Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

first-circuit-reinforces-first-amendment-protections-for-secret-audio-recording-of-police-in-public:-interpretation-of-massachusetts& Case Commentaries

Refusal of OSHA Certified Mail Does Not Defeat Service: Alternative Delivery and Judicial Notice of Address Satisfy Due Process

Refusal of OSHA Certified Mail Does Not Defeat Service: Alternative Delivery and Judicial Notice of Address Satisfy Due Process

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Refusal of OSHA Certified Mail Does Not Defeat Service: Alternative Delivery and Judicial Notice of Address Satisfy Due Process Introduction In Lori Chavez-DeRemer v. Elmer Miller d/b/a Miller...
NCMEC Is a Governmental Entity for Fourth Amendment Purposes, But ESP Hash-Matching Alone Does Not Make Providers Government Agents: A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Guard (2d Cir. 2025)

NCMEC Is a Governmental Entity for Fourth Amendment Purposes, But ESP Hash-Matching Alone Does Not Make Providers Government Agents: A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Guard (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 11, 2025
NCMEC Is a Governmental Entity for Fourth Amendment Purposes, But ESP Hash-Matching Alone Does Not Make Providers Government Agents Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Guard, No. 23-6886 (2d...
Accommodation Cannot Compel Illegality: Second Circuit Reaffirms that Title VII Does Not Require Employers to Violate State Vaccination Rules, and Uniform Mandates Do Not Support ADA “Regarded As” Claims

Accommodation Cannot Compel Illegality: Second Circuit Reaffirms that Title VII Does Not Require Employers to Violate State Vaccination Rules, and Uniform Mandates Do Not Support ADA “Regarded As” Claims

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Accommodation Cannot Compel Illegality: Second Circuit Reaffirms that Title VII Does Not Require Employers to Violate State Vaccination Rules, and Uniform Mandates Do Not Support ADA “Regarded As”...
Requesting FMLA Paperwork Is Not Protected Activity: West Virginia Supreme Court clarifies Harless retaliation and reinforces WVHRA prima facie and pretext standards

Requesting FMLA Paperwork Is Not Protected Activity: West Virginia Supreme Court clarifies Harless retaliation and reinforces WVHRA prima facie and pretext standards

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Requesting FMLA Paperwork Is Not Protected Activity: West Virginia Supreme Court clarifies Harless retaliation and reinforces WVHRA prima facie and pretext standards Introduction In Cindy Linger-Long...
Principles, Not Twins: The Third Circuit’s Sensitive-Places Framework After Bruen and Rahimi — Koons v. Attorney General of New Jersey

Principles, Not Twins: The Third Circuit’s Sensitive-Places Framework After Bruen and Rahimi — Koons v. Attorney General of New Jersey

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Principles, Not Twins: The Third Circuit’s Sensitive-Places Framework After Bruen and Rahimi Commentary on Koons v. Attorney General New Jersey (3d Cir. Sept. 10, 2025) Introduction In Koons v....
Addressing the Central Thesis Suffices: Fourth Circuit Reaffirms Minimal Explanation and Harmless Error for Consecutive Revocation Sentences

Addressing the Central Thesis Suffices: Fourth Circuit Reaffirms Minimal Explanation and Harmless Error for Consecutive Revocation Sentences

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Addressing the Central Thesis Suffices: Fourth Circuit Reaffirms Minimal Explanation and Harmless Error for Consecutive Revocation Sentences Introduction This commentary analyzes the Fourth Circuit’s...
Internal Affairs, Not Foreign Receivers, Controls Bankruptcy Authority; Product‑Line Successor Claims Are Property of the Estate — A Comprehensive Commentary on In re Whittaker Clark & Daniels, Inc. (3d Cir. 2025)

Internal Affairs, Not Foreign Receivers, Controls Bankruptcy Authority; Product‑Line Successor Claims Are Property of the Estate — A Comprehensive Commentary on In re Whittaker Clark & Daniels, Inc. (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Internal Affairs, Not Foreign Receivers, Controls Bankruptcy Authority; Product‑Line Successor Claims Are Property of the Estate A comprehensive commentary on In re Whittaker Clark & Daniels, Inc.,...
Differential Diagnosis Endorsed for Abusive Head Trauma: Nevada Affirms Physician Causation Testimony Without Biomechanical Expertise and Clarifies Limits on Juror-Impeachment and Prosecutorial Comment

Differential Diagnosis Endorsed for Abusive Head Trauma: Nevada Affirms Physician Causation Testimony Without Biomechanical Expertise and Clarifies Limits on Juror-Impeachment and Prosecutorial Comment

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Differential Diagnosis Endorsed for Abusive Head Trauma: Nevada Affirms Physician Causation Testimony Without Biomechanical Expertise and Clarifies Limits on Juror-Impeachment and Prosecutorial...
Deemed‑Admitted Noncooperation and Failure to Return Client File Warrant a One‑Year‑and‑One‑Day Suspension: In re Tristan Patrick Gilley

Deemed‑Admitted Noncooperation and Failure to Return Client File Warrant a One‑Year‑and‑One‑Day Suspension: In re Tristan Patrick Gilley

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Deemed‑Admitted Noncooperation and Failure to Return Client File Warrant a One‑Year‑and‑One‑Day Suspension: In re Tristan Patrick Gilley Introduction In In re: Tristan Patrick Gilley, No. 2025-B-0713...
Spears v. Frame: Habeas Orders Must Contain Petitioner-Specific Findings; Incorporating a Co‑Defendant’s Findings Is Insufficient for Meaningful Appellate Review

Spears v. Frame: Habeas Orders Must Contain Petitioner-Specific Findings; Incorporating a Co‑Defendant’s Findings Is Insufficient for Meaningful Appellate Review

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Spears v. Frame: Habeas Orders Must Contain Petitioner-Specific Findings; Incorporating a Co‑Defendant’s Findings Is Insufficient for Meaningful Appellate Review Court: Supreme Court of Appeals of...
Rule 35(b) in West Virginia: No Entitlement to Appointed Experts and Concise Orders Can Suffice — State v. Jeffery (W. Va. Sept. 10, 2025)

Rule 35(b) in West Virginia: No Entitlement to Appointed Experts and Concise Orders Can Suffice — State v. Jeffery (W. Va. Sept. 10, 2025)

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Rule 35(b) in West Virginia: No Entitlement to Appointed Experts and Concise Orders Can Suffice — State v. Jeffery Introduction In State of West Virginia v. Joey Keith Jeffery, No. 23-538 (Kanawha...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies PLRA “Three-Strikes”: Jurisdictional Dismissals and Prior § 1915(g) Dismissals Do Not Count Absent an Express Failure-to-State-a-Claim Basis

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies PLRA “Three-Strikes”: Jurisdictional Dismissals and Prior § 1915(g) Dismissals Do Not Count Absent an Express Failure-to-State-a-Claim Basis

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies PLRA “Three-Strikes”: Jurisdictional Dismissals and Prior § 1915(g) Dismissals Do Not Count Absent an Express Failure-to-State-a-Claim Basis Case: George Walter Brewster,...
Device‑Location Data Is CPNI Under § 222: Second Circuit Upholds FCC Forfeiture and Clarifies Seventh Amendment Path via § 504(a)

Device‑Location Data Is CPNI Under § 222: Second Circuit Upholds FCC Forfeiture and Clarifies Seventh Amendment Path via § 504(a)

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Device‑Location Data Is CPNI Under § 222: Second Circuit Upholds FCC Forfeiture and Clarifies Seventh Amendment Path via § 504(a) Introduction This commentary analyzes the Second Circuit’s decision...
For Pre‑2021 Asylum Filings, Past Persecution Triggers a Presumption that Internal Relocation Is Unreasonable—Burden Rests with DHS (Sahni v. Bondi)

For Pre‑2021 Asylum Filings, Past Persecution Triggers a Presumption that Internal Relocation Is Unreasonable—Burden Rests with DHS (Sahni v. Bondi)

Date: Sep 11, 2025
For Pre‑2021 Asylum Filings, Past Persecution Triggers a Presumption that Internal Relocation Is Unreasonable—Burden Rests with DHS (Sahni v. Bondi) Introduction This commentary analyzes the Second...
Pretext Turns on the Decisionmaker’s Actual Belief; Temporal Proximity Alone Cannot Overcome Documented, Pre‑Existing Nonrenewal Plans

Pretext Turns on the Decisionmaker’s Actual Belief; Temporal Proximity Alone Cannot Overcome Documented, Pre‑Existing Nonrenewal Plans

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Pretext Turns on the Decisionmaker’s Actual Belief; Temporal Proximity Alone Cannot Overcome Documented, Pre‑Existing Nonrenewal Plans Introduction In this unpublished decision, the Fourth Circuit...
Rendon v. White Castle Systems, Inc.: Reversible Error to Conflate Tenant and Landowner Duties in Sidewalk Cases; Medical Expenses Limited to Amounts Actually Owed

Rendon v. White Castle Systems, Inc.: Reversible Error to Conflate Tenant and Landowner Duties in Sidewalk Cases; Medical Expenses Limited to Amounts Actually Owed

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Rendon v. White Castle Systems, Inc.: Reversible Error to Conflate Tenant and Landowner Duties in Sidewalk Cases; Medical Expenses Limited to Amounts Actually Owed Introduction In Rendon v. White...
Pleading-Stage Survival of Contribution Claims Against Municipalities for Defective Street Appurtenances and “Special Use” Liability of Non‑Owner Occupiers

Pleading-Stage Survival of Contribution Claims Against Municipalities for Defective Street Appurtenances and “Special Use” Liability of Non‑Owner Occupiers

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Pleading-Stage Survival of Contribution Claims Against Municipalities for Defective Street Appurtenances and “Special Use” Liability of Non‑Owner Occupiers Introduction In N.I. v. City of New York...
“Children” Means Under 18 for § 2251(e), and § 3283’s Child‑Abuse Limitations Apply to Mann Act § 2421: Commentary on United States v. Deakins (6th Cir. 2025)

“Children” Means Under 18 for § 2251(e), and § 3283’s Child‑Abuse Limitations Apply to Mann Act § 2421: Commentary on United States v. Deakins (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 11, 2025
“Children” Means Under 18 for § 2251(e), and § 3283’s Child‑Abuse Limitations Apply to Mann Act § 2421: Commentary on United States v. Deakins (6th Cir. 2025) Introduction In United States v....
Censure, Not Suspension, for Dual Misdemeanor DWI Convictions Where Mitigation Is Strong: Matter of Halton

Censure, Not Suspension, for Dual Misdemeanor DWI Convictions Where Mitigation Is Strong: Matter of Halton

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Censure, Not Suspension, for Dual Misdemeanor DWI Convictions Where Mitigation Is Strong: Matter of Halton Introduction In Matter of Halton, 2025 NY Slip Op 04902 (Appellate Division, Second...
Sixth Circuit Holds First Step Act Time Credits Cannot Reduce Supervised Release; Habeas Challenges Become Moot Upon Release

Sixth Circuit Holds First Step Act Time Credits Cannot Reduce Supervised Release; Habeas Challenges Become Moot Upon Release

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Sixth Circuit Holds First Step Act Time Credits Cannot Reduce Supervised Release; Habeas Challenges Become Moot Upon Release Case: Terrell Anthony Hargrove v. Ian Healy, No. 24-3809 (6th Cir. Sept....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert