Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

2d Circuit Case Commentaries

Framework for Imposing Suspicionless Search Conditions under Supervised Release: United States v. Poole

Framework for Imposing Suspicionless Search Conditions under Supervised Release: United States v. Poole

Date: Apr 8, 2025
Framework for Imposing Suspicionless Search Conditions under Supervised Release: United States v. Poole Introduction United States v. Poole, decided April 7, 2025 by the Second Circuit, clarifies...
Suspicionless Search Conditions on Supervised Release: Standards and Implications following United States v. Poole

Suspicionless Search Conditions on Supervised Release: Standards and Implications following United States v. Poole

Date: Apr 8, 2025
Suspicionless Search Conditions on Supervised Release: Standards and Implications following United States v. Poole Introduction The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s decision in...
Recognizing Third-Party Insured Status and Co-Excess Coverage in RRG Policies: County of Ulster v. Alliance of Nonprofits

Recognizing Third-Party Insured Status and Co-Excess Coverage in RRG Policies: County of Ulster v. Alliance of Nonprofits

Date: Apr 8, 2025
Recognizing Third-Party Insured Status and Co-Excess Coverage in Risk Retention Group Policies: County of Ulster v. Alliance of Nonprofits Introduction The Second Circuit’s summary order in County of...
Suspicionless Search Conditions on Supervised Release May Be Imposed Without “Extraordinary Circumstances,” If Case-Specific Facts Support Them: United States v. Poole (2d Cir. 2025)

Suspicionless Search Conditions on Supervised Release May Be Imposed Without “Extraordinary Circumstances,” If Case-Specific Facts Support Them: United States v. Poole (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Apr 8, 2025
Suspicionless Search Conditions on Supervised Release May Be Imposed Without “Extraordinary Circumstances,” If Case-Specific Facts Support Them: United States v. Poole (2d Cir. 2025) Introduction In...
Principals as Insureds under Volunteer Auto Coverage Endorsements and Co-Excess Doctrine

Principals as Insureds under Volunteer Auto Coverage Endorsements and Co-Excess Doctrine

Date: Apr 8, 2025
Principals as Insureds under Volunteer Auto Coverage Endorsements and Co-Excess Doctrine Introduction County of Ulster v. Alliance of Nonprofits for Insurance Risk Retention Group is a Second Circuit...
Volunteer Liability and Insurance Priority under Risk Retention Group Policies

Volunteer Liability and Insurance Priority under Risk Retention Group Policies

Date: Apr 8, 2025
Volunteer Liability and Insurance Priority under Risk Retention Group Policies: Defining “Insured” Status and Co-Excess Coverage in County of Ulster v. Alliance of Nonprofits Introduction The Second...
Fourth Amendment Special-Needs Exception Permits Suspicionless Searches in Supervised Release: United States v. Poole

Fourth Amendment Special-Needs Exception Permits Suspicionless Searches in Supervised Release: United States v. Poole

Date: Apr 8, 2025
Fourth Amendment Special-Needs Exception Permits Suspicionless Searches in Supervised Release: United States v. Poole 1. Introduction This commentary examines the Second Circuit’s decision in United...
Volunteer Coverage and Policy Priority: County of Ulster v. Alliance of Nonprofits

Volunteer Coverage and Policy Priority: County of Ulster v. Alliance of Nonprofits

Date: Apr 8, 2025
Volunteer Coverage and Policy Priority: County of Ulster v. Alliance of Nonprofits Introduction County of Ulster v. Alliance of Nonprofits for Insurance Risk Retention Group (2d Cir. Apr. 7, 2025)...
Volunteer Coverage and Policy Priority Under Risk Retention Group Policies: County of Ulster v. Alliance of Nonprofits

Volunteer Coverage and Policy Priority Under Risk Retention Group Policies: County of Ulster v. Alliance of Nonprofits

Date: Apr 8, 2025
Volunteer Coverage and Policy Priority Under Risk Retention Group Policies: County of Ulster v. Alliance of Nonprofits Introduction County of Ulster v. Alliance of Nonprofits for Insurance Risk...
Suspicionless Searches as a Condition of Supervised Release: United States v. Poole

Suspicionless Searches as a Condition of Supervised Release: United States v. Poole

Date: Apr 8, 2025
Suspicionless Searches as a Condition of Supervised Release: United States v. Poole Introduction United States v. Poole, 24-1201 (2d Cir. Apr. 7, 2025), addresses whether a district court may impose...
Volunteer Drivers as Insureds under RRG Policies and Co-Excess Coverage Allocation

Volunteer Drivers as Insureds under RRG Policies and Co-Excess Coverage Allocation

Date: Apr 8, 2025
Volunteer Drivers as Insureds under RRG Policies and Co-Excess Coverage Allocation Introduction County of Ulster, New York State Local Government Services Foundation Inc. (as attorney-in-fact for New...
Reaffirming the Presumption of §3553(a) Consideration in Sentencing Reasonableness Review

Reaffirming the Presumption of §3553(a) Consideration in Sentencing Reasonableness Review

Date: Apr 5, 2025
Reaffirming the Presumption of §3553(a) Consideration in Sentencing Reasonableness Review Introduction United States v. Ullman arises from the appeal of Thomas Ullman’s 300-month prison sentence for...
Presumption of § 3553(a) Factor Consideration and Reasonableness of Below-Guidelines Variances – United States v. Ullman

Presumption of § 3553(a) Factor Consideration and Reasonableness of Below-Guidelines Variances – United States v. Ullman

Date: Apr 5, 2025
Presumption of § 3553(a) Factor Consideration and Reasonableness of Below-Guidelines Variances – United States v. Ullman Introduction The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s...
Mandate Rule and ERISA Benefit Calculations: Finality of Actuarial Assumptions in McCutcheon v. Colgate-Palmolive

Mandate Rule and ERISA Benefit Calculations: Finality of Actuarial Assumptions in McCutcheon v. Colgate-Palmolive

Date: Apr 5, 2025
Mandate Rule and ERISA Benefit Calculations: Finality of Actuarial Assumptions in McCutcheon v. Colgate-Palmolive Introduction McCutcheon v. Colgate-Palmolive Co., No. 24-1419 (2d Cir. April 4,...
Presumption of §3553(a) Factor Consideration and Substantive Reasonableness in High-Range Child Exploitation Sentences

Presumption of §3553(a) Factor Consideration and Substantive Reasonableness in High-Range Child Exploitation Sentences

Date: Apr 5, 2025
Presumption of §3553(a) Factor Consideration and Substantive Reasonableness in High-Range Child Exploitation Sentences Introduction United States v. Ullman, 24-987-cr (2d Cir. Apr. 4, 2025) arises...
Mandate Rule and Law-of-the-Case Doctrine in ERISA Benefit Calculations

Mandate Rule and Law-of-the-Case Doctrine in ERISA Benefit Calculations

Date: Apr 5, 2025
Mandate Rule and Law-of-the-Case Doctrine in ERISA Benefit Calculations Introduction McCutcheon v. Colgate-Palmolive Co., 24-1419 (2d Cir. Apr. 4, 2025), is a summary order affirming a district...
Prohibition of Pre-Retirement Mortality Discounts and Uniform Projection Rates in ERISA Residual Annuity Calculations

Prohibition of Pre-Retirement Mortality Discounts and Uniform Projection Rates in ERISA Residual Annuity Calculations

Date: Apr 5, 2025
Prohibition of Pre-Retirement Mortality Discounts and Uniform Projection Rates in ERISA Residual Annuity Calculations Introduction This commentary examines the Second Circuit’s decision in McCutcheon...
Reaffirming Presumption of §3553(a) Consideration and Plain‐Error Review in Sentencing: United States v. Ullman

Reaffirming Presumption of §3553(a) Consideration and Plain‐Error Review in Sentencing: United States v. Ullman

Date: Apr 5, 2025
Reaffirming Presumption of §3553(a) Consideration and Plain‐Error Review in Sentencing: United States v. Ullman Introduction United States v. Ullman, 24-987-cr (2d Cir. Apr. 4, 2025), is a summary...
Mandate Rule Bars Mortality Discounts and Requires Uniform Projection Rates in ERISA Residual Annuity Calculations

Mandate Rule Bars Mortality Discounts and Requires Uniform Projection Rates in ERISA Residual Annuity Calculations

Date: Apr 5, 2025
Mandate Rule Bars Mortality Discounts and Requires Uniform Projection Rates in ERISA Residual Annuity Calculations Introduction McCutcheon v. Colgate-Palmolive Co., No. 24-1419 (2d Cir. Apr. 4,...
United States v. Ullman: Presumption of Comprehensive §3553(a) Consideration and Plain-Error Review in Sentencing Appeals

United States v. Ullman: Presumption of Comprehensive §3553(a) Consideration and Plain-Error Review in Sentencing Appeals

Date: Apr 5, 2025
United States v. Ullman: Presumption of Comprehensive §3553(a) Consideration and Plain-Error Review in Sentencing Appeals Introduction United States v. Ullman, No. 24-987-cr (2d Cir. Apr. 4, 2025),...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert