Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

Regulation, Not Prohibition: AP High Court affirms the secular character of public roads and directs facilitation of the traditional Vinayaka immersion procession in Adoni

Regulation, Not Prohibition: AP High Court affirms the secular character of public roads and directs facilitation of the traditional Vinayaka immersion procession in Adoni

Date: Aug 30, 2025
Regulation, Not Prohibition: AP High Court affirms the secular character of public roads and directs facilitation of the traditional Vinayaka immersion procession in Adoni Introduction In Viswa Hindu...
Only-Possible-View Threshold Reaffirmed; Specificity and Public-View Requirement for Caste-Insult Offences under the SC/ST Act: State of Himachal Pradesh v. Mam Raj

Only-Possible-View Threshold Reaffirmed; Specificity and Public-View Requirement for Caste-Insult Offences under the SC/ST Act: State of Himachal Pradesh v. Mam Raj

Date: Aug 30, 2025
Only-Possible-View Threshold Reaffirmed; Specificity and Public-View Requirement for Caste-Insult Offences under the SC/ST Act: State of Himachal Pradesh v. Mam Raj Introduction This commentary...
Institutional Rules Prevail Over Party Preference: Delhi High Court mandates nomination only from SAROD’s panel even by non‑members, distinguishing CORE

Institutional Rules Prevail Over Party Preference: Delhi High Court mandates nomination only from SAROD’s panel even by non‑members, distinguishing CORE

Date: Aug 30, 2025
Institutional Rules Prevail Over Party Preference: Delhi High Court mandates nomination only from SAROD’s panel even by non‑members, distinguishing CORE Introduction This commentary analyzes the...
Family Settlement First: Allahabad High Court Prioritizes Rule 109(5)(g) in Partition (Kurra) and Sets a Step-wise Hierarchy under the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016

Family Settlement First: Allahabad High Court Prioritizes Rule 109(5)(g) in Partition (Kurra) and Sets a Step-wise Hierarchy under the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016

Date: Aug 30, 2025
Family Settlement First: Hierarchy within Rule 109(5) for Partition (Kurra) under the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 Case: Shahadat Ali and Another v. Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow through Member...
Sealed Cover Procedure Impermissible Absent Charge Memo or Criminal Chargesheet: Delhi High Court reaffirms Jankiraman in UOI v. Sameer Dnyandev Wankhede

Sealed Cover Procedure Impermissible Absent Charge Memo or Criminal Chargesheet: Delhi High Court reaffirms Jankiraman in UOI v. Sameer Dnyandev Wankhede

Date: Aug 29, 2025
Sealed Cover Procedure Impermissible Absent Charge Memo or Criminal Chargesheet: Delhi High Court reaffirms Jankiraman in UOI v. Sameer Dnyandev Wankhede Court: Delhi High Court Bench: Justice Navin...
No Appellate Jurisdiction of the High Court under the A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982: Appeals Held Not Maintainable; Liberty to Invoke Writ Jurisdiction with Interim Protection

No Appellate Jurisdiction of the High Court under the A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982: Appeals Held Not Maintainable; Liberty to Invoke Writ Jurisdiction with Interim Protection

Date: Aug 29, 2025
No Appellate Jurisdiction of the High Court under the A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982: Appeals Held Not Maintainable; Liberty to Invoke Writ Jurisdiction with Interim Protection Court:...
Further Investigation under BNSS §193(9) is Court-Regulated and Distinct from Default Bail under §187(3): Delhi High Court Declines Constitutional Challenge

Further Investigation under BNSS §193(9) is Court-Regulated and Distinct from Default Bail under §187(3): Delhi High Court Declines Constitutional Challenge

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Further Investigation under BNSS §193(9) is Court-Regulated and Distinct from Default Bail under §187(3): Delhi High Court Declines Constitutional Challenge Introduction In Yash Mishra v. State of...
Kerala High Court Sets Transparency Standard for Devaswom Outsourcing: Mandatory Multilingual Rate Display and Enforcement Against Overcharging at Sabarimala

Kerala High Court Sets Transparency Standard for Devaswom Outsourcing: Mandatory Multilingual Rate Display and Enforcement Against Overcharging at Sabarimala

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Kerala High Court Sets Transparency Standard for Devaswom Outsourcing: Mandatory Multilingual Rate Display and Enforcement Against Overcharging at Sabarimala Introduction In SUO MOTU v. State of...
Sincere Remorse Cleanses Contempt: Telangana High Court’s Restorative Approach to Scandalous Transfer Pleadings and the Bar–Bench Compact

Sincere Remorse Cleanses Contempt: Telangana High Court’s Restorative Approach to Scandalous Transfer Pleadings and the Bar–Bench Compact

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Sincere Remorse Cleanses Contempt: Telangana High Court’s Restorative Approach to Scandalous Transfer Pleadings and the Bar–Bench Compact Introduction This commentary examines the Telangana High...
Section 29 POCSO Presumption Sustains Conviction Despite Hostile Child Witness When DNA and MLC Establish Foundational Facts: Commentary on X v. State (NCTD) and Anr., 2025 DHC 7371

Section 29 POCSO Presumption Sustains Conviction Despite Hostile Child Witness When DNA and MLC Establish Foundational Facts: Commentary on X v. State (NCTD) and Anr., 2025 DHC 7371

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Section 29 POCSO Presumption Sustains Conviction Despite Hostile Child Witness When DNA and MLC Establish Foundational Facts: A Detailed Commentary on X v. State (NCTD) and Anr. (2025 DHC 7371)...
Substance Over Form in Section 34 Challenges: Rajasthan High Court Affirms Section 14 Exclusion and Cautions Against Technical Dismissals in International Commercial Arbitration

Substance Over Form in Section 34 Challenges: Rajasthan High Court Affirms Section 14 Exclusion and Cautions Against Technical Dismissals in International Commercial Arbitration

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Substance Over Form in Section 34 Challenges: Rajasthan High Court Affirms Section 14 Exclusion and Cautions Against Technical Dismissals in International Commercial Arbitration Introduction This...
Renunciation Certificate Is a Substantive Precondition—No Minor’s Exception: Kerala High Court in Union of India v. Rasheeda Bano (2025)

Renunciation Certificate Is a Substantive Precondition—No Minor’s Exception: Kerala High Court in Union of India v. Rasheeda Bano (2025)

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Renunciation Certificate Is a Substantive Precondition—No Minor’s Exception Case: Union of India v. Rasheeda Bano (2025 KER 63835) Court: High Court of Kerala (Division Bench) Bench: Sushrut Arvind...
Non‑disclosure of a trivial, time‑stale gambling conviction is not ipso facto ground for termination: Bombay High Court’s contextual, post‑sensitive test for integrity verification

Non‑disclosure of a trivial, time‑stale gambling conviction is not ipso facto ground for termination: Bombay High Court’s contextual, post‑sensitive test for integrity verification

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Non‑disclosure of a trivial, time‑stale gambling conviction is not ipso facto ground for termination: Bombay High Court’s contextual, post‑sensitive test for integrity verification Introduction In...
“Doctrine of Harmonious Accommodation” – Orissa High Court opens teacher-recruitment categories to disabled OTET-I candidates with B.Ed.

“Doctrine of Harmonious Accommodation” – Orissa High Court opens teacher-recruitment categories to disabled OTET-I candidates with B.Ed.

Date: Aug 28, 2025
“Doctrine of Harmonious Accommodation” – Orissa High Court opens teacher-recruitment categories to disabled OTET-I candidates with B.Ed. 1. Introduction The decision in Prajnya Parimita Barik v....
No Blanket Advance-Notice Right Before Arrest: Commentary on Ranjit Singh Gill v. State of Punjab & Ors., P&H High Court (2025)

No Blanket Advance-Notice Right Before Arrest: Commentary on Ranjit Singh Gill v. State of Punjab & Ors., P&H High Court (2025)

Date: Aug 28, 2025
No Blanket Advance-Notice Right Before Arrest Commentary on Ranjit Singh Gill v. State of Punjab & Others Punjab & Haryana High Court, Judgment dated 22-08-2025 1. Introduction This commentary...
“No-Injury” Attempts to Murder & The Narrow Lane of Section 482 CrPC – A Commentary on Harendra Bansal v. State of U.P. (2025 AHC 144718)

“No-Injury” Attempts to Murder & The Narrow Lane of Section 482 CrPC – A Commentary on Harendra Bansal v. State of U.P. (2025 AHC 144718)

Date: Aug 28, 2025
“No-Injury” Attempts to Murder & The Narrow Lane of Section 482 CrPC Commentary on Harendra Bansal & Anr. v. State of U.P. and Another (2025 AHC 144718) 1. Introduction The Allahabad High Court’s...
Prospective Application of the “Written-Grounds” Requirement in UAPA Arrests – Commentary on Lakhveer Singh v. NIA (2025 DHC 7313-DB)

Prospective Application of the “Written-Grounds” Requirement in UAPA Arrests – Commentary on Lakhveer Singh v. NIA (2025 DHC 7313-DB)

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Prospective Application of the “Written-Grounds” Requirement in UAPA Arrests – Commentary on Lakhveer Singh v. National Investigation Agency 1. Introduction The Delhi High Court’s division bench in...
Section 105 CrPC Held Inapplicable to Service of Notice in Criminal Revisions Involving Foreign Parties – A Commentary on UBS Switzerland AG v. State of West Bengal

Section 105 CrPC Held Inapplicable to Service of Notice in Criminal Revisions Involving Foreign Parties – A Commentary on UBS Switzerland AG v. State of West Bengal

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Section 105 CrPC Held Inapplicable to Service of Notice in Criminal Revisions Involving Foreign Parties Commentary on UBS Switzerland AG v. State of West Bengal & Ors., Calcutta High Court, C.R.R....
“Jurisdictional-Fact” Threshold for Police-Protection Writs: Kerala High Court’s Guiding Light in M.A. Sunil v. M.R. Pradeep (2025)

“Jurisdictional-Fact” Threshold for Police-Protection Writs: Kerala High Court’s Guiding Light in M.A. Sunil v. M.R. Pradeep (2025)

Date: Aug 28, 2025
“Jurisdictional-Fact” Threshold for Police-Protection Writs: Kerala High Court’s Guiding Light in M.A. Sunil v. M.R. Pradeep (2025) 1. Introduction The Division Bench of the Kerala High Court (Chief...
Doctrine of Post-Divorce Extinguishment of “Shared Household” Rights – Commentary on Kuldeep Kaur v. Swaran Kaur (2025 DHC 7098-DB)

Doctrine of Post-Divorce Extinguishment of “Shared Household” Rights – Commentary on Kuldeep Kaur v. Swaran Kaur (2025 DHC 7098-DB)

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Doctrine of Post-Divorce Extinguishment of “Shared Household” Rights (Comprehensive Commentary on Kuldeep Kaur v. Swaran Kaur (Deceased) through LRs., 2025 DHC 7098-DB) Introduction The Division...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert