Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

protected-advice-at-life’s-end:-seventh-circuit-holds-indiana’s-funeral-licensing-ban-on-death-doula-counseling-fails-even-under-intermediate-scrutiny—and-consent-orders-don’t-waive-federal-rights Case Commentaries

United States v. Cole: Juvenile Sexual Misconduct as “Crimes” Under Federal Rule of Evidence 414 and the Limits of the Rule of Lenity

United States v. Cole: Juvenile Sexual Misconduct as “Crimes” Under Federal Rule of Evidence 414 and the Limits of the Rule of Lenity

Date: Dec 26, 2025
United States v. Cole: Juvenile Sexual Misconduct as “Crimes” Under Federal Rule of Evidence 414 and the Limits of the Rule of Lenity I. Introduction The Tenth Circuit’s published decision in United...
Brown v. Flowers and ACCO: Sexual Abuse by Jailers as Outside the “Scope of Duties” in Oklahoma Governmental Self‑Insurance Coverage

Brown v. Flowers and ACCO: Sexual Abuse by Jailers as Outside the “Scope of Duties” in Oklahoma Governmental Self‑Insurance Coverage

Date: Dec 26, 2025
Brown v. Flowers and ACCO: Sexual Abuse by Jailers as Outside the “Scope of Duties” in Oklahoma Governmental Self‑Insurance Coverage I. Introduction In Brown v. Flowers, No. 25‑7009 (10th Cir. Dec....
Lancaster v. Cartmell and the End of § 1983 Enforcement of Medicaid’s “Reasonable Promptness” Provision in the Tenth Circuit

Lancaster v. Cartmell and the End of § 1983 Enforcement of Medicaid’s “Reasonable Promptness” Provision in the Tenth Circuit

Date: Dec 26, 2025
Lancaster v. Cartmell and the End of § 1983 Enforcement of Medicaid’s “Reasonable Promptness” Provision in the Tenth Circuit I. Introduction In Lancaster v. Cartmell, No. 25‑6000 (10th Cir. Dec. 23,...

    Waiting Periods, Commercial Sale Regulations, and En Banc Review: The Tenth Circuit’s Fractured Second Amendment Doctrine in Ortega v. Lujan Grisham

Waiting Periods, Commercial Sale Regulations, and En Banc Review: The Tenth Circuit’s Fractured Second Amendment Doctrine in Ortega v. Lujan Grisham

Date: Dec 26, 2025
Waiting Periods, Commercial Sale Regulations, and En Banc Review: The Tenth Circuit’s Fractured Second Amendment Doctrine in Ortega v. Lujan Grisham I. Introduction The order in Ortega v. Lujan...
Smith v. Sheriff’s Office: Unserved Federal Defendants Do Not Trigger the 60‑Day Civil Appeal Period

Smith v. Sheriff’s Office: Unserved Federal Defendants Do Not Trigger the 60‑Day Civil Appeal Period

Date: Dec 26, 2025
Smith v. Sheriff’s Office: Unserved Federal Defendants Do Not Trigger the 60‑Day Civil Appeal Period I. Introduction In Smith v. Sheriff’s Office, No. 25‑1076 (10th Cir. Dec. 22, 2025), the United...
“Refusal to Work” Means Non‑Performance, Not Safer Performance: Commentary on Berberich v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. and FRSA § 20109(b)(1)(B)

“Refusal to Work” Means Non‑Performance, Not Safer Performance: Commentary on Berberich v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. and FRSA § 20109(b)(1)(B)

Date: Dec 26, 2025
“Refusal to Work” Means Non‑Performance, Not Safer Performance: Commentary on Berberich v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company and FRSA § 20109(b)(1)(B) I. Introduction In Berberich v. Kansas City...
A Defendant’s Post-Plea Sentencing Misunderstanding Does Not Invalidate a Knowing and Voluntary Appeal Waiver: Commentary on United States v. Goers (10th Cir. 2025)

A Defendant’s Post-Plea Sentencing Misunderstanding Does Not Invalidate a Knowing and Voluntary Appeal Waiver: Commentary on United States v. Goers (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Dec 26, 2025
A Defendant’s Post-Plea Sentencing Misunderstanding Does Not Invalidate a Knowing and Voluntary Appeal Waiver: Commentary on United States v. Goers (10th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction This commentary...
Standard Insurances v. IRS: Collateral Attacks on Tax Deficiencies Barred by the Anti-Injunction and Declaratory Judgment Acts

Standard Insurances v. IRS: Collateral Attacks on Tax Deficiencies Barred by the Anti-Injunction and Declaratory Judgment Acts

Date: Dec 26, 2025
Standard Insurances v. IRS: Collateral Attacks on Tax Deficiencies Barred by the Anti-Injunction and Declaratory Judgment Acts I. Introduction In Standard Insurances v. IRS, No. 24-4094 (10th Cir....
Citizen Flagpoles, Government Speech, and Viewpoint Discrimination: The First Circuit’s Application of Shurtleff in Scaer v. City of Nashua

Citizen Flagpoles, Government Speech, and Viewpoint Discrimination: The First Circuit’s Application of Shurtleff in Scaer v. City of Nashua

Date: Dec 26, 2025
Citizen Flagpoles, Government Speech, and Viewpoint Discrimination: The First Circuit’s Application of Shurtleff in Scaer v. City of Nashua Introduction In Scaer v. City of Nashua, No. 25‑1356 (1st...
Ramos-Hernandez v. Bondi: Limits on Economic-Status and Family-Based Particular Social Groups in Extortion-Based Asylum Claims

Ramos-Hernandez v. Bondi: Limits on Economic-Status and Family-Based Particular Social Groups in Extortion-Based Asylum Claims

Date: Dec 26, 2025
Ramos-Hernandez v. Bondi: Limits on Economic-Status and Family-Based Particular Social Groups in Extortion-Based Asylum Claims I. Introduction A. The Case in Context In Ramos-Hernandez v. Bondi, No....
Life-With-Parole Modifications for Juvenile Offenders as “New Judgments” Under AEDPA: Commentary on Donovan v. Massachusetts Parole Board

Life-With-Parole Modifications for Juvenile Offenders as “New Judgments” Under AEDPA: Commentary on Donovan v. Massachusetts Parole Board

Date: Dec 26, 2025
Life-With-Parole Modifications for Juvenile Offenders as “New Judgments” Under AEDPA: Commentary on Donovan v. Massachusetts Parole Board I. Introduction The First Circuit’s decision in Donovan v....
Contextual Extortion: United States v. Díaz-Colón and the Scope of Threats under 18 U.S.C. § 875(d) and the Hobbs Act

Contextual Extortion: United States v. Díaz-Colón and the Scope of Threats under 18 U.S.C. § 875(d) and the Hobbs Act

Date: Dec 26, 2025
Contextual Extortion: United States v. Díaz-Colón and the Scope of Threats under 18 U.S.C. § 875(d) and the Hobbs Act I. Introduction The First Circuit’s decision in United States v. Díaz-Colón, No....
Substance Over Corporate Form: The Second Circuit Holds that Employer-Imposed Incorporation Cannot Defeat the FAA § 1 Transportation Worker Exemption

Substance Over Corporate Form: The Second Circuit Holds that Employer-Imposed Incorporation Cannot Defeat the FAA § 1 Transportation Worker Exemption

Date: Dec 26, 2025
Substance Over Corporate Form: The Second Circuit Holds that Employer-Imposed Incorporation Cannot Defeat the FAA § 1 Transportation Worker Exemption I. Introduction In Silva v. Schmidt Baking...
State Custody, Not Admission Status: The Second Circuit’s Control-and-Dependency Test for Due Process Duties to Voluntarily Committed Residents

State Custody, Not Admission Status: The Second Circuit’s Control-and-Dependency Test for Due Process Duties to Voluntarily Committed Residents

Date: Dec 26, 2025
State Custody, Not Admission Status: The Second Circuit’s Control-and-Dependency Test for Substantive Due Process Duties to Voluntarily Committed Residents Commentary on J.M. v. Sessions, No....
South Dakota Refines Economic Duress and Clarifies Fiduciary Duties in Manager‑Managed LLCs: Commentary on Trigger Energy Holdings v. Stevens

South Dakota Refines Economic Duress and Clarifies Fiduciary Duties in Manager‑Managed LLCs: Commentary on Trigger Energy Holdings v. Stevens

Date: Dec 26, 2025
South Dakota Refines Economic Duress and Clarifies Fiduciary Duties in Manager‑Managed LLCs: Commentary on Trigger Energy Holdings, LLC v. Stevens, 2025 S.D. 72 I. Introduction In Trigger Energy...
State v. Biteler and the Meaning of “Report” Under SDCL 22‑11‑9(3) in a Digital Monitoring Era

State v. Biteler and the Meaning of “Report” Under SDCL 22‑11‑9(3) in a Digital Monitoring Era

Date: Dec 26, 2025
State v. Biteler and the Meaning of “Report” Under SDCL 22‑11‑9(3) in a Digital Monitoring Era I. Introduction In State v. Biteler, 2025 S.D. 73, the Supreme Court of South Dakota addressed a modern...
Uniform State Sentencing Caps and Municipal Home-Rule: Operational Preemption in People v. Michelle (Camp & Simons)

Uniform State Sentencing Caps and Municipal Home-Rule: Operational Preemption in People v. Michelle (Camp & Simons)

Date: Dec 26, 2025
Uniform State Sentencing Caps and Municipal Home-Rule: Operational Preemption in People v. Michelle (Camp & Simons) I. Introduction The Colorado Supreme Court’s decision in People v. Michelle, 2025...

      Rebutting the Body‑Worn Camera Presumption: People v. Havens and the Limits of Discovery Sanctions in Colorado

Rebutting the Body‑Worn Camera Presumption: People v. Havens and the Limits of Discovery Sanctions in Colorado

Date: Dec 26, 2025
Rebutting the Body‑Worn Camera Presumption: People v. Havens and the Limits of Discovery Sanctions in Colorado I. Introduction People v. Havens, 2025 CO 65, is a significant Colorado Supreme Court...
Lane v. Stericycle: Salary-History Defenses and Temporal Pay Disparities under the Equal Pay Act and Title VII

Lane v. Stericycle: Salary-History Defenses and Temporal Pay Disparities under the Equal Pay Act and Title VII

Date: Dec 25, 2025
Lane v. Stericycle: Salary-History Defenses and Temporal Pay Disparities under the Equal Pay Act and Title VII I. Introduction The Seventh Circuit’s decision in Cheryl Lane & Adrienne Hause v....
Attempted Child Exploitation via Intermediaries under 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a): Commentary on United States v. Carpenter (7th Cir. 2025)

Attempted Child Exploitation via Intermediaries under 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a): Commentary on United States v. Carpenter (7th Cir. 2025)

Date: Dec 25, 2025
Attempted Child Exploitation via Intermediaries under 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a): Commentary on United States v. Carpenter (7th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction The Seventh Circuit’s decision in United States v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert