Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Arkansas Case Commentaries

Calkins v. Arkansas: Affirmation of First-Degree Murder Convictions and Standards for Jury Instructions on Justification and Kidnapping

Calkins v. Arkansas: Affirmation of First-Degree Murder Convictions and Standards for Jury Instructions on Justification and Kidnapping

Date: Feb 23, 2024
Calkins v. Arkansas: Affirmation of First-Degree Murder Convictions and Standards for Jury Instructions on Justification and Kidnapping Introduction The Supreme Court of Arkansas, in the landmark...
Reaffirming the Standards for Self-Representation and Hearsay Admissibility: Neal v. State (2024 Ark. 16)

Reaffirming the Standards for Self-Representation and Hearsay Admissibility: Neal v. State (2024 Ark. 16)

Date: Feb 16, 2024
Reaffirming the Standards for Self-Representation and Hearsay Admissibility: Neal v. State (2024 Ark. 16) Introduction Neal v. State is a significant decision rendered by the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Pro Se Petition Denial under AR Code §16-90-111: WOODRUFF v. STATE of Arkansas

Affirmation of Pro Se Petition Denial under AR Code §16-90-111: WOODRUFF v. STATE of Arkansas

Date: Feb 9, 2024
Affirmation of Pro Se Petition Denial under AR Code §16-90-111: WOODRUFF v. STATE of Arkansas Introduction In Darren WOODRUFF v. STATE of Arkansas, the Supreme Court of Arkansas addressed the...
Williams v. Arkansas: Upholding Continuance Standards and Speedy Trial Rights

Williams v. Arkansas: Upholding Continuance Standards and Speedy Trial Rights

Date: Feb 9, 2024
Williams v. Arkansas: Upholding Continuance Standards and Speedy Trial Rights Introduction In the landmark case of Robert J. Williams, Jr. v. State of Arkansas (2024 Ark. 7), the Supreme Court of...
Arkansas Supreme Court Upholds First-Degree Murder Conviction: Standards for Sufficiency of Evidence and Mistrial Motions

Arkansas Supreme Court Upholds First-Degree Murder Conviction: Standards for Sufficiency of Evidence and Mistrial Motions

Date: Jan 19, 2024
Arkansas Supreme Court Upholds First-Degree Murder Conviction: Standards for Sufficiency of Evidence and Mistrial Motions Introduction The case of Marlon Smith v. State of Arkansas represents a...
Capital Murder Conviction Affirmed: Substantial Evidence and Rejection of Involuntary Intoxication Defense

Capital Murder Conviction Affirmed: Substantial Evidence and Rejection of Involuntary Intoxication Defense

Date: Oct 13, 2023
Capital Murder Conviction Affirmed: Substantial Evidence and Rejection of Involuntary Intoxication Defense Introduction The case of Keith Jeffery Wofford v. State of Arkansas (2023 Ark. 138)...
Arkansas Supreme Court Establishes Standards for Defense Counsel Disqualification and Safeguards Sixth Amendment Rights

Arkansas Supreme Court Establishes Standards for Defense Counsel Disqualification and Safeguards Sixth Amendment Rights

Date: May 12, 2023
Arkansas Supreme Court Establishes Standards for Defense Counsel Disqualification and Safeguards Sixth Amendment Rights Introduction The case of Marvin Stanton v. State of Arkansas (2023 Ark. 81)...
Rakeem Harris v. State of Arkansas: Establishing Standards for Evidence Admissibility and Jury Conduct

Rakeem Harris v. State of Arkansas: Establishing Standards for Evidence Admissibility and Jury Conduct

Date: Apr 21, 2023
Rakeem Harris v. State of Arkansas: Establishing Standards for Evidence Admissibility and Jury Conduct Introduction The case of Rakeem Harris v. State of Arkansas (2023 Ark. 64) presents a pivotal...
Affirming Capital Murder Conviction on Substantial Circumstantial Evidence: Shawn Cone v. State of Arkansas

Affirming Capital Murder Conviction on Substantial Circumstantial Evidence: Shawn Cone v. State of Arkansas

Date: Nov 11, 2022
Affirming Capital Murder Conviction on Substantial Circumstantial Evidence: Shawn Cone v. State of Arkansas Introduction The case of Shawn Cone v. State of Arkansas was adjudicated by the Supreme...
Significant Clarifications on Accomplice Liability and Sentencing for Juveniles in ROBERT SMITH III v. STATE OF ARKANSAS

Significant Clarifications on Accomplice Liability and Sentencing for Juveniles in ROBERT SMITH III v. STATE OF ARKANSAS

Date: May 6, 2022
Significant Clarifications on Accomplice Liability and Sentencing for Juveniles in ROBERT SMITH III v. STATE OF ARKANSAS Introduction The case of Robert Smith III v. State of Arkansas (2022 Ark. 95)...
Affirmation of Batson Challenge Standards and Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege in Turnbo v. State of Arkansas

Affirmation of Batson Challenge Standards and Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege in Turnbo v. State of Arkansas

Date: Oct 1, 2021
Affirmation of Batson Challenge Standards and Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege in Turnbo v. State of Arkansas Introduction Turnbo v. State of Arkansas is a significant decision by the Supreme Court...
Affirmation of First-Degree Murder and Attempted First-Degree Murder Convictions Based on Substantial Evidence

Affirmation of First-Degree Murder and Attempted First-Degree Murder Convictions Based on Substantial Evidence

Date: Mar 5, 2021
Affirmation of First-Degree Murder and Attempted First-Degree Murder Convictions Based on Substantial Evidence Introduction The Supreme Court of Arkansas, in the case of Jesse Q. Collins, Jr. v....
Arkansas Supreme Court Upholds First-Degree Murder Conviction in Armstrong v. State

Arkansas Supreme Court Upholds First-Degree Murder Conviction in Armstrong v. State

Date: Oct 9, 2020
Arkansas Supreme Court Upholds First-Degree Murder Conviction in Armstrong v. State Introduction In Matthew Armstrong v. State of Arkansas, 607 S.W.3d 491 (Ark. 2020), the Arkansas Supreme Court...
Arkansas Supreme Court Clarifies Peer-Review Privilege Exceptions and Equitable Relief in Medical Staff Disputes

Arkansas Supreme Court Clarifies Peer-Review Privilege Exceptions and Equitable Relief in Medical Staff Disputes

Date: Apr 24, 2020
Arkansas Supreme Court Clarifies Peer-Review Privilege Exceptions and Equitable Relief in Medical Staff Disputes Introduction In the landmark case of Victor Bernard Williams, M.D. v. Baptist Health...
Limitations of Habeas Corpus in Parole Eligibility Cases: Finney v. Kelley

Limitations of Habeas Corpus in Parole Eligibility Cases: Finney v. Kelley

Date: Apr 17, 2020
Limitations of Habeas Corpus in Parole Eligibility Cases: Finney v. Kelley Introduction Finney v. Kelley, 598 S.W.3d 26 (Ark. 2020), is a significant case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements under the FAA: Insights from Jorja Trading, Inc. v. Willis

Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements under the FAA: Insights from Jorja Trading, Inc. v. Willis

Date: Apr 10, 2020
Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements under the FAA: Insights from Jorja Trading, Inc. v. Willis Introduction In the landmark case Jorja Trading, Inc.; Automatic Auto Finance, Inc.; Cashfish Motor...
Arkansas Supreme Court Affirms Tort Immunity for Parent Companies under Workers' Compensation Exclusive Remedy

Arkansas Supreme Court Affirms Tort Immunity for Parent Companies under Workers' Compensation Exclusive Remedy

Date: Apr 10, 2020
Arkansas Supreme Court Affirms Tort Immunity for Parent Companies under Workers' Compensation Exclusive Remedy Introduction The case of Mary Katherine Myers, Widow of Michael Earl Myers versus...
Affirmation of First-Degree Murder Conviction: Evidentiary Standards and Trial Integrity in Cameron Halliburton v. State of Arkansas

Affirmation of First-Degree Murder Conviction: Evidentiary Standards and Trial Integrity in Cameron Halliburton v. State of Arkansas

Date: Mar 6, 2020
Affirmation of First-Degree Murder Conviction: Evidentiary Standards and Trial Integrity in Cameron Halliburton v. State of Arkansas Introduction In the landmark case of Cameron Halliburton v. State...
Limitations on Act 1780 Relief and Fundamental Error in Jury Composition: Analysis of McARTY v. STATE

Limitations on Act 1780 Relief and Fundamental Error in Jury Composition: Analysis of McARTY v. STATE

Date: Feb 21, 2020
Limitations on Act 1780 Relief and Fundamental Error in Jury Composition: Analysis of McARTY v. STATE Introduction McARTY v. STATE, 594 S.W.3d 54 (2020), is a significant judgment by the Supreme...
Limitations on Utilizing Section 16-90-111 for Challenging Sentencing Procedures

Limitations on Utilizing Section 16-90-111 for Challenging Sentencing Procedures

Date: Jan 31, 2020
Limitations on Utilizing Section 16-90-111 for Challenging Sentencing Procedures Introduction The case of Lee Charles Millsap, Jr. v. State of Arkansas addresses the appellant's attempt to correct an...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert