Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Quid Pro Quo-by-Implication, “As Opportunities Arise,” and RICO Conspiracy: The Sixth Circuit’s Roadmap for Public-Corruption Prosecutions after United States v. Householder and United States v. Borges

Quid Pro Quo-by-Implication, “As Opportunities Arise,” and RICO Conspiracy: The Sixth Circuit’s Roadmap for Public-Corruption Prosecutions after United States v. Householder and United States v. Borges

Date: May 7, 2025
Quid Pro Quo-by-Implication, “As Opportunities Arise,” and RICO Conspiracy: The Sixth Circuit’s Roadmap for Public-Corruption Prosecutions after United States v. Householder and United States v....
Procedural–Substantive Line Clarified: Unpreserved “Impermissible Factor” Claims Face Plain-Error Review, and Dissimilar Prior Crimes May Support Upward Variances

Procedural–Substantive Line Clarified: Unpreserved “Impermissible Factor” Claims Face Plain-Error Review, and Dissimilar Prior Crimes May Support Upward Variances

Date: May 7, 2025
Procedural–Substantive Line Clarified: Unpreserved “Impermissible Factor” Claims Face Plain-Error Review, and Dissimilar Prior Crimes May Support Upward Variances Introduction In United States v....
Quid Pro Quo, Proven by Implication: Sixth Circuit Affirms RICO Convictions and Requires Quid Pro Quo Standards for Bribery Predicates Involving Campaign Contributions

Quid Pro Quo, Proven by Implication: Sixth Circuit Affirms RICO Convictions and Requires Quid Pro Quo Standards for Bribery Predicates Involving Campaign Contributions

Date: May 7, 2025
Quid Pro Quo, Proven by Implication: Sixth Circuit Affirms RICO Convictions and Requires Quid Pro Quo Standards for Bribery Predicates Involving Campaign Contributions Introduction In United States...
Sixth Circuit Tightens Pleading for ERISA Recordkeeping-Fee Claims: Price Disparities and “Fungibility” Allegations Are Not Enough (England v. DENSO)

Sixth Circuit Tightens Pleading for ERISA Recordkeeping-Fee Claims: Price Disparities and “Fungibility” Allegations Are Not Enough (England v. DENSO)

Date: May 7, 2025
Sixth Circuit Tightens Pleading for ERISA Recordkeeping-Fee Claims: Price Disparities and “Fungibility” Allegations Are Not Enough Case: Martha D. England v. DENSO International America Inc., No....
Legitimate Remedial Choices by State Regulators Are Not Deliberate Indifference, But Misleading Municipal Assurances About Water Safety Can State a Fourteenth Amendment Bodily-Integrity Claim

Legitimate Remedial Choices by State Regulators Are Not Deliberate Indifference, But Misleading Municipal Assurances About Water Safety Can State a Fourteenth Amendment Bodily-Integrity Claim

Date: May 7, 2025
Legitimate Remedial Choices by State Regulators Are Not Deliberate Indifference, But Misleading Municipal Assurances About Water Safety Can State a Fourteenth Amendment Bodily-Integrity Claim...
Accardi Limits at the NLRB: Sixth Circuit Holds 29 C.F.R. § 102.19(c) Does Not Restrict the General Counsel’s Unreviewable Pre‑Hearing Discretion to Withdraw Charges

Accardi Limits at the NLRB: Sixth Circuit Holds 29 C.F.R. § 102.19(c) Does Not Restrict the General Counsel’s Unreviewable Pre‑Hearing Discretion to Withdraw Charges

Date: May 7, 2025
Accardi Limits at the NLRB: Sixth Circuit Holds 29 C.F.R. § 102.19(c) Does Not Restrict the General Counsel’s Unreviewable Pre‑Hearing Discretion to Withdraw Charges Introduction In Rieth-Riley...
Reasonable Efforts, Concrete Injuries: Sixth Circuit Clarifies NVRA List Maintenance and Public‑Disclosure Standing

Reasonable Efforts, Concrete Injuries: Sixth Circuit Clarifies NVRA List Maintenance and Public‑Disclosure Standing

Date: May 7, 2025
Reasonable Efforts, Concrete Injuries: Sixth Circuit Clarifies NVRA List Maintenance and Public‑Disclosure Standing Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Date: May 6, 2025 Case: Public...
Invited Error and the Limits of Tapia v. United States: United States v. Allante Ramone Brown

Invited Error and the Limits of Tapia v. United States: United States v. Allante Ramone Brown

Date: May 6, 2025
Invited Error and the Limits of Tapia v. United States: United States v. Allante Ramone Brown Introduction The Sixth Circuit’s decision in United States v. Allante Ramone Brown (No. 23-6029/6034,...
Eligibility and Discretionary Limits on Retroactive §4C1.1 Sentence Reductions

Eligibility and Discretionary Limits on Retroactive §4C1.1 Sentence Reductions

Date: May 6, 2025
Eligibility and Discretionary Limits on Retroactive §4C1.1 Sentence Reductions Introduction This commentary examines the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit’s decision in United...
Waiver of Tapia-Based Sentencing Claims Through Invited Error in United States v. Brown

Waiver of Tapia-Based Sentencing Claims Through Invited Error in United States v. Brown

Date: May 6, 2025
Waiver of Tapia-Based Sentencing Claims Through Invited Error in United States v. Allante R. Brown Introduction In United States v. Allante Ramone Brown, 6th Cir. No. 23-6029/6034 (May 5, 2025), the...
Damages Awards Are Not “Payments” Under Reinstatement Clauses: Comerica Bank v. Pratt

Damages Awards Are Not “Payments” Under Reinstatement Clauses: Comerica Bank v. Pratt

Date: May 6, 2025
Damages Awards Are Not “Payments” Under Reinstatement Clauses: Comerica Bank v. Pratt Introduction In Comerica Bank, Inc. v. Larry Pratt, 25a0228n.06 (6th Cir. May 5, 2025), the Sixth Circuit...
Defendant-Caused Delay Bars Sixth Amendment Speedy Trial Claim

Defendant-Caused Delay Bars Sixth Amendment Speedy Trial Claim

Date: May 3, 2025
Defendant-Caused Delay Bars Sixth Amendment Speedy Trial Claim Introduction United States v. Eric Michael Schuster, 25a0113p.06 (6th Cir. May 2, 2025), is a published Sixth Circuit decision...
Full Municipal Indemnification for Compensatory §1983 Damages Under Ohio Rev. Code §2744.07

Full Municipal Indemnification for Compensatory §1983 Damages Under Ohio Rev. Code §2744.07

Date: May 3, 2025
Full Municipal Indemnification for Compensatory §1983 Damages Under Ohio Rev. Code §2744.07 Introduction This case arises from the wrongful conviction and decades-long imprisonment of Roger Dean...
Full Municipal Indemnification Under Ohio Rev. Code § 2744.07 for Officer’s Compensatory Section 1983 Liability

Full Municipal Indemnification Under Ohio Rev. Code § 2744.07 for Officer’s Compensatory Section 1983 Liability

Date: May 3, 2025
Full Municipal Indemnification Under Ohio Rev. Code § 2744.07 for Officer’s Compensatory Section 1983 Liability Introduction This commentary examines the Sixth Circuit’s decision in Roger Dean...
Municipal Indemnification and Monell Liability Under Ohio Rev. Code § 2744.07

Municipal Indemnification and Monell Liability Under Ohio Rev. Code § 2744.07

Date: May 3, 2025
Municipal Indemnification and Monell Liability Under Ohio Rev. Code § 2744.07 Introduction Roger Dean Gillispie was convicted of sexual assault in 1991, spent over two decades in a maximum‐security...
“Reasonable Forecast” of Disruption Standard in Elementary School First Amendment Cases

“Reasonable Forecast” of Disruption Standard in Elementary School First Amendment Cases

Date: May 3, 2025
“Reasonable Forecast” of Disruption Standard in Elementary School First Amendment Cases Introduction This commentary examines the Sixth Circuit’s decision in C.S. v. Craig McCrumb, 25-a0112p.06 (6th...
Demonstrated Burden Required: Darnell v. Hargett on Tennessee's Minor Party Ballot Access

Demonstrated Burden Required: Darnell v. Hargett on Tennessee's Minor Party Ballot Access

Date: May 2, 2025
Demonstrated Burden Required: Darnell v. Hargett on Tennessee's Minor Party Ballot Access Introduction In Christopher Darnell et al. v. Tre Hargett et al., the Libertarian Party of Tennessee and four...
Permissible Consideration of §3553(a)(2)(A) Factors in Supervised Release Revocation Sentencing

Permissible Consideration of §3553(a)(2)(A) Factors in Supervised Release Revocation Sentencing

Date: May 2, 2025
Permissible Consideration of §3553(a)(2)(A) Factors in Supervised Release Revocation Sentencing Introduction United States v. Deandre Lamont Blackman is a Sixth Circuit decision addressing the scope...
Regulation of Camera Lighting in Public Meetings Does Not Impede First Amendment Rights

Regulation of Camera Lighting in Public Meetings Does Not Impede First Amendment Rights

Date: May 2, 2025
Regulation of Camera Lighting in Public Meetings Does Not Impede First Amendment Rights Introduction Kamryn Randle v. Ladel Lewis, decided by the Sixth Circuit on May 1, 2025 (No. 24-1888), addressed...
Accrual of Section 1983 Malicious-Prosecution Claims: Separable Indictments and Limitations Periods

Accrual of Section 1983 Malicious-Prosecution Claims: Separable Indictments and Limitations Periods

Date: May 1, 2025
Accrual of Section 1983 Malicious-Prosecution Claims: Separable Indictments and Limitations Periods Introduction Percy Dwayne Brown sued Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Government and University of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert