Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Ohio Case Commentaries

Strict, Time-of-Filing Compliance with R.C. 2969.25(A): No Post-Filing Cure via Updated Affidavits or Civ.R. 15 in State ex rel. Harris v. Schwendeman

Strict, Time-of-Filing Compliance with R.C. 2969.25(A): No Post-Filing Cure via Updated Affidavits or Civ.R. 15 in State ex rel. Harris v. Schwendeman

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Strict, Time-of-Filing Compliance with R.C. 2969.25(A): No Post-Filing Cure via Updated Affidavits or Civ.R. 15 Introduction In State ex rel. Harris v. Schwendeman, Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-4769,...
Explicit Pleading Required: Generic "Failure to State a Claim" Does Not Preserve R.C. 2744 Political-Subdivision Immunity; Late Amendments May Be Denied for Unjustified, Prejudicial Delay

Explicit Pleading Required: Generic "Failure to State a Claim" Does Not Preserve R.C. 2744 Political-Subdivision Immunity; Late Amendments May Be Denied for Unjustified, Prejudicial Delay

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Explicit Pleading Required: Generic "Failure to State a Claim" Does Not Preserve R.C. 2744 Political-Subdivision Immunity; Late Amendments May Be Denied for Unjustified, Prejudicial Delay...
Finality Is Factual, Not Legal: Ohio Supreme Court Ends Deference to Industrial Commission’s Legal Interpretations of VSSR Rules and Clarifies “Other Heavy Objects” Under Adm.Code 4123:1-3-13(E)(7)

Finality Is Factual, Not Legal: Ohio Supreme Court Ends Deference to Industrial Commission’s Legal Interpretations of VSSR Rules and Clarifies “Other Heavy Objects” Under Adm.Code 4123:1-3-13(E)(7)

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Finality Is Factual, Not Legal: Ohio Supreme Court Ends Deference to Industrial Commission’s Legal Interpretations of VSSR Rules and Clarifies “Other Heavy Objects” Under Adm.Code 4123:1-3-13(E)(7)...
Ohio Supreme Court Caps Clerk Technology Fee at $1 Total Per Service for “Complete Record” Charges, Not Per Page

Ohio Supreme Court Caps Clerk Technology Fee at $1 Total Per Service for “Complete Record” Charges, Not Per Page

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Ohio Supreme Court Caps Clerk Technology Fee at $1 Total Per Service for “Complete Record” Charges, Not Per Page Case: State ex rel. Gault v. Medina County Court of Common Pleas Clerk, Slip Opinion...
Timeliness Is for the Arbitrator: Ohio Supreme Court Bars Employer Self‑Help on Arbitration Deadlines and Requires SERB to Explain ULP Dismissals

Timeliness Is for the Arbitrator: Ohio Supreme Court Bars Employer Self‑Help on Arbitration Deadlines and Requires SERB to Explain ULP Dismissals

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Timeliness Is for the Arbitrator: Ohio Supreme Court Bars Employer Self‑Help on Arbitration Deadlines and Requires SERB to Explain ULP Dismissals Introduction In State ex rel. Staple v. State...
No duty to convert or supply proprietary software for cellphone extractions under Ohio’s Public Records Act: State ex rel. Castellon v. Maloney

No duty to convert or supply proprietary software for cellphone extractions under Ohio’s Public Records Act: State ex rel. Castellon v. Maloney

Date: Oct 16, 2025
No duty to convert or supply proprietary software for cellphone extractions under Ohio’s Public Records Act Commentary on State ex rel. Castellon v. Maloney, Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-4687 (Supreme...
Snodgrass v. Trumbull Corr. Inst.: Conclusory Affidavits Cannot Sustain Law‑Enforcement or Security Exemptions—Prison Device and Disciplinary Records Are Disclosable Absent Specific Proof

Snodgrass v. Trumbull Corr. Inst.: Conclusory Affidavits Cannot Sustain Law‑Enforcement or Security Exemptions—Prison Device and Disciplinary Records Are Disclosable Absent Specific Proof

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Snodgrass v. Trumbull Corr. Inst.: Conclusory Affidavits Cannot Sustain Law‑Enforcement or Security Exemptions—Prison Device and Disciplinary Records Are Disclosable Absent Specific Proof...
Visiting-Judge Assignment Irregularities Render Judgments Voidable, Not Void: Ohio Supreme Court Reaffirms Limits of Habeas in Lowe v. Smith

Visiting-Judge Assignment Irregularities Render Judgments Voidable, Not Void: Ohio Supreme Court Reaffirms Limits of Habeas in Lowe v. Smith

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Visiting-Judge Assignment Irregularities Render Judgments Voidable, Not Void: Ohio Supreme Court Reaffirms Limits of Habeas in Lowe v. Smith Case: Lowe v. Smith, Warden, Slip Opinion No....
Commutation Is Not a New Judgment: Ohio Supreme Court Confirms Governor’s Power to Substitute LWOP for Death Without Ex Post Facto Implications

Commutation Is Not a New Judgment: Ohio Supreme Court Confirms Governor’s Power to Substitute LWOP for Death Without Ex Post Facto Implications

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Commutation Is Not a New Judgment: Ohio Supreme Court Confirms Governor’s Power to Substitute LWOP for Death Without Ex Post Facto Implications Case: State ex rel. Hawkins v. Frederick, Slip Opinion...
Pleading Matters in Election Mandamus: Generic “Any Other Relief” Is Insufficient to Compel an R.C. 3503.24(B) Hearing or Alternative Remedies

Pleading Matters in Election Mandamus: Generic “Any Other Relief” Is Insufficient to Compel an R.C. 3503.24(B) Hearing or Alternative Remedies

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Pleading Matters in Election Mandamus: Generic “Any Other Relief” Is Insufficient to Compel an R.C. 3503.24(B) Hearing or Alternative Remedies Introduction In State ex rel. Hicks v. Adams County...
No Prohibition for Procedural Missteps Under R.C. 2981.03: Subject-Matter Jurisdiction vs. Exercise of Jurisdiction in Post-Sentence Property-Return Orders

No Prohibition for Procedural Missteps Under R.C. 2981.03: Subject-Matter Jurisdiction vs. Exercise of Jurisdiction in Post-Sentence Property-Return Orders

Date: Oct 9, 2025
No Prohibition for Procedural Missteps Under R.C. 2981.03: Subject-Matter Jurisdiction vs. Exercise of Jurisdiction in Post-Sentence Property-Return Orders Introduction This commentary analyzes the...
No Pro Se Representation of Others and Heightened Gatekeeping of Extraordinary Writs: Commentary on the Supreme Court of Ohio’s October 1, 2025 Case Announcements

No Pro Se Representation of Others and Heightened Gatekeeping of Extraordinary Writs: Commentary on the Supreme Court of Ohio’s October 1, 2025 Case Announcements

Date: Oct 2, 2025
No Pro Se Representation of Others and Heightened Gatekeeping of Extraordinary Writs: Commentary on the Supreme Court of Ohio’s October 1, 2025 Case Announcements Introduction On October 1, 2025, the...
Ohio Supreme Court Clarifies: A Pending Adoption Petition Does Not Divest Juvenile Courts of Their Continuing Jurisdiction under R.C. 2151.353 and 2151.417

Ohio Supreme Court Clarifies: A Pending Adoption Petition Does Not Divest Juvenile Courts of Their Continuing Jurisdiction under R.C. 2151.353 and 2151.417

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Ohio Supreme Court Clarifies: A Pending Adoption Petition Does Not Divest Juvenile Courts of Their Continuing Jurisdiction under R.C. 2151.353 and 2151.417 Introduction In State ex rel. T.B. v....
No Mandamus to Force Prosecution of Private‑Citizen Affidavits under R.C. 2935.09/.10: Commentary on State ex rel. Rankin v. State, 2025-Ohio-4483

No Mandamus to Force Prosecution of Private‑Citizen Affidavits under R.C. 2935.09/.10: Commentary on State ex rel. Rankin v. State, 2025-Ohio-4483

Date: Oct 2, 2025
No Mandamus to Force Prosecution of Private‑Citizen Affidavits under R.C. 2935.09/.10 In-depth Commentary on State ex rel. Rankin v. State, 2025-Ohio-4483 (Supreme Court of Ohio) Introduction This...
Agencies Need Not Run New Database Queries: Ohio Supreme Court Clarifies “Creation of a New Record” Under the Public Records Act

Agencies Need Not Run New Database Queries: Ohio Supreme Court Clarifies “Creation of a New Record” Under the Public Records Act

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Agencies Need Not Run New Database Queries: Ohio Supreme Court Clarifies “Creation of a New Record” Under the Public Records Act Introduction In State ex rel. Huwig v. Department of Health,...
Posthumous Vacatur of 2005 Registration Suspensions: Ohio Supreme Court Clarifies that Attorney Registration Sanctions Do Not Survive a Lawyer’s Death

Posthumous Vacatur of 2005 Registration Suspensions: Ohio Supreme Court Clarifies that Attorney Registration Sanctions Do Not Survive a Lawyer’s Death

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Posthumous Vacatur of 2005 Registration Suspensions: Ohio Supreme Court Clarifies that Attorney Registration Sanctions Do Not Survive a Lawyer’s Death Introduction In an Administrative Actions entry...
Continuing Jurisdiction to Correct Jail‑Time Credit During Appeal: The Ohio Supreme Court’s Clarification in Krouskoupf v. Anderson

Continuing Jurisdiction to Correct Jail‑Time Credit During Appeal: The Ohio Supreme Court’s Clarification in Krouskoupf v. Anderson

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Continuing Jurisdiction to Correct Jail‑Time Credit During Appeal: The Ohio Supreme Court’s Clarification in Krouskoupf v. Anderson Introduction In Krouskoupf v. Anderson, Slip Opinion No....
County Auditors Have No Discretion to Withhold Listing of Voter‑Approved Bond Levies While Bonds Remain Outstanding (State ex rel. Springfield City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Hamilton, 2025-Ohio-4427)

County Auditors Have No Discretion to Withhold Listing of Voter‑Approved Bond Levies While Bonds Remain Outstanding (State ex rel. Springfield City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Hamilton, 2025-Ohio-4427)

Date: Sep 27, 2025
County Auditors Have No Discretion to Withhold Listing of Voter‑Approved Bond Levies While Bonds Remain Outstanding Case: State ex rel. Springfield City School District Board of Education v....
Mandamus Is Not a Shortcut Around Nonfinal Custody Orders: State ex rel. Conomy v. Fuller (2025-Ohio-4411)

Mandamus Is Not a Shortcut Around Nonfinal Custody Orders: State ex rel. Conomy v. Fuller (2025-Ohio-4411)

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Mandamus Is Not a Shortcut Around Nonfinal Custody Orders: State ex rel. Conomy v. Fuller Introduction In State ex rel. Conomy v. Fuller, 2025-Ohio-4411, the Supreme Court of Ohio reaffirmed core...
In Reopened Appeals, Appellants Must Brief Deficiency and Prejudice: No Presumption of Ineffective Assistance Under App.R. 26(B)

In Reopened Appeals, Appellants Must Brief Deficiency and Prejudice: No Presumption of Ineffective Assistance Under App.R. 26(B)

Date: Sep 26, 2025
In Reopened Appeals, Appellants Must Brief Deficiency and Prejudice: No Presumption of Ineffective Assistance Under App.R. 26(B) Introduction In State v. Clark, Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-4410, the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert