Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

reinforcing-the-implied-covenant-of-good-faith-in-commercial-development-contracts:-anthony& Case Commentaries

Private-University Police as State Actors: A Commentary on Warman v. Mount St. Joseph University (6th Cir. 2025)

Private-University Police as State Actors: A Commentary on Warman v. Mount St. Joseph University (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 22, 2025
Private-University Police as State Actors: A Commentary on Warman v. Mount St. Joseph University (6th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction In Matthew Warman v. Mount St. Joseph University, the United States...
The “Endless-Cycle” Doctrine Reaffirmed: United States v. Frederick and the Scope of § 3583 Revocation Authority

The “Endless-Cycle” Doctrine Reaffirmed: United States v. Frederick and the Scope of § 3583 Revocation Authority

Date: Jul 22, 2025
The “Endless-Cycle” Doctrine Reaffirmed: United States v. Frederick and the Scope of § 3583 Revocation Authority Introduction In United States v. Frederick, No. 24-5099 (10th Cir. July 18, 2025), the...
Clarifying Warrant-Exception Boundaries During Police “Wellness Checks” – A Commentary on Alicea v. City of Bridgeport

Clarifying Warrant-Exception Boundaries During Police “Wellness Checks” – A Commentary on Alicea v. City of Bridgeport

Date: Jul 22, 2025
Clarifying Warrant-Exception Boundaries During Police “Wellness Checks” – A Commentary on Alicea v. City of Bridgeport 1. Introduction Jurisdiction & Panel: Second Circuit Court of Appeals (Judges...
Perpetuating Diversity Jurisdiction after Partial Dismissal: The Second Circuit’s Clarification in Banga v. Lustig (2025)

Perpetuating Diversity Jurisdiction after Partial Dismissal: The Second Circuit’s Clarification in Banga v. Lustig (2025)

Date: Jul 22, 2025
Perpetuating Diversity Jurisdiction after Partial Dismissal: The Second Circuit’s Clarification in Banga v. Lustig (2025) Introduction Banga v. Lustig, 24-140-cv, is a Second Circuit summary order...
Clarifying Section 29(b) Rescission: Convertible Notes Not Voidable Absent Contractual Broker-Dealer Obligations – Commentary on EMA Financial, LLC v. Vystar Corp. (2d Cir. 2025)

Clarifying Section 29(b) Rescission: Convertible Notes Not Voidable Absent Contractual Broker-Dealer Obligations – Commentary on EMA Financial, LLC v. Vystar Corp. (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 22, 2025
Clarifying Section 29(b) Rescission: Convertible Notes Not Voidable Absent Contractual Broker-Dealer Obligations – Commentary on EMA Financial, LLC v. Vystar Corp. (2d Cir. 2025) Introduction The...
Gluck v. Hecla Mining Co.: The Second Circuit’s Reinforcement of Strict PSLRA Pleading—Puffery, Scienter, and Safe-Harbor in Securities Fraud

Gluck v. Hecla Mining Co.: The Second Circuit’s Reinforcement of Strict PSLRA Pleading—Puffery, Scienter, and Safe-Harbor in Securities Fraud

Date: Jul 22, 2025
Gluck v. Hecla Mining Co.: The Second Circuit’s Reinforcement of Strict PSLRA Pleading—Puffery, Scienter, and Safe-Harbor in Securities Fraud Introduction In Gluck v. Hecla Mining Co. (24-2947-cv),...
Standard Account Terms as a Global Waiver of Sovereign Immunity & The Civil Nature of Large Coercive Fines ― A Commentary on JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. VTB Bank, P.J.S.C. (2d Cir. 2025)

Standard Account Terms as a Global Waiver of Sovereign Immunity & The Civil Nature of Large Coercive Fines ― A Commentary on JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. VTB Bank, P.J.S.C. (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 22, 2025
Standard Account Terms as a Global Waiver of Sovereign Immunity & The Civil Nature of Large Coercive Fines Comprehensive Commentary on JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. VTB Bank, P.J.S.C. United States...
The Illusion of APA Work-Arounds: Quezada Palacios v. Bondi and the Second Circuit’s Re-affirmation of § 1252(a)(2)(B)’s Jurisdictional Bar

The Illusion of APA Work-Arounds: Quezada Palacios v. Bondi and the Second Circuit’s Re-affirmation of § 1252(a)(2)(B)’s Jurisdictional Bar

Date: Jul 22, 2025
The Illusion of APA Work-Arounds: Quezada Palacios v. Bondi and the Second Circuit’s Re-affirmation of § 1252(a)(2)(B)’s Jurisdictional Bar 1. Introduction Kevin Donely Quezada Palacios (“Quezada”),...
“Hostile Appropriation by a Co-Owner” and “Active Concealment” as Dual Triggers: Commentary on Su v. Yeh (2d Cir. 2025)

“Hostile Appropriation by a Co-Owner” and “Active Concealment” as Dual Triggers: Commentary on Su v. Yeh (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 22, 2025
“Hostile Appropriation by a Co-Owner” and “Active Concealment” as Dual Triggers for Conversion & Equitable Estoppel: An In-Depth Commentary on Su v. Yeh, 24-0653 (2d Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction...

Second Circuit Endorses “One-Facility / One-Remediation” Rule: 
Statute of Limitations Under CERCLA Runs from the First Physical Cleanup

Second Circuit Endorses “One-Facility / One-Remediation” Rule: Statute of Limitations Under CERCLA Runs from the First Physical Cleanup

Date: Jul 22, 2025
Second Circuit Endorses “One-Facility / One-Remediation” Rule: Statute of Limitations Under CERCLA Runs from the First Physical Cleanup I. Introduction On 17 July 2025, the United States Court of...
“Grave Doubt” in Coram Nobis: Johnson v. United States and the Second Circuit’s Refined Harmless-Error Framework after Ciminelli

“Grave Doubt” in Coram Nobis: Johnson v. United States and the Second Circuit’s Refined Harmless-Error Framework after Ciminelli

Date: Jul 22, 2025
“Grave Doubt” in Coram Nobis: Johnson v. United States and the Second Circuit’s Refined Harmless-Error Framework after Ciminelli Introduction Johnson v. United States, No. 24-1221 (2d Cir. July 17,...

        Qualified Immunity for Indirect Regulatory Coercion of Non-Expressive Conduct:
        A Commentary on Nat’l Rifle Ass’n of Am. v. Vullo (2d Cir. 2025)

Qualified Immunity for Indirect Regulatory Coercion of Non-Expressive Conduct: A Commentary on Nat’l Rifle Ass’n of Am. v. Vullo (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 22, 2025
Qualified Immunity for Indirect Regulatory Coercion of Non-Expressive Conduct: A Commentary on Nat’l Rifle Ass’n of Am. v. Vullo (2d Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction On 17 July 2025 the United States Court...
Expansive Reach of PPIA Preemption over On-Site Distribution Operations: Northwestern Selecta, Inc. v. González-Beiró

Expansive Reach of PPIA Preemption over On-Site Distribution Operations: Northwestern Selecta, Inc. v. González-Beiró

Date: Jul 22, 2025
Expansive Reach of PPIA Preemption over On-Site Distribution Operations: Northwestern Selecta, Inc. v. González-Beiró Introduction In Northwestern Selecta, Inc. v. González-Beiró, the United States...
United States v. Muñoz-Gonzalez: Stipulated-Facts Advocacy & Plain-Error Waiver in Breach-of-Plea Claims

United States v. Muñoz-Gonzalez: Stipulated-Facts Advocacy & Plain-Error Waiver in Breach-of-Plea Claims

Date: Jul 22, 2025
United States v. Muñoz-Gonzalez: Stipulated-Facts Advocacy & Plain-Error Waiver in Breach-of-Plea Claims Introduction United States v. Muñoz-Gonzalez, No. 22-1423 (1st Cir. July 17 2025), addresses...
Fourth Circuit Abolishes the “Reasonable-Interpretation” Safe Harbor in Healthcare-Fraud Cases: A Commentary on United States v. Elfenbein

Fourth Circuit Abolishes the “Reasonable-Interpretation” Safe Harbor in Healthcare-Fraud Cases: A Commentary on United States v. Elfenbein

Date: Jul 22, 2025
Fourth Circuit Abolishes the “Reasonable-Interpretation” Safe Harbor in Healthcare-Fraud Cases: United States v. Elfenbein 1. Introduction In United States v. Ron Elfenbein, the United States Court...
Sullivan v. Graham: Tenth Circuit Clarifies District Courts’ Discretion over Page-Limits, Rule 8 Compliance, and Counsel Appointment for Pro Se Litigants

Sullivan v. Graham: Tenth Circuit Clarifies District Courts’ Discretion over Page-Limits, Rule 8 Compliance, and Counsel Appointment for Pro Se Litigants

Date: Jul 22, 2025
Sullivan v. Graham: Tenth Circuit Clarifies District Courts’ Discretion over Page-Limits, Rule 8 Compliance, and Counsel Appointment for Pro Se Litigants Introduction The consolidated appeals in...
“Reasonable Brevity”: Sullivan v. Hartford Financial Services Group and the Tenth Circuit’s Re-affirmation of District Courts’ Discretion to Impose Page Limits and Dismiss Prolix Pro Se Pleadings

“Reasonable Brevity”: Sullivan v. Hartford Financial Services Group and the Tenth Circuit’s Re-affirmation of District Courts’ Discretion to Impose Page Limits and Dismiss Prolix Pro Se Pleadings

Date: Jul 22, 2025
“Reasonable Brevity”: Sullivan v. Hartford Financial Services Group and the Tenth Circuit’s Re-affirmation of District Courts’ Discretion to Impose Page Limits and Dismiss Prolix Pro Se Pleadings 1....
Jackson v. KA-3 Associates, LLC: Oregon Supreme Court Affirms Landlord Duty to Maintain Common Areas Under ORS 90.320(1)

Jackson v. KA-3 Associates, LLC: Oregon Supreme Court Affirms Landlord Duty to Maintain Common Areas Under ORS 90.320(1)

Date: Jul 22, 2025
Jackson v. KA-3 Associates, LLC: Extending Oregon Landlord Habitability Obligations to Common Areas Under ORS 90.320(1) Introduction Citation: Jackson v. KA-3 Associates, LLC, 374 Or 1 (2025),...
Implicit Nondisparagement Clauses Do Not Waive Oregon’s Anti-SLAPP Protections – A Commentary on Lowes v. Thompson, 374 Or 23 (2025)

Implicit Nondisparagement Clauses Do Not Waive Oregon’s Anti-SLAPP Protections – A Commentary on Lowes v. Thompson, 374 Or 23 (2025)

Date: Jul 22, 2025
Implicit Nondisparagement Clauses Do Not Waive Oregon’s Anti-SLAPP Protections A Comprehensive Commentary on Lowes v. Thompson, 374 Or 23 (2025) 1. Introduction Lowes v. Thompson is the Oregon...
“The Registered-Owner Inference Rule” – A New Article I, § 9 Benchmark after State v. Betancourt (2025)

“The Registered-Owner Inference Rule” – A New Article I, § 9 Benchmark after State v. Betancourt (2025)

Date: Jul 22, 2025
“The Registered-Owner Inference Rule” – A New Article I, § 9 Benchmark after State v. Betancourt (2025) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of Oregon’s en banc decision in State v. Betancourt, 374 Or...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert