Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New York Case Commentaries

Delayed SORA Proceedings Require a Showing of Prejudice to the Registrant’s Ability to Litigate Risk Level (People v. Collier)

Delayed SORA Proceedings Require a Showing of Prejudice to the Registrant’s Ability to Litigate Risk Level (People v. Collier)

Date: Jan 9, 2026
Delayed SORA Proceedings Require a Showing of Prejudice to the Registrant’s Ability to Litigate Risk Level Case: People v Collier, 2026 NY Slip Op 00074 (NY Ct App Jan. 8, 2026) (Garcia, J.)...
Implied-Covenant Liability for Fund Restructuring that Diverts Bargained-for Revenue Share Beyond the Contract’s Defined Fee-Recipient

Implied-Covenant Liability for Fund Restructuring that Diverts Bargained-for Revenue Share Beyond the Contract’s Defined Fee-Recipient

Date: Jan 9, 2026
Implied-Covenant Liability for Fund Restructuring that Diverts Bargained-for Revenue Share Beyond the Contract’s Defined Fee-Recipient 1. Introduction AMF Trust Ventures LLC v. i80 Group LLC (2026 NY...
Federal “No Retaliatory Animus” Findings Collaterally Estop Later City HRL Retaliation Claims Despite Liberal Construction

Federal “No Retaliatory Animus” Findings Collaterally Estop Later City HRL Retaliation Claims Despite Liberal Construction

Date: Jan 9, 2026
Federal “No Retaliatory Animus” Findings Collaterally Estop Later City HRL Retaliation Claims Despite Liberal Construction 1. Introduction In Abromavage v Deutsche Bank Sec. Inc. (2026 NY Slip Op...
Romano v. Kelly: Reformation of a Settlement Agreement on Motion Where a Scrivener’s Error Defeats the Parties’ Intended Transfer of Entire Real Property

Romano v. Kelly: Reformation of a Settlement Agreement on Motion Where a Scrivener’s Error Defeats the Parties’ Intended Transfer of Entire Real Property

Date: Jan 9, 2026
Romano v. Kelly: Reformation of a Settlement Agreement on Motion Where a Scrivener’s Error Defeats the Parties’ Intended Transfer of Entire Real Property 1. Introduction Romano v Kelly (2026 NY Slip...
Counterclaims Rarely Support Human Rights Law Retaliation; Withdrawal Does Not Moot the Alleged Retaliatory Filing

Counterclaims Rarely Support Human Rights Law Retaliation; Withdrawal Does Not Moot the Alleged Retaliatory Filing

Date: Jan 9, 2026
Counterclaims Rarely Support Human Rights Law Retaliation; Withdrawal Does Not Moot the Alleged Retaliatory Filing 1. Introduction In Yegoryan v BB Med. & Dermatology P.C. (2026 NY Slip Op 00041),...
New York Appellate Sanctions for AI-Hallucinated Citations: A Nondelegable Duty to Verify Legal Authorities

New York Appellate Sanctions for AI-Hallucinated Citations: A Nondelegable Duty to Verify Legal Authorities

Date: Jan 9, 2026
New York Appellate Sanctions for AI-Hallucinated Citations: A Nondelegable Duty to Verify Legal Authorities 1. Introduction Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v LeTennier (2026 NY Slip Op 00040 [3d Dept...
People v. Clay: No Brady Violation (and No CPL 440.10 Hearing) Where an Allegedly Withheld Photograph Is Not Shown to Be in the People’s Possession and Would Be Inculpatory

People v. Clay: No Brady Violation (and No CPL 440.10 Hearing) Where an Allegedly Withheld Photograph Is Not Shown to Be in the People’s Possession and Would Be Inculpatory

Date: Jan 9, 2026
People v. Clay: No Brady Violation (and No CPL 440.10 Hearing) Where an Allegedly Withheld Photograph Is Not Shown to Be in the People’s Possession and Would Be Inculpatory Court: Appellate Division,...
People v. Bjork: Narrow Grounds to Reopen Suppression Hearings, Limits on “Homicide” Opinions, and What Counts as a Meaningful Jury-Note Response

People v. Bjork: Narrow Grounds to Reopen Suppression Hearings, Limits on “Homicide” Opinions, and What Counts as a Meaningful Jury-Note Response

Date: Jan 9, 2026
People v. Bjork: Narrow Grounds to Reopen Suppression Hearings, Limits on “Homicide” Opinions, and What Counts as a Meaningful Jury-Note Response Introduction In People v Bjork (Appellate Division,...
Funti v Andrews: Neutral-Principles Proof of Religious “Solemnization” Required for No-License Marriages Under DRL § 12

Funti v Andrews: Neutral-Principles Proof of Religious “Solemnization” Required for No-License Marriages Under DRL § 12

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Funti v Andrews: Neutral-Principles Proof of Religious “Solemnization” Required for No-License Marriages Under DRL § 12 Court: Appellate Division, First Department (Jan. 6, 2026) (Kern, J.) Core...
Reciprocal Discipline in New York: When a Foreign Probation Sanction Becomes a Public Censure

Reciprocal Discipline in New York: When a Foreign Probation Sanction Becomes a Public Censure

Date: Jan 7, 2026
Reciprocal Discipline in New York: When a Foreign Probation Sanction Becomes a Public Censure 1. Introduction Matter of Tejada (2026 NY Slip Op 00020) is a reciprocal-discipline decision of the...
Reciprocal Disbarment in New York for Out-of-State Trust-Account Conversion and Client Abandonment Absent Any 22 NYCRR 1240.13 Defense

Reciprocal Disbarment in New York for Out-of-State Trust-Account Conversion and Client Abandonment Absent Any 22 NYCRR 1240.13 Defense

Date: Jan 7, 2026
Reciprocal Disbarment in New York for Out-of-State Trust-Account Conversion and Client Abandonment Absent Any 22 NYCRR 1240.13 Defense Introduction Matter of Richardson-Vargas is a First Department...
Cotto v. Robinson (2d Dept 2025): Law-of-the-Case Locks in Graves Amendment Dismissal; Relation-Back Fails Without Timely Notice to Newly Added Employer

Cotto v. Robinson (2d Dept 2025): Law-of-the-Case Locks in Graves Amendment Dismissal; Relation-Back Fails Without Timely Notice to Newly Added Employer

Date: Jan 3, 2026
Law-of-the-Case Locks in Graves Amendment Dismissal; Relation-Back Requires Proof the New Employer Had Timely Notice Case: Cotto v Robinson, 2025 NY Slip Op 07374 (App Div, 2d Dept Dec. 31, 2025)...
People v. Grigoroff: When a Confession Is the Only Evidence, Courts Must Not Undercut False-Confession Expert Proof (and Must Charge “Promise by the Police” When Supported)

People v. Grigoroff: When a Confession Is the Only Evidence, Courts Must Not Undercut False-Confession Expert Proof (and Must Charge “Promise by the Police” When Supported)

Date: Jan 3, 2026
People v. Grigoroff: When a Confession Is the Only Evidence, Courts Must Not Undercut False-Confession Expert Proof (and Must Charge “Promise by the Police” When Supported) 1. Introduction In People...
Replevin Amendment Liberally Granted Despite Disputed Abandonment and No Unequivocal TRO for Contempt (LaBoy v. Diven)

Replevin Amendment Liberally Granted Despite Disputed Abandonment and No Unequivocal TRO for Contempt (LaBoy v. Diven)

Date: Jan 3, 2026
Replevin Amendment Liberally Granted Despite Disputed Abandonment and No Unequivocal TRO for Contempt 1. Introduction LaBoy v Diven (2025 NY Slip Op 07381 [App Div, 2d Dept Dec. 31, 2025]) arises...
Consumer Reviews and Complaint Letters as “Public Interest” Speech Under New York Anti-SLAPP, Supporting Fee Awards for Baseless Defamation Claims

Consumer Reviews and Complaint Letters as “Public Interest” Speech Under New York Anti-SLAPP, Supporting Fee Awards for Baseless Defamation Claims

Date: Jan 3, 2026
Consumer Reviews and Complaint Letters as “Public Interest” Speech Under New York Anti-SLAPP, Supporting Fee Awards for Baseless Defamation Claims Case: Biagini Realty v Brightman, 2025 NY Slip Op...
Dudley v API Industries, Inc.: Private Nuisance Is Not Numerically Limited to “One Person or a Relatively Few”

Dudley v API Industries, Inc.: Private Nuisance Is Not Numerically Limited to “One Person or a Relatively Few”

Date: Jan 2, 2026
Dudley v API Industries, Inc.: Private Nuisance Is Not Numerically Limited to “One Person or a Relatively Few,” but Negligence Still Requires Physical Injury or Tangible Property Damage Court:...
Dender v. North Shore Manhasset Hosp.: Subjective Fear, Police-Threats, and Driveway Blocking—Without Objective Restraint—Do Not Prove Confinement for False Imprisonment (JMOL)

Dender v. North Shore Manhasset Hosp.: Subjective Fear, Police-Threats, and Driveway Blocking—Without Objective Restraint—Do Not Prove Confinement for False Imprisonment (JMOL)

Date: Jan 2, 2026
Dender v. North Shore Manhasset Hosp.: Subjective Fear, Police-Threats, and Driveway Blocking—Without Objective Restraint—Do Not Prove Confinement for False Imprisonment (JMOL) 1. Introduction In...
EDTPA Repeal Is Not Retroactive; Nursing Homes May Obtain CPLR 3211 Dismissal When Documentary Proof Establishes COVID-Response Immunity

EDTPA Repeal Is Not Retroactive; Nursing Homes May Obtain CPLR 3211 Dismissal When Documentary Proof Establishes COVID-Response Immunity

Date: Jan 2, 2026
EDTPA Repeal Is Not Retroactive; Nursing Homes May Obtain CPLR 3211 Dismissal When Documentary Proof Establishes COVID-Response Immunity 1. Introduction In Byington v North Sea Assoc., LLC (2025 NY...
Smith v. Zama — Conflicting Expert Proof on Discharge Anticoagulation/Beta-Blocker Decisions Creates Triable Issues and Defeats Summary Judgment

Smith v. Zama — Conflicting Expert Proof on Discharge Anticoagulation/Beta-Blocker Decisions Creates Triable Issues and Defeats Summary Judgment

Date: Jan 2, 2026
Smith v. Zama: Conflicting Expert Proof on Discharge Anticoagulation/Beta-Blocker Decisions Creates Triable Issues and Defeats Summary Judgment 1. Introduction Case: Smith v Zama, 2025 NY Slip Op...
Matter of Hattala — Undue Influence Objections Require Specific, Substantial Proof to Defeat Summary Judgment in Probate

Matter of Hattala — Undue Influence Objections Require Specific, Substantial Proof to Defeat Summary Judgment in Probate

Date: Jan 2, 2026
Matter of Hattala: Undue Influence Objections Require Specific, Substantial Proof to Defeat Summary Judgment in Probate Introduction Matter of Hattala (Appellate Division, Third Department, Dec. 31,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert