Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Colorado Case Commentaries

Lis Pendens Not Exempt from Favorable Termination Requirement in Colorado Malicious Prosecution Claims

Lis Pendens Not Exempt from Favorable Termination Requirement in Colorado Malicious Prosecution Claims

Date: Mar 20, 2007
Lis Pendens Not Exempt from Favorable Termination Requirement in Colorado Malicious Prosecution Claims Introduction The Supreme Court of Colorado, in HEWITT v. RICE, 154 P.3d 408 (2007), addressed...
Coverage of Subsequent Homeowners under CGL Insurance: Insights from Hoang v. Monterra Homes

Coverage of Subsequent Homeowners under CGL Insurance: Insights from Hoang v. Monterra Homes

Date: Mar 6, 2007
Coverage of Subsequent Homeowners under Commercial General Liability Insurance: Insights from Hoang v. Monterra Homes Introduction The case of HOANG v. MONTERRA HOMES (POWDERHORN) LLC et al. (149...
Good Cause Exception under Colorado's Express Consent Law: Insights from Turbyne v. The People

Good Cause Exception under Colorado's Express Consent Law: Insights from Turbyne v. The People

Date: Feb 6, 2007
Good Cause Exception under Colorado's Express Consent Law: Insights from Turbyne v. The People Introduction Turbyne v. The People of the State of Colorado, 151 P.3d 563, adjudicated on February 5,...
Colorado Supreme Court Limits "Ordinary and Necessary Expenses" Excludes Overhead in Teacher Resignation Damages

Colorado Supreme Court Limits "Ordinary and Necessary Expenses" Excludes Overhead in Teacher Resignation Damages

Date: Apr 4, 2006
Colorado Supreme Court Limits "Ordinary and Necessary Expenses" Excludes Overhead in Teacher Resignation Damages Introduction In the case of Mary Klinger v. Adams County School District No. 50, the...
PEOPLE v. VIGIL: Clarification on Testimonial Hearsay and Confrontation Clauses

PEOPLE v. VIGIL: Clarification on Testimonial Hearsay and Confrontation Clauses

Date: Feb 14, 2006
PEOPLE v. VIGIL: Clarification on Testimonial Hearsay and Confrontation Clauses Introduction In The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, v. Joe Vigil,...
People v. Domingo-Gomez: Standards for Prosecutorial Conduct in Closing Arguments

People v. Domingo-Gomez: Standards for Prosecutorial Conduct in Closing Arguments

Date: Jan 10, 2006
People v. Domingo-Gomez: Standards for Prosecutorial Conduct in Closing Arguments Introduction People v. Victor Hugo Domingo-Gomez is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Colorado in...
Colorado Supreme Court Holds Attorneys Liable Under CCPA for Deceptive Advertising

Colorado Supreme Court Holds Attorneys Liable Under CCPA for Deceptive Advertising

Date: Jan 10, 2006
Colorado Supreme Court Holds Attorneys Liable Under CCPA for Deceptive Advertising Introduction The Colorado Supreme Court's decision in Richard E. Crowe v. Marc B. Tull and Franklin D. Azar...
Supreme Court of Colorado Establishes Strict Protocol for Resolving Personal Jurisdiction in 12(b)(2) Motions

Supreme Court of Colorado Establishes Strict Protocol for Resolving Personal Jurisdiction in 12(b)(2) Motions

Date: Dec 20, 2005
Supreme Court of Colorado Establishes Strict Protocol for Resolving Personal Jurisdiction in 12(b)(2) Motions Introduction In the landmark case of Archangel Diamond Corporation v. Lukoil and...
Colorado Supreme Court Clarifies 'Significant Disruption' and Upholds Obstruction of Peace Officer in Dempsey Case

Colorado Supreme Court Clarifies 'Significant Disruption' and Upholds Obstruction of Peace Officer in Dempsey Case

Date: Aug 23, 2005
Colorado Supreme Court Clarifies 'Significant Disruption' and Upholds Obstruction of Peace Officer in Dempsey Case Introduction The Colorado Supreme Court's decision in Matthew Charles Dempsey v. The...
Plain Error Application to Unpreserved Constitutional Errors in Jury Instructions: People v. Miller

Plain Error Application to Unpreserved Constitutional Errors in Jury Instructions: People v. Miller

Date: Jun 28, 2005
Plain Error Application to Unpreserved Constitutional Errors in Jury Instructions: People v. Miller Introduction People v. Miller is a significant case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Colorado in...
Colorado Upholds Constitutionality of Aggravated Sentencing under Section 18-1.3-401(6)

Colorado Upholds Constitutionality of Aggravated Sentencing under Section 18-1.3-401(6)

Date: Jun 28, 2005
Colorado Upholds Constitutionality of Aggravated Sentencing under Section 18-1.3-401(6) Introduction The case of Robert A. Lopez v. The People of the State of Colorado (113 P.3d 713, 2005) addressed...
Subcontractors' Independent Duty of Care in Construction Negligence Claims: Overriding the Economic Loss Rule

Subcontractors' Independent Duty of Care in Construction Negligence Claims: Overriding the Economic Loss Rule

Date: Jun 28, 2005
Subcontractors' Independent Duty of Care in Construction Negligence Claims: Overriding the Economic Loss Rule Introduction The case of Yacht Club II Homeowners Association, Inc. v. A.C. Excavating,...
Coors v. Security Life: Defining Public Impact in CCPA and Enforcing Termination Penalties

Coors v. Security Life: Defining Public Impact in CCPA and Enforcing Termination Penalties

Date: May 24, 2005
Coors v. Security Life: Defining Public Impact in CCPA and Enforcing Termination Penalties Introduction COORS v. SECURITY LIFE OF DENVER Insurance Co. is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Contractually Restricted Water Delivery Rights in Mutual Ditch Companies

Affirmation of Contractually Restricted Water Delivery Rights in Mutual Ditch Companies

Date: Apr 26, 2005
Affirmation of Contractually Restricted Water Delivery Rights in Mutual Ditch Companies Introduction The case of East Ridge of Fort Collins, LLC v. The Larimer and Weld Irrigation Company (2005)...
Res Judicata Upholds Claim Preclusion Against Statutory Reformation Claims in Colorado

Res Judicata Upholds Claim Preclusion Against Statutory Reformation Claims in Colorado

Date: Mar 29, 2005
Res Judicata Upholds Claim Preclusion Against Statutory Reformation Claims in Colorado Introduction In Argus Real Estate, Inc. v. E-470 Public Highway Authority, the Supreme Court of Colorado...
Establishing Clear Separation of Authority in RICD Adjudications under SB 216

Establishing Clear Separation of Authority in RICD Adjudications under SB 216

Date: Mar 15, 2005
Establishing Clear Separation of Authority in RICD Adjudications under SB 216 Introduction The Colorado Supreme Court case, Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District v. Colorado Water...
Colorado Supreme Court Rules Postconviction Relief Not Required to File Legal Malpractice Claims Against Criminal Defense Attorneys

Colorado Supreme Court Rules Postconviction Relief Not Required to File Legal Malpractice Claims Against Criminal Defense Attorneys

Date: Mar 1, 2005
Colorado Supreme Court Rules Postconviction Relief Not Required to File Legal Malpractice Claims Against Criminal Defense Attorneys Introduction In re Geoffrey RANTZ, Plaintiff, v. Ann P. KAUFMAN and...
Double Jeopardy Implications for Multiple Convictions under Sexual Assault Statutes: The PEOPLE v. WOELLHAF Decision

Double Jeopardy Implications for Multiple Convictions under Sexual Assault Statutes: The PEOPLE v. WOELLHAF Decision

Date: Jan 19, 2005
Double Jeopardy Implications for Multiple Convictions under Sexual Assault Statutes: The PEOPLE v. WOELLHAF Decision Introduction The case of Warren Woellhaf v. The People of the State of Colorado...
Ownership Determines PIP Coverage: Colorado Supreme Court Sets Precedent on Insurance Good Faith Claims

Ownership Determines PIP Coverage: Colorado Supreme Court Sets Precedent on Insurance Good Faith Claims

Date: Dec 7, 2004
Ownership Determines PIP Coverage: Colorado Supreme Court Sets Precedent on Insurance Good Faith Claims Introduction In American Family Mutual Insurance Company v. Cynthia M. Allen and Leland...
Colorado Supreme Court Clarifies Temporary Total Disability Benefits under Section 8-42-105(4)

Colorado Supreme Court Clarifies Temporary Total Disability Benefits under Section 8-42-105(4)

Date: Dec 7, 2004
Colorado Supreme Court Clarifies Temporary Total Disability Benefits under Section 8-42-105(4) Introduction The Colorado Supreme Court, in the landmark case Andrew Anderson and Industrial Claim...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert