Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

protection-of-fanciful-trademarks-and-recovery-of-infringer& Case Commentaries

Post‑Abitron, Narrowing an Injunction Does Not Strip Prevailing‑Party Status or Preclude Exceptional‑Case Fees Under § 1117(a)

Post‑Abitron, Narrowing an Injunction Does Not Strip Prevailing‑Party Status or Preclude Exceptional‑Case Fees Under § 1117(a)

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Post‑Abitron, Narrowing an Injunction Does Not Strip Prevailing‑Party Status or Preclude Exceptional‑Case Fees Under § 1117(a) Introduction In this unpublished per curiam decision, the Eleventh...
No Constructive Amendment Where §1344 Indictment Language Subsumes Both Prongs; Second Circuit Reaffirms Deference to “Intended Loss” Commentary and Jointly Undertaken Activity at Sentencing (United States v. Rahmankulov)

No Constructive Amendment Where §1344 Indictment Language Subsumes Both Prongs; Second Circuit Reaffirms Deference to “Intended Loss” Commentary and Jointly Undertaken Activity at Sentencing (United States v. Rahmankulov)

Date: Sep 30, 2025
No Constructive Amendment Where §1344 Indictment Language Subsumes Both Prongs; Second Circuit Reaffirms Deference to “Intended Loss” Commentary and Jointly Undertaken Activity at Sentencing Case:...
“Move Over” Means Move Over: Second Circuit (Nonprecedential) Clarification That N.Y. VTL § 1144-a(b) Mandates a Lane Change (When Safe), Supporting Reasonable Suspicion for a Traffic Stop

“Move Over” Means Move Over: Second Circuit (Nonprecedential) Clarification That N.Y. VTL § 1144-a(b) Mandates a Lane Change (When Safe), Supporting Reasonable Suspicion for a Traffic Stop

Date: Sep 30, 2025
“Move Over” Means Move Over: Second Circuit (Nonprecedential) Clarification That N.Y. VTL § 1144-a(b) Mandates a Lane Change (When Safe), Supporting Reasonable Suspicion for a Traffic Stop...
Reaffirming Deference to Sentencing Courts: Above-Guidelines Variance Upheld for Aggravated NFA Possession Involving Discharge and Protective-Order Violations

Reaffirming Deference to Sentencing Courts: Above-Guidelines Variance Upheld for Aggravated NFA Possession Involving Discharge and Protective-Order Violations

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Reaffirming Deference to Sentencing Courts: Above-Guidelines Variance Upheld for Aggravated NFA Possession Involving Discharge and Protective-Order Violations Introduction In United States v....
Systemwide Conditions Are Not “Adverse Employment Actions” Absent Individualized Harm After Muldrow: Commentary on Bowman v. City of Chicago Board of Education (7th Cir. 2025)

Systemwide Conditions Are Not “Adverse Employment Actions” Absent Individualized Harm After Muldrow: Commentary on Bowman v. City of Chicago Board of Education (7th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Systemwide Conditions Are Not “Adverse Employment Actions” Absent Individualized Harm After Muldrow Commentary on Bowman v. City of Chicago Board of Education (7th Cir. Sept. 29, 2025) Introduction...
Post-Erlinger Harmless Error in ACCA Cases: Sixth Circuit Confirms PSRs May Ground “Different Occasions” Findings and Emphasizes the Reasonable-Jury Standard

Post-Erlinger Harmless Error in ACCA Cases: Sixth Circuit Confirms PSRs May Ground “Different Occasions” Findings and Emphasizes the Reasonable-Jury Standard

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Post-Erlinger Harmless Error in ACCA Cases: Sixth Circuit Confirms PSRs May Ground “Different Occasions” Findings and Emphasizes the Reasonable-Jury Standard Introduction In United States v. Marquise...
Channel Stuffing as a Half-Truth: The Second Circuit Confirms 10b-5(b) Liability and Clarifies Scienter and “Truth-on-the-Market” at the Pleading Stage

Channel Stuffing as a Half-Truth: The Second Circuit Confirms 10b-5(b) Liability and Clarifies Scienter and “Truth-on-the-Market” at the Pleading Stage

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Channel Stuffing as a Half-Truth: The Second Circuit Confirms 10b-5(b) Liability and Clarifies Scienter and “Truth-on-the-Market” at the Pleading Stage Introduction In Gimpel v. Hain Celestial Group,...
After Delligatti, VICAR Attempted Murder Categorically Supports §924(c) “Crime of Violence”; Stipulated §2K2.1(b)(6)(B) Enhancements Are Effectively Unreviewable

After Delligatti, VICAR Attempted Murder Categorically Supports §924(c) “Crime of Violence”; Stipulated §2K2.1(b)(6)(B) Enhancements Are Effectively Unreviewable

Date: Sep 30, 2025
After Delligatti, VICAR Attempted Murder Categorically Supports §924(c) “Crime of Violence”; Stipulated §2K2.1(b)(6)(B) Enhancements Are Effectively Unreviewable Introduction In United States v....
Nevada Supreme Court Clarifies: Post‑Judgment Sealing Orders Are Not Appealable Unless They Affect Rights Embedded in the Final Judgment (Bloom v. Rodgers, 2025)

Nevada Supreme Court Clarifies: Post‑Judgment Sealing Orders Are Not Appealable Unless They Affect Rights Embedded in the Final Judgment (Bloom v. Rodgers, 2025)

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Nevada Supreme Court Clarifies: Post‑Judgment Sealing Orders Are Not Appealable Unless They Affect Rights Embedded in the Final Judgment Case Overview and Procedural Posture Case: Bloom v. Rodgers...
When Parties Waive Appeals, Even Erroneous Sealing Orders Stand: Third Circuit Holds Indefinite Post‑Judgment Sealing Orders Are Final Collateral Orders but Unreviewable by a Waiving Party

When Parties Waive Appeals, Even Erroneous Sealing Orders Stand: Third Circuit Holds Indefinite Post‑Judgment Sealing Orders Are Final Collateral Orders but Unreviewable by a Waiving Party

Date: Sep 28, 2025
When Parties Waive Appeals, Even Erroneous Sealing Orders Stand: The Third Circuit Confirms Indefinite Post‑Judgment Sealing Orders Are Final Collateral Orders but Unreviewable by a Waiving Party...
Reaffirming Sovereign and Judicial Immunity and Plausibility Pleading in Domestic‑Relations–Adjunct RICO/§ 1983 Suits: Fake v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (3d Cir. 2025)

Reaffirming Sovereign and Judicial Immunity and Plausibility Pleading in Domestic‑Relations–Adjunct RICO/§ 1983 Suits: Fake v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 28, 2025
Reaffirming Sovereign and Judicial Immunity and Plausibility Pleading in Domestic‑Relations–Adjunct RICO/§ 1983 Suits: Fake v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (3d Cir. 2025) Note: This Third Circuit...
Post-Deprivation Prison Grievance Procedures Satisfy Due Process for Temporarily Withheld Inmate Funds; Supervisory Liability Requires Personal Involvement, Not Grievance Denials (Bell v. Superintendent Benner Township SCI)

Post-Deprivation Prison Grievance Procedures Satisfy Due Process for Temporarily Withheld Inmate Funds; Supervisory Liability Requires Personal Involvement, Not Grievance Denials (Bell v. Superintendent Benner Township SCI)

Date: Sep 28, 2025
Post-Deprivation Prison Grievance Procedures Satisfy Due Process for Temporarily Withheld Inmate Funds; Supervisory Liability Requires Personal Involvement, Not Grievance Denials Introduction This...
Actual Fraud or Nothing: Market-Tested Sale Findings and Appellate Record Limits Defeat § 1144 Revocation in Virgin Orbit

Actual Fraud or Nothing: Market-Tested Sale Findings and Appellate Record Limits Defeat § 1144 Revocation in Virgin Orbit

Date: Sep 28, 2025
Actual Fraud or Nothing: Market-Tested Sale Findings and Appellate Record Limits Defeat § 1144 Revocation in Virgin Orbit Introduction This commentary analyzes the Third Circuit’s non-precedential...
CAFA Amount in Controversy Fixed at Filing—Even If Federal Claims Are Later Dismissed; Third Circuit Reaffirms Panzarella’s “Use” Requirement for TCPA ATDS Liability

CAFA Amount in Controversy Fixed at Filing—Even If Federal Claims Are Later Dismissed; Third Circuit Reaffirms Panzarella’s “Use” Requirement for TCPA ATDS Liability

Date: Sep 28, 2025
CAFA Amount in Controversy Fixed at Filing—Even If Federal Claims Are Later Dismissed; Third Circuit Reaffirms Panzarella’s “Use” Requirement for TCPA ATDS Liability Introduction In Michael Anthony...
Imposters Can “Occupy” a Position of Trust: Fourth Circuit Reaffirms §3B1.3’s Reach Post‑Kisor and Upholds Probation’s Authority to Set Treatment Details

Imposters Can “Occupy” a Position of Trust: Fourth Circuit Reaffirms §3B1.3’s Reach Post‑Kisor and Upholds Probation’s Authority to Set Treatment Details

Date: Sep 28, 2025
Imposters Can “Occupy” a Position of Trust: Fourth Circuit Reaffirms §3B1.3’s Reach Post‑Kisor and Upholds Probation’s Authority to Set Treatment Details Introduction In United States v. Brewer, the...
Mandamus Is Not a Vehicle to Challenge § 636(b) Referrals or Routine Case-Management Orders: In re Huber (10th Cir. 2025)

Mandamus Is Not a Vehicle to Challenge § 636(b) Referrals or Routine Case-Management Orders: In re Huber (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 28, 2025
Mandamus Is Not a Vehicle to Challenge § 636(b) Referrals or Routine Case-Management Orders: In re Huber (10th Cir. 2025) Introduction In In re Huber, No. 25-4109 (10th Cir. Sept. 26, 2025), the...
“Found In” Means Each Discovery Is a Separate § 1326 Offense—No Intervening Removal Required (United States v. Herrera‑Salazar, 10th Cir. 2025)

“Found In” Means Each Discovery Is a Separate § 1326 Offense—No Intervening Removal Required (United States v. Herrera‑Salazar, 10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 28, 2025
“Found In” Means Each Discovery Is a Separate § 1326 Offense—No Intervening Removal Required Case: United States v. Herrera‑Salazar, No. 24‑7029 (10th Cir. Sept. 26, 2025) (nonprecedential Order and...
United States v. Stacy: Tenth Circuit Opens §1292(a)(1) Path to Enjoin DOJ Spending Under the Medical Marijuana Appropriations Rider and Limits Protection to At Least Substantial Compliance with State Law

United States v. Stacy: Tenth Circuit Opens §1292(a)(1) Path to Enjoin DOJ Spending Under the Medical Marijuana Appropriations Rider and Limits Protection to At Least Substantial Compliance with State Law

Date: Sep 28, 2025
United States v. Stacy: Tenth Circuit Opens §1292(a)(1) Path to Enjoin DOJ Spending Under the Medical Marijuana Appropriations Rider and Limits Protection to At Least Substantial Compliance with...
No Continuing Violation for FDCPA Suits Based on Debt-Collection Litigation; Post-Complaint Filings Do Not Restart the One-Year Clock

No Continuing Violation for FDCPA Suits Based on Debt-Collection Litigation; Post-Complaint Filings Do Not Restart the One-Year Clock

Date: Sep 27, 2025
No Continuing Violation for FDCPA Suits Based on Debt-Collection Litigation; Post-Complaint Filings Do Not Restart the One-Year Clock Case: Helisha Moore v. Cohn, Lifland, Pearlman, Hermann & Knoph...
Davis v. Curtis: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Continuing Court‑Martial Jurisdiction After ETS and Strict “Full and Fair Consideration” Limits on § 2241 Review

Davis v. Curtis: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Continuing Court‑Martial Jurisdiction After ETS and Strict “Full and Fair Consideration” Limits on § 2241 Review

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Continuing Court‑Martial Jurisdiction After ETS and the Strict Dodson Gatekeeper for Military Habeas Review: Commentary on Davis v. Curtis (10th Cir. Sept. 25, 2025) Introduction In Davis v. Curtis,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert