Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New York Case Commentaries

DHCR Legal Rent as the Measure of Use-and-Occupancy and Strict Rent‑Stabilization Notice Compliance for Ejectment: Commentary on Esposito v. Larig (2025 NY Slip Op 04704)

DHCR Legal Rent as the Measure of Use-and-Occupancy and Strict Rent‑Stabilization Notice Compliance for Ejectment: Commentary on Esposito v. Larig (2025 NY Slip Op 04704)

Date: Aug 21, 2025
DHCR Legal Rent as the Measure of Use-and-Occupancy and Strict Rent‑Stabilization Notice Compliance for Ejectment: Commentary on Esposito v. Larig (2025 NY Slip Op 04704) Introduction Esposito v....
RPAPL 1304 Compliance When Using Third‑Party Mailing Vendors: Tracking Numbers and RPAPL 1306 Filings Are Insufficient — Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Ricks

RPAPL 1304 Compliance When Using Third‑Party Mailing Vendors: Tracking Numbers and RPAPL 1306 Filings Are Insufficient — Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Ricks

Date: Aug 21, 2025
RPAPL 1304 Compliance When Using Third‑Party Mailing Vendors: Tracking Numbers and RPAPL 1306 Filings Are Insufficient Commentary on Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Ricks (2025 NY Slip Op 04728,...
Gomez v. Tilden Estates, LLC: Dust on Permanent Stairs as a Potential 12 NYCRR 23-1.7(d) “Slipping Hazard,” Limits on Untimely Cross-Motions, and No Automatic §240(1) Liability for Stairway Slips

Gomez v. Tilden Estates, LLC: Dust on Permanent Stairs as a Potential 12 NYCRR 23-1.7(d) “Slipping Hazard,” Limits on Untimely Cross-Motions, and No Automatic §240(1) Liability for Stairway Slips

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Gomez v. Tilden Estates, LLC: Dust on Permanent Stairs as a Potential 12 NYCRR 23-1.7(d) “Slipping Hazard,” Limits on Untimely Cross-Motions, and No Automatic §240(1) Liability for Stairway Slips...
Nominal Damages for Technical Trespass Are Discretionary Absent Prescriptive-Rights Risk; Landowner’s Retention of Trespasser’s Materials Constitutes Conversion — Commentary on Fairchild Corp. v. LIRR (2025 NY Slip Op 04705)

Nominal Damages for Technical Trespass Are Discretionary Absent Prescriptive-Rights Risk; Landowner’s Retention of Trespasser’s Materials Constitutes Conversion — Commentary on Fairchild Corp. v. LIRR (2025 NY Slip Op 04705)

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Nominal Damages for Technical Trespass Are Discretionary Absent Prescriptive-Rights Risk; Landowner’s Retention of Trespasser’s Materials Constitutes Conversion — Commentary on Fairchild Corp. v....
Extended-Block Visitation and IDEA “Comparable Services” Under Tropea: First Department Affirms Out‑of‑State Relocation Without Requiring Economic Necessity (Matter of Jasmine M. v. Albert M., 2025)

Extended-Block Visitation and IDEA “Comparable Services” Under Tropea: First Department Affirms Out‑of‑State Relocation Without Requiring Economic Necessity (Matter of Jasmine M. v. Albert M., 2025)

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Extended-Block Visitation and IDEA “Comparable Services” Under Tropea: First Department Affirms Out‑of‑State Relocation Without Requiring Economic Necessity Introduction This commentary examines the...
The Three-Day Filing Rule Is Jurisdictional: First Department Vacates Neglect Finding and Declares Prolonged Removal Unlawful in Matter of Kaius A. v. Abigail H.

The Three-Day Filing Rule Is Jurisdictional: First Department Vacates Neglect Finding and Declares Prolonged Removal Unlawful in Matter of Kaius A. v. Abigail H.

Date: Aug 15, 2025
The Three-Day Filing Rule Is Jurisdictional: First Department Vacates Neglect Finding and Declares Prolonged Removal Unlawful in Matter of Kaius A. v. Abigail H. Introduction This commentary examines...
Prevailing “In Whole” Without Judicial Imprimatur: Third Department Adopts a Text‑Driven Catalyst Rule Under New York’s EAJA and Overrules Clarke v. Annucci

Prevailing “In Whole” Without Judicial Imprimatur: Third Department Adopts a Text‑Driven Catalyst Rule Under New York’s EAJA and Overrules Clarke v. Annucci

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Prevailing “In Whole” Without Judicial Imprimatur: Third Department Adopts a Text‑Driven Catalyst Rule Under New York’s EAJA and Overrules Clarke v. Annucci Case: Matter of Markey v. Tietz, 2025 NY...
Approval-as-Injury: New York Recognizes Organizational Standing to Preemptively Challenge Certified Voting Machines and Permits Recasting of Article 78 Relief

Approval-as-Injury: New York Recognizes Organizational Standing to Preemptively Challenge Certified Voting Machines and Permits Recasting of Article 78 Relief

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Approval-as-Injury: New York Recognizes Organizational Standing to Preemptively Challenge Certified Voting Machines and Permits Recasting of Article 78 Relief Introduction In Matter of Common Cause...
Second Department Clarifies “Reasonable Time” for Substitution Under CPLR 1021 Amid Insurer Liquidation Stays: Dagastino v. Crown Container, Inc. (2025 NY Slip Op 04627)

Second Department Clarifies “Reasonable Time” for Substitution Under CPLR 1021 Amid Insurer Liquidation Stays: Dagastino v. Crown Container, Inc. (2025 NY Slip Op 04627)

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Second Department Clarifies “Reasonable Time” for Substitution Under CPLR 1021 Amid Insurer Liquidation Stays Dagastino v. Crown Container, Inc. (2025 NY Slip Op 04627) Introduction In Dagastino v....
Negligent Escrow Misappropriation and Failure to Reconcile Warrant Suspension Despite Remedial Steps: Commentary on Matter of Stutman (2025 NY Slip Op 04655)

Negligent Escrow Misappropriation and Failure to Reconcile Warrant Suspension Despite Remedial Steps: Commentary on Matter of Stutman (2025 NY Slip Op 04655)

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Negligent Escrow Misappropriation and Failure to Reconcile Warrant Suspension Despite Remedial Steps: Matter of Stutman Introduction Matter of Stutman (2025 NY Slip Op 04655) is a per curiam...
Nonpayment of Binding Part 137 Fee Arbitration Awards as Professional Misconduct Under Rules 1.15(c)(4) and 8.4: Matter of O’Brien

Nonpayment of Binding Part 137 Fee Arbitration Awards as Professional Misconduct Under Rules 1.15(c)(4) and 8.4: Matter of O’Brien

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Nonpayment of Binding Part 137 Fee Arbitration Awards as Professional Misconduct Under Rules 1.15(c)(4) and 8.4: Matter of O’Brien Introduction In Matter of O’Brien (2025 NY Slip Op 04651), the...
Completion of Services Is Not Enough: Second Department Clarifies “Diligent Efforts” and the “Insight” Requirement in Permanent Neglect Terminations

Completion of Services Is Not Enough: Second Department Clarifies “Diligent Efforts” and the “Insight” Requirement in Permanent Neglect Terminations

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Completion of Services Is Not Enough: Second Department Clarifies “Diligent Efforts” and the “Insight” Requirement in Permanent Neglect Terminations Case: Matter of Benz G. (Nadia B.) — In the...
Supervisory Liability of Individual Clinicians Survives While Corporate Negligent Hiring Claims Fall Under Respondeat Superior: Commentary on Garcia v. Hollander (2025 NY Slip Op 04634)

Supervisory Liability of Individual Clinicians Survives While Corporate Negligent Hiring Claims Fall Under Respondeat Superior: Commentary on Garcia v. Hollander (2025 NY Slip Op 04634)

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Supervisory Liability of Individual Clinicians Survives While Corporate Negligent Hiring Claims Fall Under Respondeat Superior: Garcia v. Hollander (2025 NY Slip Op 04634) Introduction In Garcia v....
Encounter‑Specific EDTPA Immunity: Sapienza v. Tromba Clarifies the “Impact” Requirement and Reaffirms Non‑Retroactivity of EDTPA Repeal

Encounter‑Specific EDTPA Immunity: Sapienza v. Tromba Clarifies the “Impact” Requirement and Reaffirms Non‑Retroactivity of EDTPA Repeal

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Encounter‑Specific EDTPA Immunity: Sapienza v. Tromba Clarifies the “Impact” Requirement and Reaffirms Non‑Retroactivity of EDTPA Repeal Introduction Sapienza v. Tromba (2025 NY Slip Op 04672) is a...
Cooperative Corporations as “Owners” for Labor Law §§ 240(1) and 241(6): Proprietary-Lease Nexus Confirmed; Device-Quality Regulations (12 NYCRR 23-1.15, 23-1.16) Inapplicable When No Device Is Supplied

Cooperative Corporations as “Owners” for Labor Law §§ 240(1) and 241(6): Proprietary-Lease Nexus Confirmed; Device-Quality Regulations (12 NYCRR 23-1.15, 23-1.16) Inapplicable When No Device Is Supplied

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Cooperative Corporations as “Owners” for Labor Law §§ 240(1) and 241(6): Proprietary-Lease Nexus Confirmed; Device-Quality Regulations (12 NYCRR 23-1.15, 23-1.16) Inapplicable When No Device Is...
Including Children in Orders of Protection Requires Demonstrable Exposure or Endangerment: Second Department’s Clarification in Laura W. v. John U. (2025)

Including Children in Orders of Protection Requires Demonstrable Exposure or Endangerment: Second Department’s Clarification in Laura W. v. John U. (2025)

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Including Children in Orders of Protection Requires Demonstrable Exposure or Endangerment: Second Department’s Clarification in Laura W. v. John U. (2025) Court: Appellate Division, Second...
Settlement Allocution as Conclusive Documentary Evidence Defeating Post‑Settlement Malpractice Claims: Valentina v. Beckerman (2025)

Settlement Allocution as Conclusive Documentary Evidence Defeating Post‑Settlement Malpractice Claims: Valentina v. Beckerman (2025)

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Settlement Allocution as Conclusive Documentary Evidence Defeating Post‑Settlement Malpractice Claims: Valentina v. Beckerman Citation: Valentina v. Beckerman, 2025 NY Slip Op 04682 (App. Div. 2d...
CEEFPA Hardship Declarations Are Not an “Appearance”: Second Department Clarifies No Waiver of Personal Jurisdiction in Foreclosure Actions

CEEFPA Hardship Declarations Are Not an “Appearance”: Second Department Clarifies No Waiver of Personal Jurisdiction in Foreclosure Actions

Date: Aug 14, 2025
CEEFPA Hardship Declarations Are Not an “Appearance”: Second Department Clarifies No Waiver of Personal Jurisdiction in Foreclosure Actions Introduction In U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v. Lane (2025 NY Slip...
Oversight Duties Defeat Common‑Law Indemnity and Contribution; Prime‑Contract Indemnity Does Not Flow Down Without Clear Incorporation — Town of Oyster Bay v. Peter Scalamandre & Sons, Inc. (2025 NY Slip Op 04679)

Oversight Duties Defeat Common‑Law Indemnity and Contribution; Prime‑Contract Indemnity Does Not Flow Down Without Clear Incorporation — Town of Oyster Bay v. Peter Scalamandre & Sons, Inc. (2025 NY Slip Op 04679)

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Oversight Duties Defeat Common‑Law Indemnity and Contribution; Prime‑Contract Indemnity Does Not Flow Down Without Clear Incorporation Case: Town of Oyster Bay v. Peter Scalamandre & Sons, Inc., 2025...
Functional Control at the Pleading Stage: New York’s Second Department Lowers the Barrier to Alleging Joint-Employer and Single-Enterprise Liability (Shujing Yu v. Mask Pot, Inc., 2025 NY Slip Op 04673)

Functional Control at the Pleading Stage: New York’s Second Department Lowers the Barrier to Alleging Joint-Employer and Single-Enterprise Liability (Shujing Yu v. Mask Pot, Inc., 2025 NY Slip Op 04673)

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Functional Control at the Pleading Stage: New York’s Second Department Lowers the Barrier to Alleging Joint-Employer and Single-Enterprise Liability Introduction In Shujing Yu v. Mask Pot, Inc. (2025...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert