Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
“A Special Class that Should Be Treated Differently”: The Connecticut Supreme Court Re-aligns Equal-Protection Doctrine for Insanity Acquittees – State v. Foster, 353 Conn. 1 (2025) 1. Introduction...
Clarifying “Imminent Dangerousness”: State v. Foster Sets a Strict Evidentiary Compass for the Continued Commitment of Insanity Acquittees 1. Introduction State v. Foster, --- Conn. --- (Aug. 19,...
Vacatur of Moot Commitment Orders for Insanity Acquittees: State v. Guild, 353 Conn. ____ (2025) Introduction State v. Guild confronts the Connecticut Supreme Court with an increasingly common...
State v. Evans (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2025): Clarifying “More-Than-Minimal Familiarity” for Lay Identifications and Defining Reasonable Temporal Limits on CSLI Warrants Introduction In State...
“From Familiar Faces to Fleeting Glimpses”: State v. Evans (Conn. 2025) Expands the Admissibility of Lay-Witness Identifications from Surveillance Media 1. Introduction State v. Evans is a murder...
State v. Myers (Conn. 2025): Clarifying When the Exclusion of Third-Party Culpability Evidence is Merely Evidentiary, Not Constitutional Introduction State v. Myers, officially released on 12 August...
Jamie G. v. Department of Children & Families (Conn. 2025): Preserving Quasi-Judicial Immunity Despite a Sovereign Immunity Waiver under § 4-160 Introduction On 5 August 2025 the Connecticut Supreme...
White v. FCW Law Offices (2025): Harmonising Treble Damages for Identity Theft with Punitive Damages under CUTPA 1. Introduction In White v. FCW Law Offices, the Supreme Court of Connecticut...
High Watch Recovery Center Rule: Competitors Lack Standing to Appeal Connecticut Certificate-of-Need Approvals Introduction On 5 August 2025 the Supreme Court of Connecticut delivered its opinion in...
Airey v. Feliciano: The “No-Candidate, No-Primary” Rule – Connecticut Supreme Court Clarifies the Limits of § 9-329a(b)(3) Introduction On 29 July 2025 the Connecticut Supreme Court delivered its...
State v. Parris: A Heightened Intolerance for Prosecutorial Misstatements on Affirmative Defenses Introduction In State v. Parris, the Connecticut Supreme Court addressed whether repeated...
State v. Parris: A New Guard-Rail for Prosecutorial Summations on Extreme Emotional Disturbance Introduction State v. Parris (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2025) is a landmark decision that...
“Best-Judgment” as an Enforceable Contractual Duty and the Limits of Exculpatory Clauses: Commentary on Clinton v. Aspinwall, Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2025 1. Introduction Parties & Setting....
Managerial “Good-Faith” Is Not a Contractual Duty: Clinton v. Aspinwall and the Boundary Between Exculpation and Obligation Introduction In Clinton v. Aspinwall, 352 Conn. 597 (2025), the Connecticut...
State v. Traynham: Clarifying “Degree-Versus-Kind” Inculpation and the Trustworthiness Standard for Dual Inculpatory Statements Against Penal Interest 1. Introduction In State v. Traynham, 0 Conn. 1...
“Contextual Nexus” Requirement for Third-Party Culpability Instructions A Structured Commentary on State v. Simmons, 358 Conn. ___ (July 22, 2025) I. Introduction On 22 July 2025 the Supreme Court of...
The Aquarion Rule: Prohibiting Hindsight Prudence Review and Isolating ROE from Cost Disallowances in Connecticut Utility Rate-Setting Aquarion Water Co. of Connecticut v. Public Utilities Regulatory...
State v. Maharg – Clarifying the Burden of Proof for “Tainted-Evidence” Claims under Golding and the Harmless-Error Standard 1. Introduction Court: Supreme Court of Connecticut – July 8, 2025...
State v. Maharg: The Connecticut Supreme Court Affirms a Police Duty to Halt Interrogations When a Suspect Exhibits Acute Medical Distress 1. Introduction In State v. Maharg, 0 Conn. 0 (July 8 2025),...
State v. Moore: Narrowing the Definition of “Serious Firearm Offense” for 30 % Cash Bonds Introduction Case: State v. Moore, Supreme Court of Connecticut (2025) Core issue: Whether conspiracy to...