Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

state Case Commentaries

“Link-the-Mail” Doctrine: State ex rel. Mobley v. Grabman (2025) and the Evidentiary Threshold for Statutory Damages under Ohio’s Public-Records Act

“Link-the-Mail” Doctrine: State ex rel. Mobley v. Grabman (2025) and the Evidentiary Threshold for Statutory Damages under Ohio’s Public-Records Act

Date: Jul 7, 2025
“Link-the-Mail” Doctrine: State ex rel. Mobley v. Grabman (2025) and the Evidentiary Threshold for Statutory Damages under Ohio’s Public-Records Act 1. Introduction State ex rel. Mobley v. Grabman,...
Punitive Sanctions, Inherent Powers, and Rule 11: The New Due-Process Divide in Butler v. Motiva Performance Engineering, LLC

Punitive Sanctions, Inherent Powers, and Rule 11: The New Due-Process Divide in Butler v. Motiva Performance Engineering, LLC

Date: Jul 7, 2025
Punitive Sanctions, Inherent Powers, and Rule 11: The New Due-Process Divide in Butler v. Motiva Performance Engineering, LLC 1. Introduction Background. The litigation began with Creig Butler’s...
Kileen v. Didio: The New Mexico Supreme Court Mandates a Per-Vehicle Offer of UM/UIM Coverage

Kileen v. Didio: The New Mexico Supreme Court Mandates a Per-Vehicle Offer of UM/UIM Coverage

Date: Jul 7, 2025
Kileen v. Didio: The New Mexico Supreme Court Mandates a Per-Vehicle Offer of UM/UIM Coverage Introduction Kileen v. Didio, Opinion No. 2 (June 30 2025), marks the latest and most consequential...
State v. Goldman: Clarifying the Permissible Use of “And/Or” in Felony-Murder Jury Instructions

State v. Goldman: Clarifying the Permissible Use of “And/Or” in Felony-Murder Jury Instructions

Date: Jul 7, 2025
State v. Goldman: Clarifying the Permissible Use of “And/Or” in Felony-Murder Jury Instructions Introduction State v. Goldman, No. S-1-SC-40100 (N.M. Sup. Ct. June 30 2025), is a non-precedential...
State v. Moore: Narrowing the Definition of “Serious Firearm Offense” for 30 % Cash Bonds

State v. Moore: Narrowing the Definition of “Serious Firearm Offense” for 30 % Cash Bonds

Date: Jul 6, 2025
State v. Moore: Narrowing the Definition of “Serious Firearm Offense” for 30 % Cash Bonds Introduction Case: State v. Moore, Supreme Court of Connecticut (2025) Core issue: Whether conspiracy to...
State v. Moore: The Element-Focused Definition of “Serious Firearm Offense” in Connecticut Bail Law

State v. Moore: The Element-Focused Definition of “Serious Firearm Offense” in Connecticut Bail Law

Date: Jul 6, 2025
State v. Moore: The Element-Focused Definition of “Serious Firearm Offense” in Connecticut Bail Law 1. Introduction On 8 July 2025 the Supreme Court of Connecticut handed down State v. Moore, a...
“Clay v. State” and the Clarification of Res Judicata’s Reach in Probation-Revocation Appeals

“Clay v. State” and the Clarification of Res Judicata’s Reach in Probation-Revocation Appeals

Date: Jul 6, 2025
“Clay v. State” and the Clarification of Res Judicata’s Reach in Probation-Revocation Appeals Introduction The Wyoming Supreme Court’s decision in Jeremy Gene Clay v. The State of Wyoming, 2025 WY...
The “Duke Rule” – When Victim Testimony & Expert Estimates Alone Sustain a Restitution Award

The “Duke Rule” – When Victim Testimony & Expert Estimates Alone Sustain a Restitution Award

Date: Jul 6, 2025
The “Duke Rule” – When Victim Testimony & Expert Estimates Alone Sustain a Restitution Award Introduction In Timothy B. Duke v. State of Wyoming, 2025 WY 72, the Wyoming Supreme Court confronted a...
“Continuous Coercion” & the Role of Personal History: A Comprehensive Commentary on State v. Joan L. Stetzer, 2025 WI 34

“Continuous Coercion” & the Role of Personal History: A Comprehensive Commentary on State v. Joan L. Stetzer, 2025 WI 34

Date: Jul 5, 2025
“Continuous Coercion” & the Role of Personal History: State v. Joan L. Stetzer, 2025 WI 34 – New Parameters for Wisconsin’s Coercion Defense 1. Introduction On 3 July 2025 the Wisconsin Supreme Court...
Wisconsin DOC v. Hayes: Supreme Court Clarifies “Good-Cause” Threshold for Hearsay at Probation-Revocation Hearings

Wisconsin DOC v. Hayes: Supreme Court Clarifies “Good-Cause” Threshold for Hearsay at Probation-Revocation Hearings

Date: Jul 5, 2025
Wisconsin DOC v. Hayes: Supreme Court Clarifies “Good-Cause” Threshold for Hearsay at Probation-Revocation Hearings Introduction In State ex rel. Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Division of...
Implied-Repeal-by-Substitution:  Wisconsin Supreme Court Dispenses with the 1849 Abortion Ban in Josh Kaul v. Urmanski (2025 WI 32)

Implied-Repeal-by-Substitution: Wisconsin Supreme Court Dispenses with the 1849 Abortion Ban in Josh Kaul v. Urmanski (2025 WI 32)

Date: Jul 5, 2025
Implied-Repeal-by-Substitution: Wisconsin Supreme Court Dispenses with the 1849 Abortion Ban in Josh Kaul v. Urmanski (2025 WI 32) 1. Introduction The Wisconsin Supreme Court’s decision in Josh Kaul...
“The Davis Doctrine” – Post-Verdict Juror Statements Are Inadmissible Under NRS 50.065(2)(a)

“The Davis Doctrine” – Post-Verdict Juror Statements Are Inadmissible Under NRS 50.065(2)(a)

Date: Jul 5, 2025
“The Davis Doctrine” – Post-Verdict Juror Statements Are Inadmissible Under NRS 50.065(2)(a) Introduction Davis (Laron) v. State, decided by the Supreme Court of Nevada on 2 July 2025, concerns the...
“Dwelling” for Home-Occupation Permits Must Independently Qualify as an Allowed Category of Dwelling in the Zone – Friends of Yamhill County v. Yamhill County (373 Or 790)

“Dwelling” for Home-Occupation Permits Must Independently Qualify as an Allowed Category of Dwelling in the Zone – Friends of Yamhill County v. Yamhill County (373 Or 790)

Date: Jul 5, 2025
“Dwelling” for Home-Occupation Permits Must Independently Qualify as an Allowed Category of Dwelling in the Zone – Friends of Yamhill County v. Yamhill County, 373 Or 790 (2025) 1. Introduction In...
Allen v. State (2025): The “Self-Representation Bar” – Clarifying the Procedural Limits on Postconviction Claims by Pro Se Capital Defendants

Allen v. State (2025): The “Self-Representation Bar” – Clarifying the Procedural Limits on Postconviction Claims by Pro Se Capital Defendants

Date: Jul 5, 2025
Allen v. State (2025): The “Self-Representation Bar” – Clarifying the Procedural Limits on Postconviction Claims by Pro Se Capital Defendants Introduction Scottie D. Allen, already serving a 25-year...
Express-Authorization Doctrine for Cosmetic Surgery:  Anderson v. Department of Commerce (2025 UT 19)

Express-Authorization Doctrine for Cosmetic Surgery: Anderson v. Department of Commerce (2025 UT 19)

Date: Jul 5, 2025
“Express-Authorization Doctrine” for Ablative Cosmetic Medical Procedures A Commentary on Anderson v. Utah Department of Commerce, 2025 UT 19 1. Introduction Anderson v. Department of Commerce...
Johnson v. Village of Polk (319 Neb. 352): Co-Equal Permitting –
         Municipal Wellhead Protection Ordinances Coexist with NRD Well-Drilling Authority

Johnson v. Village of Polk (319 Neb. 352): Co-Equal Permitting – Municipal Wellhead Protection Ordinances Coexist with NRD Well-Drilling Authority

Date: Jul 5, 2025
Johnson v. Village of Polk (319 Neb. 352): Co-Equal Permitting – Municipal Wellhead Protection Ordinances Coexist with NRD Well-Drilling Authority Introduction The Nebraska Supreme Court’s decision...
Brooks “Good-Cause” Exclusion: Clarifying Nebraska’s Speedy-Trial Clock for Pre-Hearing Discovery Delays

Brooks “Good-Cause” Exclusion: Clarifying Nebraska’s Speedy-Trial Clock for Pre-Hearing Discovery Delays

Date: Jul 5, 2025
Brooks “Good-Cause” Exclusion: Clarifying Nebraska’s Speedy-Trial Clock for Pre-Hearing Discovery Delays 1. Introduction In State v. Brooks, 319 Neb. 377 (2025), the Nebraska Supreme Court confronted...
Washington v. State: Temporal-Proximity Sufficiency & the Narrow Scope of Corpus Delicti in Delaware Concealed-Firearm Prosecutions

Washington v. State: Temporal-Proximity Sufficiency & the Narrow Scope of Corpus Delicti in Delaware Concealed-Firearm Prosecutions

Date: Jul 4, 2025
Washington v. State: Temporal-Proximity Sufficiency & the Narrow Scope of Corpus Delicti in Delaware Concealed-Firearm Prosecutions Introduction On 2 July 2025 the Supreme Court of Delaware affirmed...
“More-Than-Enough” Predicate Felonies: Fulton v. State and the Narrow Path to Extraordinary Circumstances under Delaware Rule 35

“More-Than-Enough” Predicate Felonies: Fulton v. State and the Narrow Path to Extraordinary Circumstances under Delaware Rule 35

Date: Jul 4, 2025
“More-Than-Enough” Predicate Felonies: Fulton v. State and the Narrow Path to Extraordinary Circumstances under Delaware Rule 35 Introduction Fulton v. State, No. 123, 2025, decided by the Supreme...
Statutory Cross-Reference Prevails: How Rembert v. State Clarifies the Violent-Felony Predicate Rule After Subsection Renumbering

Statutory Cross-Reference Prevails: How Rembert v. State Clarifies the Violent-Felony Predicate Rule After Subsection Renumbering

Date: Jul 4, 2025
Statutory Cross-Reference Prevails: How Rembert v. State Clarifies the Violent-Felony Predicate Rule After Subsection Renumbering 1. Introduction The Delaware Supreme Court’s decision in Rembert v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert