Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

comprehensive-interpretation-of-& Case Commentaries

Tenth Circuit Clarifies “Mixed-Accuracy” Informant Reliability for Probable Cause – Commentary on United States v. Harris (2025)

Tenth Circuit Clarifies “Mixed-Accuracy” Informant Reliability for Probable Cause – Commentary on United States v. Harris (2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Tenth Circuit Clarifies “Mixed-Accuracy” Informant Reliability for Probable Cause Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Harris, No. 24-8050 (10th Cir. July 2, 2025) Introduction United States...
From Moderate Limits to Logical Bridges: Moy v. Bisignano Clarifies the RFC Standard for Concentration, Persistence, and Pace

From Moderate Limits to Logical Bridges: Moy v. Bisignano Clarifies the RFC Standard for Concentration, Persistence, and Pace

Date: Jul 3, 2025
From Moderate Limits to Logical Bridges: Moy v. Bisignano Clarifies the RFC Standard for Concentration, Persistence, and Pace 1. Introduction The Seventh Circuit’s decision in Ferida Moy v. Frank...
“Braking the Cat’s Paw” – Seventh Circuit Narrows Retaliatory Causation in Johnson v. Accenture LLP

“Braking the Cat’s Paw” – Seventh Circuit Narrows Retaliatory Causation in Johnson v. Accenture LLP

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“Braking the Cat’s Paw” – Seventh Circuit Narrows Retaliatory Causation in Johnson v. Accenture LLP 1. Introduction In an opinion rendered on 2 July 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh...
Seventh Circuit Clarifies “Representative-Sample” Rule for Ex-Ante Attorney-Fee Calculations

Seventh Circuit Clarifies “Representative-Sample” Rule for Ex-Ante Attorney-Fee Calculations

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Seventh Circuit Clarifies “Representative-Sample” Rule for Ex-Ante Attorney-Fee Calculations Introduction The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has issued its second opinion in the sprawling...
The “Role-Specific Incompatibility” Doctrine: Seventh Circuit Narrows First-Amendment Protection for Public-Employee Speech in Darlingh v. Maddaleni

The “Role-Specific Incompatibility” Doctrine: Seventh Circuit Narrows First-Amendment Protection for Public-Employee Speech in Darlingh v. Maddaleni

Date: Jul 3, 2025
The “Role-Specific Incompatibility” Doctrine: Seventh Circuit Narrows First-Amendment Protection for Public-Employee Speech in Marissa Darlingh v. Adria Maddaleni Introduction On 2 July 2025, the...
Extending the “Ready-Willing-Able” Doctrine to Commercial Sales Commissions: Commentary on Moncada Alaniz v. Bay Promo, LLC (1st Cir. 2025)

Extending the “Ready-Willing-Able” Doctrine to Commercial Sales Commissions: Commentary on Moncada Alaniz v. Bay Promo, LLC (1st Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Extending the “Ready-Willing-Able” Doctrine to Commercial Sales Commissions A Comprehensive Commentary on Moncada Alaniz v. Bay Promo, LLC, 1st Cir. 2025 1. Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic...
Commission Entitlement Survives Buyer Non-Payment When Seller’s Own Breach Scuttles the Deal: First Circuit Extends Florida’s “Ready, Willing, and Able” Doctrine Beyond Real-Estate Brokerage

Commission Entitlement Survives Buyer Non-Payment When Seller’s Own Breach Scuttles the Deal: First Circuit Extends Florida’s “Ready, Willing, and Able” Doctrine Beyond Real-Estate Brokerage

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Commission Entitlement Survives Buyer Non-Payment When Seller’s Own Breach Scuttles the Deal: First Circuit Extends Florida’s “Ready, Willing, and Able” Doctrine Beyond Real-Estate Brokerage...
“No Bootstrap through Mathis” – The First Circuit Narrows Johnson II Relief in United States v. Capozzi

“No Bootstrap through Mathis” – The First Circuit Narrows Johnson II Relief in United States v. Capozzi

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“No Bootstrap through Mathis” – The First Circuit Narrows Johnson II Relief in United States v. Capozzi 1. Introduction United States v. Capozzi, No. 22-1243 (1st Cir. July 2, 2025) clarifies the...
“No Substance, No Violation” – The First Circuit Confirms that Replacing Pseudonyms with Actual Victim Names Is a Permissible Formal Amendment (United States v. De Souza Prado, 1st Cir. 2025)

“No Substance, No Violation” – The First Circuit Confirms that Replacing Pseudonyms with Actual Victim Names Is a Permissible Formal Amendment (United States v. De Souza Prado, 1st Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“No Substance, No Violation” – The First Circuit Confirms that Replacing Pseudonyms with Actual Victim Names Is a Permissible Formal Amendment Commentary on United States v. De Souza Prado, 93 F.4th...
“Co-Conspirator Liability and Cooperative-Witness Authentication” — A Comment on United States v. Reyes-Rosario (1st Cir. 2025)

“Co-Conspirator Liability and Cooperative-Witness Authentication” — A Comment on United States v. Reyes-Rosario (1st Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“Co-Conspirator Liability and Cooperative-Witness Authentication” Commentary on United States v. Reyes-Rosario, 79 F.4th ___ (1st Cir. 2025) I. Introduction United States v. Reyes-Rosario is a...
Hackman v. InductEV: The Third Circuit Reinforces Evidentiary Specificity and Record-Citation Duties in Pro Se Employment Discrimination Appeals

Hackman v. InductEV: The Third Circuit Reinforces Evidentiary Specificity and Record-Citation Duties in Pro Se Employment Discrimination Appeals

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Hackman v. InductEV: The Third Circuit Reinforces Evidentiary Specificity and Record-Citation Duties in Pro Se Employment Discrimination Appeals 1. Introduction Assata Acey Hackman, a former...

        “Deceit by Definition” – Third Circuit Holds that a Conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 287 Is
        Categorically an Aggravated Felony Involving Deceit and Bars a Retroactive INA § 212(h) Waiver

“Deceit by Definition” – Third Circuit Holds that a Conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 287 Is Categorically an Aggravated Felony Involving Deceit and Bars a Retroactive INA § 212(h) Waiver

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“Deceit by Definition” – Third Circuit Holds that a Conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 287 Is Categorically an Aggravated Felony Involving Deceit and Bars a Retroactive INA § 212(h) Waiver 1. Introduction...
No-Virtual-Prohibition Test – Fifth Circuit Re-defines the Threshold for Pre-emption Challenges to Home-Rule Ordinances

No-Virtual-Prohibition Test – Fifth Circuit Re-defines the Threshold for Pre-emption Challenges to Home-Rule Ordinances

Date: Jul 3, 2025
No-Virtual-Prohibition Test: TitleMax of Texas v. City of Dallas Clarifies Pre-emption and Due-Course Limits on Challenges to Municipal Lending Ordinances Introduction TitleMax of Texas v. City of...
“Exclusive-Causation” under the Vaccine Act: A Commentary on Amanda Watts v. Maryland CVS Pharmacy, LLC

“Exclusive-Causation” under the Vaccine Act: A Commentary on Amanda Watts v. Maryland CVS Pharmacy, LLC

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“Exclusive-Causation” under the Vaccine Act: A Commentary on Amanda Watts v. Maryland CVS Pharmacy, LLC 1. Introduction In Amanda Watts v. Maryland CVS Pharmacy, LLC, the United States Court of...
Fourth Circuit Affirms “Good-Faith Belief” Shield Against § 523(a)(4) Embezzlement Nondischargeability

Fourth Circuit Affirms “Good-Faith Belief” Shield Against § 523(a)(4) Embezzlement Nondischargeability

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Fourth Circuit Affirms “Good-Faith Belief” Shield Against § 523(a)(4) Embezzlement Nondischargeability Introduction In Deborah Parker v. Dan Martin, No. 23-2084 (4th Cir. 2025), the United States...
Brown v. Stapleton: Due-Process Protection for Prison Trust-Account Funds and the Limits of Sandin

Brown v. Stapleton: Due-Process Protection for Prison Trust-Account Funds and the Limits of Sandin

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Brown v. Stapleton: Due-Process Protection for Prison Trust-Account Funds and the Limits of Sandin 1. Introduction In Demmerick Eric Brown v. Karen Stapleton, the United States Court of Appeals for...
Younger-Based Dismissals Are NOT § 1915(g) “Strikes” & Strikes Are Counted Only as of the Filing Date: Burrell v. Shirley (4th Cir. 2025)

Younger-Based Dismissals Are NOT § 1915(g) “Strikes” & Strikes Are Counted Only as of the Filing Date: Burrell v. Shirley (4th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Younger-Based Dismissals Are NOT § 1915(g) “Strikes” & Strikes Are Counted Only as of the Filing Date: Burrell v. Shirley, 4th Cir. 2025 1. Introduction In Burrell v. Shirley, No. 23-6791 (4th Cir....
“But-For” Means “One Of,” Not “The Only”: The Fourth Circuit’s Clarification of Causation in Title VII Retaliation – Commentary on LaShaun Curry v. South Carolina State Election Commission (4th Cir. 2025)

“But-For” Means “One Of,” Not “The Only”: The Fourth Circuit’s Clarification of Causation in Title VII Retaliation – Commentary on LaShaun Curry v. South Carolina State Election Commission (4th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“But-For” Means “One Of,” Not “The Only”: The Fourth Circuit’s Clarification of Causation in Title VII Retaliation Commentary on LaShaun Curry v. South Carolina State Election Commission (4th Cir....
When the LLC Speaks: Fourth Circuit Holds That a Single-Member LLC—Not Its Owner—Is the Contracting Party for Arbitration Purposes

When the LLC Speaks: Fourth Circuit Holds That a Single-Member LLC—Not Its Owner—Is the Contracting Party for Arbitration Purposes

Date: Jul 3, 2025
When the LLC Speaks: Fourth Circuit Holds That a Single-Member LLC—Not Its Owner—Is the Contracting Party for Arbitration Purposes Introduction In Randy Luna v. Tug Hill Operating, LLC, No. 24-1281...
“When a Written Judgment Conflicts with the Oral Pronouncement: Clarifying District Courts’ Duties in § 2255 Sentence Corrections – A Commentary on United States v. Barrow (2d Cir. 2025)”

“When a Written Judgment Conflicts with the Oral Pronouncement: Clarifying District Courts’ Duties in § 2255 Sentence Corrections – A Commentary on United States v. Barrow (2d Cir. 2025)”

Date: Jul 3, 2025
When a Written Judgment Conflicts with the Oral Pronouncement: Clarifying District Courts’ Duties in § 2255 Sentence Corrections – A Commentary on United States v. Barrow (2d Cir. 2025) 1....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert