Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Georgia Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Procedural Standards in Capital Cases: Severance, Miranda Rights, and Jury Selection - Childs v. The State

Affirmation of Procedural Standards in Capital Cases: Severance, Miranda Rights, and Jury Selection - Childs v. The State

Date: Jun 19, 1987
Affirmation of Procedural Standards in Capital Cases: Severance, Miranda Rights, and Jury Selection - Childs v. The State Introduction In Childs v. The State (257 Ga. 243, 1987), the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Death Sentence Under Aggravating Circumstances: Hicks v. The State

Affirmation of Death Sentence Under Aggravating Circumstances: Hicks v. The State

Date: Feb 14, 1987
Affirmation of Death Sentence Under Aggravating Circumstances: Hicks v. The State Introduction Hicks v. The State, 256 Ga. 715 (1987), is a significant case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in Romine v. The State: Legal Principles and Implications

Affirmation of Death Sentence in Romine v. The State: Legal Principles and Implications

Date: Dec 3, 1986
Affirmation of Death Sentence in Romine v. The State: Legal Principles and Implications Introduction Romine v. The State, 256 Ga. 521 (1986), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Establishing the Broad Scope of Georgia's RICO Act in Chancey v. The State

Establishing the Broad Scope of Georgia's RICO Act in Chancey v. The State

Date: Nov 14, 1986
Establishing the Broad Scope of Georgia's RICO Act in Chancey v. The State Introduction Chancey v. The State, Jordan v. The State, Cagle v. The State, 256 Ga. 415 (1986), represents a pivotal case in...
Judicial Partiality Through Law Clerk Employment: Reversal of Death Sentence in POPE v. THE STATE

Judicial Partiality Through Law Clerk Employment: Reversal of Death Sentence in POPE v. THE STATE

Date: Jul 17, 1986
Judicial Partiality Through Law Clerk Employment: Reversal of Death Sentence in POPE v. THE STATE Introduction POPE v. THE STATE is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia on July...
Yost v. Torok et al. and the Evolution of Abusive Litigation Remedies in Georgia

Yost v. Torok et al. and the Evolution of Abusive Litigation Remedies in Georgia

Date: Jun 26, 1986
Yost v. Torok et al. and the Evolution of Abusive Litigation Remedies in Georgia Introduction The case of Yost v. Torok et al., adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia on June 25, 1986, addresses...
Clarification on Self-Contradictory Testimony in Summary Judgment Proceedings: Prophecy Corp. v. Rossignol

Clarification on Self-Contradictory Testimony in Summary Judgment Proceedings: Prophecy Corp. v. Rossignol

Date: May 29, 1986
Clarification on Self-Contradictory Testimony in Summary Judgment Proceedings: Prophecy Corp. v. Rossignol Introduction Prophecy Corporation v. Charles Rossignol, Inc., 256 Ga. 27 (1986), is a...
Affirmation of Death Penalty Under Aggravating Circumstances in Cargill v. The State

Affirmation of Death Penalty Under Aggravating Circumstances in Cargill v. The State

Date: Mar 19, 1986
Affirmation of Death Penalty Under Aggravating Circumstances in Cargill v. The State Introduction Cargill v. The State (255 Ga. 616) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia on...
Abolishment of the Inconsistent Verdict Rule in Criminal Cases: Milam v. The State

Abolishment of the Inconsistent Verdict Rule in Criminal Cases: Milam v. The State

Date: Mar 13, 1986
Abolishment of the Inconsistent Verdict Rule in Criminal Cases: Milam v. The State Introduction Milam v. The State is a landmark decision rendered by the Supreme Court of Georgia on March 12, 1986....
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress: Insights from BRIDGES v. WINN-DIXIE ATLANTA, INC.

Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress: Insights from BRIDGES v. WINN-DIXIE ATLANTA, INC.

Date: Sep 11, 1985
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress: Insights from Bridges v. Winn-Dixie Atlanta, Inc. Introduction The case of Bridges v. Winn-Dixie Atlanta, Inc. (176 Ga. App. 227) adjudicated by the...
Affirmation of Strickland Standards and Upholding Georgia's Jury Instructions in Death Penalty Cases: Smith v. Francis

Affirmation of Strickland Standards and Upholding Georgia's Jury Instructions in Death Penalty Cases: Smith v. Francis

Date: Jan 30, 1985
Affirmation of Strickland Standards and Upholding Georgia's Jury Instructions in Death Penalty Cases: Smith v. Francis Introduction Smith v. Francis (253 Ga. 782, 1985) is a pivotal case adjudicated...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in Ingram v. The State: Upholding Jury Selection and Sentencing Standards

Affirmation of Death Sentence in Ingram v. The State: Upholding Jury Selection and Sentencing Standards

Date: Nov 28, 1984
Affirmation of Death Sentence in Ingram v. The State: Upholding Jury Selection and Sentencing Standards Introduction Ingram v. The State (253 Ga. 622, 1984) is a seminal case adjudicated by the...
Head v. The State: Establishing Bifurcation Protocols for Admitting Prior Convictions in Separate Charges

Head v. The State: Establishing Bifurcation Protocols for Admitting Prior Convictions in Separate Charges

Date: Oct 18, 1984
Head v. The State: Establishing Bifurcation Protocols for Admitting Prior Convictions in Separate Charges Introduction In Head v. The State (253 Ga. 429), the Supreme Court of Georgia addressed...
Establishing the Standards for Death Penalty Sentencing and Jury Qualification in Georgia: A Comprehensive Analysis of Spivey v. The State

Establishing the Standards for Death Penalty Sentencing and Jury Qualification in Georgia: A Comprehensive Analysis of Spivey v. The State

Date: Jul 3, 1984
Establishing the Standards for Death Penalty Sentencing and Jury Qualification in Georgia: A Comprehensive Analysis of Spivey v. The State Introduction The case of Spivey v. The State (253 Ga. 187)...
Felker v. The State: Establishing Identity Through Modus Operandi in Murder Convictions

Felker v. The State: Establishing Identity Through Modus Operandi in Murder Convictions

Date: Mar 16, 1984
Felker v. The State: Establishing Identity Through Modus Operandi in Murder Convictions Introduction In the landmark case of Felker v. The State, decided by the Supreme Court of Georgia on March 15,...
The State v. Stephens et al.: Establishing the "Totality of the Circumstances" Standard in Probable Cause Analysis

The State v. Stephens et al.: Establishing the "Totality of the Circumstances" Standard in Probable Cause Analysis

Date: Feb 7, 1984
The State v. Stephens et al.: Establishing the "Totality of the Circumstances" Standard in Probable Cause Analysis Introduction The State v. Stephens et al., 252 Ga. 181 (1984), is a landmark...
Williams v. The State: Establishing Standards for Admissibility of Correlative Crimes Evidence in Georgia

Williams v. The State: Establishing Standards for Admissibility of Correlative Crimes Evidence in Georgia

Date: Dec 6, 1983
Williams v. The State: Establishing Standards for Admissibility of Correlative Crimes Evidence in Georgia Introduction Williams v. The State, 251 Ga. 749 (1983), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Service by Publication in Divorce Proceedings: ABBA GANA v. ABBA GANA

Service by Publication in Divorce Proceedings: ABBA GANA v. ABBA GANA

Date: Jul 16, 1983
Service by Publication in Divorce Proceedings: ABBA GANA v. ABBA GANA Introduction ABBA GANA v. ABBA GANA is a landmark judgment delivered by the Supreme Court of Georgia on July 15, 1983. The case...
Emotional Appeals in Capital Sentencing: An Analysis of CONNER v. THE STATE

Emotional Appeals in Capital Sentencing: An Analysis of CONNER v. THE STATE

Date: May 25, 1983
Emotional Appeals in Capital Sentencing: An Analysis of CONNER v. THE STATE Introduction CONNER v. THE STATE is a pivotal 1983 judgment by the Supreme Court of Georgia that addresses the nuances of...
Admissibility of Autopsy Photographs in Criminal Trials: Brown v. The State

Admissibility of Autopsy Photographs in Criminal Trials: Brown v. The State

Date: Apr 26, 1983
Admissibility of Autopsy Photographs in Criminal Trials: Brown v. The State Introduction In the landmark case of Brown et al. v. The State (250 Ga. 862), decided by the Supreme Court of Georgia on...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert