Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Alaska Case Commentaries

Legislative “Clarification” Cannot Override Binding Precedent: Separation of Powers and Ex Post Facto Constraints on Retroactive Sentencing Amendments

Legislative “Clarification” Cannot Override Binding Precedent: Separation of Powers and Ex Post Facto Constraints on Retroactive Sentencing Amendments

Date: May 10, 2025
Legislative “Clarification” Cannot Override Binding Precedent: Separation of Powers and Ex Post Facto Constraints on Retroactive Sentencing Amendments Introduction Yako W. Collins was convicted in...
Allocation of Nonresident Guided Hunt Permits Upholds Alaska Constitutional Principles

Allocation of Nonresident Guided Hunt Permits Upholds Alaska Constitutional Principles

Date: May 3, 2025
Allocation of Nonresident Guided Hunt Permits Upholds Alaska Constitutional Principles Introduction In Robert Cassell v. State of Alaska, Department of Fish & Game, Board of Game (Supreme Court No....
Immunity for Municipal “Good Samaritan” Services: Interpreting “Gratuitous” in AS 09.65.070(d)(4)

Immunity for Municipal “Good Samaritan” Services: Interpreting “Gratuitous” in AS 09.65.070(d)(4)

Date: May 3, 2025
Immunity for Municipal “Good Samaritan” Services: Interpreting “Gratuitous” in AS 09.65.070(d)(4) Introduction In John D. Rochon v. City of Nome, Allen Wright, and Jackie L. Reader, the Alaska...
Clear and Convincing Evidence Required for Involuntary Head-Shaving of Nonconsenting Patients

Clear and Convincing Evidence Required for Involuntary Head-Shaving of Nonconsenting Patients

Date: May 3, 2025
Clear and Convincing Evidence Required for Involuntary Head-Shaving of Nonconsenting Patients Introduction In the matter of the necessity for the hospitalization of Lila B., the Supreme Court of...
Flexible Interpretation of Municipal Rezoning Criteria: Priestley v. Anchorage

Flexible Interpretation of Municipal Rezoning Criteria: Priestley v. Anchorage

Date: May 1, 2025
Flexible Interpretation of Municipal Rezoning Criteria: Priestley v. Anchorage Introduction In Priestley v. Municipality of Anchorage, 2025 Alas. LEXIS 2088, the Alaska Supreme Court considered a...
Substantial Evidence and Board Discretion in Alaska Workers’ Compensation Appeals

Substantial Evidence and Board Discretion in Alaska Workers’ Compensation Appeals

Date: Apr 24, 2025
Substantial Evidence and Harmless-Error Doctrine Affirmed in Alaska Workers’ Compensation Appeals Introduction This commentary examines the Supreme Court of Alaska’s April 23, 2025 Memorandum Opinion...
Mandatory Aircraft Forfeiture Under Alaska’s Bootlegging Statute: Excessive Fines Clause Standard

Mandatory Aircraft Forfeiture Under Alaska’s Bootlegging Statute: Excessive Fines Clause Standard

Date: Apr 19, 2025
Mandatory Aircraft Forfeiture Under Alaska’s Bootlegging Statute: Excessive Fines Clause Standard Introduction In Kenneth John Jouppi v. State of Alaska, the Alaska Supreme Court addressed whether...
Expansion of Appointed‐Counsel Rights: Extending Flores to Pro Bono Representation by ANDVSA

Expansion of Appointed‐Counsel Rights: Extending Flores to Pro Bono Representation by ANDVSA

Date: Apr 17, 2025
Expansion of Appointed‐Counsel Rights: Extending Flores to Pro Bono Representation by ANDVSA Introduction John M. v. Michelle M. is a Supreme Court of Alaska custody dispute decided on April 16,...
Apathy and Self-Neglect as Indicators of Gravely Disabled Status under Alaska’s Involuntary Commitment Statute

Apathy and Self-Neglect as Indicators of Gravely Disabled Status under Alaska’s Involuntary Commitment Statute

Date: Apr 17, 2025
Apathy and Self-Neglect as Indicators of Gravely Disabled Status under Alaska’s Involuntary Commitment Statute Introduction In In the Matter of the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Kai H....
Litigation Privilege and Stringent Standards for Post-Judgment Tort Claims: NIED, Malicious Prosecution, and Abuse of Process in David Griffith v. Hemphill

Litigation Privilege and Stringent Standards for Post-Judgment Tort Claims: NIED, Malicious Prosecution, and Abuse of Process in David Griffith v. Hemphill

Date: Apr 12, 2025
Litigation Privilege and Stringent Standards for Post-Judgment Tort Claims: NIED, Malicious Prosecution, and Abuse of Process in David Griffith v. Hemphill Introduction In David Griffith v. Roger...
Clarifying Least Restrictive Alternatives in Involuntary Commitment: In the Matter of L.G.

Clarifying Least Restrictive Alternatives in Involuntary Commitment: In the Matter of L.G.

Date: Apr 10, 2025
Clarifying Least Restrictive Alternatives in Involuntary Commitment: In the Matter of L.G. Introduction In April 2025, the Alaska Supreme Court considered an appeal from Lawrence G. (“L.G.”), who was...
Preserving Constitutional Funding Frameworks: The Plainly Legitimate Sweep Standard and Joinder in Article VII, Section 1 Challenges

Preserving Constitutional Funding Frameworks: The Plainly Legitimate Sweep Standard and Joinder in Article VII, Section 1 Challenges

Date: Mar 29, 2025
Preserving Constitutional Funding Frameworks: The Plainly Legitimate Sweep Standard and Joinder in Article VII, Section 1 Challenges Introduction In State of Alaska, Department of Education & Early...
Alaska’s Interests-Based Choice-of-Law Rule for Corporate Veil-Piercing

Alaska’s Interests-Based Choice-of-Law Rule for Corporate Veil-Piercing

Date: Mar 29, 2025
Alaska’s Interests-Based Choice-of-Law Rule for Corporate Veil-Piercing Introduction Kaiser-Francis Oil Company and Aurora-KF, LLC (collectively “KFOC”) sued Rieck Oil, Inc., Deutsche Oel & Gas,...
Mandatory Notice Requirement in Self-Reimbursing State Representative Payee Schemes for Foster Children’s Social Security Benefits

Mandatory Notice Requirement in Self-Reimbursing State Representative Payee Schemes for Foster Children’s Social Security Benefits

Date: Mar 29, 2025
Mandatory Notice Requirement in Self-Reimbursing State Representative Payee Schemes for Foster Children’s Social Security Benefits Introduction In Z.C. v. State of Alaska, Department of Health and...
Reaffirming Evidentiary Standards and No-Contact Orders in Divorce: Juma v. Peterson

Reaffirming Evidentiary Standards and No-Contact Orders in Divorce: Juma v. Peterson

Date: Mar 27, 2025
Reaffirming Evidentiary Standards and No-Contact Orders in Divorce: Juma v. Peterson Introduction In Erick Juma v. Reketta Peterson (Alaska Sup. Ct. No. S-18942, March 26, 2025), the Alaska Supreme...
Continuous Representation Rule Defines Accrual Date for Legal Malpractice Claims

Continuous Representation Rule Defines Accrual Date for Legal Malpractice Claims

Date: Mar 22, 2025
Continuous Representation Rule Defines Accrual Date for Legal Malpractice Claims Introduction In Holly Sheldon-Lee v. Birch Horton Bittner, Inc., the Alaska Supreme Court addressed two interrelated...
Exclusion of Military Disability Benefits from Marital Property Division under USFSPA: Iozzo v. Tarpenning

Exclusion of Military Disability Benefits from Marital Property Division under USFSPA: Iozzo v. Tarpenning

Date: Mar 20, 2025
Exclusion of Military Disability Benefits from Marital Property Division under USFSPA: Iozzo v. Tarpenning Introduction This case arises from the 2015 divorce of Michael Thomas Iozzo Jr. (“Iozzo”)...
Civil Challenges to Criminal Sentences Require Prior Invalidation: Affirmation of the Heck–Patterson Rule in Alaska

Civil Challenges to Criminal Sentences Require Prior Invalidation: Affirmation of the Heck–Patterson Rule in Alaska

Date: Mar 20, 2025
Civil Challenges to Criminal Sentences Require Prior Invalidation: Affirmation of the Heck–Patterson Rule in Alaska Introduction This commentary examines the Alaska Supreme Court’s memorandum opinion...
Requiring Consideration of DVPO Findings in Child Custody Best-Interests Analysis

Requiring Consideration of DVPO Findings in Child Custody Best-Interests Analysis

Date: Mar 20, 2025
Requiring Consideration of DVPO Findings in Child Custody Best-Interests Analysis Introduction Jasmine R. v. Cornell R. is a memorandum opinion issued by the Supreme Court of the State of Alaska on...
Clarifying Excusable Neglect Under Alaska R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1): Attorney Error Does Not Warrant Relief

Clarifying Excusable Neglect Under Alaska R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1): Attorney Error Does Not Warrant Relief

Date: Mar 20, 2025
Clarifying Excusable Neglect Under Alaska R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1): Attorney Error Does Not Warrant Relief Introduction In Edward H. v. Sarah B., Supreme Court No. S-18832 (Alaska March 19, 2025), the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert