Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

new-precedent-on... Case Commentaries

Willful Blindness, Lis Pendens, and Lender Aiding‑and‑Abetting Liability under Maryland Law – Commentary on Al‑Sabah v. World Business Lenders, LLC (4th Cir. 2025)

Willful Blindness, Lis Pendens, and Lender Aiding‑and‑Abetting Liability under Maryland Law – Commentary on Al‑Sabah v. World Business Lenders, LLC (4th Cir. 2025)

Date: Dec 2, 2025
Willful Blindness, Lis Pendens, and Lender Aiding‑and‑Abetting Liability under Maryland Law Commentary on Alia Al‑Sabah v. World Business Lenders, LLC, 4th Cir. (Nov. 26, 2025) I. Introduction This...
Willful Blindness, Lis Pendens, and Lender Liability: The Fourth Circuit Clarifies Aiding‑and‑Abetting Fraud in Alia Al‑Sabah v. World Business Lenders, LLC

Willful Blindness, Lis Pendens, and Lender Liability: The Fourth Circuit Clarifies Aiding‑and‑Abetting Fraud in Alia Al‑Sabah v. World Business Lenders, LLC

Date: Dec 2, 2025
Willful Blindness, Lis Pendens, and Lender Liability: The Fourth Circuit Clarifies Aiding‑and‑Abetting Fraud in Alia Al‑Sabah v. World Business Lenders, LLC I. Introduction The Fourth Circuit’s...
United States v. Spencer & Morgan: Substantial Step and Foreseeable Firearm Possession in Attempted Hobbs Act Robbery

United States v. Spencer & Morgan: Substantial Step and Foreseeable Firearm Possession in Attempted Hobbs Act Robbery

Date: Dec 2, 2025
United States v. Spencer & Morgan: Substantial Step and Foreseeable Firearm Possession in Attempted Hobbs Act Robbery I. Introduction The consolidated appeals in United States v. Harold Edward...
Substantial Steps, Circumstantial Evidence, and Foreseeable Firearms: A Commentary on United States v. Spencer & Morgan

Substantial Steps, Circumstantial Evidence, and Foreseeable Firearms: A Commentary on United States v. Spencer & Morgan

Date: Dec 2, 2025
Substantial Steps, Circumstantial Evidence, and Foreseeable Firearms: A Commentary on United States v. Harold Edward Spencer, III & United States v. Jon Demetrious Jacques Morgan I. Introduction The...
Evolving Market Realities and NCAA Eligibility Rules: Antitrust Scrutiny and Market Definition After Jett Elad v. NCAA

Evolving Market Realities and NCAA Eligibility Rules: Antitrust Scrutiny and Market Definition After Jett Elad v. NCAA

Date: Dec 2, 2025
Evolving Market Realities and NCAA Eligibility Rules: Antitrust Scrutiny and Market Definition After Jett Elad v. NCAA I. Introduction The Third Circuit’s precedential decision in Jett Elad v. NCAA,...
Loan‑Shark Extortion, Nexus to Protected Grounds, and the Original Meaning of “Particular Social Group”: Commentary on Silvio Augusto Lima Carneiro v. Attorney General

Loan‑Shark Extortion, Nexus to Protected Grounds, and the Original Meaning of “Particular Social Group”: Commentary on Silvio Augusto Lima Carneiro v. Attorney General

Date: Dec 2, 2025
Loan‑Shark Extortion, Nexus to Protected Grounds, and the Original Meaning of “Particular Social Group” Commentary on Silvio Augusto Lima Carneiro v. Attorney General of the United States (3d Cir....
United States v. Knox: No Variance Relief Without Concrete Prejudice and No Appellate Review for Invited Sentencing Errors

United States v. Knox: No Variance Relief Without Concrete Prejudice and No Appellate Review for Invited Sentencing Errors

Date: Dec 2, 2025
United States v. Knox: No Variance Relief Without Concrete Prejudice and No Appellate Review for Invited Sentencing Errors I. Introduction The Third Circuit’s non-precedential opinion in United...
NVRA Preemption of State Use Restrictions on Voter Data: Commentary on Voter Reference Foundation v. Torrez

NVRA Preemption of State Use Restrictions on Voter Data: Commentary on Voter Reference Foundation v. Torrez

Date: Dec 2, 2025
NVRA Preemption of State Use Restrictions on Voter Data: A Commentary on Voter Reference Foundation v. Torrez (10th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction The Tenth Circuit’s decision in Voter Reference...
The NVRA’s Public Disclosure Provision Preempts State Bans on Online Publication and Use Restrictions on Voter Data: Commentary on Voter Reference Foundation v. Torrez (10th Cir. 2025)

The NVRA’s Public Disclosure Provision Preempts State Bans on Online Publication and Use Restrictions on Voter Data: Commentary on Voter Reference Foundation v. Torrez (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Dec 2, 2025
The NVRA’s Public Disclosure Provision Preempts State Bans on Online Publication and Use Restrictions on Voter Data Commentary on Voter Reference Foundation, LLC v. Torrez, 10th Cir. (2025) 1....

    Actual Innocence as a Gateway Around § 2254 Procedural Bars:
    Commentary on Julien v. Stancil (10th Cir. 2025)

Actual Innocence as a Gateway Around § 2254 Procedural Bars: Commentary on Julien v. Stancil (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Dec 2, 2025
Actual Innocence as a Gateway Around § 2254 Procedural Bars: Commentary on Julien v. Stancil (10th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction Julien v. Stancil, No. 25-1302 (10th Cir. Nov. 26, 2025), is a...
Equitable Tolling, Motions to Reconsider, and the Limits of Judicial Review of BIA Sua Sponte Authority: Commentary on Carhuamaca‑Vilcahuaman v. Bondi (10th Cir. 2025)

Equitable Tolling, Motions to Reconsider, and the Limits of Judicial Review of BIA Sua Sponte Authority: Commentary on Carhuamaca‑Vilcahuaman v. Bondi (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Dec 2, 2025
Equitable Tolling, Motions to Reconsider, and the Limits of Judicial Review of BIA Sua Sponte Authority: Commentary on Carhuamaca‑Vilcahuaman v. Bondi (10th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction This commentary...
Facially Constitutional Use‑of‑Force Policies and Single‑Incident Failure‑to‑Train Liability for Jail Suicide Risks: Commentary on Thao v. Grady County Criminal Justice Authority (10th Cir. 2025)

Facially Constitutional Use‑of‑Force Policies and Single‑Incident Failure‑to‑Train Liability for Jail Suicide Risks: Commentary on Thao v. Grady County Criminal Justice Authority (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Dec 2, 2025
Facially Constitutional Use‑of‑Force Policies and Single‑Incident Failure‑to‑Train Liability for Jail Suicide Risks: Commentary on Thao v. Grady County Criminal Justice Authority (10th Cir. 2025) I....
Implied License to Knock and Trespass-Based Terry Stops: Commentary on Gonzalez v. Brunnemer

Implied License to Knock and Trespass-Based Terry Stops: Commentary on Gonzalez v. Brunnemer

Date: Dec 2, 2025
Implied License to Knock and Trespass-Based Terry Stops: A Detailed Commentary on Gonzalez v. Brunnemer (10th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction This commentary analyzes the Tenth Circuit’s unpublished but...
United States v. Honors: Tenth Circuit Limits Custodial No‑Contact Orders and Demands Compelling Justification for Familial Restrictions on Supervised Release

United States v. Honors: Tenth Circuit Limits Custodial No‑Contact Orders and Demands Compelling Justification for Familial Restrictions on Supervised Release

Date: Dec 2, 2025
United States v. Honors: Tenth Circuit Limits Custodial No‑Contact Orders and Demands Compelling Justification for Familial Restrictions on Supervised Release I. Introduction In United States v....
United States v. SpineFrontier, Inc.: Limiting Implied Waiver of Corporate Attorney‑Client Privilege When Executives Raise “Involvement‑of‑Counsel” Defenses

United States v. SpineFrontier, Inc.: Limiting Implied Waiver of Corporate Attorney‑Client Privilege When Executives Raise “Involvement‑of‑Counsel” Defenses

Date: Dec 2, 2025
United States v. SpineFrontier, Inc.: Limiting Implied Waiver of Corporate Attorney‑Client Privilege When Executives Raise “Involvement‑of‑Counsel” Defenses Introduction This First Circuit decision...
Restrepo Castano v. Bondi: Partial but “Fruitful” State Protection and the “Unwilling or Unable” Standard in Gang-Based Asylum Claims

Restrepo Castano v. Bondi: Partial but “Fruitful” State Protection and the “Unwilling or Unable” Standard in Gang-Based Asylum Claims

Date: Dec 2, 2025
Restrepo Castano v. Bondi: Partial but “Fruitful” State Protection and the “Unwilling or Unable” Standard in Gang-Based Asylum Claims I. Introduction In Restrepo Castano v. Bondi, No. 24‑2117 (1st...
United States v. Tang: Foreseeability and Proof of Firearm Use in Joint Hobbs Act Robberies Under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines

United States v. Tang: Foreseeability and Proof of Firearm Use in Joint Hobbs Act Robberies Under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines

Date: Dec 2, 2025
United States v. Tang: Foreseeability and Proof of Firearm Use in Joint Hobbs Act Robberies Under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines I. Introduction The First Circuit’s decision in United States v. Tang,...
When “Notwithstanding” Controls: Shapiro v. U.S. Social Security Administration and the Priority of Social Security Act § 1306(c) over FOIA’s Fee‑Preclusion Rule

When “Notwithstanding” Controls: Shapiro v. U.S. Social Security Administration and the Priority of Social Security Act § 1306(c) over FOIA’s Fee‑Preclusion Rule

Date: Dec 1, 2025
When “Notwithstanding” Controls: Shapiro v. U.S. Social Security Administration and the Priority of Social Security Act § 1306(c) over FOIA’s Fee‑Preclusion Rule I. Introduction In Shapiro v. U.S....
Buller v. Commissioner: The § 6213(a) Deficiency Petition Deadline as a Nonjurisdictional, Equitably Tollable Rule

Buller v. Commissioner: The § 6213(a) Deficiency Petition Deadline as a Nonjurisdictional, Equitably Tollable Rule

Date: Dec 1, 2025
Buller v. Commissioner: The § 6213(a) Deficiency Petition Deadline as a Nonjurisdictional, Equitably Tollable Rule I. Introduction In Buller v. Commissioner, No. 24-1557 (2d Cir. Nov. 26, 2025) (as...
Reaffirming Mt. Healthy at the Preliminary Injunction Stage: 
    First Amendment Retaliation and Local Permitting in Minocqua Brewing Co. v. Hess

Reaffirming Mt. Healthy at the Preliminary Injunction Stage: First Amendment Retaliation and Local Permitting in Minocqua Brewing Co. v. Hess

Date: Dec 1, 2025
Reaffirming Mt. Healthy at the Preliminary Injunction Stage: First Amendment Retaliation and Local Permitting in Minocqua Brewing Company LLC v. Hess I. Introduction The Seventh Circuit’s decision in...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert