Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Georgia Case Commentaries

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel on Appeal: A Comprehensive Analysis of Hayes v. The State

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel on Appeal: A Comprehensive Analysis of Hayes v. The State

Date: Mar 16, 1993
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel on Appeal: A Comprehensive Analysis of Hayes v. The State Introduction Hayes v. The State, decided by the Supreme Court of Georgia on March 15, 1993, is a pivotal...
Establishing Special Relationships in Municipal Liability: Insights from CITY OF ROME v. JORDAN

Establishing Special Relationships in Municipal Liability: Insights from CITY OF ROME v. JORDAN

Date: Mar 16, 1993
Establishing Special Relationships in Municipal Liability: Insights from CITY OF ROME et al. v. JORDAN et al. Introduction The landmark case of CITY OF ROME et al. v. JORDAN et al., decided by the...
EARNEST v. THE STATE: Upholding Malice Murder Conviction and Standards for Trial Error Appeals

EARNEST v. THE STATE: Upholding Malice Murder Conviction and Standards for Trial Error Appeals

Date: Oct 31, 1992
EARNEST v. THE STATE: Upholding Malice Murder Conviction and Standards for Trial Error Appeals Introduction EARNEST v. THE STATE is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia on...
Enforcing No-Solicitation Clauses Without Geographical Limits in Georgia: Analysis of W.R. GRACE CO. v. MOUYAL

Enforcing No-Solicitation Clauses Without Geographical Limits in Georgia: Analysis of W.R. GRACE CO. v. MOUYAL

Date: Oct 22, 1992
Enforcing No-Solicitation Clauses Without Geographical Limits in Georgia: Analysis of W.R. GRACE CO. v. MOUYAL Introduction The case of W.R. Grace Company, Dearborn Division v. Mouyal et al. (262 Ga....
Balancing Defendant's Right to Counsel Choice and Trial Court's Discretion: Lynd v. The State

Balancing Defendant's Right to Counsel Choice and Trial Court's Discretion: Lynd v. The State

Date: Feb 28, 1992
Balancing Defendant's Right to Counsel Choice and Trial Court's Discretion: Lynd v. The State Introduction Lynd v. The State is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia on February...
Mallory v. The State: Reversal Due to Improper Hearsay Admission and Jury Selection Issues

Mallory v. The State: Reversal Due to Improper Hearsay Admission and Jury Selection Issues

Date: Nov 2, 1991
Mallory v. The State: Reversal Due to Improper Hearsay Admission and Jury Selection Issues Introduction Mallory v. The State (261 Ga. 625) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Yarbray v. Southern Bell Telephone Telegraph Company: Establishing Standards for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress

Yarbray v. Southern Bell Telephone Telegraph Company: Establishing Standards for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress

Date: Nov 2, 1991
Yarbray v. Southern Bell Telephone Telegraph Company: Establishing Standards for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Introduction Yarbray v. Southern Bell Telephone Telegraph Company is a...
Chandler v. The State: Admissibility of Victim's Prior Acts in Justification Defenses

Chandler v. The State: Admissibility of Victim's Prior Acts in Justification Defenses

Date: Jul 4, 1991
Chandler v. The State: Admissibility of Victim's Prior Acts in Justification Defenses Introduction Chandler v. The State, 261 Ga. 402 (1991), is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Admissibility of Prior Convictions in Drug-Related Cases: Insights from Stephens v. The State

Admissibility of Prior Convictions in Drug-Related Cases: Insights from Stephens v. The State

Date: Jul 4, 1991
Admissibility of Prior Convictions in Drug-Related Cases: Insights from Stephens v. The State Introduction Stephens v. The State, 261 Ga. 467 (1991), is a significant case decided by the Supreme...
No General Duty to Warn of Crime Risks: Lau's Corporation, Inc. v. Haskins et al.

No General Duty to Warn of Crime Risks: Lau's Corporation, Inc. v. Haskins et al.

Date: Jun 28, 1991
No General Duty to Warn of Crime Risks: Lau's Corporation, Inc. v. Haskins et al. Introduction In the landmark case of Lau's Corporation, Inc. v. Haskins et al., decided by the Supreme Court of...
Renner v. The State: Clarifying the Use of Flight as Circumstantial Evidence in Criminal Trials

Renner v. The State: Clarifying the Use of Flight as Circumstantial Evidence in Criminal Trials

Date: Nov 8, 1990
Renner v. The State: Clarifying the Use of Flight as Circumstantial Evidence in Criminal Trials Introduction Renner v. The State is a seminal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia on...
Affirmation of Death Penalty in Isaacs v. The State: A Comprehensive Analysis

Affirmation of Death Penalty in Isaacs v. The State: A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: Dec 1, 1989
Affirmation of Death Penalty in Isaacs v. The State: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction Isaacs v. The State (259 Ga. 717) is a pivotal 1989 decision by the Supreme Court of Georgia that reaffirmed...
Reinterpreting Pollution Exclusion Clauses: Georgia Supreme Court in Claussen v. Aetna Casualty Surety Company

Reinterpreting Pollution Exclusion Clauses: Georgia Supreme Court in Claussen v. Aetna Casualty Surety Company

Date: Jun 23, 1989
Reinterpreting Pollution Exclusion Clauses: Georgia Supreme Court in Claussen v. Aetna Casualty Surety Company Introduction The case of Claussen v. Aetna Casualty Surety Company et al. (259 Ga. 333)...
Establishing the 'Source of Funds' Principle in Property Division: Analysis of Thomas v. Thomas

Establishing the 'Source of Funds' Principle in Property Division: Analysis of Thomas v. Thomas

Date: Mar 16, 1989
Establishing the 'Source of Funds' Principle in Property Division: Analysis of Thomas v. Thomas Introduction Thomas v. Thomas (259 Ga. 73), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia on March 15,...
Reaffirmation and Expansion of Landlord Liability under Georgia Law in THOMPSON v. CROWNOVER

Reaffirmation and Expansion of Landlord Liability under Georgia Law in THOMPSON v. CROWNOVER

Date: Mar 10, 1989
Reaffirmation and Expansion of Landlord Liability under Georgia Law in THOMPSON v. CROWNOVER Introduction THOMPSON v. CROWNOVER et al. is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia...
Extradition Procedures and Sentencing in Moon v. State: Establishing Precedents in Capital Cases

Extradition Procedures and Sentencing in Moon v. State: Establishing Precedents in Capital Cases

Date: Dec 1, 1988
Extradition Procedures and Sentencing in Moon v. The State: Establishing Precedents in Capital Cases Introduction Moon v. The State, 258 Ga. 748 (1988), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia,...
Polito v. Holland: Non-Retroactive Effect of OCGA §51-12-1(b) on Collateral Source Evidence

Polito v. Holland: Non-Retroactive Effect of OCGA §51-12-1(b) on Collateral Source Evidence

Date: Mar 10, 1988
Polito v. Holland: Non-Retroactive Effect of OCGA §51-12-1(b) on Collateral Source Evidence Introduction Polito v. Holland et al. is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Georgia, rendered on...
Jones v. The State: Clarifying the Scope of Character Evidence under OCGA § 24-9-20 (b)

Jones v. The State: Clarifying the Scope of Character Evidence under OCGA § 24-9-20 (b)

Date: Jan 7, 1988
Jones v. The State: Clarifying the Scope of Character Evidence under OCGA § 24-9-20 (b) Introduction Jones v. The State, 257 Ga. 753 (1988), is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Georgia...
Supreme Court of Georgia Upholds Death Penalty and Adheres to Established Legal Standards in Frazier v. The State

Supreme Court of Georgia Upholds Death Penalty and Adheres to Established Legal Standards in Frazier v. The State

Date: Dec 2, 1987
Supreme Court of Georgia Upholds Death Penalty and Adheres to Established Legal Standards in Frazier v. The State Introduction In the landmark case Frazier v. The State, decided on December 1, 1987,...
Gamble v. The State: Establishing Racial Neutrality in Peremptory Challenges

Gamble v. The State: Establishing Racial Neutrality in Peremptory Challenges

Date: Jul 10, 1987
Gamble v. The State: Establishing Racial Neutrality in Peremptory Challenges Introduction The case of Gamble v. The State, decided by the Supreme Court of Georgia on July 9, 1987, serves as a pivotal...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert