Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Takings Without Borders: Ohio’s Self-Executing Takings Clause Confers Standing to Seek Mandamus for Inverse Condemnation Against a Foreign Municipality Case: State ex rel. Boggs v. Cleveland, Slip...
Shading the Truth Disqualifies: Ohio Supreme Court Denies UBE-Transfer Admission for Abandonment and Lack of Candor, but Allows Rehabilitation Window Case: In re Application of Dempsey, Slip Opinion...
State v. Musarra: Venue Insufficiency Is a Dismissal, Not an Acquittal—Prosecution May Appeal as of Right Under R.C. 2945.67(A) Introduction In State v. Musarra, 2025-Ohio-5058, the Supreme Court of...
Res Judicata Bars Prohibition Actions Against the Adult Parole Authority Based on Previously Litigated or Litigable Attacks on Nunc Pro Tunc Sentencing Entries Introduction In State ex rel. Norris v....
Bad-Faith Insurance Claims Are Presumptively Arbitrable Under Broad Policy Clauses When the Claim Cannot Be Maintained Without Reference to the Policy or Insurer–Insured Relationship Introduction In...
Maurent v. Spatny: Habeas Release Does Not Moot the State’s Appeal When Return to Custody Remains Possible Introduction In Maurent v. Spatny, 2025-Ohio-5002, the Supreme Court of Ohio clarifies a...
Jurisdiction to Resentence Persists After Federal Habeas Vacates Death Sentence; Extraordinary Writs Inapplicable to Indictment and Verdict-Form Errors Introduction In State ex rel. Allah-U-Akbar v....
Automatic Suspension and “Prior Discipline” for Attorney-Registration Noncompliance under Gov.Bar R. VI: The Supreme Court of Ohio’s 2025 Administrative Order Citation: 11/04/2025 Administrative...
Self‑Serving Affidavits Cannot Overcome One’s Own Confirmation Receipts: Clarifying Proof Standards in Ohio Public‑Records Mandamus Introduction In State ex rel. Clark v. Department of Rehabilitation...
No Late Respondent Evidence and No Deflecting Public-Records Duties: The Ohio Supreme Court’s Mandamus Blueprint in State ex rel. Howard v. Shuler Introduction In State ex rel. Howard v. Shuler,...
Official Release and Oath Administration for the July 2025 Ohio Bar Examination: Non‑Precedential Administrative Action of the Supreme Court of Ohio Introduction In 2025-Ohio-4877 (Administrative...
Parisi Left Intact for Now: Mandamus Dismissed Without Opinion While Chief Justice Kennedy Calls to Restore Public Records Act Control Over Court Records and Apply H.B. 265’s Affirmation Requirement...
Enhanced Actual Suspension for Violent Threats Absent Mental-Health Mitigation: Ohio Supreme Court Clarifies Sanctioning in Attorney Discipline Introduction In Disciplinary Counsel v. Taylor, Slip...
Clarifying “Additional Defendants” in Ohio Medical-Claim Actions: No Civ.R. 15(D) Compliance Needed and 180-Day Extension Not Limited to Newly Discovered Parties Case: Lewis v. MedCentral Health...
Strict, Contemporaneous Compliance with R.C. 2969.25(A) Is Required; Noncompliance Requires Dismissal Without Prejudice and Cannot Be Cured by Later Amendment Introduction In State ex rel. Mason v....
Rigorous Gatekeeping of Extraordinary Writs and the Court’s Use of Alternative Writs under S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.04 and 12.05: Analysis of the Supreme Court of Ohio’s October 22, 2025 Case Announcements...
Only the Office of Disciplinary Counsel May Invoke Reciprocal Discipline in Ohio; Court Flags Risks of Mandatory Reciprocity During Pending Ohio Appeals Introduction In 10/22/2025 Case Announcements...
Whole-Record Review of Juror Bias Permits Reliance on Group Voir Dire Responses Commentary on State v. Rogers, 2025-Ohio-4794 (Supreme Court of Ohio) Introduction In State v. Rogers, the Supreme...
Prospective Application of Amended S.Ct.Prac.R. 4.03(A) and Strict Limits on Habeas Relief Reaffirmed: Gordon v. Smith Introduction In Gordon v. Smith, 2025-Ohio-4768, the Supreme Court of Ohio...