Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Arkansas Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Admissibility of Prior Acts in Sexual Abuse Cases: Chunestudy v. State of Arkansas

Affirmation of Admissibility of Prior Acts in Sexual Abuse Cases: Chunestudy v. State of Arkansas

Date: May 25, 2012
Affirmation of Admissibility of Prior Acts in Sexual Abuse Cases: Chunestudy v. State of Arkansas Introduction Chunestudy v. State of Arkansas is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Effective Assistance of Counsel and Rape-Shield Statute Compliance Affirmed in HENINGTON v. STATE

Effective Assistance of Counsel and Rape-Shield Statute Compliance Affirmed in HENINGTON v. STATE

Date: Apr 27, 2012
Effective Assistance of Counsel and Rape-Shield Statute Compliance Affirmed in HENINGTON v. STATE Introduction The case of Danny Ray HENINGTON v. STATE of Arkansas (403 S.W.3d 55) adjudicated by the...
HOWARD v. STATE of Arkansas: Establishing Standards for Brady Violations in Error Coram Nobis Proceedings

HOWARD v. STATE of Arkansas: Establishing Standards for Brady Violations in Error Coram Nobis Proceedings

Date: Apr 27, 2012
HOWARD v. STATE of Arkansas: Establishing Standards for Brady Violations in Error Coram Nobis Proceedings Introduction HOWARD v. STATE of Arkansas (403 S.W.3d 38, 2012) is a pivotal case adjudicated...
Strict Interpretation of Contractor Licensing Laws Affirmed by Arkansas Supreme Court

Strict Interpretation of Contractor Licensing Laws Affirmed by Arkansas Supreme Court

Date: Apr 13, 2012
Strict Interpretation of Contractor Licensing Laws Affirmed by Arkansas Supreme Court Introduction The case of Central Oklahoma Pipeline, Inc., d/b/a CenOk Pipeline, Inc. v. Hawk Field Services, LLC...
Sartin v. Arkansas: Upholding Standards for Effective Counsel and Waiver of Testimonial Rights

Sartin v. Arkansas: Upholding Standards for Effective Counsel and Waiver of Testimonial Rights

Date: Apr 13, 2012
Sartin v. Arkansas: Upholding Standards for Effective Counsel and Waiver of Testimonial Rights Introduction The case of Antonio Deshaun SARTIN v. STATE of Arkansas, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Efficient Assistance of Counsel in Postconviction Relief: The ABERNATHY v. STATE Decision

Efficient Assistance of Counsel in Postconviction Relief: The ABERNATHY v. STATE Decision

Date: Feb 10, 2012
Efficient Assistance of Counsel in Postconviction Relief: The ABERNATHY v. STATE Decision Introduction The case of Routy ABERNATHY v. STATE of Arkansas (386 S.W.3d 477) adjudicated by the Supreme...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in Justin ANDERSON v. STATE of Arkansas

Affirmation of Death Sentence in Justin ANDERSON v. STATE of Arkansas

Date: Nov 18, 2011
Affirmation of Death Sentence in Justin ANDERSON v. STATE of Arkansas Introduction Justin Anderson, a nineteen-year-old at the time of the crime, was convicted and sentenced to death for the murder...
Voluntariness of Confessions and Validity of Vehicle Searches in Computer Child Pornography Cases: Analysis of FUSON v. STATE

Voluntariness of Confessions and Validity of Vehicle Searches in Computer Child Pornography Cases: Analysis of FUSON v. STATE

Date: Sep 23, 2011
Voluntariness of Confessions and Validity of Vehicle Searches in Computer Child Pornography Cases: Analysis of FUSON v. STATE Introduction In FUSON v. STATE (383 S.W.3d 848, Supreme Court of...
Arkansas Supreme Court Sets Precedent on ADTPA and Unauthorized Practice of Law in Otis Campbell v. Asbury Automotive

Arkansas Supreme Court Sets Precedent on ADTPA and Unauthorized Practice of Law in Otis Campbell v. Asbury Automotive

Date: Apr 15, 2011
Arkansas Supreme Court Sets Precedent on ADTPA and Unauthorized Practice of Law in Otis Campbell v. Asbury Automotive Introduction In the landmark case of Otis Campbell, on behalf of himself and all...
Breach of Contract and Defamation in Clinical Study Operations: An In-Depth Analysis of Boellner v. Clinical Study Centers

Breach of Contract and Defamation in Clinical Study Operations: An In-Depth Analysis of Boellner v. Clinical Study Centers

Date: Feb 25, 2011
Breach of Contract and Defamation in Clinical Study Operations: An In-Depth Analysis of Boellner v. Clinical Study Centers Introduction The case of Samuel Boellner, M.D., and Marilyn Boellner v....
Strict Enforcement of Procedural Requirements in Postconviction Relief: Insights from WATKINS v. STATE

Strict Enforcement of Procedural Requirements in Postconviction Relief: Insights from WATKINS v. STATE

Date: Apr 2, 2010
Strict Enforcement of Procedural Requirements in Postconviction Relief: Insights from WATKINS v. STATE Introduction The case of Kyron Deandre WATKINS v. STATE of Arkansas, 362 S.W.3d 910 (Ark. 2010),...
Strict Compliance Required for No-Merit Briefs in Criminal Appeals: Sartin v. Arkansas

Strict Compliance Required for No-Merit Briefs in Criminal Appeals: Sartin v. Arkansas

Date: Jan 15, 2010
Strict Compliance Required for No-Merit Briefs in Criminal Appeals: Sartin v. Arkansas Introduction Antonio Deshun Sartin v. State of Arkansas, 362 S.W.3d 877 (Ark. 2010), is a pivotal case decided...
Insufficiency of Evidence in Proving Continuing Criminal Enterprise and Improper Admissibility of Unrelated Evidence: Campbell v. Arkansas

Insufficiency of Evidence in Proving Continuing Criminal Enterprise and Improper Admissibility of Unrelated Evidence: Campbell v. Arkansas

Date: Nov 6, 2009
Insufficiency of Evidence in Proving Continuing Criminal Enterprise and Improper Admissibility of Unrelated Evidence: Campbell v. Arkansas 1. Introduction Ronald J. Campbell v. State of Arkansas,...
Establishing Precedent on Termination of Parental Rights Due to Mental Incapacity: Dowdy v. Arkansas DHS

Establishing Precedent on Termination of Parental Rights Due to Mental Incapacity: Dowdy v. Arkansas DHS

Date: Mar 12, 2009
Establishing Precedent on Termination of Parental Rights Due to Mental Incapacity: Dowdy v. Arkansas DHS Introduction The case of Carmal Renee Dowdy and Walter Dowdy v. Arkansas Department of Human...
Resolution of Testimonial Inconsistencies in Sexual Assault Cases: Billy Joe Kelley, Jr. v. State of Arkansas

Resolution of Testimonial Inconsistencies in Sexual Assault Cases: Billy Joe Kelley, Jr. v. State of Arkansas

Date: Feb 6, 2009
Resolution of Testimonial Inconsistencies in Sexual Assault Cases: Billy Joe Kelley, Jr. v. State of Arkansas Introduction Billy Joe Kelley, Jr. v. State of Arkansas (292 S.W.3d 297) is a landmark...
Preservation Requirements for Sufficiency-of-Evidence Challenges: Insights from Bienemy v. State of Arkansas

Preservation Requirements for Sufficiency-of-Evidence Challenges: Insights from Bienemy v. State of Arkansas

Date: Sep 19, 2008
Preservation Requirements for Sufficiency-of-Evidence Challenges: Insights from Bienemy v. State of Arkansas Introduction The case of Joseph M. Bienemy v. State of Arkansas (374 Ark. 232) serves as a...
No Concurrent Conflict of Interest in Dual Prosecutorial Roles: Kelly Sulli v. Whitmer

No Concurrent Conflict of Interest in Dual Prosecutorial Roles: Kelly Sulli v. Whitmer

Date: May 2, 2008
No Concurrent Conflict of Interest in Dual Prosecutorial Roles: Kelly Sulli v. Whitmer Introduction The case of Kelly Sullivent Whitmer v. Jeromy Sullivent, decided by the Supreme Court of Arkansas...
Reaffirming Standards of Effective Assistance of Counsel in Joint Representation Cases: HARRISON v. STATE of Arkansas

Reaffirming Standards of Effective Assistance of Counsel in Joint Representation Cases: HARRISON v. STATE of Arkansas

Date: Jan 11, 2008
Reaffirming Standards of Effective Assistance of Counsel in Joint Representation Cases: HARRISON v. STATE of Arkansas Introduction Raye Lynn HARRISON v. STATE of Arkansas (371 Ark. 474) is a pivotal...
Sovereign Immunity Upheld in LandsnPulaski v. Arkansas Dept. of Correction

Sovereign Immunity Upheld in LandsnPulaski v. Arkansas Dept. of Correction

Date: Dec 14, 2007
Sovereign Immunity Upheld in LandsnPulaski v. Arkansas Dept. of Correction Introduction LandsnPulaski, LLC v. Arkansas Department of Correction (269 S.W.3d 793) is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Clarifying Fourth Amendment Standing and Admissibility of Luminol Evidence in First-Degree Murder: Dunn v. Arkansas

Clarifying Fourth Amendment Standing and Admissibility of Luminol Evidence in First-Degree Murder: Dunn v. Arkansas

Date: Oct 5, 2007
Clarifying Fourth Amendment Standing and Admissibility of Luminol Evidence in First-Degree Murder: Dunn v. Arkansas Introduction The case of Andre Peter Dunn v. State of Arkansas (No. CR 07-96)...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert