Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Arkansas Case Commentaries

Strict Enforcement of Service of Process Requirements under Arkansas Rule 4(i): RAYMOND v. RAYMOND

Strict Enforcement of Service of Process Requirements under Arkansas Rule 4(i): RAYMOND v. RAYMOND

Date: Feb 2, 2001
Strict Enforcement of Service of Process Requirements under Arkansas Rule 4(i): RAYMOND v. RAYMOND Introduction RAYMOND v. RAYMOND is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Arkansas delivered on...
Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege in Successive Proceedings Affirmed: Stacey Eugene JOHNSON v. STATE of Arkansas

Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege in Successive Proceedings Affirmed: Stacey Eugene JOHNSON v. STATE of Arkansas

Date: Oct 6, 2000
Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege in Successive Proceedings Affirmed: Stacey Eugene JOHNSON v. STATE of Arkansas Introduction In the landmark case of Stacey Eugene JOHNSON v. STATE of Arkansas (342...
Enhanced Standards for Ballot Title Clarity: Insights from ROBERTS v. PRIEST

Enhanced Standards for Ballot Title Clarity: Insights from ROBERTS v. PRIEST

Date: Jul 8, 2000
Enhanced Standards for Ballot Title Clarity: Insights from ROBERTS v. PRIEST Introduction The case of ROBERTS v. PRIEST (341 Ark. 813) adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Arkansas on July 7, 2000,...
Requirements for Medical Certainty in Workers' Compensation Claims: Analysis of Michael CRUDUP v. REGAL WARE, INC.

Requirements for Medical Certainty in Workers' Compensation Claims: Analysis of Michael CRUDUP v. REGAL WARE, INC.

Date: Jul 8, 2000
Requirements for Medical Certainty in Workers' Compensation Claims: Analysis of Michael CRUDUP v. REGAL WARE, INC. Introduction The case of Michael CRUDUP v. REGAL WARE, INC.; CNA Insurance Co....
Sovereign Immunity Reinforced: Arkansas Supreme Court Dismisses Suit Against State University Trustees

Sovereign Immunity Reinforced: Arkansas Supreme Court Dismisses Suit Against State University Trustees

Date: Jun 2, 2000
Sovereign Immunity Reinforced: Arkansas Supreme Court Dismisses Suit Against State University Trustees Introduction The case of Arkansas Tech University; Mary Ann Salmon, Steve A. Sutton, Dale Brown,...
Brady Violations and Error Coram Nobis in Criminal Procedure: Comprehensive Analysis of STATE of Arkansas v. Gregory Larimore

Brady Violations and Error Coram Nobis in Criminal Procedure: Comprehensive Analysis of STATE of Arkansas v. Gregory Larimore

Date: May 26, 2000
Brady Violations and Error Coram Nobis in Criminal Procedure: Comprehensive Analysis of STATE of Arkansas v. Gregory Larimore Introduction STATE of Arkansas v. Gregory Larimore (341 Ark. 397) is a...
Clarifying Summary Judgment Standards in Arkansas Gender Discrimination Cases: Flentje v. FNB of Wynne

Clarifying Summary Judgment Standards in Arkansas Gender Discrimination Cases: Flentje v. FNB of Wynne

Date: Mar 3, 2000
Clarifying Summary Judgment Standards in Arkansas Gender Discrimination Cases: Flentje v. First National Bank of Wynne Introduction Charlotte Flentje v. First National Bank of Wynne is a landmark...
Establishing Boundaries of Sovereign Immunity in Academic Disputes: Grine v. Board of Trustees

Establishing Boundaries of Sovereign Immunity in Academic Disputes: Grine v. Board of Trustees

Date: Oct 15, 1999
Establishing Boundaries of Sovereign Immunity in Academic Disputes: Grine v. Board of Trustees Introduction The case of Michael Grine v. Board of Trustees, University of Arkansas (338 Ark. 791)...
Ultra Vires Determination in Bank Reorganization: Ford v. Keith Jurisprudence

Ultra Vires Determination in Bank Reorganization: Ford v. Keith Jurisprudence

Date: Jul 23, 1999
Ultra Vires Determination in Bank Reorganization: Ford v. Keith Jurisprudence Introduction Bill J. Ford, Bank Commissioner of Arkansas v. A.M. Keith (338 Ark. 487) is a landmark case adjudicated by...
Clarifying the Role of Objective Medical Evidence in Workers' Compensation Claims: WAL-MART STORES, INC. v. Brenda VanWagner

Clarifying the Role of Objective Medical Evidence in Workers' Compensation Claims: WAL-MART STORES, INC. v. Brenda VanWagner

Date: May 7, 1999
Clarifying the Role of Objective Medical Evidence in Workers' Compensation Claims: WAL-MART STORES, INC. v. Brenda VanWagner Introduction In the landmark case of WAL-MART STORES, INC. v. Brenda...
Substantial Evidence Standard Reinforced in Workers' Compensation Denials: Dalton v. Allen Engineering

Substantial Evidence Standard Reinforced in Workers' Compensation Denials: Dalton v. Allen Engineering

Date: May 6, 1999
Substantial Evidence Standard Reinforced in Workers' Compensation Denials: Dalton v. Allen Engineering Introduction The case of B.W. Dalton v. Allen Engineering Company addressed pivotal issues...
Arkansas Supreme Court Establishes Statute of Limitations for Scheduled Workers' Compensation Injuries

Arkansas Supreme Court Establishes Statute of Limitations for Scheduled Workers' Compensation Injuries

Date: Mar 26, 1999
Arkansas Supreme Court Establishes Statute of Limitations for Scheduled Workers' Compensation Injuries Introduction The Arkansas Supreme Court, in the landmark case Minnesota Mining Manufacturing and...
Refining the Scope of Writ of Error Coram Nobis: Insights from Eugene Isaac PITTS v. STATE of Arkansas

Refining the Scope of Writ of Error Coram Nobis: Insights from Eugene Isaac PITTS v. STATE of Arkansas

Date: Mar 12, 1999
Refining the Scope of Writ of Error Coram Nobis: Insights from Eugene Isaac PITTS v. STATE of Arkansas Introduction Eugene Isaac PITTS v. STATE of Arkansas (336 Ark. 580, 1999) is a pivotal case...
Attorney's Lien and Inter Vivos Gifts: Insights from J.R. Nash v. Estate of Eddie Linn Swaffar

Attorney's Lien and Inter Vivos Gifts: Insights from J.R. Nash v. Estate of Eddie Linn Swaffar

Date: Jan 29, 1999
Attorney's Lien and Inter Vivos Gifts: Insights from J.R. Nash v. Estate of Eddie Linn Swaffar Introduction The case J.R. Nash v. Estate of Eddie Linn Swaffar, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Termination of Trusts: Aycock Pontiac, Inc. v. James Hervey Aycock Jr. Establishes Standards for Trust Revocation and Interpretation

Termination of Trusts: Aycock Pontiac, Inc. v. James Hervey Aycock Jr. Establishes Standards for Trust Revocation and Interpretation

Date: Dec 22, 1998
Termination of Trusts: Aycock Pontiac, Inc. v. James Hervey Aycock Jr. Establishes Standards for Trust Revocation and Interpretation Introduction The case of Aycock Pontiac, Inc., James H. Aycock...
Actual Dependency Requirement Affirmed in Workers' Compensation Death Benefits

Actual Dependency Requirement Affirmed in Workers' Compensation Death Benefits

Date: Dec 4, 1998
Actual Dependency Requirement Affirmed in Workers' Compensation Death Benefits Introduction In the landmark case of Lawhon Farm Services, et al. v. James R. Brown (984 S.W.2d 1), adjudicated by the...
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Recognized as Per Se Compensable Injury under Arkansas Workers' Compensation Act

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Recognized as Per Se Compensable Injury under Arkansas Workers' Compensation Act

Date: May 22, 1998
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Recognized as Per Se Compensable Injury under Arkansas Workers' Compensation Act Introduction The case of Lilly KILDOW v. BALDWIN PIANO ORGAN (97-828) addressed a pivotal issue...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Limited Partner's Individual Action: Establishing the Necessity of Derivative Suits for Injuries Primarily to the Partnership

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Limited Partner's Individual Action: Establishing the Necessity of Derivative Suits for Injuries Primarily to the Partnership

Date: May 15, 1998
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Limited Partner's Individual Action: Establishing the Necessity of Derivative Suits for Injuries Primarily to the Partnership Introduction In the landmark case of...
Hames and Robinson v. Cravens: Affirming Standards for Derivative Actions in Arkansas

Hames and Robinson v. Cravens: Affirming Standards for Derivative Actions in Arkansas

Date: Apr 10, 1998
Hames and Robinson v. Cravens: Affirming Standards for Derivative Actions in Arkansas Introduction In the landmark case of Pat Hames and Ben Robinson v. Marybeth Cravens (332 Ark. 437), decided on...
Balancing Public Interest and Personal Privacy in FOI Requests: The Stilley v. McBride Precedent

Balancing Public Interest and Personal Privacy in FOI Requests: The Stilley v. McBride Precedent

Date: Mar 20, 1998
Balancing Public Interest and Personal Privacy in FOI Requests: The Stilley v. McBride Precedent Introduction Oscar Stilley v. Wanda McBride, 332 Ark. 306 (1998), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert