Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Ohio Case Commentaries

Takings Without Borders: Ohio’s Self-Executing Takings Clause Confers Standing to Seek Mandamus for Inverse Condemnation Against a Foreign Municipality

Takings Without Borders: Ohio’s Self-Executing Takings Clause Confers Standing to Seek Mandamus for Inverse Condemnation Against a Foreign Municipality

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Takings Without Borders: Ohio’s Self-Executing Takings Clause Confers Standing to Seek Mandamus for Inverse Condemnation Against a Foreign Municipality Case: State ex rel. Boggs v. Cleveland, Slip...
Ohio Supreme Court Signals Impending Clarification of R.C. 2921.31 and Exercises Robust Supervisory Writ Authority: Commentary on 11/12/2025 Case Announcements (2025-Ohio-5079)

Ohio Supreme Court Signals Impending Clarification of R.C. 2921.31 and Exercises Robust Supervisory Writ Authority: Commentary on 11/12/2025 Case Announcements (2025-Ohio-5079)

Date: Nov 15, 2025
Ohio Supreme Court Signals Impending Clarification of R.C. 2921.31 and Exercises Robust Supervisory Writ Authority: Commentary on 11/12/2025 Case Announcements (2025-Ohio-5079) Introduction This...
Shading the Truth Disqualifies: Ohio Supreme Court Denies UBE-Transfer Admission for Abandonment and Lack of Candor, but Allows Rehabilitation Window (In re Application of Dempsey, 2025-Ohio-5059)

Shading the Truth Disqualifies: Ohio Supreme Court Denies UBE-Transfer Admission for Abandonment and Lack of Candor, but Allows Rehabilitation Window (In re Application of Dempsey, 2025-Ohio-5059)

Date: Nov 15, 2025
Shading the Truth Disqualifies: Ohio Supreme Court Denies UBE-Transfer Admission for Abandonment and Lack of Candor, but Allows Rehabilitation Window Case: In re Application of Dempsey, Slip Opinion...
State v. Musarra: Venue Insufficiency Is a Dismissal, Not an Acquittal—Prosecution May Appeal as of Right Under R.C. 2945.67(A)

State v. Musarra: Venue Insufficiency Is a Dismissal, Not an Acquittal—Prosecution May Appeal as of Right Under R.C. 2945.67(A)

Date: Nov 15, 2025
State v. Musarra: Venue Insufficiency Is a Dismissal, Not an Acquittal—Prosecution May Appeal as of Right Under R.C. 2945.67(A) Introduction In State v. Musarra, 2025-Ohio-5058, the Supreme Court of...
Res Judicata Bars Prohibition Actions Against the Adult Parole Authority Based on Previously Litigated or Litigable Attacks on Nunc Pro Tunc Sentencing Entries

Res Judicata Bars Prohibition Actions Against the Adult Parole Authority Based on Previously Litigated or Litigable Attacks on Nunc Pro Tunc Sentencing Entries

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Res Judicata Bars Prohibition Actions Against the Adult Parole Authority Based on Previously Litigated or Litigable Attacks on Nunc Pro Tunc Sentencing Entries Introduction In State ex rel. Norris v....
Bad-Faith Insurance Claims Are Presumptively Arbitrable Under Broad Policy Clauses When the Claim Cannot Be Maintained Without Reference to the Policy or Insurer–Insured Relationship

Bad-Faith Insurance Claims Are Presumptively Arbitrable Under Broad Policy Clauses When the Claim Cannot Be Maintained Without Reference to the Policy or Insurer–Insured Relationship

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Bad-Faith Insurance Claims Are Presumptively Arbitrable Under Broad Policy Clauses When the Claim Cannot Be Maintained Without Reference to the Policy or Insurer–Insured Relationship Introduction In...
Maurent v. Spatny: Habeas Release Does Not Moot the State’s Appeal When Return to Custody Remains Possible

Maurent v. Spatny: Habeas Release Does Not Moot the State’s Appeal When Return to Custody Remains Possible

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Maurent v. Spatny: Habeas Release Does Not Moot the State’s Appeal When Return to Custody Remains Possible Introduction In Maurent v. Spatny, 2025-Ohio-5002, the Supreme Court of Ohio clarifies a...
Jurisdiction to Resentence Persists After Federal Habeas Vacates Death Sentence; Extraordinary Writs Inapplicable to Indictment and Verdict-Form Errors

Jurisdiction to Resentence Persists After Federal Habeas Vacates Death Sentence; Extraordinary Writs Inapplicable to Indictment and Verdict-Form Errors

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Jurisdiction to Resentence Persists After Federal Habeas Vacates Death Sentence; Extraordinary Writs Inapplicable to Indictment and Verdict-Form Errors Introduction In State ex rel. Allah-U-Akbar v....
Automatic Suspension and “Prior Discipline” for Attorney-Registration Noncompliance under Gov.Bar R. VI: The Supreme Court of Ohio’s 2025 Administrative Order

Automatic Suspension and “Prior Discipline” for Attorney-Registration Noncompliance under Gov.Bar R. VI: The Supreme Court of Ohio’s 2025 Administrative Order

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Automatic Suspension and “Prior Discipline” for Attorney-Registration Noncompliance under Gov.Bar R. VI: The Supreme Court of Ohio’s 2025 Administrative Order Citation: 11/04/2025 Administrative...
Self‑Serving Affidavits Cannot Overcome One’s Own Confirmation Receipts: Clarifying Proof Standards in Ohio Public‑Records Mandamus

Self‑Serving Affidavits Cannot Overcome One’s Own Confirmation Receipts: Clarifying Proof Standards in Ohio Public‑Records Mandamus

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Self‑Serving Affidavits Cannot Overcome One’s Own Confirmation Receipts: Clarifying Proof Standards in Ohio Public‑Records Mandamus Introduction In State ex rel. Clark v. Department of Rehabilitation...
No Late Respondent Evidence and No Deflecting Public-Records Duties: The Ohio Supreme Court’s Mandamus Blueprint in State ex rel. Howard v. Shuler

No Late Respondent Evidence and No Deflecting Public-Records Duties: The Ohio Supreme Court’s Mandamus Blueprint in State ex rel. Howard v. Shuler

Date: Nov 7, 2025
No Late Respondent Evidence and No Deflecting Public-Records Duties: The Ohio Supreme Court’s Mandamus Blueprint in State ex rel. Howard v. Shuler Introduction In State ex rel. Howard v. Shuler,...
Official Release and Oath Administration for the July 2025 Ohio Bar Examination: Non‑Precedential Administrative Action of the Supreme Court of Ohio

Official Release and Oath Administration for the July 2025 Ohio Bar Examination: Non‑Precedential Administrative Action of the Supreme Court of Ohio

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Official Release and Oath Administration for the July 2025 Ohio Bar Examination: Non‑Precedential Administrative Action of the Supreme Court of Ohio Introduction In 2025-Ohio-4877 (Administrative...
Parisi Left Intact for Now: Mandamus Dismissed Without Opinion While Chief Justice Kennedy Calls to Restore Public Records Act Control Over Court Records and Apply H.B. 265’s Affirmation Requirement

Parisi Left Intact for Now: Mandamus Dismissed Without Opinion While Chief Justice Kennedy Calls to Restore Public Records Act Control Over Court Records and Apply H.B. 265’s Affirmation Requirement

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Parisi Left Intact for Now: Mandamus Dismissed Without Opinion While Chief Justice Kennedy Calls to Restore Public Records Act Control Over Court Records and Apply H.B. 265’s Affirmation Requirement...
Enhanced Actual Suspension for Violent Threats Absent Mental-Health Mitigation: Ohio Supreme Court Clarifies Sanctioning in Attorney Discipline

Enhanced Actual Suspension for Violent Threats Absent Mental-Health Mitigation: Ohio Supreme Court Clarifies Sanctioning in Attorney Discipline

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Enhanced Actual Suspension for Violent Threats Absent Mental-Health Mitigation: Ohio Supreme Court Clarifies Sanctioning in Attorney Discipline Introduction In Disciplinary Counsel v. Taylor, Slip...
Clarifying “Additional Defendants” in Ohio Medical-Claim Actions: No Civ.R. 15(D) Compliance Needed and 180-Day Extension Not Limited to Newly Discovered Parties (Lewis v. MedCentral Health Sys.)

Clarifying “Additional Defendants” in Ohio Medical-Claim Actions: No Civ.R. 15(D) Compliance Needed and 180-Day Extension Not Limited to Newly Discovered Parties (Lewis v. MedCentral Health Sys.)

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Clarifying “Additional Defendants” in Ohio Medical-Claim Actions: No Civ.R. 15(D) Compliance Needed and 180-Day Extension Not Limited to Newly Discovered Parties Case: Lewis v. MedCentral Health...
Strict, Contemporaneous Compliance with R.C. 2969.25(A) Is Required; Noncompliance Requires Dismissal Without Prejudice and Cannot Be Cured by Later Amendment

Strict, Contemporaneous Compliance with R.C. 2969.25(A) Is Required; Noncompliance Requires Dismissal Without Prejudice and Cannot Be Cured by Later Amendment

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Strict, Contemporaneous Compliance with R.C. 2969.25(A) Is Required; Noncompliance Requires Dismissal Without Prejudice and Cannot Be Cured by Later Amendment Introduction In State ex rel. Mason v....
Rigorous Gatekeeping of Extraordinary Writs and the Court’s Use of Alternative Writs under S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.04 and 12.05: Analysis of the Supreme Court of Ohio’s October 22, 2025 Case Announcements

Rigorous Gatekeeping of Extraordinary Writs and the Court’s Use of Alternative Writs under S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.04 and 12.05: Analysis of the Supreme Court of Ohio’s October 22, 2025 Case Announcements

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Rigorous Gatekeeping of Extraordinary Writs and the Court’s Use of Alternative Writs under S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.04 and 12.05: Analysis of the Supreme Court of Ohio’s October 22, 2025 Case Announcements...
Only the Office of Disciplinary Counsel May Invoke Reciprocal Discipline in Ohio; Court Flags Risks of Mandatory Reciprocity During Pending Ohio Appeals

Only the Office of Disciplinary Counsel May Invoke Reciprocal Discipline in Ohio; Court Flags Risks of Mandatory Reciprocity During Pending Ohio Appeals

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Only the Office of Disciplinary Counsel May Invoke Reciprocal Discipline in Ohio; Court Flags Risks of Mandatory Reciprocity During Pending Ohio Appeals Introduction In 10/22/2025 Case Announcements...
Whole-Record Review of Juror Bias Permits Reliance on Group Voir Dire Responses: State v. Rogers (2025-Ohio-4794)

Whole-Record Review of Juror Bias Permits Reliance on Group Voir Dire Responses: State v. Rogers (2025-Ohio-4794)

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Whole-Record Review of Juror Bias Permits Reliance on Group Voir Dire Responses Commentary on State v. Rogers, 2025-Ohio-4794 (Supreme Court of Ohio) Introduction In State v. Rogers, the Supreme...
Prospective Application of Amended S.Ct.Prac.R. 4.03(A) and Strict Limits on Habeas Relief Reaffirmed: Gordon v. Smith

Prospective Application of Amended S.Ct.Prac.R. 4.03(A) and Strict Limits on Habeas Relief Reaffirmed: Gordon v. Smith

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Prospective Application of Amended S.Ct.Prac.R. 4.03(A) and Strict Limits on Habeas Relief Reaffirmed: Gordon v. Smith Introduction In Gordon v. Smith, 2025-Ohio-4768, the Supreme Court of Ohio...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert