Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

comprehensive-interpretation-of-& Case Commentaries

United States v. Jones (11th Cir. 2025): Reinforcing the Oral-Pronouncement Rule for Standard Conditions of Supervised Release and the Mandatory “Jones Colloquy”

United States v. Jones (11th Cir. 2025): Reinforcing the Oral-Pronouncement Rule for Standard Conditions of Supervised Release and the Mandatory “Jones Colloquy”

Date: Aug 13, 2025
United States v. Jones (11th Cir. 2025): Reinforcing the Oral-Pronouncement Rule for Standard Conditions of Supervised Release and the Mandatory “Jones Colloquy” 1. Introduction In United States v....
“Still Presumptively Lawful” – Eleventh Circuit’s Post-Rahimi Endorsement of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) in United States v. Williams

“Still Presumptively Lawful” – Eleventh Circuit’s Post-Rahimi Endorsement of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) in United States v. Williams

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Still Presumptively Lawful” – Eleventh Circuit’s Post-Rahimi Endorsement of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) in United States v. Williams Introduction Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit...
Concurrent-Sentence Doctrine Shields Guideline Miscalculations in Supervised-Release Revocations – A Commentary on United States v. Lawrence Braswell, Jr. (11th Cir. 2025)

Concurrent-Sentence Doctrine Shields Guideline Miscalculations in Supervised-Release Revocations – A Commentary on United States v. Lawrence Braswell, Jr. (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Concurrent-Sentence Doctrine Shields Guideline Miscalculations in Supervised-Release Revocations – A Commentary on United States v. Lawrence Braswell, Jr. (11th Cir. 2025) Introduction In United...
United States v. Batista: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Evidentiary Threshold and Fact-Finding Duty for §3C1.1 Obstruction Enhancements

United States v. Batista: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Evidentiary Threshold and Fact-Finding Duty for §3C1.1 Obstruction Enhancements

Date: Aug 13, 2025
United States v. Batista: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Evidentiary Threshold and Fact-Finding Duty for §3C1.1 Obstruction Enhancements 1. Introduction In United States v. Roberto Batista Jean Francois...
“Mini-Cabins Are Houses” – Sixth Circuit Extends Curtilage Protection and Denies Qualified Immunity in Mockeridge v. Harvey

“Mini-Cabins Are Houses” – Sixth Circuit Extends Curtilage Protection and Denies Qualified Immunity in Mockeridge v. Harvey

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Mini-Cabins Are Houses” – Sixth Circuit Extends Curtilage Protection and Denies Qualified Immunity in Mockeridge v. Harvey Introduction In Michael & Susan Mockeridge v. Harry Harvey, the United...
Sixth Circuit Affirms Fourth-Amendment Protection for Mini-Cabins:
            Warrantless Code-Enforcement Inspections of Curtilage Held Unconstitutional

Sixth Circuit Affirms Fourth-Amendment Protection for Mini-Cabins: Warrantless Code-Enforcement Inspections of Curtilage Held Unconstitutional

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Sixth Circuit Affirms Fourth-Amendment Protection for Mini-Cabins: Warrantless Code-Enforcement Inspections of Curtilage Held Unconstitutional Introduction In Michael & Susan Mockeridge v. Harry...
The Zai Doctrine: Post-Bar-Date Claims Against NCUA Liquidators Bypass Administrative Exhaustion

The Zai Doctrine: Post-Bar-Date Claims Against NCUA Liquidators Bypass Administrative Exhaustion

Date: Aug 13, 2025
The Zai Doctrine: Post-Bar-Date Claims Against NCUA Liquidators Bypass Administrative Exhaustion Introduction In Tina Zai v. National Credit Union Administration Board, the United States Court of...
United States v. Owens – Post-Esteras Limits on § 3553(a)(2)(A) in Supervised-Release Revocations and the Boundaries of Plain-Error Review

United States v. Owens – Post-Esteras Limits on § 3553(a)(2)(A) in Supervised-Release Revocations and the Boundaries of Plain-Error Review

Date: Aug 13, 2025
United States v. Owens – Post-Esteras Limits on § 3553(a)(2)(A) in Supervised-Release Revocations and the Boundaries of Plain-Error Review Introduction United States v. Retsyn Deshawn Owens, No....
“Presumed Jury Prejudice ≠ Presumed Ineffective Assistance” – A Commentary on Michael & Stewart Parnell v. United States (11th Cir. 2025)

“Presumed Jury Prejudice ≠ Presumed Ineffective Assistance” – A Commentary on Michael & Stewart Parnell v. United States (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Presumed Jury Prejudice ≠ Presumed Ineffective Assistance” – Commentary on Parnell v. United States, 79 F.4th ____ (11th Cir. 2025) Introduction The consolidated appeal of Stewart Parnell and...
“The Parnell Doctrine” – Why a Skilling Presumption of Jury Prejudice Does NOT Dispense with Strickland’s Performance Prong

“The Parnell Doctrine” – Why a Skilling Presumption of Jury Prejudice Does NOT Dispense with Strickland’s Performance Prong

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“The Parnell Doctrine” – Why a Skilling Presumption of Jury Prejudice Does NOT Dispense with Strickland’s Performance Prong 1. Introduction Stewart and Michael Parnell, former executives of Peanut...
Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms that Bankruptcy Rule 4007(c) Cannot Be Equitably Tolled: Actual Notice Alone Triggers the Creditor’s Duty to Act

Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms that Bankruptcy Rule 4007(c) Cannot Be Equitably Tolled: Actual Notice Alone Triggers the Creditor’s Duty to Act

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms that Bankruptcy Rule 4007(c) Cannot Be Equitably Tolled: Actual Notice Alone Triggers the Creditor’s Duty to Act 1. Introduction In TL90108 LLC v. Joseph Louis Ford, III,...
Clarifying Waiver of Speedy-Trial Act Rights and the Effect of COVID-19 Delays – Commentary on United States v. Francisco Louis

Clarifying Waiver of Speedy-Trial Act Rights and the Effect of COVID-19 Delays – Commentary on United States v. Francisco Louis

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Clarifying Waiver of Speedy-Trial Act Rights and the Validity of Pandemic-Related Delays – A Commentary on United States v. Francisco Louis (11th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction The Eleventh Circuit’s...
Intervening Misconduct and Temporal Distance: The Seventh Circuit Tightens Causation and Constructive-Discharge Standards in Retaliation Cases

Intervening Misconduct and Temporal Distance: The Seventh Circuit Tightens Causation and Constructive-Discharge Standards in Retaliation Cases

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Intervening Misconduct and Temporal Distance: The Seventh Circuit Tightens Causation and Constructive-Discharge Standards in Retaliation Cases Introduction In Alex Kedas v. Illinois Department of...
“No Place Like Home”: Seventh Circuit Confirms ADA Right to Paid Parental Attendant-Care When Needed to Avert Institutionalisation

“No Place Like Home”: Seventh Circuit Confirms ADA Right to Paid Parental Attendant-Care When Needed to Avert Institutionalisation

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“No Place Like Home”: Seventh Circuit Confirms ADA Right to Paid Parental Attendant-Care When Needed to Avert Institutionalisation 1. Introduction Indiana Protection and Advocacy Services Comm’n v....
Parents as Paid Attendant-Care Providers:  A New ADA Integration Mandate Precedent from Indiana Protection & Advocacy Services Comm’n v. FSSA

Parents as Paid Attendant-Care Providers: A New ADA Integration Mandate Precedent from Indiana Protection & Advocacy Services Comm’n v. FSSA

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Parents as Paid Attendant-Care Providers: Seventh Circuit Re-Affirms the ADA’s Integration Mandate in Indiana Protection & Advocacy Services Commission v. Indiana FSSA 1. Introduction The...
“Risk-of-Institutionalisation” Re-affirmed: Seventh Circuit Requires States to Pay Legally-Responsible Relatives for Attendant Care When Needed to Avoid Segregation

“Risk-of-Institutionalisation” Re-affirmed: Seventh Circuit Requires States to Pay Legally-Responsible Relatives for Attendant Care When Needed to Avoid Segregation

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Risk-of-Institutionalisation” Re-affirmed: Seventh Circuit Requires States to Pay Legally-Responsible Relatives for Attendant Care When Needed to Avoid Segregation 1. Introduction Indiana Protection...

        Passive Dissent and the “Pattern-or-Practice” Threshold:
        Seventh Circuit Tightens Asylum Standards in Rivas-Jarquin v. Bondi

Passive Dissent and the “Pattern-or-Practice” Threshold: Seventh Circuit Tightens Asylum Standards in Rivas-Jarquin v. Bondi

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Passive Dissent and the “Pattern-or-Practice” Threshold: Seventh Circuit Tightens Asylum Standards in Rivas-Jarquin v. Bondi 1. Introduction In Leonis Amanda Rivas-Jarquin & C.A.C-R. v. Pamela J....
Fine-Tuning Pike: The First Circuit Refines Dormant Commerce Clause Analysis for Local Cruise-Ship Disembarkation Caps

Fine-Tuning Pike: The First Circuit Refines Dormant Commerce Clause Analysis for Local Cruise-Ship Disembarkation Caps

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Fine-Tuning Pike: The First Circuit Refines Dormant Commerce Clause Analysis for Local Cruise-Ship Disembarkation Caps 1. Introduction Ass’n to Preserve and Protect Local Livelihoods v. Town of Bar...
“When a Town Draws the Line at the Pier” – The First Circuit’s Refashioning of Pike Balancing and the “Continuous-Flow” Doctrine in Ass’n to Preserve and Protect Local Livelihoods v. Sidman (2025)

“When a Town Draws the Line at the Pier” – The First Circuit’s Refashioning of Pike Balancing and the “Continuous-Flow” Doctrine in Ass’n to Preserve and Protect Local Livelihoods v. Sidman (2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“When a Town Draws the Line at the Pier” – The First Circuit’s Refashioning of Pike Balancing and the “Continuous-Flow” Doctrine in Ass’n to Preserve and Protect Local Livelihoods v. Sidman (1st Cir....
Pike Balancing Re-Energised: The First Circuit’s Refocus on Fact-Finding in Dormant Commerce Clause Cases – A Commentary on Penobscot Bay & River Pilots Ass’n v. Town of Bar Harbor

Pike Balancing Re-Energised: The First Circuit’s Refocus on Fact-Finding in Dormant Commerce Clause Cases – A Commentary on Penobscot Bay & River Pilots Ass’n v. Town of Bar Harbor

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Pike Balancing Re-Energised: The First Circuit’s Refocus on Fact-Finding in Dormant Commerce Clause Cases Commentary on Penobscot Bay & River Pilots Ass’n. v. Town of Bar Harbor, Nos. 24-1317 etc....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert