Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Arkansas Case Commentaries

Defining the Scope of Medical Evidence in Workers' Compensation – Stephens Truck Lines v. Millican

Defining the Scope of Medical Evidence in Workers' Compensation – Stephens Truck Lines v. Millican

Date: Sep 18, 1997
Defining the Scope of Medical Evidence in Workers' Compensation – Stephens Truck Lines v. Millican Introduction Parties Involved: Appellant: Stephens Truck Lines Appellee: Robert Millican Background:...
Reaffirming the 'Clear and Convincing Evidence' Standard and Child Welfare Prioritization in Termination of Parental Rights: J.T. v. Arkansas DHS

Reaffirming the 'Clear and Convincing Evidence' Standard and Child Welfare Prioritization in Termination of Parental Rights: J.T. v. Arkansas DHS

Date: Jul 1, 1997
Reaffirming the 'Clear and Convincing Evidence' Standard and Child Welfare Prioritization in Termination of Parental Rights: J.T. v. Arkansas DHS Introduction The case of J.T. v. Arkansas Department...
Strict Construction of Consent in Adoption Statutes Upheld in King v. Lybrand

Strict Construction of Consent in Adoption Statutes Upheld in King v. Lybrand

Date: Jun 24, 1997
Strict Construction of Consent in Adoption Statutes Upheld in King v. Lybrand Introduction In In the Matter of the Adoption of Kristen Dyan Lybrand; John Wesley King v. Sharon Lybrand, 329 Ark. 163...
Defining "Employment Services" in Workers' Compensation: Olsten Kimberly Quality Care v. Cheri Pettey

Defining "Employment Services" in Workers' Compensation: Olsten Kimberly Quality Care v. Cheri Pettey

Date: May 6, 1997
Defining "Employment Services" in Workers' Compensation: Olsten Kimberly Quality Care v. Cheri Pettey Introduction The Supreme Court of Arkansas, in the landmark decision Olsten Kimberly Quality Care...
Reasonable Suspicion from Marijuana Odor: Alton Le v. Brunson and Its Implications

Reasonable Suspicion from Marijuana Odor: Alton Le v. Brunson and Its Implications

Date: Mar 18, 1997
Reasonable Suspicion from Marijuana Odor: Alton Le v. Brunson and Its Implications Introduction Alton Le v. Brunson is a pivotal 1997 decision by the Supreme Court of Arkansas that addressed the...
Strict Enforcement of Clear Policy Exclusions Upheld in Smith v. Shelter Mutual

Strict Enforcement of Clear Policy Exclusions Upheld in Smith v. Shelter Mutual

Date: Feb 11, 1997
Strict Enforcement of Clear Policy Exclusions Upheld in Smith v. Shelter Mutual Introduction In the landmark case of Judy Smith v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Company, 327 Ark. 208 (Ark. Supreme Court,...
Echols and Baldwin v. State of Arkansas: Upholding Substantial Evidence and Procedural Standards

Echols and Baldwin v. State of Arkansas: Upholding Substantial Evidence and Procedural Standards

Date: Dec 24, 1996
Comprehensive Commentary on Echols and Baldwin v. State of Arkansas (1996) Introduction Damien Wayne Echols and Charles Jason Baldwin were convicted of the capital murders of three eight-year-old...
Defining Prime Contractor Status under Arkansas Workers' Compensation: Nucor-Yamato Steel Co. v. Rinkines

Defining Prime Contractor Status under Arkansas Workers' Compensation: Nucor-Yamato Steel Co. v. Rinkines

Date: Oct 8, 1996
Defining Prime Contractor Status under Arkansas Workers' Compensation: Nucor-Yamato Steel Co. v. Rinkines Introduction The case of NUCOR HOLDING CORPORATION and Yamato Holding Corporation d/b/a...
Jordan v. Tyson Foods: Affirmation of Workers' Compensation Denial Standards

Jordan v. Tyson Foods: Affirmation of Workers' Compensation Denial Standards

Date: Dec 7, 1995
Jordan v. Tyson Foods: Affirmation of Workers' Compensation Denial Standards Introduction Jack Jordan v. Tyson Foods, Inc. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Court of Appeals of Arkansas, En Banc...
Arkansas Supreme Court Affirms Protection of Minor’s Right to Continuing Child Support Over ARCP Rule 41

Arkansas Supreme Court Affirms Protection of Minor’s Right to Continuing Child Support Over ARCP Rule 41

Date: Nov 7, 1995
Arkansas Supreme Court Affirms Protection of Minor’s Right to Continuing Child Support Over ARCP Rule 41 Introduction In the landmark case of Erwin L. Davis v. Office of Child Support Enforcement...
Substantial Evidence Standard in Workers' Compensation: Insights from Morelock v. Kearney Company

Substantial Evidence Standard in Workers' Compensation: Insights from Morelock v. Kearney Company

Date: Mar 9, 1995
Substantial Evidence Standard in Workers' Compensation: Insights from Morelock v. Kearney Company Introduction Bobby Morelock v. Kearney Company is a pivotal 1995 decision by the Court of Appeals of...
Arkansas Supreme Court Establishes 'Design-Based' Definition of Handgun in Juvenile Possession Cases

Arkansas Supreme Court Establishes 'Design-Based' Definition of Handgun in Juvenile Possession Cases

Date: Nov 1, 1994
Arkansas Supreme Court Establishes 'Design-Based' Definition of Handgun in Juvenile Possession Cases Introduction The case of S.T. and C.B. v. STATE of Arkansas (318 Ark. 499) adjudicated by the...
Suppression of Confessions Due to Arraignment Delays: Michael Clay v. State of Arkansas

Suppression of Confessions Due to Arraignment Delays: Michael Clay v. State of Arkansas

Date: Nov 1, 1994
Suppression of Confessions Due to Arraignment Delays: Michael Clay v. State of Arkansas Introduction Michael Clay v. State of Arkansas, 318 Ark. 122 (1994), is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme...
Sufficiency of Ballot Titles: Arkansas Supreme Court Establishes Standards for Material Omissions and Misleading Information

Sufficiency of Ballot Titles: Arkansas Supreme Court Establishes Standards for Material Omissions and Misleading Information

Date: Oct 15, 1994
Sufficiency of Ballot Titles: Arkansas Supreme Court Establishes Standards for Material Omissions and Misleading Information Introduction In the landmark case R. Robert Bailey and Ed H. Smith v. W.J....
Ballot Title Clarity: Establishing Standards from Christian Civic Action Committee v. McCuen

Ballot Title Clarity: Establishing Standards from Christian Civic Action Committee v. McCuen

Date: Oct 15, 1994
Ballot Title Clarity: Establishing Standards from Christian Civic Action Committee v. McCuen Introduction In the landmark case of Christian Civic Action Committee and Barry King v. W.J. Bill McCuen,...
Establishing Substantial Evidence in Workers' Compensation: Insights from Tracy NIX v. WILSON WORLD HOTEL

Establishing Substantial Evidence in Workers' Compensation: Insights from Tracy NIX v. WILSON WORLD HOTEL

Date: Jul 7, 1994
Establishing Substantial Evidence in Workers' Compensation: Insights from Tracy NIX v. WILSON WORLD HOTEL Introduction The case of Tracy NIX v. WILSON WORLD HOTEL (46 Ark. App. 303, 1994) presents a...
Greene v. Arkansas: Reinforcing Evidentiary Standards in Capital Sentencing

Greene v. Arkansas: Reinforcing Evidentiary Standards in Capital Sentencing

Date: Jun 21, 1994
Greene v. Arkansas: Reinforcing Evidentiary Standards in Capital Sentencing Introduction The case of Jack Gordon Greene v. State of Arkansas (317 Ark. 350) adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Admissibility of Prior Misconduct in Cross-Examination of Character Witnesses: Insights from W.L. SMITH v. STATE of Arkansas

Admissibility of Prior Misconduct in Cross-Examination of Character Witnesses: Insights from W.L. SMITH v. STATE of Arkansas

Date: Mar 23, 1994
Admissibility of Prior Misconduct in Cross-Examination of Character Witnesses: Insights from W.L. SMITH v. STATE of Arkansas Introduction In the landmark case of W.L. SMITH v. STATE of Arkansas (316...
Admonition and Objections for Prior Bad Acts: Insights from Hall v. State of Arkansas

Admonition and Objections for Prior Bad Acts: Insights from Hall v. State of Arkansas

Date: Oct 12, 1993
Admonition and Objections for Prior Bad Acts: Insights from Hall v. State of Arkansas Introduction The case of Michael HALL v. STATE of Arkansas (314 Ark. 402) presents a significant examination of...
Arkansas Methodist Hospital v. Martha Adams: Clarifying Second Injury Fund Liability

Arkansas Methodist Hospital v. Martha Adams: Clarifying Second Injury Fund Liability

Date: Jul 8, 1993
Arkansas Methodist Hospital v. Martha Adams: Clarifying Second Injury Fund Liability Introduction In the landmark case of Arkansas Methodist Hospital v. Martha Adams and Second Injury Fund, the Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert