Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

establishing-&amp Case Commentaries

Parisi Left Intact for Now: Mandamus Dismissed Without Opinion While Chief Justice Kennedy Calls to Restore Public Records Act Control Over Court Records and Apply H.B. 265’s Affirmation Requirement

Parisi Left Intact for Now: Mandamus Dismissed Without Opinion While Chief Justice Kennedy Calls to Restore Public Records Act Control Over Court Records and Apply H.B. 265’s Affirmation Requirement

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Parisi Left Intact for Now: Mandamus Dismissed Without Opinion While Chief Justice Kennedy Calls to Restore Public Records Act Control Over Court Records and Apply H.B. 265’s Affirmation Requirement...
Enhanced Actual Suspension for Violent Threats Absent Mental-Health Mitigation: Ohio Supreme Court Clarifies Sanctioning in Attorney Discipline

Enhanced Actual Suspension for Violent Threats Absent Mental-Health Mitigation: Ohio Supreme Court Clarifies Sanctioning in Attorney Discipline

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Enhanced Actual Suspension for Violent Threats Absent Mental-Health Mitigation: Ohio Supreme Court Clarifies Sanctioning in Attorney Discipline Introduction In Disciplinary Counsel v. Taylor, Slip...
Clarifying “Additional Defendants” in Ohio Medical-Claim Actions: No Civ.R. 15(D) Compliance Needed and 180-Day Extension Not Limited to Newly Discovered Parties (Lewis v. MedCentral Health Sys.)

Clarifying “Additional Defendants” in Ohio Medical-Claim Actions: No Civ.R. 15(D) Compliance Needed and 180-Day Extension Not Limited to Newly Discovered Parties (Lewis v. MedCentral Health Sys.)

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Clarifying “Additional Defendants” in Ohio Medical-Claim Actions: No Civ.R. 15(D) Compliance Needed and 180-Day Extension Not Limited to Newly Discovered Parties Case: Lewis v. MedCentral Health...
Strict, Contemporaneous Compliance with R.C. 2969.25(A) Is Required; Noncompliance Requires Dismissal Without Prejudice and Cannot Be Cured by Later Amendment

Strict, Contemporaneous Compliance with R.C. 2969.25(A) Is Required; Noncompliance Requires Dismissal Without Prejudice and Cannot Be Cured by Later Amendment

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Strict, Contemporaneous Compliance with R.C. 2969.25(A) Is Required; Noncompliance Requires Dismissal Without Prejudice and Cannot Be Cured by Later Amendment Introduction In State ex rel. Mason v....
Houghton v. Malibu Boats: Shareholder Standing Is Prudential and Forfeitable in Tennessee; Derivative Statutory Requirements Do Not Strip Jurisdiction

Houghton v. Malibu Boats: Shareholder Standing Is Prudential and Forfeitable in Tennessee; Derivative Statutory Requirements Do Not Strip Jurisdiction

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Houghton v. Malibu Boats: Shareholder Standing Is Prudential and Forfeitable in Tennessee; Derivative Statutory Requirements Do Not Strip Jurisdiction Introduction This commentary analyzes the...
Mere Situs Is Not “Use” Under Florida UM Coverage: Alaska Supreme Court (Mem. Op.) Affirms No Coverage for Fireworks Injury Launched From a Stationary, Uninsured Trailer

Mere Situs Is Not “Use” Under Florida UM Coverage: Alaska Supreme Court (Mem. Op.) Affirms No Coverage for Fireworks Injury Launched From a Stationary, Uninsured Trailer

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Mere Situs Is Not “Use” Under Florida UM Coverage: Alaska Supreme Court (Mem. Op.) Affirms No Coverage for Fireworks Injury Launched From a Stationary, Uninsured Trailer Case: Walter M. Elrod and...
Uniform “Reasonable Probability” Harmless‑Error Standard Adopted; Defendant’s Absence from Suppression Hearing Deemed Harmless; Confession Upheld as Voluntary

Uniform “Reasonable Probability” Harmless‑Error Standard Adopted; Defendant’s Absence from Suppression Hearing Deemed Harmless; Confession Upheld as Voluntary

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Uniform “Reasonable Probability” Harmless‑Error Standard Adopted; Defendant’s Absence from Suppression Hearing Deemed Harmless; Confession Upheld as Voluntary Introduction In Cheri Lynn Marler v....
“Dispositive Must Mean Case-Ending”: Wyoming Supreme Court Invalidates Non‑Dispositive Conditional Plea Under W.R.Cr.P. 11(a)(2) in Kotrc v. State

“Dispositive Must Mean Case-Ending”: Wyoming Supreme Court Invalidates Non‑Dispositive Conditional Plea Under W.R.Cr.P. 11(a)(2) in Kotrc v. State

Date: Oct 24, 2025
“Dispositive Must Mean Case-Ending”: Wyoming Supreme Court Invalidates Non‑Dispositive Conditional Plea Under W.R.Cr.P. 11(a)(2) in Kotrc v. State Introduction In Cody Allan Kotrc v. State of...
Eviction After Statutory Contract‑for‑Deed Cancellation: North Dakota Affirms Posted Service and Strict Nonjoinability in Summary Proceedings — Cache Private Capital Diversified Fund v. Braddock (2025 ND 168)

Eviction After Statutory Contract‑for‑Deed Cancellation: North Dakota Affirms Posted Service and Strict Nonjoinability in Summary Proceedings — Cache Private Capital Diversified Fund v. Braddock (2025 ND 168)

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Eviction After Statutory Contract‑for‑Deed Cancellation: North Dakota Affirms Posted Service and Strict Nonjoinability in Summary Proceedings — Cache Private Capital Diversified Fund v. Braddock...
Serious Difficulty Controlling Behavior Proven by Treatment Refusal and Institutional Misconduct, with Expert Nexus; Negative Inference from Absent Independent Expert Affirmed

Serious Difficulty Controlling Behavior Proven by Treatment Refusal and Institutional Misconduct, with Expert Nexus; Negative Inference from Absent Independent Expert Affirmed

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Serious Difficulty Controlling Behavior Proven by Treatment Refusal and Institutional Misconduct, with Expert Nexus; Negative Inference from Absent Independent Expert Affirmed Introduction In...
State v. King (2025 ND 174): Clarifying the Dual “True Threat” Standard for Terrorizing and Cabining Overbreadth in As-Applied Challenges Under Obvious-Error Review

State v. King (2025 ND 174): Clarifying the Dual “True Threat” Standard for Terrorizing and Cabining Overbreadth in As-Applied Challenges Under Obvious-Error Review

Date: Oct 24, 2025
State v. King (2025 ND 174): Clarifying the Dual “True Threat” Standard for Terrorizing and Cabining Overbreadth in As-Applied Challenges Under Obvious-Error Review Introduction In State v. King,...
Mandatory Credit for Voluntary Prejudgment Child Support Payments in North Dakota: Sutherby v. Astanina (2025 ND 166)

Mandatory Credit for Voluntary Prejudgment Child Support Payments in North Dakota: Sutherby v. Astanina (2025 ND 166)

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Mandatory Credit for Voluntary Prejudgment Child Support Payments in North Dakota Commentary on Sutherby v. Astanina, 2025 ND 166 (N.D. Oct. 22, 2025) Introduction In Sutherby v. Astanina, the North...
Rigorous Gatekeeping of Extraordinary Writs and the Court’s Use of Alternative Writs under S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.04 and 12.05: Analysis of the Supreme Court of Ohio’s October 22, 2025 Case Announcements

Rigorous Gatekeeping of Extraordinary Writs and the Court’s Use of Alternative Writs under S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.04 and 12.05: Analysis of the Supreme Court of Ohio’s October 22, 2025 Case Announcements

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Rigorous Gatekeeping of Extraordinary Writs and the Court’s Use of Alternative Writs under S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.04 and 12.05: Analysis of the Supreme Court of Ohio’s October 22, 2025 Case Announcements...
Only the Office of Disciplinary Counsel May Invoke Reciprocal Discipline in Ohio; Court Flags Risks of Mandatory Reciprocity During Pending Ohio Appeals

Only the Office of Disciplinary Counsel May Invoke Reciprocal Discipline in Ohio; Court Flags Risks of Mandatory Reciprocity During Pending Ohio Appeals

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Only the Office of Disciplinary Counsel May Invoke Reciprocal Discipline in Ohio; Court Flags Risks of Mandatory Reciprocity During Pending Ohio Appeals Introduction In 10/22/2025 Case Announcements...
Whole-Record Review of Juror Bias Permits Reliance on Group Voir Dire Responses: State v. Rogers (2025-Ohio-4794)

Whole-Record Review of Juror Bias Permits Reliance on Group Voir Dire Responses: State v. Rogers (2025-Ohio-4794)

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Whole-Record Review of Juror Bias Permits Reliance on Group Voir Dire Responses Commentary on State v. Rogers, 2025-Ohio-4794 (Supreme Court of Ohio) Introduction In State v. Rogers, the Supreme...
“Never” Means Never, and “Openly” Means Publicly: Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies the § 8-607(b)(1)(b) Exception to the Two-Year Parentage Limitations Period

“Never” Means Never, and “Openly” Means Publicly: Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies the § 8-607(b)(1)(b) Exception to the Two-Year Parentage Limitations Period

Date: Oct 24, 2025
“Never” Means Never, and “Openly” Means Publicly: Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies the § 8-607(b)(1)(b) Exception to the Two-Year Parentage Limitations Period Introduction In Kelly Oscar and Jack...
Actual Notice as a Prerequisite to Civil Contempt for Discharge-Injunction Violations; Broad Discretion over Discovery Sanctions Reaffirmed

Actual Notice as a Prerequisite to Civil Contempt for Discharge-Injunction Violations; Broad Discretion over Discovery Sanctions Reaffirmed

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Actual Notice as a Prerequisite to Civil Contempt for Discharge-Injunction Violations; Broad Discretion over Discovery Sanctions Reaffirmed Introduction In Shirley White‑Lett v. Shellpoint Mortgage...
Crime Complete at Recruitment: Tenth Circuit Clarifies § 1591 Does Not Require a Completed Commercial Sex Act and Reaffirms Circumstantial Proof of Actual Possession

Crime Complete at Recruitment: Tenth Circuit Clarifies § 1591 Does Not Require a Completed Commercial Sex Act and Reaffirms Circumstantial Proof of Actual Possession

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Crime Complete at Recruitment: Tenth Circuit Clarifies § 1591 Does Not Require a Completed Commercial Sex Act and Reaffirms Circumstantial Proof of Actual Possession Introduction In United States v....
Inferring the MDLEA’s “On Request” Statelessness Requirement from Standard Boarding Procedures

Inferring the MDLEA’s “On Request” Statelessness Requirement from Standard Boarding Procedures

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Inferring the MDLEA’s “On Request” Statelessness Requirement from Standard Boarding Procedures Introduction In United States v. Santo Rosario‑Rivera (consolidated with United States v. Francisco...
Implied Covenant Cannot Override “Immediate, For-Any-Reason” Termination Clause; Sovereign Immunity Bars District-Court Retaliation Claims Against IHS Absent a Specific Waiver

Implied Covenant Cannot Override “Immediate, For-Any-Reason” Termination Clause; Sovereign Immunity Bars District-Court Retaliation Claims Against IHS Absent a Specific Waiver

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Implied Covenant Cannot Override “Immediate, For-Any-Reason” Termination Clause; Sovereign Immunity Bars District-Court Retaliation Claims Against IHS Absent a Specific Waiver Introduction In...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert