Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

protected-advice-at-life’s-end:-seventh-circuit-holds-indiana’s-funeral-licensing-ban-on-death-doula-counseling-fails-even-under-intermediate-scrutiny—and-consent-orders-don’t-waive-federal-rights Case Commentaries

No Internet Shortcut: Creditor’s Right to Repayment and Escrow Possession Qualify as “Property” Under Wire Fraud; Interstate Proof Required for Online Wires

No Internet Shortcut: Creditor’s Right to Repayment and Escrow Possession Qualify as “Property” Under Wire Fraud; Interstate Proof Required for Online Wires

Date: Oct 23, 2025
No Internet Shortcut: Creditor’s Right to Repayment and Escrow Possession Qualify as “Property” Under Wire Fraud; Interstate Proof Required for Online Wires Introduction In United States v. Baker,...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Wire Fraud “Property”: Creditor’s Collection Right and Escrow Possession Qualify; Internet Use Alone Does Not Satisfy Interstate Element; Grand Jury May Initiate §401 Contempt

Tenth Circuit Clarifies Wire Fraud “Property”: Creditor’s Collection Right and Escrow Possession Qualify; Internet Use Alone Does Not Satisfy Interstate Element; Grand Jury May Initiate §401 Contempt

Date: Oct 23, 2025
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Wire Fraud “Property”: Creditor’s Collection Right and Escrow Possession Qualify; Internet Use Alone Does Not Satisfy Interstate Element; Grand Jury May Initiate §401 Contempt...
Facial Bans on Transgender Women Are Direct Evidence of MHRA Discrimination; “Legitimate Business Purpose” Requires BFOQ‑like Necessity and Does Not Apply to Public Accommodations

Facial Bans on Transgender Women Are Direct Evidence of MHRA Discrimination; “Legitimate Business Purpose” Requires BFOQ‑like Necessity and Does Not Apply to Public Accommodations

Date: Oct 23, 2025
Facial Bans on Transgender Women Are Direct Evidence of MHRA Discrimination; “Legitimate Business Purpose” Requires BFOQ‑like Necessity and Does Not Apply to Public Accommodations Introduction In...
Nagle’s Rule: Corroboration of a CRI Tip Is a Factor—Not an Independent Requirement—But a Bare, One-Time Drug-Use Observation Within 72 Hours Does Not Establish Probable Cause

Nagle’s Rule: Corroboration of a CRI Tip Is a Factor—Not an Independent Requirement—But a Bare, One-Time Drug-Use Observation Within 72 Hours Does Not Establish Probable Cause

Date: Oct 23, 2025
Nagle’s Rule: Corroboration of a CRI Tip Is a Factor—Not an Independent Requirement—But a Bare, One-Time Drug-Use Observation Within 72 Hours Does Not Establish Probable Cause Introduction In State...
Employee-Benefit Only: Minnesota Supreme Court Narrows Recreational Program Exclusion and Clarifies “Reasonably Incidental” Employment Activities

Employee-Benefit Only: Minnesota Supreme Court Narrows Recreational Program Exclusion and Clarifies “Reasonably Incidental” Employment Activities

Date: Oct 23, 2025
Employee-Benefit Only: Minnesota Supreme Court Narrows Recreational Program Exclusion and Clarifies “Reasonably Incidental” Employment Activities Introduction In Erin Lindsay v. Minneapolis Public...
Riley v. Minnesota: Rule 27.03 Motions Are Not Time-Barred and PSIs/Sentencing Guidelines Do Not Control Mandatory Life Sentences

Riley v. Minnesota: Rule 27.03 Motions Are Not Time-Barred and PSIs/Sentencing Guidelines Do Not Control Mandatory Life Sentences

Date: Oct 23, 2025
Riley v. Minnesota: Rule 27.03 Motions Are Not Time-Barred and PSIs/Sentencing Guidelines Do Not Control Mandatory Life Sentences Introduction In Adrian Dominic Riley v. State of Minnesota, the...
Clear-and-Convincing Is a Standard, Not an Element: Henke v. Hospital Development of West Phoenix Recalibrates Causation Proof in Arizona Emergency-Room Malpractice

Clear-and-Convincing Is a Standard, Not an Element: Henke v. Hospital Development of West Phoenix Recalibrates Causation Proof in Arizona Emergency-Room Malpractice

Date: Oct 23, 2025
Clear-and-Convincing Is a Standard, Not an Element: Henke v. Hospital Development of West Phoenix Recalibrates Causation Proof in Arizona Emergency-Room Malpractice Introduction In Henke v. Hospital...
Prospective Application of Amended S.Ct.Prac.R. 4.03(A) and Strict Limits on Habeas Relief Reaffirmed: Gordon v. Smith

Prospective Application of Amended S.Ct.Prac.R. 4.03(A) and Strict Limits on Habeas Relief Reaffirmed: Gordon v. Smith

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Prospective Application of Amended S.Ct.Prac.R. 4.03(A) and Strict Limits on Habeas Relief Reaffirmed: Gordon v. Smith Introduction In Gordon v. Smith, 2025-Ohio-4768, the Supreme Court of Ohio...
Strict, Time-of-Filing Compliance with R.C. 2969.25(A): No Post-Filing Cure via Updated Affidavits or Civ.R. 15 in State ex rel. Harris v. Schwendeman

Strict, Time-of-Filing Compliance with R.C. 2969.25(A): No Post-Filing Cure via Updated Affidavits or Civ.R. 15 in State ex rel. Harris v. Schwendeman

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Strict, Time-of-Filing Compliance with R.C. 2969.25(A): No Post-Filing Cure via Updated Affidavits or Civ.R. 15 Introduction In State ex rel. Harris v. Schwendeman, Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-4769,...
A Bifurcated Test for “Cruel or Unusual”: Wyoming Supreme Court Clarifies Article 1, § 14 and Declines Categorical Protections for Emerging Adults

A Bifurcated Test for “Cruel or Unusual”: Wyoming Supreme Court Clarifies Article 1, § 14 and Declines Categorical Protections for Emerging Adults

Date: Oct 22, 2025
A Bifurcated Test for “Cruel or Unusual”: Wyoming Supreme Court Clarifies Article 1, § 14 and Declines Categorical Protections for Emerging Adults Introduction In Christopher Robert Hicks v. The...
When Parties Fail to Provide Valuation Evidence, a District Court May Order Appraisal or Sale and Still Equitably Divide the Estate: Nonprecedential Affirmance in Marriage of Schafer

When Parties Fail to Provide Valuation Evidence, a District Court May Order Appraisal or Sale and Still Equitably Divide the Estate: Nonprecedential Affirmance in Marriage of Schafer

Date: Oct 22, 2025
When Parties Fail to Provide Valuation Evidence, a District Court May Order Appraisal or Sale and Still Equitably Divide the Estate: Nonprecedential Affirmance in Marriage of Schafer Court: Supreme...
No Waiver Without a Record: Montana Supreme Court Reaffirms and Clarifies § 53‑21‑119(1), MCA, Requirements for Waiver in Involuntary Commitment Proceedings

No Waiver Without a Record: Montana Supreme Court Reaffirms and Clarifies § 53‑21‑119(1), MCA, Requirements for Waiver in Involuntary Commitment Proceedings

Date: Oct 22, 2025
No Waiver Without a Record: Montana Supreme Court Reaffirms and Clarifies § 53‑21‑119(1), MCA, Requirements for Waiver in Involuntary Commitment Proceedings Introduction In Matter of P.G.J., 2025 MT...
No Implied Easements from Settlement Silence: Four‑Corners Enforcement of MOUs, Strict Limits on Easement “Maintenance,” and Fees for Multiplying Proceedings (Schubert v. Toepp, 2025 MT 239)

No Implied Easements from Settlement Silence: Four‑Corners Enforcement of MOUs, Strict Limits on Easement “Maintenance,” and Fees for Multiplying Proceedings (Schubert v. Toepp, 2025 MT 239)

Date: Oct 22, 2025
No Implied Easements from Settlement Silence: Four‑Corners Enforcement of MOUs, Strict Limits on Easement “Maintenance,” and Fees for Multiplying Proceedings (Schubert v. Toepp, 2025 MT 239)...
State v. Spangler (2025 MT 244N): Nonprecedential Reaffirmation that Single-Witness Testimony Can Sustain Unlawful Restraint; Remand to Correct Judgment to Attempted Assault with a Weapon

State v. Spangler (2025 MT 244N): Nonprecedential Reaffirmation that Single-Witness Testimony Can Sustain Unlawful Restraint; Remand to Correct Judgment to Attempted Assault with a Weapon

Date: Oct 22, 2025
State v. Spangler (2025 MT 244N): Nonprecedential Reaffirmation that Single-Witness Testimony Can Sustain Unlawful Restraint; Remand to Correct Judgment to Attempted Assault with a Weapon...
State v. Burrington: Medically Required Functional Restrictions Can Constitute “Protracted Impairment” for Serious Bodily Injury; Self-Defense May Be Asserted While Disputing the Injury Element

State v. Burrington: Medically Required Functional Restrictions Can Constitute “Protracted Impairment” for Serious Bodily Injury; Self-Defense May Be Asserted While Disputing the Injury Element

Date: Oct 22, 2025
State v. Burrington: Medically Required Functional Restrictions Can Constitute “Protracted Impairment” for Serious Bodily Injury; Self-Defense May Be Asserted While Disputing the Injury Element...
Reaffirming Hinkle: “Reasonable Evidence” Must Show Unconsciousness at the Moment of the Crime to Warrant an Automatism Instruction

Reaffirming Hinkle: “Reasonable Evidence” Must Show Unconsciousness at the Moment of the Crime to Warrant an Automatism Instruction

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Reaffirming Hinkle: “Reasonable Evidence” Must Show Unconsciousness at the Moment of the Crime to Warrant an Automatism Instruction Introduction In State of West Virginia v. Timothy W. (No. 23-518),...
Ordinance Amendments Can Moot Systemic Challenges; Extraordinary Writs Cannot Compel Discretionary Permit Decisions Absent Arbitrary or Capricious Conduct

Ordinance Amendments Can Moot Systemic Challenges; Extraordinary Writs Cannot Compel Discretionary Permit Decisions Absent Arbitrary or Capricious Conduct

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Ordinance Amendments Can Moot Systemic Challenges; Extraordinary Writs Cannot Compel Discretionary Permit Decisions Absent Arbitrary or Capricious Conduct Introduction In Susan Casdorph v. City of...
Burks v. State: No Inherent Prejudice from Co‑Defendants’ Mid‑Voir Dire Guilty Pleas; Post‑Incision Autopsy Photos Admissible; Single Online Comment Insufficient for Change of Venue

Burks v. State: No Inherent Prejudice from Co‑Defendants’ Mid‑Voir Dire Guilty Pleas; Post‑Incision Autopsy Photos Admissible; Single Online Comment Insufficient for Change of Venue

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Burks v. State: No Inherent Prejudice from Co‑Defendants’ Mid‑Voir Dire Guilty Pleas; Post‑Incision Autopsy Photos Admissible; Single Online Comment Insufficient for Change of Venue Introduction In...
No Per Se Miranda Custody for 10-13 Behavioral Health Interviews; Pattern Insanity and Intoxication Instructions Suffice — Gravitt v. State (Ga. 2025)

No Per Se Miranda Custody for 10-13 Behavioral Health Interviews; Pattern Insanity and Intoxication Instructions Suffice — Gravitt v. State (Ga. 2025)

Date: Oct 22, 2025
No Per Se Miranda Custody for 10-13 Behavioral Health Interviews; Pattern Insanity and Intoxication Instructions Suffice Commentary on Gravitt v. State, Supreme Court of Georgia (Decided Oct. 21,...
Strategic Non-Objections and Prison Gang Expertise: Georgia Supreme Court Clarifies Ineffective Assistance and Relevance Standards in Momon v. State

Strategic Non-Objections and Prison Gang Expertise: Georgia Supreme Court Clarifies Ineffective Assistance and Relevance Standards in Momon v. State

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Strategic Non-Objections and Prison Gang Expertise: Georgia Supreme Court Clarifies Ineffective Assistance and Relevance Standards in Momon v. State Introduction In Momon v. State, the Supreme Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert