Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

juvenile-sentencing-guidelines:-iowa-supreme-court Case Commentaries

Clarification of the "Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship" Standard in Cancellation of Removal Proceedings

Clarification of the "Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship" Standard in Cancellation of Removal Proceedings

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Clarification of the "Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship" Standard in Cancellation of Removal Proceedings Introduction Homero Trejo-Juarez v. Pamela Bondi, decided by the United States Court...
Qualified Immunity for Law Enforcement Facing Furtive Movements: Objective Reasonableness Clarified in Benton v. Layton

Qualified Immunity for Law Enforcement Facing Furtive Movements: Objective Reasonableness Clarified in Benton v. Layton

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Qualified Immunity for Law Enforcement Facing Furtive Movements: Objective Reasonableness Clarified in Benton v. Layton Introduction In LaToya Benton v. Seth Layton, 23-1680 (4th Cir. June 3, 2025),...
Nonreviewability of USCIS Adjudication Hold Policy under INA § 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii)

Nonreviewability of USCIS Adjudication Hold Policy under INA § 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii)

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Nonreviewability of USCIS Adjudication Hold Policy under INA § 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii) Introduction In Lolakshi Kale v. Angelica Alfonso-Royals, 4th Cir. No. 23-1799 (June 3, 2025), the Fourth Circuit...
Functional-Scheme Requirement for CSRA Jurisdiction Stripping in Pre-Enforcement Challenges

Functional-Scheme Requirement for CSRA Jurisdiction Stripping in Pre-Enforcement Challenges

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Functional-Scheme Requirement for CSRA Jurisdiction Stripping in Pre-Enforcement Challenges Introduction This commentary addresses the Fourth Circuit’s decision in National Association of Immigration...
Enforceability of Contractual Class-Action Waivers in MDL Proceedings: Peter Maldini v. Accenture LLP

Enforceability of Contractual Class-Action Waivers in MDL Proceedings: Peter Maldini v. Accenture LLP

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Enforceability of Contractual Class-Action Waivers in MDL Proceedings Introduction In Peter Maldini et al. v. Accenture LLP, 4th Cir. (June 3, 2025), the Fourth Circuit addressed for the second time...
Enforceability of Contractual Class-Action Waivers in MDL Proceedings: Peter Maldini v. Marriott International

Enforceability of Contractual Class-Action Waivers in MDL Proceedings: Peter Maldini v. Marriott International

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Enforceability of Contractual Class-Action Waivers in MDL Proceedings: Peter Maldini v. Marriott International Introduction In Peter Maldini v. Marriott International, Incorporated (4th Cir. June 3,...
The Fourth Circuit Refines Constructive Amendment Doctrine: No Reversal for Stray Oral Jury Misstatements Corrected in Writing

The Fourth Circuit Refines Constructive Amendment Doctrine: No Reversal for Stray Oral Jury Misstatements Corrected in Writing

Date: Jun 10, 2025
The Fourth Circuit Refines Constructive Amendment Doctrine: No Reversal for Stray Oral Jury Misstatements Corrected in Writing Introduction United States v. Brayan Contreras-Avalos (Fourth Circuit,...
United States v. Jacome: Limits on Constructive Amendments in VICAR Jury Instructions

United States v. Jacome: Limits on Constructive Amendments in VICAR Jury Instructions

Date: Jun 10, 2025
United States v. Jacome: Limits on Constructive Amendments in VICAR Jury Instructions 1. Introduction United States v. Jairo Arnaldo Jacome (Fourth Circuit, June 3, 2025) arises from a...
Correction in Written Jury Instructions Cures Oral Misstatements: No Fatal Variance

Correction in Written Jury Instructions Cures Oral Misstatements: No Fatal Variance

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Correction in Written Jury Instructions Cures Oral Misstatements: No Fatal Variance Introduction This case arises from the consolidated appeals of three MS-13 gang members—Brayan Alexander...
Unambiguous Plat Dedications: Private Rights of Way Preclude Extrinsic Evidence

Unambiguous Plat Dedications: Private Rights of Way Preclude Extrinsic Evidence

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Unambiguous Plat Dedications: Private Rights of Way Preclude Extrinsic Evidence Introduction In Arthur Behm v. John Ketchum and the Matanuska-Susitna Borough (Supreme Court No. S-18872, June 4,...
Reaffirmation of Substantial-Change and Procedural Compliance in Child Custody Modifications

Reaffirmation of Substantial-Change and Procedural Compliance in Child Custody Modifications

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Reaffirmation of Substantial-Change and Procedural Compliance in Child Custody Modifications Introduction In Edward H. v. Sarah B., No. S-19072 (Alaska Sup. Ct. June 4, 2025), the Alaska Supreme...
Dram Shop Immunity Extends to Non-Serving Entities and Limits Restatement §324A Liability

Dram Shop Immunity Extends to Non-Serving Entities and Limits Restatement §324A Liability

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Dram Shop Immunity Extends to Non-Serving Entities and Limits Restatement §324A Liability Introduction Barnes v. Hooper and Harrington Raceway, Inc. d/b/a Harrington Raceway & Casino is a landmark...
No Duty of West Virginia DHS to Fund Services for Children under Private Guardianship Absent Statutory Authority

No Duty of West Virginia DHS to Fund Services for Children under Private Guardianship Absent Statutory Authority

Date: Jun 10, 2025
No Duty of West Virginia DHS to Fund Services for Children under Private Guardianship Absent Statutory Authority Introduction State ex rel. West Virginia Department of Human Services v. The Honorable...
Clarification of Rule 52(c) Judgment as a Matter of Law and Attorneys’ Fees Under § 9-1-45

Clarification of Rule 52(c) Judgment as a Matter of Law and Attorneys’ Fees Under § 9-1-45

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Clarification of Rule 52(c) Judgment as a Matter of Law and Attorneys’ Fees Under § 9-1-45 Introduction Cashman Equipment Corporation, Inc. v. Cardi Corporation, Inc. (2025) is a landmark Rhode...
New Rule: Construction Liens Limited to Debts Directly Benefiting the Encumbered Property

New Rule: Construction Liens Limited to Debts Directly Benefiting the Encumbered Property

Date: Jun 10, 2025
New Rule: Construction Liens Limited to Debts Directly Benefiting the Encumbered Property Introduction The Indiana Supreme Court’s decision in EdgeRock Development, LLC, et al. v. C.H. Garmong & Son...
Clarifying Maintenance Expenditures under §25-13-802: Exclusion of Personal Property Cleanup Costs in Redemption Actions

Clarifying Maintenance Expenditures under §25-13-802: Exclusion of Personal Property Cleanup Costs in Redemption Actions

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Clarifying Maintenance Expenditures under §25-13-802: Exclusion of Personal Property Cleanup Costs in Redemption Actions Introduction This memorandum opinion arises from a long-running feud over a...
Compelling Administrative Action: Mandamus to Enforce Board’s Duty to Review Petroleum Tank Cleanup Claims

Compelling Administrative Action: Mandamus to Enforce Board’s Duty to Review Petroleum Tank Cleanup Claims

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Compelling Administrative Action: Mandamus to Enforce Board’s Duty to Review Petroleum Tank Cleanup Claims Introduction Cascade County v. Montana Petroleum Tank Release Compensation Board (2025 MT...
Estate of Neal v. 8th Jud Dist Ct: Limiting Probate Notice to “Good Cause” under § 72-1-301(2), MCA

Estate of Neal v. 8th Jud Dist Ct: Limiting Probate Notice to “Good Cause” under § 72-1-301(2), MCA

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Estate of Neal v. Eighth Judicial District Court: Limiting Probate Notice to “Good Cause” under § 72-1-301(2), MCA Introduction In Estate of Neal v. Eighth Judicial District Court, 2025 MT __, the...
Defining Supervisory Control: Limits and Criteria in Montana Appellate Procedure

Defining Supervisory Control: Limits and Criteria in Montana Appellate Procedure

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Defining Supervisory Control: Limits and Criteria in Montana Appellate Procedure Introduction This commentary examines the Supreme Court of Montana’s Order in Jing v. 13th Judicial District Court, OP...
Independent Termination of Parental Rights Under MCA §41-3-609

Independent Termination of Parental Rights Under MCA §41-3-609

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Independent Termination of Parental Rights Under MCA §41-3-609 Introduction This commentary examines the Supreme Court of Montana’s decision in Matter of B.J.B., YINC (2025 MT 116), which clarifies...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert