Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

establishing-&amp Case Commentaries

Serious Difficulty Controlling Behavior Proven by Treatment Refusal and Institutional Misconduct, with Expert Nexus; Negative Inference from Absent Independent Expert Affirmed

Serious Difficulty Controlling Behavior Proven by Treatment Refusal and Institutional Misconduct, with Expert Nexus; Negative Inference from Absent Independent Expert Affirmed

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Serious Difficulty Controlling Behavior Proven by Treatment Refusal and Institutional Misconduct, with Expert Nexus; Negative Inference from Absent Independent Expert Affirmed Introduction In...
State v. King (2025 ND 174): Clarifying the Dual “True Threat” Standard for Terrorizing and Cabining Overbreadth in As-Applied Challenges Under Obvious-Error Review

State v. King (2025 ND 174): Clarifying the Dual “True Threat” Standard for Terrorizing and Cabining Overbreadth in As-Applied Challenges Under Obvious-Error Review

Date: Oct 24, 2025
State v. King (2025 ND 174): Clarifying the Dual “True Threat” Standard for Terrorizing and Cabining Overbreadth in As-Applied Challenges Under Obvious-Error Review Introduction In State v. King,...
Mandatory Credit for Voluntary Prejudgment Child Support Payments in North Dakota: Sutherby v. Astanina (2025 ND 166)

Mandatory Credit for Voluntary Prejudgment Child Support Payments in North Dakota: Sutherby v. Astanina (2025 ND 166)

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Mandatory Credit for Voluntary Prejudgment Child Support Payments in North Dakota Commentary on Sutherby v. Astanina, 2025 ND 166 (N.D. Oct. 22, 2025) Introduction In Sutherby v. Astanina, the North...
Rigorous Gatekeeping of Extraordinary Writs and the Court’s Use of Alternative Writs under S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.04 and 12.05: Analysis of the Supreme Court of Ohio’s October 22, 2025 Case Announcements

Rigorous Gatekeeping of Extraordinary Writs and the Court’s Use of Alternative Writs under S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.04 and 12.05: Analysis of the Supreme Court of Ohio’s October 22, 2025 Case Announcements

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Rigorous Gatekeeping of Extraordinary Writs and the Court’s Use of Alternative Writs under S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.04 and 12.05: Analysis of the Supreme Court of Ohio’s October 22, 2025 Case Announcements...
Only the Office of Disciplinary Counsel May Invoke Reciprocal Discipline in Ohio; Court Flags Risks of Mandatory Reciprocity During Pending Ohio Appeals

Only the Office of Disciplinary Counsel May Invoke Reciprocal Discipline in Ohio; Court Flags Risks of Mandatory Reciprocity During Pending Ohio Appeals

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Only the Office of Disciplinary Counsel May Invoke Reciprocal Discipline in Ohio; Court Flags Risks of Mandatory Reciprocity During Pending Ohio Appeals Introduction In 10/22/2025 Case Announcements...
Whole-Record Review of Juror Bias Permits Reliance on Group Voir Dire Responses: State v. Rogers (2025-Ohio-4794)

Whole-Record Review of Juror Bias Permits Reliance on Group Voir Dire Responses: State v. Rogers (2025-Ohio-4794)

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Whole-Record Review of Juror Bias Permits Reliance on Group Voir Dire Responses Commentary on State v. Rogers, 2025-Ohio-4794 (Supreme Court of Ohio) Introduction In State v. Rogers, the Supreme...
“Never” Means Never, and “Openly” Means Publicly: Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies the § 8-607(b)(1)(b) Exception to the Two-Year Parentage Limitations Period

“Never” Means Never, and “Openly” Means Publicly: Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies the § 8-607(b)(1)(b) Exception to the Two-Year Parentage Limitations Period

Date: Oct 24, 2025
“Never” Means Never, and “Openly” Means Publicly: Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies the § 8-607(b)(1)(b) Exception to the Two-Year Parentage Limitations Period Introduction In Kelly Oscar and Jack...
Actual Notice as a Prerequisite to Civil Contempt for Discharge-Injunction Violations; Broad Discretion over Discovery Sanctions Reaffirmed

Actual Notice as a Prerequisite to Civil Contempt for Discharge-Injunction Violations; Broad Discretion over Discovery Sanctions Reaffirmed

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Actual Notice as a Prerequisite to Civil Contempt for Discharge-Injunction Violations; Broad Discretion over Discovery Sanctions Reaffirmed Introduction In Shirley White‑Lett v. Shellpoint Mortgage...
Crime Complete at Recruitment: Tenth Circuit Clarifies § 1591 Does Not Require a Completed Commercial Sex Act and Reaffirms Circumstantial Proof of Actual Possession

Crime Complete at Recruitment: Tenth Circuit Clarifies § 1591 Does Not Require a Completed Commercial Sex Act and Reaffirms Circumstantial Proof of Actual Possession

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Crime Complete at Recruitment: Tenth Circuit Clarifies § 1591 Does Not Require a Completed Commercial Sex Act and Reaffirms Circumstantial Proof of Actual Possession Introduction In United States v....
Inferring the MDLEA’s “On Request” Statelessness Requirement from Standard Boarding Procedures

Inferring the MDLEA’s “On Request” Statelessness Requirement from Standard Boarding Procedures

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Inferring the MDLEA’s “On Request” Statelessness Requirement from Standard Boarding Procedures Introduction In United States v. Santo Rosario‑Rivera (consolidated with United States v. Francisco...
Implied Covenant Cannot Override “Immediate, For-Any-Reason” Termination Clause; Sovereign Immunity Bars District-Court Retaliation Claims Against IHS Absent a Specific Waiver

Implied Covenant Cannot Override “Immediate, For-Any-Reason” Termination Clause; Sovereign Immunity Bars District-Court Retaliation Claims Against IHS Absent a Specific Waiver

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Implied Covenant Cannot Override “Immediate, For-Any-Reason” Termination Clause; Sovereign Immunity Bars District-Court Retaliation Claims Against IHS Absent a Specific Waiver Introduction In...
Material Omissions and Conflicting Residence Evidence Sustain Adverse Credibility Under the REAL ID Act: Chen v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025) [Summary Order]

Material Omissions and Conflicting Residence Evidence Sustain Adverse Credibility Under the REAL ID Act: Chen v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025) [Summary Order]

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Material Omissions and Conflicting Residence Evidence Sustain Adverse Credibility Under the REAL ID Act: Chen v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025) [Summary Order] Court: United States Court of Appeals for the...
Circumstance-Specific Proof of Protection-Order Violations May Rely on PSIs and Conviction Elements; Indictment Time Ranges Can Fix CIMT “Commission” Date for Stop-Time Purposes

Circumstance-Specific Proof of Protection-Order Violations May Rely on PSIs and Conviction Elements; Indictment Time Ranges Can Fix CIMT “Commission” Date for Stop-Time Purposes

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Circumstance-Specific Proof of Protection-Order Violations May Rely on PSIs and Conviction Elements; Indictment Time Ranges Can Fix CIMT “Commission” Date for Stop-Time Purposes Case: Moco v. Bondi,...
Second Circuit Clarifies Pro Se Estate Representation and Upholds Qualified Immunity for Warrantless Code‑Enforcement Entry Under Claimed Exigent Circumstances: Simmons v. Incorporated Village of Rockville Centre

Second Circuit Clarifies Pro Se Estate Representation and Upholds Qualified Immunity for Warrantless Code‑Enforcement Entry Under Claimed Exigent Circumstances: Simmons v. Incorporated Village of Rockville Centre

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Second Circuit Clarifies Pro Se Estate Representation and Upholds Qualified Immunity for Warrantless Code‑Enforcement Entry Under Claimed Exigent Circumstances Case: Simmons v. Incorporated Village...
No §3C1.1 Obstruction Enhancement on a Bare “Perjury” Label: Second Circuit Requires Discernable Dunnigan Findings in United States v. Onah

No §3C1.1 Obstruction Enhancement on a Bare “Perjury” Label: Second Circuit Requires Discernable Dunnigan Findings in United States v. Onah

Date: Oct 24, 2025
No §3C1.1 Obstruction Enhancement on a Bare “Perjury” Label: Second Circuit Requires Discernable Dunnigan Findings in United States v. Onah Introduction In a summary order issued on October 21, 2025,...
Second Circuit: No Property Right to Continue as a Medicaid Fiscal Intermediary; CDPAP Consolidation Survives Takings, Contracts, and Due Process Challenges

Second Circuit: No Property Right to Continue as a Medicaid Fiscal Intermediary; CDPAP Consolidation Survives Takings, Contracts, and Due Process Challenges

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Second Circuit: No Property Right to Continue as a Medicaid Fiscal Intermediary; CDPAP Consolidation Survives Takings, Contracts, and Due Process Challenges Introduction In Principle Homecare, LLC v....
No Records, No Lien: Eleventh Circuit affirms extinguishment of a Georgia attorney’s lien absent credible proof of value

No Records, No Lien: Eleventh Circuit affirms extinguishment of a Georgia attorney’s lien absent credible proof of value

Date: Oct 24, 2025
No Records, No Lien: Eleventh Circuit affirms extinguishment of a Georgia attorney’s lien absent credible proof of value Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (Non-Argument Calendar;...
No Gross Disproportionality Under Plain-Error Review: Eleventh Circuit Affirms 600-Month Sentence for Child Pornography Production and Possession

No Gross Disproportionality Under Plain-Error Review: Eleventh Circuit Affirms 600-Month Sentence for Child Pornography Production and Possession

Date: Oct 24, 2025
No Gross Disproportionality Under Plain-Error Review: Eleventh Circuit Affirms 600-Month Sentence for Child Pornography Production and Possession United States v. Angel Antonio Cannella, No. 22-13924...
Implicit Proof of the MDLEA “Request” Requirement for Stateless-Vessel Jurisdiction in the EEZ

Implicit Proof of the MDLEA “Request” Requirement for Stateless-Vessel Jurisdiction in the EEZ

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Implicit Proof of the MDLEA “Request” Requirement for Stateless-Vessel Jurisdiction in the EEZ Commentary on United States v. Francisco Rijo-Rijo, et al. (consolidated), Nos. 23-12779, 23-12828,...
Post-Offense Mail-Inspection Videos Are Admissible Under Rule 404(b); Broad Relevant-Conduct Loss Attribution (Including Acquitted Conduct under pre-2024 Guidelines) Upheld — United States v. Glover (11th Cir. 2025)

Post-Offense Mail-Inspection Videos Are Admissible Under Rule 404(b); Broad Relevant-Conduct Loss Attribution (Including Acquitted Conduct under pre-2024 Guidelines) Upheld — United States v. Glover (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Post-Offense Mail-Inspection Videos Are Admissible Under Rule 404(b); Broad Relevant-Conduct Loss Attribution (Including Acquitted Conduct under pre-2024 Guidelines) Upheld — United States v. Glover...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert