Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Arkansas Case Commentaries

Preservation of Trial Integrity in Mistrial Decisions: Insights from McClendon v. State of Arkansas

Preservation of Trial Integrity in Mistrial Decisions: Insights from McClendon v. State of Arkansas

Date: Apr 5, 2019
Preservation of Trial Integrity in Mistrial Decisions: Insights from McClendon v. State of Arkansas Introduction David Wayne McClendon appealed his conviction for first-degree murder to the Supreme...
Arkansas Supreme Court Reinforces Judicial Review of Agency Actions Amid Sovereign Immunity Debate

Arkansas Supreme Court Reinforces Judicial Review of Agency Actions Amid Sovereign Immunity Debate

Date: Dec 21, 2018
Arkansas Supreme Court Reinforces Judicial Review of Agency Actions Amid Sovereign Immunity Debate Introduction In the landmark case involving the Arkansas Oil & Gas Commission (AOGC) and SWN...
Arkansas Supreme Court Invalidates Legislative Waiver of Sovereign Immunity in ACC v. Barnes

Arkansas Supreme Court Invalidates Legislative Waiver of Sovereign Immunity in ACC v. Barnes

Date: Apr 13, 2018
Arkansas Supreme Court Invalidates Legislative Waiver of Sovereign Immunity in ACC v. Barnes Introduction The case of Arkansas Community Correction (ACC) v. Annette Barnes (542 S.W.3d 841) presented...
Taffner v. Arkansas: Implications for Rape-Shield Protections and Brady Obligations

Taffner v. Arkansas: Implications for Rape-Shield Protections and Brady Obligations

Date: Mar 30, 2018
Taffner v. Arkansas: Implications for Rape-Shield Protections and Brady Obligations Introduction The case of Chris Beason Taffner v. State of Arkansas (541 S.W.3d 430) adjudicated by the Supreme...
Arkansas Supreme Court Establishes Clarity on Short-Term Rentals in Restrictive Covenants

Arkansas Supreme Court Establishes Clarity on Short-Term Rentals in Restrictive Covenants

Date: Feb 9, 2018
Arkansas Supreme Court Establishes Clarity on Short-Term Rentals in Restrictive Covenants Introduction In the landmark case of Vera Lee Angel Revocable Trust, Johnny Angel, and Paula Napper v. Jim...
Reaffirming Sovereign Immunity: Arkansas Supreme Court Limits Legislative Waivers Under Article 5, Section 20

Reaffirming Sovereign Immunity: Arkansas Supreme Court Limits Legislative Waivers Under Article 5, Section 20

Date: Jan 19, 2018
Reaffirming Sovereign Immunity: Arkansas Supreme Court Limits Legislative Waivers Under Article 5, Section 20 Introduction The case of The Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas v. Matthew...
Arkansas Supreme Court Establishes Rigorous Standards for Constructive Possession in Vehicle Transportation Cases: Pokatilov v. State

Arkansas Supreme Court Establishes Rigorous Standards for Constructive Possession in Vehicle Transportation Cases: Pokatilov v. State

Date: Sep 29, 2017
Arkansas Supreme Court Establishes Rigorous Standards for Constructive Possession in Vehicle Transportation Cases: Pokatilov v. State Introduction In the landmark case of Alexander Pokatilov v. State...
Reaffirmation of Constructive Possession Standards and Brady Obligations in Arkansas Firearm Possession Cases

Reaffirmation of Constructive Possession Standards and Brady Obligations in Arkansas Firearm Possession Cases

Date: Feb 17, 2017
Reaffirmation of Constructive Possession Standards and Brady Obligations in Arkansas Firearm Possession Cases Introduction The case of Derrick Gerade Lambert v. State of Arkansas (509 S.W.3d 637)...
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Postconviction Relief: The Adrian Dewayne Wooten Case

Effective Assistance of Counsel in Postconviction Relief: The Adrian Dewayne Wooten Case

Date: Nov 4, 2016
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Postconviction Relief: The Adrian Dewayne Wooten Case Introduction The case of Adrian Dewayne Wooten v. State of Arkansas, decided on November 3, 2016, by the...
Arkansas Supreme Court Upholds Trial Court's Discretion on Jury Instructions in Serandon Starling v. State of Arkansas

Arkansas Supreme Court Upholds Trial Court's Discretion on Jury Instructions in Serandon Starling v. State of Arkansas

Date: Jan 29, 2016
Arkansas Supreme Court Upholds Trial Court's Discretion on Jury Instructions in Serandon Starling v. State of Arkansas Introduction In the case of Serandon Starling, Appellant v. State of Arkansas...
Affirmation of Mistrial Denial in Cases of Juror's Preconceived Notions: Edmond McClinton v. State of Arkansas

Affirmation of Mistrial Denial in Cases of Juror's Preconceived Notions: Edmond McClinton v. State of Arkansas

Date: May 29, 2015
Affirmation of Mistrial Denial in Cases of Juror's Preconceived Notions: Edmond McClinton v. State of Arkansas Introduction In the landmark case of Edmond McClinton, Appellant v. State of Arkansas,...
Insufficient Service of Process via Email: Reversal of Default Judgment in Steward v. Kuettel

Insufficient Service of Process via Email: Reversal of Default Judgment in Steward v. Kuettel

Date: Dec 5, 2014
Insufficient Service of Process via Email: Reversal of Default Judgment in Steward v. Kuettel Introduction The case of James L. Steward, Jr., Appellant, v. Adam Kuettel, Appellee, adjudicated by the...
Arkansas Supreme Court Affirms Habeas Corpus Eligibility for Juvenile Life Imprisonment Claims Following Miller v. Alabama

Arkansas Supreme Court Affirms Habeas Corpus Eligibility for Juvenile Life Imprisonment Claims Following Miller v. Alabama

Date: May 16, 2014
Arkansas Supreme Court Affirms Habeas Corpus Eligibility for Juvenile Life Imprisonment Claims Following Miller v. Alabama Introduction The case of Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of...
Holcomb v. State: Defining the Scope of "Effort to Arrange a Meeting" in Internet Stalking Laws

Holcomb v. State: Defining the Scope of "Effort to Arrange a Meeting" in Internet Stalking Laws

Date: Apr 4, 2014
Holcomb v. State: Defining the Scope of "Effort to Arrange a Meeting" in Internet Stalking Laws Introduction In Derek Coy Holcomb v. State of Arkansas, 432 S.W.3d 600 (Ark. 2014), the Supreme Court...
Arkansas Supreme Court Establishes Direct Standing for LLC Members in Bankruptcy Cases

Arkansas Supreme Court Establishes Direct Standing for LLC Members in Bankruptcy Cases

Date: Jan 31, 2014
Arkansas Supreme Court Establishes Direct Standing for LLC Members in Bankruptcy Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Tom Muccio; Mike Muccio; and Next Chapter Resources, LLC v. Johnelle Hunt...
GREEN v. STATE: Affirmation of Accomplice Liability in Capital Murder Convictions

GREEN v. STATE: Affirmation of Accomplice Liability in Capital Murder Convictions

Date: Jan 17, 2014
GREEN v. STATE: Affirmation of Accomplice Liability in Capital Murder Convictions Introduction In the case of Billy Dale Green, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas (430 S.W.3d 729), the Supreme Court of...
Arkansas Supreme Court Establishes Clarity on Agency Relationships in Fire-Damage Liability

Arkansas Supreme Court Establishes Clarity on Agency Relationships in Fire-Damage Liability

Date: Nov 22, 2013
Arkansas Supreme Court Establishes Clarity on Agency Relationships in Fire-Damage Liability Introduction In the case of Charlotte Hall Hardin, Troy Gentry Guthrey, and Entergy Arkansas, Inc. v. India...
Jurisdictional Boundaries and Double Jeopardy: Insights from Michael Fields v. Ray Hobbs (2013 Ark. 416)

Jurisdictional Boundaries and Double Jeopardy: Insights from Michael Fields v. Ray Hobbs (2013 Ark. 416)

Date: Oct 25, 2013
Jurisdictional Boundaries and Double Jeopardy: Insights from Michael Fields v. Ray Hobbs (2013 Ark. 416) Introduction The case of Michael Fields v. Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of...
Roberts v. State: Affirmation of Death Sentence and Appellate Process Integrity

Roberts v. State: Affirmation of Death Sentence and Appellate Process Integrity

Date: Feb 15, 2013
Roberts v. State: Affirmation of Death Sentence and Appellate Process Integrity Introduction Roberts v. State (425 S.W.3d 771, Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2013) is a pivotal case that underscores the...
Affirmation of Jurisdictional Authority in Extraterritorial Breathalyzer Testing: Pickering v. State of Arkansas

Affirmation of Jurisdictional Authority in Extraterritorial Breathalyzer Testing: Pickering v. State of Arkansas

Date: Jun 22, 2012
Affirmation of Jurisdictional Authority in Extraterritorial Breathalyzer Testing: Pickering v. State of Arkansas Introduction The case of Mackenzie Pickering v. State of Arkansas (412 S.W.3d 143)...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert