Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

comprehensive-interpretation-of-& Case Commentaries

“Court-Created Disclosure Exception” — Brooks v. City of Southside and the Duty to Re-Evaluate Anonymity When the Court Itself Releases Sensitive Information

“Court-Created Disclosure Exception” — Brooks v. City of Southside and the Duty to Re-Evaluate Anonymity When the Court Itself Releases Sensitive Information

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“Court-Created Disclosure Exception” — Brooks v. City of Southside and the Duty to Re-Evaluate Anonymity When the Court Itself Releases Sensitive Information 1. Introduction The Eleventh Circuit’s...
“Future–Risk” Is Not “Present Disability”: The Eleventh Circuit’s Clarification on Unvaccinated Status, Religious Accommodation, and Retaliation in Pajer v. Disney

“Future–Risk” Is Not “Present Disability”: The Eleventh Circuit’s Clarification on Unvaccinated Status, Religious Accommodation, and Retaliation in Pajer v. Disney

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“Future–Risk” Is Not “Present Disability”: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies the Limits of ADA “Regarded-As” Claims and Religious Discrimination Theories in Pajer v. Disney 1. Introduction In Adam Pajer v....
Reaffirming Officers’ Limited Investigative Duty: Barnett v. Elsmore and the Threshold for “Arguable Probable Cause” in Malicious-Prosecution Claims

Reaffirming Officers’ Limited Investigative Duty: Barnett v. Elsmore and the Threshold for “Arguable Probable Cause” in Malicious-Prosecution Claims

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Reaffirming Officers’ Limited Investigative Duty: Barnett v. Elsmore and the Threshold for “Arguable Probable Cause” in Malicious-Prosecution Claims Introduction In Harry Barnett v. Justin Elsmore,...
“Particularity Means Particularity” – The Eleventh Circuit Narrows the Circumstances for Relaxing Rule 9(b) in False Claims Act Pleadings

“Particularity Means Particularity” – The Eleventh Circuit Narrows the Circumstances for Relaxing Rule 9(b) in False Claims Act Pleadings

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“Particularity Means Particularity” – The Eleventh Circuit Narrows the Circumstances for Relaxing Rule 9(b) in False Claims Act Pleadings Introduction In Monica McKoy v. Atlanta Primary Care...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Unvaccinated Status Is Not a “Perceived Disability” and Neutral COVID-19 Safety Protocols Do Not Constitute Religious Discrimination

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Unvaccinated Status Is Not a “Perceived Disability” and Neutral COVID-19 Safety Protocols Do Not Constitute Religious Discrimination

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Unvaccinated Status Is Not a “Perceived Disability” and Neutral COVID-19 Safety Protocols Do Not Constitute Religious Discrimination Introduction In Seth Schmidt v....
Pajer-Cribb-Gibbons-Schmidt v. Disney (11th Cir. 2025): 
           Unvaccinated Status Is Not a “Regarded-As” Disability and Neutral COVID-19 Safety Protocols Do Not Trigger a Religious-Accommodation Duty

Pajer-Cribb-Gibbons-Schmidt v. Disney (11th Cir. 2025): Unvaccinated Status Is Not a “Regarded-As” Disability and Neutral COVID-19 Safety Protocols Do Not Trigger a Religious-Accommodation Duty

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Unvaccinated Status Is Not a “Regarded-As” Disability and Neutral COVID-19 Safety Protocols Do Not Trigger a Religious-Accommodation Duty Commentary on Pajer, Cribb, Gibbons & Schmidt v. Disney...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Unvaccinated Status Is Not a “Regarded-As” Disability and that Post-Mandate COVID-19 Protocols Do Not Trigger Religious-Accommodation Duties

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Unvaccinated Status Is Not a “Regarded-As” Disability and that Post-Mandate COVID-19 Protocols Do Not Trigger Religious-Accommodation Duties

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Unvaccinated Status Is Not a “Regarded-As” Disability and that Post-Mandate COVID-19 Protocols Do Not Trigger Religious-Accommodation Duties Introduction In Steven...
“Overwhelming Evidence” and the Harmless-Error Shield:  An Analysis of United States v. Belas Rosier (11th Cir. 2025)

“Overwhelming Evidence” and the Harmless-Error Shield: An Analysis of United States v. Belas Rosier (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“Overwhelming Evidence” and the Harmless-Error Shield: United States v. Belas Rosier, No. 23-14234 (11th Cir. July 2, 2025) Introduction United States v. Belas Rosier is an unpublished Eleventh...
“Strict Limits on Post-Sentencing Modification of Mandatory Restitution” – A Commentary on United States v. Donald Mathias (11th Cir. 2025)

“Strict Limits on Post-Sentencing Modification of Mandatory Restitution” – A Commentary on United States v. Donald Mathias (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Strict Limits on Post-Sentencing Modification of Mandatory Restitution: A Detailed Commentary on United States v. Donald Mathias, 23-14211 (11th Cir. July 2, 2025) 1. Introduction United States v....
Harmless-Error Review for “Different Occasions” Findings after Erlinger – A Commentary on United States v. Jameel Williams (11th Cir. 2025)

Harmless-Error Review for “Different Occasions” Findings after Erlinger – A Commentary on United States v. Jameel Williams (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Harmless-Error Review for “Different Occasions” Findings after Erlinger A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Jameel Williams (11th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction In United States v. Jameel...

        Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms § 922(g)(1) after Bruen/Rahimi and Clarifies
        “In-Connection-With” Enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B)

Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms § 922(g)(1) after Bruen/Rahimi and Clarifies “In-Connection-With” Enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms § 922(g)(1) after Bruen/Rahimi and Clarifies “In-Connection-With” Enhancement under § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) – Commentary on United States v. Thomas Youngblood, No. 24-10053 (11th...
“Beyond Call Volume” – Sixth Circuit Re-affirms Twombly/Iqbal Pleading Threshold for TCPA Autodialer & Prerecorded-Voice Claims

“Beyond Call Volume” – Sixth Circuit Re-affirms Twombly/Iqbal Pleading Threshold for TCPA Autodialer & Prerecorded-Voice Claims

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“Beyond Call Volume” – Sixth Circuit Re-affirms Twombly/Iqbal Pleading Threshold for TCPA Autodialer & Prerecorded-Voice Claims Introduction Antonio Lynn Fluker, Jr. v. Ally Financial, Inc., No....
Smith v. Davis: Strengthening Federal Oversight of Conditional Habeas Writs and the Presumption of Release Pending Appeal

Smith v. Davis: Strengthening Federal Oversight of Conditional Habeas Writs and the Presumption of Release Pending Appeal

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Smith v. Davis: Strengthening Federal Oversight of Conditional Habeas Writs and the Presumption of Release Pending Appeal Introduction David M. Smith was twice convicted in Ohio state court for the...
Savel v. MetroHealth: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Post-Groff “Undue Hardship” and Rejects an Implied Interactive-Process Duty under Title VII

Savel v. MetroHealth: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Post-Groff “Undue Hardship” and Rejects an Implied Interactive-Process Duty under Title VII

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Savel v. MetroHealth: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Post-Groff “Undue Hardship” and Rejects an Implied Interactive-Process Duty under Title VII Introduction In Frank Savel v. The MetroHealth System, No....
Sixth Circuit Re-Affirms Broad Discretion for Upward Variances When the Defendant Commits New Crimes While Incarcerated & After Escape – Commentary on United States v. Alex Robinson (2025)

Sixth Circuit Re-Affirms Broad Discretion for Upward Variances When the Defendant Commits New Crimes While Incarcerated & After Escape – Commentary on United States v. Alex Robinson (2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Sixth Circuit Re-Affirms Broad Discretion for Upward Variances When the Defendant Commits New Crimes While Incarcerated & After Escape – Commentary on United States v. Alex Robinson (2025)...
Strategic Delay Is Not “Good-Cause” – The Sixth Circuit in United States v. Downey Clarifies Standards for Untimely Suppression Motions and Confirms Broad Application of Constructive Possession & Sentencing Enhancements

Strategic Delay Is Not “Good-Cause” – The Sixth Circuit in United States v. Downey Clarifies Standards for Untimely Suppression Motions and Confirms Broad Application of Constructive Possession & Sentencing Enhancements

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Strategic Delay Is Not “Good-Cause” – The Sixth Circuit in United States v. Chase Russell Downey Clarifies Standards for Untimely Suppression Motions and Confirms Broad Application of Constructive...
United States v. Deangelus Thomas – Sixth Circuit Confirms that Erlinger Errors Are Subject to Harmless-Error Review and May Be Resolved with Shepard Documents

United States v. Deangelus Thomas – Sixth Circuit Confirms that Erlinger Errors Are Subject to Harmless-Error Review and May Be Resolved with Shepard Documents

Date: Jul 3, 2025
United States v. Deangelus Thomas – Sixth Circuit Confirms that Erlinger Errors Are Subject to Harmless-Error Review and May Be Resolved with Shepard Documents 1. Introduction United States v....
“Jury, Not Judge” – The Sixth Circuit’s First Full Application of Erlinger to the ACCA “Different-Occasions” Question

“Jury, Not Judge” – The Sixth Circuit’s First Full Application of Erlinger to the ACCA “Different-Occasions” Question

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“Jury, Not Judge” – The Sixth Circuit’s First Full Application of Erlinger to the ACCA “Different-Occasions” Question Introduction The Sixth Circuit’s decision in United States v. Timothy John Lewis,...
United States v. Horsley: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Explanation Requirements and Appellate Review Standards for § 3582(c)(2) Sentence Reductions Post-Amendment 821

United States v. Horsley: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Explanation Requirements and Appellate Review Standards for § 3582(c)(2) Sentence Reductions Post-Amendment 821

Date: Jul 3, 2025
United States v. Horsley: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Explanation Requirements and Appellate Review Standards for § 3582(c)(2) Sentence Reductions Post-Amendment 821 1. Introduction United States v....
Tenth Circuit Reinforces Timeliness and Non-Jurisdictional Treatment of Defective NTAs – Comment on Lopez-Vega v. Garland

Tenth Circuit Reinforces Timeliness and Non-Jurisdictional Treatment of Defective NTAs – Comment on Lopez-Vega v. Garland

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Tenth Circuit Reinforces Timeliness and Non-Jurisdictional Treatment of Defective NTAs Commentary on Lopez-Vega v. Garland, No. 24-9537 (10th Cir. July 2 2025) Introduction Lopez-Vega v. Garland is...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert