Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

retrospective-application-of-prehire-labor-agreements:-laborers&amp Case Commentaries

“Jurisdiction vs. Remedy”: Idaho Supreme Court Affirms Its Authority to Hear Appeals from Void Intermediate Decisions – Comment on State v. Moore (2025)

“Jurisdiction vs. Remedy”: Idaho Supreme Court Affirms Its Authority to Hear Appeals from Void Intermediate Decisions – Comment on State v. Moore (2025)

Date: Jul 15, 2025
“Jurisdiction vs. Remedy”: Idaho Supreme Court Affirms Its Authority to Hear Appeals from Void Intermediate Decisions – Comment on State v. Moore (2025) Introduction State v. Moore, decided by the...
“Partisan-Parity Standing” – Michigan Supreme Court Confers Standing on Major Political Parties to Enforce Election-Inspector Equality

“Partisan-Parity Standing” – Michigan Supreme Court Confers Standing on Major Political Parties to Enforce Election-Inspector Equality

Date: Jul 15, 2025
“Partisan-Parity Standing” – Michigan Supreme Court Confers Standing on Major Political Parties to Enforce Election-Inspector Equality Introduction The case of Michigan Republican Party & Republican...
From Automatic Discharge to Due-Process Balancing:  Aragon v. Martinez Redefines the Remedy for Untimely Sex-Offender Parole Reviews in New Mexico

From Automatic Discharge to Due-Process Balancing: Aragon v. Martinez Redefines the Remedy for Untimely Sex-Offender Parole Reviews in New Mexico

Date: Jul 15, 2025
From Automatic Discharge to Due-Process Balancing: Aragon v. Martinez Redefines the Remedy for Untimely Sex-Offender Parole Reviews in New Mexico Introduction Aragon v. Martinez, consolidated with...
State v. Olayinka Alege: Clarifying the Threshold for Franks Hearings on Arrest Warrants and the Admissibility of Similar-Act Evidence under Rule 404(b)

State v. Olayinka Alege: Clarifying the Threshold for Franks Hearings on Arrest Warrants and the Admissibility of Similar-Act Evidence under Rule 404(b)

Date: Jul 15, 2025
State v. Olayinka Alege: Clarifying the Threshold for Franks Hearings on Arrest Warrants and the Admissibility of Similar-Act Evidence under Rule 404(b) Introduction State v. Olayinka Alege,...
“Neutral Narrative” Testimony and the Absence of a Sua Sponte Instruction: The Legacy of Johnson v. State (Del. 2025)

“Neutral Narrative” Testimony and the Absence of a Sua Sponte Instruction: The Legacy of Johnson v. State (Del. 2025)

Date: Jul 15, 2025
“Neutral Narrative” Testimony and the Absence of a Sua Sponte Instruction: The Legacy of Johnson v. State (Del. 2025) Introduction Johnson v. State, No. 320, 2024 (Del. July 14, 2025) tackles a...
“Directory, Not Disqualifying” – Arizona Supreme Court Holds that Failure to File A.R.S. § 14-5109 Notice Does Not Automatically Bar Professional Fees

“Directory, Not Disqualifying” – Arizona Supreme Court Holds that Failure to File A.R.S. § 14-5109 Notice Does Not Automatically Bar Professional Fees

Date: Jul 13, 2025
“Directory, Not Disqualifying” – Arizona Supreme Court Holds that Failure to File A.R.S. § 14-5109 Notice Does Not Automatically Bar Professional Fees 1. Introduction In In the Matter of the...
Veljovic v. TD Bank, N.A. — Notarial Negligence, the Economic-Loss Rule, and the Boundaries of the “Special Relationship” Exception

Veljovic v. TD Bank, N.A. — Notarial Negligence, the Economic-Loss Rule, and the Boundaries of the “Special Relationship” Exception

Date: Jul 13, 2025
Notarial Negligence, the Economic-Loss Rule, and the Boundaries of the “Special Relationship” Exception Commentary on Aleksandra Veljovic v. TD Bank, N.A., 2025 VT 38 (Vt. July 11, 2025) 1....
The “Pigeon Rule”: Heightened Pleading Duties for Rebutting the Presumption of Probable Cause in Vermont

The “Pigeon Rule”: Heightened Pleading Duties for Rebutting the Presumption of Probable Cause in Vermont

Date: Jul 13, 2025
The “Pigeon Rule”: Heightened Pleading Duties for Rebutting the Presumption of Probable Cause in Vermont 1. Introduction Allen Pigeon v. Hazen Stone and numerous State defendants presented the...
“Rule 60(b) Motions Do Not Suspend Compliance” — Gaines v. Gaines and the Vermont Supreme Court’s Clarification on Timeliness, Trust Assets, and Contempt

“Rule 60(b) Motions Do Not Suspend Compliance” — Gaines v. Gaines and the Vermont Supreme Court’s Clarification on Timeliness, Trust Assets, and Contempt

Date: Jul 13, 2025
“Rule 60(b) Motions Do Not Suspend Compliance” — Gaines v. Gaines and the Vermont Supreme Court’s Clarification on Timeliness, Trust Assets, and Contempt Introduction Cindy Gaines v. Edmund Gaines,...

        The “Woods Doctrine”: Clarifying Good-Cause Evidence & Judicial Deference in Community-Supervision Furlough Appeals

The “Woods Doctrine”: Clarifying Good-Cause Evidence & Judicial Deference in Community-Supervision Furlough Appeals

Date: Jul 13, 2025
The “Woods Doctrine”: Clarifying Good-Cause Evidence & Judicial Deference in Community-Supervision Furlough Appeals 1. Introduction George Woods, Jr., a self-represented litigant, sought appellate...
“Beyond-Control” Limits in Parental‐Rights Terminations: Vermont Supreme Court Defines the Parent’s Evidentiary Burden in Stagnation Cases

“Beyond-Control” Limits in Parental‐Rights Terminations: Vermont Supreme Court Defines the Parent’s Evidentiary Burden in Stagnation Cases

Date: Jul 13, 2025
“Beyond-Control” Limits in Parental‐Rights Terminations: Vermont Supreme Court Defines the Parent’s Evidentiary Burden in Stagnation Cases 1. Introduction In In re A.B. & B.B., Juveniles, 2025 VT ___...
“One Track, Two Standards” – Vermont Supreme Court Endorses Combined Merits /
           Temporary-Care Hearings and Re-affirms Termination of Parental Rights at
           Initial Disposition without a Reasonable-Efforts Finding

“One Track, Two Standards” – Vermont Supreme Court Endorses Combined Merits / Temporary-Care Hearings and Re-affirms Termination of Parental Rights at Initial Disposition without a Reasonable-Efforts Finding

Date: Jul 13, 2025
“One Track, Two Standards” – Vermont Supreme Court Endorses Combined Merits / Temporary-Care Hearings and Re-affirms Termination of Parental Rights at Initial Disposition without a Reasonable-Efforts...
Expedited Review and Mootness in Extradition Habeas Appeals: Commentary on In Re James Fredrick (2025 VT 37)

Expedited Review and Mootness in Extradition Habeas Appeals: Commentary on In Re James Fredrick (2025 VT 37)

Date: Jul 13, 2025
Expedited Review and Mootness in Extradition Habeas Appeals A Commentary on the Supreme Court of Vermont’s Decision in In Re James Fredrick, 2025 VT 37 1. Introduction The Vermont Supreme Court’s...
Establishing Emotional Maltreatment as Child Abuse under Vermont’s RFA Statute: A Detailed Commentary on Rafuse v. Rafuse (2025)

Establishing Emotional Maltreatment as Child Abuse under Vermont’s RFA Statute: A Detailed Commentary on Rafuse v. Rafuse (2025)

Date: Jul 13, 2025
Establishing Emotional Maltreatment as Child Abuse under Vermont’s RFA Statute: A Detailed Commentary on Rafuse v. Rafuse (Vt. 2025) 1. Introduction The Vermont Supreme Court’s July 2025 entry order...
“Statutory, Not Inherent” – Vermont Supreme Court Recognizes an Implied Right of Statewide Officers to Seek Mandamus under 3 V.S.A. § 159 but Declines to Police the Substance of Attorney-General Opinions

“Statutory, Not Inherent” – Vermont Supreme Court Recognizes an Implied Right of Statewide Officers to Seek Mandamus under 3 V.S.A. § 159 but Declines to Police the Substance of Attorney-General Opinions

Date: Jul 13, 2025
“Statutory, Not Inherent” – Vermont Supreme Court Recognizes an Implied Right of Statewide Officers to Seek Mandamus under 3 V.S.A. § 159 but Declines to Police the Substance of Attorney-General...
State v. Breer, Jr.: Plea Agreements Cannot Bind Non-Party Agencies—Clarifying Enforcement Limits and Standards of Review

State v. Breer, Jr.: Plea Agreements Cannot Bind Non-Party Agencies—Clarifying Enforcement Limits and Standards of Review

Date: Jul 13, 2025
State v. Breer, Jr.: Plea Agreements Cannot Bind Non-Party Agencies—Clarifying Enforcement Limits and Standards of Review 1. Introduction In State v. Harley Breer, Jr., 2025 VT ___ (No. 24-AP-308),...
“Solicitation Requires an Overt Act” –  A Comprehensive Commentary on Insure Idaho v. Horn (Idaho 2025)

“Solicitation Requires an Overt Act” – A Comprehensive Commentary on Insure Idaho v. Horn (Idaho 2025)

Date: Jul 13, 2025
“Solicitation Requires an Overt Act” Idaho Supreme Court Clarifies Enforcement of Non-Solicitation Covenants, Preliminary Injunction Standards, and Contempt Procedure (Insure Idaho, LLC v. Horn, 173...
Beyond Formal Board Action: Agent-Authorization Liability in Wyoming Inverse Condemnation – A Commentary on Thomas Hamann v. Heart Mountain Irrigation District (2025 WY 75)

Beyond Formal Board Action: Agent-Authorization Liability in Wyoming Inverse Condemnation – A Commentary on Thomas Hamann v. Heart Mountain Irrigation District (2025 WY 75)

Date: Jul 13, 2025
Beyond Formal Board Action: Agent-Authorization Liability in Wyoming Inverse Condemnation A Comprehensive Commentary on Thomas Hamann v. Heart Mountain Irrigation District, 2025 WY 75 (Wyo. 2025) 1....
People v. Muhammad (2025): Redefining “Tortured Confession” under the TIRC Act and Establishing the “Actual-Conflict” Standard for Rescinding a Special Prosecutor in Illinois

People v. Muhammad (2025): Redefining “Tortured Confession” under the TIRC Act and Establishing the “Actual-Conflict” Standard for Rescinding a Special Prosecutor in Illinois

Date: Jul 13, 2025
People v. Muhammad (2025 IL 130470) Redefining “Tortured Confession” under the Illinois TIRC Act & Clarifying the Evidence Required to Remove a Special Prosecutor under § 3-9008(a-10)...
Jenco v. Valderra Land Holdings: Utah Supreme Court Limits Rule 62(b) Stays to Money Judgments

Jenco v. Valderra Land Holdings: Utah Supreme Court Limits Rule 62(b) Stays to Money Judgments

Date: Jul 13, 2025
Jenco v. Valderra Land Holdings (2025 UT 20): Utah Supreme Court Limits Rule 62(b) Stays to Money Judgments Introduction Jenco v. Valderra Land Holdings presented the Utah Supreme Court with a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert