Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

protected-advice-at-life’s-end:-seventh-circuit-holds-indiana’s-funeral-licensing-ban-on-death-doula-counseling-fails-even-under-intermediate-scrutiny—and-consent-orders-don’t-waive-federal-rights Case Commentaries

Guardianship Under § 41-3-444, MCA Requires No “Unfitness” Finding and Imposes No Clear-and-Convincing Burden

Guardianship Under § 41-3-444, MCA Requires No “Unfitness” Finding and Imposes No Clear-and-Convincing Burden

Date: Dec 31, 2025
Guardianship Under § 41-3-444, MCA Requires No “Unfitness” Finding and Imposes No Clear-and-Convincing Burden I. Introduction In Matters of I.D., T.D., and L.D., Youths in Need of Care, 2025 MT 299,...
MDLEA Reaffirmed: EEZ Treated as “High Seas,” Statelessness Defined by Statute, No U.S. Nexus Required, and “Nationality” Equals “Registry”

MDLEA Reaffirmed: EEZ Treated as “High Seas,” Statelessness Defined by Statute, No U.S. Nexus Required, and “Nationality” Equals “Registry”

Date: Dec 31, 2025
MDLEA Reaffirmed: EEZ Treated as “High Seas,” Statelessness Defined by Statute, No U.S. Nexus Required, and “Nationality” Equals “Registry” Case: United States v. Jose Marin (consolidated with United...
Unlimited Statute-of-Limitations Waivers in Guam Promissory Notes Are Unenforceable Absent Statutory Authorization

Unlimited Statute-of-Limitations Waivers in Guam Promissory Notes Are Unenforceable Absent Statutory Authorization

Date: Dec 31, 2025
Unlimited Statute-of-Limitations Waivers in Guam Promissory Notes Are Unenforceable Absent Statutory Authorization I. Introduction In Goodwind Development Corporation v. West Bay Corporation and 21st...
United States v. Andino: Enforcing Plea-Agreement Waivers of Rule 32.2(b)(4)(B) Forfeiture Pronouncement/Notice Rights When the Substance Is Confirmed at the Plea Colloquy

United States v. Andino: Enforcing Plea-Agreement Waivers of Rule 32.2(b)(4)(B) Forfeiture Pronouncement/Notice Rights When the Substance Is Confirmed at the Plea Colloquy

Date: Dec 31, 2025
United States v. Andino: Enforcing Plea-Agreement Waivers of Rule 32.2(b)(4)(B) Forfeiture Pronouncement/Notice Rights When the Substance Is Confirmed at the Plea Colloquy Introduction In United...
Unpreserved Sentencing-Explanation Challenges Trigger Plain-Error Review; Minimal Reasons Suffice for Within-Guidelines Illegal-Reentry Sentences in “Conceptually Simple” Cases

Unpreserved Sentencing-Explanation Challenges Trigger Plain-Error Review; Minimal Reasons Suffice for Within-Guidelines Illegal-Reentry Sentences in “Conceptually Simple” Cases

Date: Dec 31, 2025
Unpreserved Sentencing-Explanation Challenges Trigger Plain-Error Review; Minimal Reasons Suffice for Within-Guidelines Illegal-Reentry Sentences in “Conceptually Simple” Cases I. Introduction United...
People of Guam v. Camacho: Guam Adopts Maryland v. Craig for Two-Way Remote Testimony by Adult Witnesses

People of Guam v. Camacho: Guam Adopts Maryland v. Craig for Two-Way Remote Testimony by Adult Witnesses

Date: Dec 31, 2025
Guam Adopts Maryland v. Craig as the Governing Sixth Amendment Standard for Two-Way Remote Testimony by Adult Witnesses (Rejecting a Categorical Deposition Requirement) I. Introduction In People of...
United States v. Patel: Jointly Proposed Jury Instructions as Invited Error; No Double Counting When §2H1.1(b)(1) Adds Unaccounted “Color of Law” Harm to a §2A3.4-Derived Base Level

United States v. Patel: Jointly Proposed Jury Instructions as Invited Error; No Double Counting When §2H1.1(b)(1) Adds Unaccounted “Color of Law” Harm to a §2A3.4-Derived Base Level

Date: Dec 31, 2025
United States v. Patel: Jointly Proposed Jury Instructions as Invited Error; No Double Counting When §2H1.1(b)(1) Adds Unaccounted “Color of Law” Harm to a §2A3.4-Derived Base Level 1. Introduction...
United States v. Demarcus Hill — Commentary

United States v. Demarcus Hill — Commentary

Date: Dec 31, 2025
Uncorroborated Co‑Conspirator Trial Testimony Can Sustain a § 846 Conviction; Suppression Arguments Waived Absent Pretrial Motion Are Reviewed Only for Plain Error Case: United States v. Demarcus...
Silent Record Bars Direct-Appeal McCoy Relief: Objection Must Appear in the Record; Otherwise the Concession-of-Guilt Claim Proceeds by Habeas

Silent Record Bars Direct-Appeal McCoy Relief: Objection Must Appear in the Record; Otherwise the Concession-of-Guilt Claim Proceeds by Habeas

Date: Dec 30, 2025
Silent Record Bars Direct-Appeal McCoy Relief: Objection Must Appear in the Record; Otherwise the Concession-of-Guilt Claim Proceeds by Habeas Case: People of Guam v. Brian Jason Martinez (aka Brenda...
People of Guam v. Santos: GRE 1004(1) Permits Testimonial Secondary Evidence When the Original Video Is Destroyed by a Third Party, and No Hierarchy of Secondary Evidence Bars Testimony Despite Destruction of a Duplicate

People of Guam v. Santos: GRE 1004(1) Permits Testimonial Secondary Evidence When the Original Video Is Destroyed by a Third Party, and No Hierarchy of Secondary Evidence Bars Testimony Despite Destruction of a Duplicate

Date: Dec 30, 2025
GRE 1004(1) and Missing Surveillance Video: Third-Party Destruction Excuses the Original, and Secondary Evidence Has No Hierarchy Even If Police Destroy a Duplicate 1. Introduction People of Guam v....
Private Sporting-Competition Governance Is Not State Action Absent Compulsion/Nexus/Public Function, and Arbitration Rights May Be Waived by Extensive Federal Litigation

Private Sporting-Competition Governance Is Not State Action Absent Compulsion/Nexus/Public Function, and Arbitration Rights May Be Waived by Extensive Federal Litigation

Date: Dec 30, 2025
Private Sporting-Competition Governance Is Not State Action Absent Compulsion/Nexus/Public Function, and Arbitration Rights May Be Waived by Extensive Federal Litigation 1. Introduction In Gerding v....
MDLEA Reach Confirmed: EEZ as “High Seas,” No Nexus Requirement, and Broad Stateless-Vessel Jurisdiction

MDLEA Reach Confirmed: EEZ as “High Seas,” No Nexus Requirement, and Broad Stateless-Vessel Jurisdiction

Date: Dec 30, 2025
MDLEA Reach Confirmed: EEZ as “High Seas,” No Nexus Requirement, and Broad Stateless-Vessel Jurisdiction 1. Introduction United States v. Rodolfo Rodriguez Vazquez (consolidated with appeals by Jose...
MDLEA Enforcement in Foreign EEZs and “Stateless Vessel” Determinations; No Minor-Role Reduction for Essential High-Seas Couriers

MDLEA Enforcement in Foreign EEZs and “Stateless Vessel” Determinations; No Minor-Role Reduction for Essential High-Seas Couriers

Date: Dec 30, 2025
MDLEA Enforcement in Foreign EEZs and “Stateless Vessel” Determinations; No Minor-Role Reduction for Essential High-Seas Couriers Case: United States v. Stanley Cabrera (consolidated with appeals by...
Sentencing “Reference vs. Reliance”: Considering Uncharged/Admitted Prior Abuse Without Upward Effect Does Not Create Procedural Error

Sentencing “Reference vs. Reliance”: Considering Uncharged/Admitted Prior Abuse Without Upward Effect Does Not Create Procedural Error

Date: Dec 30, 2025
Sentencing “Reference vs. Reliance”: Considering Uncharged/Admitted Prior Abuse Without Upward Effect Does Not Create Procedural Error 1. Introduction In United States v. Michael Moran (3d Cir. Dec....
People of Guam v. Simmons (2025 Guam 13) Commentary

People of Guam v. Simmons (2025 Guam 13) Commentary

Date: Dec 30, 2025
Guam Adopts a Flexible McDonough Juror-Bias Framework, Confines Implied Bias to “Extreme” Cases, and Approves Non‑Corroboration Instructions in CSC Trials Case: People of Guam v. Derick James...
Third Circuit: Pennsylvania PCRA “Custody” Bar Is Not an Adequate Procedural-Default Ground; Plea Counsel Need Not Advise on Collateral Consequences After Patel

Third Circuit: Pennsylvania PCRA “Custody” Bar Is Not an Adequate Procedural-Default Ground; Plea Counsel Need Not Advise on Collateral Consequences After Patel

Date: Dec 29, 2025
Third Circuit: Pennsylvania PCRA “Custody” Bar Is Not an Adequate Procedural-Default Ground; Plea Counsel Need Not Advise on Collateral Consequences After Patel 1. Introduction In Russell Tinsley v....
Rule 29.3 Stays Against the State: Appellate Courts Must Weigh Merits, Balance Harms, and Act Within a Reasonable Time

Rule 29.3 Stays Against the State: Appellate Courts Must Weigh Merits, Balance Harms, and Act Within a Reasonable Time

Date: Dec 29, 2025
Rule 29.3 Stays Against the State: Appellate Courts Must Weigh Merits, Balance Harms, and Act Within a Reasonable Time 1. Introduction In re Ken Paxton and the Office of the Attorney General is an...
Gade v. Gade and the Plenary Jurisdiction of the Vermont Family Division Over Premarital Agreement Breach Claims

Gade v. Gade and the Plenary Jurisdiction of the Vermont Family Division Over Premarital Agreement Breach Claims

Date: Dec 28, 2025
Gade v. Gade and the Plenary Jurisdiction of the Vermont Family Division Over Premarital Agreement Breach Claims I. Introduction In Christopher Gade v. Erin Gade, 2025 VT 68, the Vermont Supreme...
Intent-Centered Use of Vermont Rule 60(a) to Correct Divorce Property Judgments: Commentary on Warner v. Warner, 2025 VT 70

Intent-Centered Use of Vermont Rule 60(a) to Correct Divorce Property Judgments: Commentary on Warner v. Warner, 2025 VT 70

Date: Dec 28, 2025
Intent-Centered Use of Rule 60(a) to Correct Divorce Property Judgments: Commentary on Nichole Warner v. Sean Warner, 2025 VT 70 I. Introduction Warner v. Warner, 2025 VT 70, is a significant Vermont...
Stayed Reciprocal Suspension and Coordinated Probation in Kansas Attorney Discipline: Commentary on In re Kort

Stayed Reciprocal Suspension and Coordinated Probation in Kansas Attorney Discipline: Commentary on In re Kort

Date: Dec 28, 2025
Stayed Reciprocal Suspension and Coordinated Probation in Kansas Attorney Discipline: Commentary on In re Kort I. Introduction The Kansas Supreme Court’s decision in In re Kort, No. 129,389 (Dec. 26,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert