Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Arkansas Case Commentaries

Reaffirming Attorney Accountability in Timely Appeal Filings – Randolph McDonald v. State of Arkansas

Reaffirming Attorney Accountability in Timely Appeal Filings – Randolph McDonald v. State of Arkansas

Date: Mar 5, 2004
Reaffirming Attorney Accountability in Timely Appeal Filings – Randolph McDonald v. State of Arkansas Introduction The case of Randolph McDonald v. State of Arkansas (356 Ark. 106) serves as a...
Exceeding Restraint in Sexual Offenses: Insights from Moore v. State of Arkansas

Exceeding Restraint in Sexual Offenses: Insights from Moore v. State of Arkansas

Date: Jan 30, 2004
Exceeding Restraint in Sexual Offenses: Insights from Moore v. State of Arkansas Introduction Moore v. State of Arkansas (355 Ark. 657), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Arkansas on January 29,...
Affirmation of Employer Responsibility for Initial Physician Visit in One-Time Change Under Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-514(a)(3)(A)(ii)

Affirmation of Employer Responsibility for Initial Physician Visit in One-Time Change Under Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-514(a)(3)(A)(ii)

Date: Jul 31, 2003
Affirmation of Employer Responsibility for Initial Physician Visit in One-Time Change Under Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-514(a)(3)(A)(ii) Introduction The case of WAL-MART STORES, INC., Employer and Claims...
Strict Adherence to Statutory Procedures in Death Penalty Sentencing: Randy L. Anderson v. State of Arkansas

Strict Adherence to Statutory Procedures in Death Penalty Sentencing: Randy L. Anderson v. State of Arkansas

Date: Jul 4, 2003
Strict Adherence to Statutory Procedures in Death Penalty Sentencing: Randy L. Anderson v. State of Arkansas Introduction Randy L. Anderson v. State of Arkansas is a pivotal case decided by the...
Broad Construction of 'Arising Out Of' in Underinsured Motorist Insurance Policies: Hisaw v. State Farm

Broad Construction of 'Arising Out Of' in Underinsured Motorist Insurance Policies: Hisaw v. State Farm

Date: Jun 20, 2003
Broad Construction of 'Arising Out Of' in Underinsured Motorist Insurance Policies: Hisaw v. State Farm Introduction Glenn Hisaw and Elizabeth Hisaw, a husband and wife team, appealed a summary...
Constructive Possession and Substantial Evidence Affirmed: Arkansas Supreme Court in Walley v. State

Constructive Possession and Substantial Evidence Affirmed: Arkansas Supreme Court in Walley v. State

Date: Jun 13, 2003
Constructive Possession and Substantial Evidence Affirmed: Arkansas Supreme Court in Walley v. State Introduction The landmark case of Johnny Walley v. State of Arkansas (353 Ark. 586), adjudicated...
Statute of Limitations and Extrinsic Fraud in Annulment of Adoption: Insights from McAdams v. McAdams

Statute of Limitations and Extrinsic Fraud in Annulment of Adoption: Insights from McAdams v. McAdams

Date: Jun 6, 2003
Statute of Limitations and Extrinsic Fraud in Annulment of Adoption: Insights from McAdams v. McAdams Introduction McAdams v. McAdams (353 Ark. 494), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Arkansas on...
Enhancements in Directed Verdict Procedures and Lesser-Included Offense Instructions: Eric Z. Grillot v. State of Arkansas

Enhancements in Directed Verdict Procedures and Lesser-Included Offense Instructions: Eric Z. Grillot v. State of Arkansas

Date: May 23, 2003
Enhancements in Directed Verdict Procedures and Lesser-Included Offense Instructions: Eric Z. Grillot v. State of Arkansas Introduction Eric Z. Grillot v. State of Arkansas (353 Ark. 294) is a...
Affirmation of Reasonable Suspicion and Pat-Down Searches under Arkansas Criminal Procedure: Davis v. Arkansas (351 Ark. 406, 2003)

Affirmation of Reasonable Suspicion and Pat-Down Searches under Arkansas Criminal Procedure: Davis v. Arkansas (351 Ark. 406, 2003)

Date: Jan 10, 2003
Affirmation of Reasonable Suspicion and Pat-Down Searches under Arkansas Criminal Procedure Lee Roy DAVIS v. STATE of Arkansas, 351 Ark. 406 (2003) Introduction Lee Roy DAVIS v. STATE of Arkansas is...
Clarification on Temporary Total Disability Benefits and 'Return to Work' in Arkansas Workers' Compensation Law: Poulan Weed Eater v. Loretta Marshall

Clarification on Temporary Total Disability Benefits and 'Return to Work' in Arkansas Workers' Compensation Law: Poulan Weed Eater v. Loretta Marshall

Date: Sep 19, 2002
Clarification on Temporary Total Disability Benefits and 'Return to Work' in Arkansas Workers' Compensation Law: Poulan Weed Eater v. Loretta Marshall Introduction The case of Poulan Weed Eater v....
Arkansas Civil Rights Act Limits 'Disability' to Actual Impairments, Excludes Those 'Regarded As' Disabled

Arkansas Civil Rights Act Limits 'Disability' to Actual Impairments, Excludes Those 'Regarded As' Disabled

Date: Apr 12, 2002
Arkansas Civil Rights Act Limits 'Disability' to Actual Impairments, Excludes Those 'Regarded As' Disabled Introduction The case Sherry C. Faulkner v. Arkansas Children's Hospital et al. (347 Ark....
Admissibility of Prior Inconsistent Statements and Prosecutorial Conduct: Insights from THREADGILL v. STATE

Admissibility of Prior Inconsistent Statements and Prosecutorial Conduct: Insights from THREADGILL v. STATE

Date: Mar 15, 2002
Admissibility of Prior Inconsistent Statements and Prosecutorial Conduct: Insights from THREADGILL v. STATE Introduction Marcus Threadgill was convicted in the Miller County Circuit Court of...
Arkansas Supreme Court Establishes Two-Prong Test for Exemption of Disability Settlements from Marital Property in Divorce Cases

Arkansas Supreme Court Establishes Two-Prong Test for Exemption of Disability Settlements from Marital Property in Divorce Cases

Date: Jan 18, 2002
Arkansas Supreme Court Establishes Two-Prong Test for Exemption of Disability Settlements from Marital Property in Divorce Cases Introduction The case Martha COLLINS v. Cornelius COLLINS (347 Ark....
Expanded Duty to Defend in Insurance Policies Under Pollution Exclusions: Arkansas Supreme Court Establishes New Precedent

Expanded Duty to Defend in Insurance Policies Under Pollution Exclusions: Arkansas Supreme Court Establishes New Precedent

Date: Jan 11, 2002
Expanded Duty to Defend in Insurance Policies Under Pollution Exclusions: Arkansas Supreme Court Establishes New Precedent Introduction The Supreme Court of Arkansas delivered a pivotal decision on...
Preserving Sufficiency of Evidence and Double Jeopardy in Directed Verdicts: An Analysis of Brown v. Arkansas

Preserving Sufficiency of Evidence and Double Jeopardy in Directed Verdicts: An Analysis of Brown v. Arkansas

Date: Dec 21, 2001
Preserving Sufficiency of Evidence and Double Jeopardy in Directed Verdicts: An Analysis of Brown v. Arkansas Introduction In James BROWN v. STATE of Arkansas, 347 Ark. 308 (2001), the Supreme Court...
LAIME v. STATE: Arkansas Supreme Court Affirms Standards for Traffic Stops and Reasonable Suspicion

LAIME v. STATE: Arkansas Supreme Court Affirms Standards for Traffic Stops and Reasonable Suspicion

Date: Dec 7, 2001
LAIME v. STATE: Arkansas Supreme Court Affirms Standards for Traffic Stops and Reasonable Suspicion Introduction In LAIME v. STATE, the Arkansas Supreme Court addressed critical issues surrounding...
Arkansas Supreme Court Sets Precedent on Summary Judgment in Insurance Policy Ambiguity – Elam v. First Unum

Arkansas Supreme Court Sets Precedent on Summary Judgment in Insurance Policy Ambiguity – Elam v. First Unum

Date: Oct 19, 2001
Arkansas Supreme Court Sets Precedent on Summary Judgment in Insurance Policy Ambiguity – Elam v. First Unum Introduction The case of James E. ELAM v. FIRST UNUM LIFE INSurance Company addresses a...
Freeman v. ConAgra: Enhancing Standards for Medical Causation in Workers' Compensation

Freeman v. ConAgra: Enhancing Standards for Medical Causation in Workers' Compensation

Date: May 4, 2001
Freeman v. ConAgra Frozen Foods: Enhancing Standards for Medical Causation in Workers' Compensation Introduction In the case of Mary (Noelker) Freeman v. ConAgra Frozen Foods, decided by the Supreme...
Affirmation of Parental Rights Termination Under Clear and Convincing Evidence: Dinkins v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

Affirmation of Parental Rights Termination Under Clear and Convincing Evidence: Dinkins v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

Date: Mar 23, 2001
Affirmation of Parental Rights Termination Under Clear and Convincing Evidence: Dinkins v. Arkansas Department of Human Services Introduction The case of Tiffany Amelia Dinkins v. Arkansas Department...
Strict Construction of Workers' Compensation Act in Armstrong v. Wheeler Construction Co.

Strict Construction of Workers' Compensation Act in Armstrong v. Wheeler Construction Co.

Date: Mar 15, 2001
Strict Construction of Workers' Compensation Act in Armstrong v. Wheeler Construction Co. Introduction Wheeler Construction Company, Appellant v. Raymond L. Armstrong, Appellee is a pivotal case...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert