form” and the Narrow Reach of the Collateral-Order Doctrine and 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)

No Interlocutory Appeal From Denial of Motion to Dismiss Criminal Contempt: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms “Substance Over Form” and the Narrow Reach of the Collateral-Order Doctrine and 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)

Date: Sep 27, 2025
No Interlocutory Appeal From Denial of Motion to Dismiss Criminal Contempt: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms “Substance Over Form” and the Narrow Reach of the Collateral-Order Doctrine and 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)...
Financing Is Not “Labor or Material” Under Subcontract Payment Bonds; Oklahoma’s Parol‑Evidence Stranger Exception Applies; Prevailing Defendants May Recover Fees Under § 936 Based on the Suit’s Gravamen

Financing Is Not “Labor or Material” Under Subcontract Payment Bonds; Oklahoma’s Parol‑Evidence Stranger Exception Applies; Prevailing Defendants May Recover Fees Under § 936 Based on the Suit’s Gravamen

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Financing Is Not “Labor or Material” Under Subcontract Payment Bonds; Oklahoma’s Parol‑Evidence Stranger Exception Applies; Prevailing Defendants May Recover Fees Under § 936 Based on the Suit’s...
Limited Pearce Presumption in Nevada Parole Proceedings: No Vindictiveness Presumed When the Parole Board Self‑Corrects

Limited Pearce Presumption in Nevada Parole Proceedings: No Vindictiveness Presumed When the Parole Board Self‑Corrects

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Limited Pearce Presumption in Nevada Parole Proceedings: No Vindictiveness Presumed When the Parole Board Self‑Corrects Introduction This commentary analyzes the Nevada Supreme Court’s decision in...
Gatekeeping the Three‑Judge Panel: Wisconsin Supreme Court Requires Threshold Showing that a Redistricting Suit Is an “Apportionment” Challenge Before § 751.035 Is Triggered

Gatekeeping the Three‑Judge Panel: Wisconsin Supreme Court Requires Threshold Showing that a Redistricting Suit Is an “Apportionment” Challenge Before § 751.035 Is Triggered

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Gatekeeping the Three‑Judge Panel: Wisconsin Supreme Court Requires Threshold Showing that a Redistricting Suit Is an “Apportionment” Challenge Before § 751.035 Is Triggered Introduction In a...
Gatekeeping Before Appointing Three‑Judge Redistricting Panels: Wisconsin Supreme Court to Decide What Counts as an “Apportionment” Challenge Under Wis. Stat. § 801.50(4m)

Gatekeeping Before Appointing Three‑Judge Redistricting Panels: Wisconsin Supreme Court to Decide What Counts as an “Apportionment” Challenge Under Wis. Stat. § 801.50(4m)

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Gatekeeping Before Appointing Three‑Judge Redistricting Panels: Wisconsin Supreme Court to Decide What Counts as an “Apportionment” Challenge Under Wis. Stat. § 801.50(4m) Introduction In Wisconsin...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert