Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

reinforcing-the-implied-covenant-of-good-faith-in-commercial-development-contracts:-anthony& Case Commentaries

Reaffirming the Plaintiff’s Burden on the Clearly-Established Law Prong in Qualified Immunity: A Commentary on Bailey v. Beale (10th Cir. 2025)

Reaffirming the Plaintiff’s Burden on the Clearly-Established Law Prong in Qualified Immunity: A Commentary on Bailey v. Beale (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Reaffirming the Plaintiff’s Burden on the Clearly-Established Law Prong in Qualified Immunity A Comprehensive Commentary on Bailey v. Beale, No. 23-7083 (10th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction Bailey v....

“Material Amendments Reset the Clock” – The Tenth Circuit’s Clarification that a
Materially-Amended Judgment, not the Initial Judgment, Triggers Utah’s Eight-Year
Enforcement Period, and that Statutory Stays Toll that Period (EarthGrains Baking
Companies v. Sycamore Family Bakery, 10th Cir. 2025)

“Material Amendments Reset the Clock” – The Tenth Circuit’s Clarification that a Materially-Amended Judgment, not the Initial Judgment, Triggers Utah’s Eight-Year Enforcement Period, and that Statutory Stays Toll that Period (EarthGrains Baking Companies v. Sycamore Family Bakery, 10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 18, 2025
“Material Amendments Reset the Clock” – The Tenth Circuit’s Clarification that a Materially-Amended Judgment, not the Initial Judgment, Triggers Utah’s Eight-Year Enforcement Period, and that...
Grunt Style LLC v. TWD, LLC: Treating Omitted Counter-claims as a Rule 60(a) Clerical Error – A Streamlined Remand Procedure Without a New Notice of Appeal

Grunt Style LLC v. TWD, LLC: Treating Omitted Counter-claims as a Rule 60(a) Clerical Error – A Streamlined Remand Procedure Without a New Notice of Appeal

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Grunt Style LLC v. TWD, LLC: Treating Omitted Counter-claims as a Rule 60(a) Clerical Error – A Streamlined Remand Procedure Without a New Notice of Appeal Introduction In Grunt Style LLC v. TWD,...
Restoring Clarity to Final Judgments: Seventh Circuit Defines Procedure for Correcting Rule 58 Omissions and Handling Duplicative Appeals

Restoring Clarity to Final Judgments: Seventh Circuit Defines Procedure for Correcting Rule 58 Omissions and Handling Duplicative Appeals

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Restoring Clarity to Final Judgments: Seventh Circuit Defines Procedure for Correcting Rule 58 Omissions and Handling Duplicative Appeals Introduction Grunt Style LLC v. TWD, LLC, Nos. 25-1305 &...

        “No-Hearing Where No-Fact-Dispute” Doctrine & Continued Protection for Transgender Students:
        A Commentary on Jane Doe (D.P.) v. Mukwonago Area School District, 7th Cir. (2025)

“No-Hearing Where No-Fact-Dispute” Doctrine & Continued Protection for Transgender Students: A Commentary on Jane Doe (D.P.) v. Mukwonago Area School District, 7th Cir. (2025)

Date: Jun 18, 2025
“No-Hearing Where No-Fact-Dispute” Doctrine & Continued Protection for Transgender Students Commentary on Jane Doe (D.P.) v. Mukwonago Area School District, Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit...
Oye v. Hartford Life: Seventh Circuit Clarifies District Courts’ Obligations in De Novo ERISA Reviews under Rule 52(a)

Oye v. Hartford Life: Seventh Circuit Clarifies District Courts’ Obligations in De Novo ERISA Reviews under Rule 52(a)

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Oye v. Hartford Life: Seventh Circuit Clarifies District Courts’ Obligations in De Novo ERISA Reviews under Rule 52(a) Introduction In Olayinka Oye v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company,...
“One Standard for All” – The Supreme Court Abolishes the “Bad-Faith or Gross-Misjudgment” Hurdle in ADA & §504 Education Cases

“One Standard for All” – The Supreme Court Abolishes the “Bad-Faith or Gross-Misjudgment” Hurdle in ADA & §504 Education Cases

Date: Jun 18, 2025
“One Standard for All” – The Supreme Court Abolishes the “Bad-Faith or Gross-Misjudgment” Hurdle in ADA & §504 Education Cases Introduction In A. J. T. v. Osseo Area Schools, Indep. Sch. Dist....
“When the Levy Vanishes, So Does Jurisdiction” –  Commissioner v. Zuch and the New Limits on Tax Court Review under 26 U.S.C. § 6330

“When the Levy Vanishes, So Does Jurisdiction” – Commissioner v. Zuch and the New Limits on Tax Court Review under 26 U.S.C. § 6330

Date: Jun 18, 2025
“When the Levy Vanishes, So Does Jurisdiction” – Commissioner v. Zuch and the New Limits on Tax Court Review under 26 U.S.C. § 6330 I. Introduction Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Zuch, 605 U.S....

    Narrowing the FTCA Exceptions: Martin v. United States
    Establishes that the “Law-Enforcement Proviso” Overrides
    Only §2680(h) and Rejects a Supremacy-Clause Defense

Narrowing the FTCA Exceptions: Martin v. United States Establishes that the “Law-Enforcement Proviso” Overrides Only §2680(h) and Rejects a Supremacy-Clause Defense

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Narrowing the FTCA Exceptions: Martin v. United States (2025) Clarifies the Limited Reach of the “Law-Enforcement Proviso” and Eliminates the Eleventh Circuit’s Supremacy-Clause Defense I....
The Forward-Relation Doctrine Extended: No Second Notice Required After Reopening Appeal Time under 28 U.S.C. §2107(c)

The Forward-Relation Doctrine Extended: No Second Notice Required After Reopening Appeal Time under 28 U.S.C. §2107(c)

Date: Jun 18, 2025
The Forward-Relation Doctrine Extended: No Second Notice Required After Reopening Appeal Time under 28 U.S.C. §2107(c) Introduction Parrish v. United States (605 U.S. ___ (2025)) is the Supreme...

        “Final-Judgment Finality” – Rivers v. Guerrero Settles When a 
        Habeas Filing Becomes “Second or Successive” under AEDPA

“Final-Judgment Finality” – Rivers v. Guerrero Settles When a Habeas Filing Becomes “Second or Successive” under AEDPA

Date: Jun 18, 2025
“Final-Judgment Finality” – Rivers v. Guerrero Settles When a Habeas Filing Becomes “Second or Successive” under AEDPA Introduction Rivers v. Guerrero, 605 U.S. ___ (2025), resolves a long-standing...
“Beyond Magic Words” –  Soto v. United States and the Re-Configuration of the Barring Act’s “Another Law” Exception

“Beyond Magic Words” – Soto v. United States and the Re-Configuration of the Barring Act’s “Another Law” Exception

Date: Jun 18, 2025
“Beyond Magic Words” – Soto v. United States (2025) and the Re-Configuration of the Barring Act’s “Another Law” Exception Introduction In Soto v. United States, 605 U.S. ___ (2025), a unanimous...
State v. Armendariz: New Mexico Re-Affirms Broad Admissibility of Lay Video-Identification and Contextual Statements Against Penal Interest

State v. Armendariz: New Mexico Re-Affirms Broad Admissibility of Lay Video-Identification and Contextual Statements Against Penal Interest

Date: Jun 18, 2025
State v. Armendariz: New Mexico Re-Affirms Broad Admissibility of Lay Video-Identification and Contextual Statements Against Penal Interest 1. Introduction On 12 June 2025 the Supreme Court of New...
Harris v. Joplin: Re-affirming the Preponderance Standard and Abuse-of-Discretion Review for Extrinsic Proof of Illegible Contracts

Harris v. Joplin: Re-affirming the Preponderance Standard and Abuse-of-Discretion Review for Extrinsic Proof of Illegible Contracts

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Harris v. Joplin: Re-affirming the Preponderance Standard and Abuse-of-Discretion Review for Extrinsic Proof of Illegible Contracts 1. Introduction In Harris v. Joplin, Supreme Court of Virginia,...
“Lawfully Entitled to Have Applied” – Ohio Supreme Court Bars Dependents from Reviving a Denied Scheduled-Loss Claim (Commentary on State ex rel. Byk v. Industrial Commission, 2025-Ohio-2044)

“Lawfully Entitled to Have Applied” – Ohio Supreme Court Bars Dependents from Reviving a Denied Scheduled-Loss Claim (Commentary on State ex rel. Byk v. Industrial Commission, 2025-Ohio-2044)

Date: Jun 18, 2025
“Lawfully Entitled to Have Applied” – Ohio Supreme Court Bars Dependents from Reviving a Denied Scheduled-Loss Claim Commentary on State ex rel. Byk v. Industrial Commission (2025-Ohio-2044) 1....
“Five-Years-Means-Five-Years”:  Supreme Court of Ohio Clarifies that Jail-Time Credit Cannot Shorten the Post-Mandatory Waiting Period for Judicial Release

“Five-Years-Means-Five-Years”: Supreme Court of Ohio Clarifies that Jail-Time Credit Cannot Shorten the Post-Mandatory Waiting Period for Judicial Release

Date: Jun 18, 2025
“Five-Years-Means-Five-Years”: Supreme Court of Ohio Clarifies that Jail-Time Credit Cannot Shorten the Post-Mandatory Waiting Period for Judicial Release Introduction State v. Clinkscale, Slip...
Beyond Ordinary Negligence: West Virginia Formally Adopts Negligent Supervision and Extends Employer Liability to Intentional & Reckless Employee Torts

Beyond Ordinary Negligence: West Virginia Formally Adopts Negligent Supervision and Extends Employer Liability to Intentional & Reckless Employee Torts

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Beyond Ordinary Negligence: West Virginia Formally Adopts Negligent Supervision and Extends Employer Liability to Intentional & Reckless Employee Torts 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of Appeals of...
From Wellhead to Final Buyer: West Virginia Affirms “Point-of-Sale” Standard and Extends Royalty Protection to Natural Gas Liquids

From Wellhead to Final Buyer: West Virginia Affirms “Point-of-Sale” Standard and Extends Royalty Protection to Natural Gas Liquids

Date: Jun 18, 2025
From Wellhead to Final Buyer: West Virginia Affirms “Point-of-Sale” Standard and Extends Royalty Protection to Natural Gas Liquids 1. Introduction In Jacklin Romeo, Susan S. Rine, and Debra Snyder...
The Expanded “Point-of-Sale” Doctrine: Downstream Markets and Enhanced Hydrocarbons in West Virginia Royalty Calculations

The Expanded “Point-of-Sale” Doctrine: Downstream Markets and Enhanced Hydrocarbons in West Virginia Royalty Calculations

Date: Jun 18, 2025
The Expanded “Point-of-Sale” Doctrine: Downstream Markets and Enhanced Hydrocarbons in West Virginia Royalty Calculations 1. Introduction Jacklin Romeo, Susan S. Rine and Debra Snyder Miller...
State v. Roman: Rhode Island Supreme Court Casts Doubt on Automatic Waiver of Rule 35 Sentence-Reduction Motions in Plea Agreements

State v. Roman: Rhode Island Supreme Court Casts Doubt on Automatic Waiver of Rule 35 Sentence-Reduction Motions in Plea Agreements

Date: Jun 18, 2025
State v. Roman: Rhode Island Supreme Court Casts Doubt on Automatic Waiver of Rule 35 Sentence-Reduction Motions in Plea Agreements Introduction State v. Luis Roman, No. 2024-78-C.A. (R.I. June 11,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert