Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Stipulations and Harmless Error: The Montana Supreme Court Refines Right-to-Counsel Violations, Tribal Transfer Motions, and ICWA Placement in In re I.R.S. & M.W.A.H. Introduction On 1 July 2025 the...
“More Than a Question”: The Montana Supreme Court Clarifies that a Mere Inquiry Is Not a Motion to Transfer under MICWA § 41-3-1310 and Re-confirms the Narrow Scope of Relative Intervention in Indian...
State v. Warr: Mandatory Second-Chance Withdrawal after Rejection of a Binding Plea Agreement under § 46-12-211(4), MCA Introduction In State v. J. Warr, 2025 MT 138, the Montana Supreme Court...
State v. Welzel: Clarifying “Under the Order of the Court” for Credit on Time Spent in Residential Treatment Facilities Introduction State v. Welzel, 2025 MT 136, is a decision of the Supreme Court...
Expanding Fee-Shifting under Montana’s UDJA: A Detailed Commentary on Upper Missouri Waterkeeper v. Broadwater County & DNRC (2025 MT 137) 1. Introduction Upper Missouri Waterkeeper, several local...
“We Do, the Bureau May”: State v. Crist and the Court-Centric Rule for Determining Substantial Equivalency Under Idaho’s Sex Offender Registration Act Introduction State v. Crist, 50737 (Idaho July 1...
Meaningful Review Revisited: Idaho Supreme Court Narrows “Plan-or-Design Immunity” to Government Plans & Change Orders that Receive Actual, Documented Scrutiny South Hill Meat Lockers Inc. v. Idaho...
“Any Means Any”: Idaho Code § 49-456 Applies to All Vehicles Driven in Idaho — A Comprehensive Commentary on State v. Sherwood (Idaho 2025) 1. Introduction Background. In State v. Sherwood, the Idaho...
Gallegos v. Gallegos – Wyoming Supreme Court Re-Affirms Strict Procedural Compliance for Pro Se Appellants Introduction The Wyoming Supreme Court’s decision in Latoya L. Adams f/k/a Latoya L....
State v. Fletcher: Idaho Supreme Court Declares Drug-Dog “Free-Air” Sniffs Non-Searches Under Article I § 17 and Re-Affirms the Bright-Line Automobile Exception 1. Introduction State v. Fletcher,...
State v. Popp (2025): Narrowing “Reasonable Suspicion” When the Predicate Offense is Littering under Idaho Code § 18-7031 1. Introduction State v. Popp is the Idaho Supreme Court’s most recent...
Narrowing OV 7 After the 2015 Amendments: “Similarly Egregious” Conduct and an Intent-to-Heighten-Fear Requirement Highlighted in People v. Brownfield Introduction This commentary analyzes the...
Certification Is Not a Vehicle to Revisit Settled Law: Michigan Supreme Court Declines to Answer Federal Certified Question on the Medical-Malpractice Damages Cap Introduction This commentary...
No Do‑Overs for Pro Se Capital Defendants: Invited Error and Colorable-Claim Gatekeeping Foreclose Postconviction Mitigation Challenges Introduction This commentary examines the Florida Supreme...
Lockdown, Then Consent: Kansas High Court Upholds Premises Security Pending Warrant and Validates Nonverbal Consent to Home Entry Case: State v. Arredondo (No. 126,819) — Supreme Court of Kansas —...
State v. Haynes: A Defendant’s Direct-Motion Right to Obtain Warrant Affidavits—But Not Warrants—Under K.S.A. 22-2302(b) and 22-2502(d) Introduction In State v. Haynes (Kan. July 3, 2025), the Kansas...
“All Issues Are for the Arbitrator”: Lamonaco v. Experian and the Eleventh Circuit’s Express Recognition that Waiver Can Be Validly Delegated 1. Introduction Lamonaco v. Experian Information...
Kansas adopts a rebuttable “presumed prejudice” standard under Section 5 for jury-instruction omissions of an element Introduction In State v. Gleason, No. 125,156 (Kan. July 3, 2025), the Supreme...
State v. Mitchell: Kansas Supreme Court Confirms Broad Discretion to Deny Hard-25 Departure and to Impose Consecutive Hard-50 Sentences for Multiple Victims Introduction In State v. Mitchell, No....
“Finality & Forfeiture”: The Indiana Supreme Court’s Reinforcement of Strict Appellate Deadlines in Juvenile Delinquency Matters – Comment on State of Indiana v. B.H. (2025) 1. Introduction In State...