Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Arkansas Case Commentaries

Correction of Clerical Errors in Sentencing: Insights from Baker v. Norris

Correction of Clerical Errors in Sentencing: Insights from Baker v. Norris

Date: Apr 13, 2007
Correction of Clerical Errors in Sentencing: Insights from Baker v. Norris Introduction Charles Alan Baker v. Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, 369 Ark. 405 (2007), is a...
WILLIAMS v. STATE of Arkansas: Reinforcing Standards for Effective Assistance of Counsel in Post-Conviction Proceedings

WILLIAMS v. STATE of Arkansas: Reinforcing Standards for Effective Assistance of Counsel in Post-Conviction Proceedings

Date: Mar 2, 2007
WILLIAMS v. STATE of Arkansas: Reinforcing Standards for Effective Assistance of Counsel in Post-Conviction Proceedings Introduction In WILLIAMS v. STATE of Arkansas, 369 Ark. 104 (2007), the Supreme...
Arkansas Supreme Court Clarifies Application of the Indian Child Welfare Act in Adoption Cases

Arkansas Supreme Court Clarifies Application of the Indian Child Welfare Act in Adoption Cases

Date: Jan 5, 2007
Arkansas Supreme Court Clarifies Application of the Indian Child Welfare Act in Adoption Cases Introduction In the landmark case Paul Vick v. Dennis and Lois Cecil, 368 Ark. 369 (2007), the Supreme...
Limitations on Postconviction Relief and Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: The HOWARD v. STATE of Arkansas Decision

Limitations on Postconviction Relief and Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: The HOWARD v. STATE of Arkansas Decision

Date: Jun 30, 2006
Limitations on Postconviction Relief and Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: The HOWARD v. STATE of Arkansas Decision Introduction Timothy L. HOWARD v. STATE of Arkansas, 367 Ark. 18...
Strict Adherence to Arkansas Rule 4(b)(1) Over Rule 60(a): Implications from Lee Murchison v. Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois

Strict Adherence to Arkansas Rule 4(b)(1) Over Rule 60(a): Implications from Lee Murchison v. Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois

Date: Jun 30, 2006
Strict Adherence to Arkansas Rule 4(b)(1) Over Rule 60(a): Implications from Lee Murchison v. Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois Introduction Lee Murchison v. Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois,...
Armstrong v. State of Arkansas: Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction amidst Professional Conduct and Batson Challenges

Armstrong v. State of Arkansas: Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction amidst Professional Conduct and Batson Challenges

Date: Apr 14, 2006
Armstrong v. State of Arkansas: Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction amidst Professional Conduct and Batson Challenges Introduction Ralph Armstrong v. State of Arkansas is a pivotal case...
Corroboration of Accomplice Testimony and Waiver of Rights in Michael Raymond MACKOOL v. STATE of Arkansas

Corroboration of Accomplice Testimony and Waiver of Rights in Michael Raymond MACKOOL v. STATE of Arkansas

Date: Apr 14, 2006
Corroboration of Accomplice Testimony and Waiver of Rights in Michael Raymond MACKOOL v. STATE of Arkansas Introduction Michael Raymond MACKOOL v. STATE of Arkansas is a pivotal case decided by the...
Summary Judgment Improper in Defamation Claims where Defendant's Intent is in Dispute: Dodson v. Allstate

Summary Judgment Improper in Defamation Claims where Defendant's Intent is in Dispute: Dodson v. Allstate

Date: Mar 10, 2006
Summary Judgment Improper in Defamation Claims where Defendant's Intent is in Dispute: Dodson v. Allstate Introduction Jon H. Dodson, M.D.; Forest Park Medical Clinic, P.A. v. Allstate Insurance...
Commencement of Statute of Limitations in Rape Cases Involving Minors - Young v. Norris

Commencement of Statute of Limitations in Rape Cases Involving Minors - Young v. Norris

Date: Feb 3, 2006
Commencement of Statute of Limitations in Rape Cases Involving Minors - Young v. Norris Introduction The case of Charles D. Young v. Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, and...
Arkansas Supreme Court Upholds Sovereign Immunity in Law Enforcement Access Case

Arkansas Supreme Court Upholds Sovereign Immunity in Law Enforcement Access Case

Date: Sep 16, 2005
Disclaimer: This commentary is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For professional legal counsel, please consult a qualified attorney. Arkansas Supreme...
Establishing Constructive Possession in Commercial Vehicle Cases: Principles from Ke v. McKenzie

Establishing Constructive Possession in Commercial Vehicle Cases: Principles from Ke v. McKenzie

Date: May 13, 2005
Establishing Constructive Possession in Commercial Vehicle Cases: Principles from Ke v. McKenzie Introduction Ke v. McKenzie, a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Arkansas in 2005, addresses...
Williams v. Arkansas Department of Correction: Establishing the Threshold for Serious Medical Need in Civil Rights Claims

Williams v. Arkansas Department of Correction: Establishing the Threshold for Serious Medical Need in Civil Rights Claims

Date: Apr 29, 2005
Williams v. Arkansas Department of Correction: Establishing the Threshold for Serious Medical Need in Civil Rights Claims Introduction Williams v. Arkansas Department of Correction (No. 03-674) is a...
Establishing Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard in Termination of Parental Rights: Camarillo-Cox v. Arkansas DHS

Establishing Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard in Termination of Parental Rights: Camarillo-Cox v. Arkansas DHS

Date: Jan 21, 2005
Establishing Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard in Termination of Parental Rights: Camarillo-Cox v. Arkansas Department of Human Services Introduction The case of Linda Camarillo-Cox v. Arkansas...
Duty of Care and Summary Judgment in Negligence Actions: Analysis of Clark v. Transcontinental Insurance Company and Associates

Duty of Care and Summary Judgment in Negligence Actions: Analysis of Clark v. Transcontinental Insurance Company and Associates

Date: Dec 17, 2004
Duty of Care and Summary Judgment in Negligence Actions: Analysis of Clark v. Transcontinental Insurance Company and Associates Introduction The Supreme Court of Arkansas, in the landmark case of...
Affirmation of Director Removal in Closely Held Corporations for Gross Abuse of Discretion

Affirmation of Director Removal in Closely Held Corporations for Gross Abuse of Discretion

Date: Dec 17, 2004
Affirmation of Director Removal in Closely Held Corporations for Gross Abuse of Discretion Introduction The case of Joe Alan Taylor, Jr. and Steve Hufstedler v. Michael Hinkle and Beiife, Inc. (360...
Strict Construction of Ark. R. Civ. P. 4(i): Good Cause Must Be Shown Prior to Extension of Service of Process

Strict Construction of Ark. R. Civ. P. 4(i): Good Cause Must Be Shown Prior to Extension of Service of Process

Date: Dec 3, 2004
Strict Construction of Ark. R. Civ. P. 4(i): Good Cause Must Be Shown Prior to Extension of Service of Process Introduction The Supreme Court of Arkansas, in the case of Louise A. Henyan and Robert...
Aerial Spraying of Common Herbicides Not Considered Ultrahazardous: An Analysis of Mangrum v. Pigue

Aerial Spraying of Common Herbicides Not Considered Ultrahazardous: An Analysis of Mangrum v. Pigue

Date: Nov 12, 2004
Aerial Spraying of Common Herbicides Not Considered Ultrahazardous: An Analysis of Mangrum v. Pigue Introduction Mangrum v. Pigue is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Arkansas on...
Comprehensive Commentary on Shipley, Inc. v. Fletcher: Broad Interpretation of Arkansas' Harmful Material Statute

Comprehensive Commentary on Shipley, Inc. v. Fletcher: Broad Interpretation of Arkansas' Harmful Material Statute

Date: Oct 22, 2004
Comprehensive Commentary on Shipley, Inc. v. Fletcher: Broad Interpretation of Arkansas' Harmful Material Statute Introduction Shipley, Inc., d/b/a That Bookstore in Blytheville v. Fletcher is a...
Adoption of Anders Procedures in Termination of Parental Rights Appeals: Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

Adoption of Anders Procedures in Termination of Parental Rights Appeals: Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

Date: Oct 8, 2004
Adoption of Anders Procedures in Termination of Parental Rights Appeals: Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human Services Introduction Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human Services is...
Clarifying Contempt: The Distinction Between Civil and Criminal in Omni Holdings v. 3D.S.A., Inc.

Clarifying Contempt: The Distinction Between Civil and Criminal in Omni Holdings v. 3D.S.A., Inc.

Date: Mar 26, 2004
Clarifying Contempt: The Distinction Between Civil and Criminal in Omni Holdings v. 3D.S.A., Inc. Introduction The case of Omni Holding and Development Corporation and Tom Papachristou v. 3D.S.A.,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert