Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

trial-court&amp Case Commentaries

“Toward Another” Under Iowa’s Assault Statute Does Not Require Pointing a Weapon: State v. Meisheid

“Toward Another” Under Iowa’s Assault Statute Does Not Require Pointing a Weapon: State v. Meisheid

Date: Oct 28, 2025
“Toward Another” Under Iowa’s Assault Statute Does Not Require Pointing a Weapon: State v. Meisheid Introduction In State of Iowa v. Matthew James Meisheid, the Iowa Supreme Court addressed whether a...
No Final Opinion Yet: The Disciplinary Case Against Mark E. Anderson Signals Strict Enforcement of MRPC 3.1, 3.5, and 8.4 for Abusive Litigation Conduct

No Final Opinion Yet: The Disciplinary Case Against Mark E. Anderson Signals Strict Enforcement of MRPC 3.1, 3.5, and 8.4 for Abusive Litigation Conduct

Date: Oct 28, 2025
No Final Opinion Yet: The Disciplinary Case Against Mark E. Anderson Signals Strict Enforcement of MRPC 3.1, 3.5, and 8.4 for Abusive Litigation Conduct Introduction This commentary examines the...
Public Censure for a Single, Self‑Reported False Affidavit: Rhode Island Supreme Court Clarifies Sanction Factors under Rules 3.3 and 8.4

Public Censure for a Single, Self‑Reported False Affidavit: Rhode Island Supreme Court Clarifies Sanction Factors under Rules 3.3 and 8.4

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Public Censure for a Single, Self‑Reported False Affidavit: Rhode Island Supreme Court Clarifies Sanction Factors under Rules 3.3 and 8.4 Introduction In In the Matter of Santiago H. Posas, No....
Ceccarelli v. Morgan Stanley: Second Circuit reiterates the Rooker-Feldman/Res Judicata divide in post-foreclosure TILA suits and requires without-prejudice jurisdictional dismissals

Ceccarelli v. Morgan Stanley: Second Circuit reiterates the Rooker-Feldman/Res Judicata divide in post-foreclosure TILA suits and requires without-prejudice jurisdictional dismissals

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Ceccarelli v. Morgan Stanley: Second Circuit reiterates the Rooker-Feldman/Res Judicata divide in post-foreclosure TILA suits and requires without-prejudice jurisdictional dismissals Introduction In...
Non‑Reserved Acceptance Triggers Inter‑Insurer Estoppel: Second Circuit Affirms Standing, Reliance, and Prejudice in Penn‑Star v. Dongbu

Non‑Reserved Acceptance Triggers Inter‑Insurer Estoppel: Second Circuit Affirms Standing, Reliance, and Prejudice in Penn‑Star v. Dongbu

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Non‑Reserved Acceptance Triggers Inter‑Insurer Estoppel: Second Circuit Affirms Standing, Reliance, and Prejudice in Penn‑Star v. Dongbu Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit...
Residential Storage Triggers the §2D1.1(b)(12) “Stash House” Enhancement; DWAI Always Counts in Criminal History Under Amended §4A1.2 cmt. n.5; Appeal Waiver Bars Fine Challenge — United States v. Luizzi (2d Cir. 2025 Summary Order)

Residential Storage Triggers the §2D1.1(b)(12) “Stash House” Enhancement; DWAI Always Counts in Criminal History Under Amended §4A1.2 cmt. n.5; Appeal Waiver Bars Fine Challenge — United States v. Luizzi (2d Cir. 2025 Summary Order)

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Residential Storage Triggers the §2D1.1(b)(12) “Stash House” Enhancement; DWAI Always Counts in Criminal History Under Amended §4A1.2 cmt. n.5; Appeal Waiver Bars Fine Challenge — United States v....
Second Circuit Reaffirms PLRA 150% Fee Cap and Declines “Mini En Banc” Reconsideration in Webb v. Trombley

Second Circuit Reaffirms PLRA 150% Fee Cap and Declines “Mini En Banc” Reconsideration in Webb v. Trombley

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Second Circuit Reaffirms PLRA 150% Fee Cap and Declines “Mini En Banc” Reconsideration in Webb v. Trombley Introduction In Webb v. Trombley, No. 24-2582-pr (2d Cir. Oct. 24, 2025) (Summary Order),...
Second Circuit Confirms Constitutional Limit on Mandatory § 1226(c) Detention: Bond Hearing Required Once Detention Becomes Unreasonably Prolonged, With Government’s Clear-and-Convincing Burden

Second Circuit Confirms Constitutional Limit on Mandatory § 1226(c) Detention: Bond Hearing Required Once Detention Becomes Unreasonably Prolonged, With Government’s Clear-and-Convincing Burden

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Second Circuit Confirms Constitutional Limit on Mandatory § 1226(c) Detention: Bond Hearing Required Once Detention Becomes Unreasonably Prolonged, With Government’s Clear-and-Convincing Burden...
Qualifying-Child Status for Non–LPR Cancellation Is Measured at Adjudication, Not Filing: Yupangui‑Yunga v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025)

Qualifying-Child Status for Non–LPR Cancellation Is Measured at Adjudication, Not Filing: Yupangui‑Yunga v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Qualifying-Child Status for Non–LPR Cancellation Is Measured at Adjudication, Not Filing Commentary on Yupangui‑Yunga v. Bondi, No. 23‑6522 (2d Cir. Oct. 24, 2025) Introduction In this precedential...
No Blanket Immunity for Post‑Settlement Keyword Bidding: Eleventh Circuit Limits Release and Res Judicata to Pre‑Execution Conduct and Enforces FTC‑Approval Contingency

No Blanket Immunity for Post‑Settlement Keyword Bidding: Eleventh Circuit Limits Release and Res Judicata to Pre‑Execution Conduct and Enforces FTC‑Approval Contingency

Date: Oct 28, 2025
No Blanket Immunity for Post‑Settlement Keyword Bidding: Eleventh Circuit Limits Release and Res Judicata to Pre‑Execution Conduct and Enforces FTC‑Approval Contingency Case: Edible IP, LLC v....
ECF Non-Receipt, Health Issues, and Computer Viruses Are Not Excusable Neglect Without Specific, Supported Facts: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Counsel’s Duty to Monitor the Docket and Limits Post-Judgment Amendments

ECF Non-Receipt, Health Issues, and Computer Viruses Are Not Excusable Neglect Without Specific, Supported Facts: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Counsel’s Duty to Monitor the Docket and Limits Post-Judgment Amendments

Date: Oct 28, 2025
ECF Non-Receipt, Health Issues, and Computer Viruses Are Not Excusable Neglect Without Specific, Supported Facts: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Counsel’s Duty to Monitor the Docket and Limits...
Shotgun Pleadings, Pro Se Latitude, and Rule 58 Waiver: The Eleventh Circuit’s Reaffirmation in Moore v. Southern Company

Shotgun Pleadings, Pro Se Latitude, and Rule 58 Waiver: The Eleventh Circuit’s Reaffirmation in Moore v. Southern Company

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Shotgun Pleadings, Pro Se Latitude, and Rule 58 Waiver: The Eleventh Circuit’s Reaffirmation in Moore v. Southern Company Introduction In an unpublished, per curiam decision, the Eleventh Circuit...
Reaffirming Broad Discretion to Weigh Prior Sentences in Upward Variances: United States v. Carmel Linot (11th Cir. 2025)

Reaffirming Broad Discretion to Weigh Prior Sentences in Upward Variances: United States v. Carmel Linot (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Reaffirming Broad Discretion to Weigh Prior Sentences in Upward Variances Under § 3553(a): United States v. Carmel Linot Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Date: October 24, 2025...
Guidelines as Starting Point; Public Protection as Dominant Factor: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Substantial Upward Variance for §1470 Despite Mandatory §2260A Term

Guidelines as Starting Point; Public Protection as Dominant Factor: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Substantial Upward Variance for §1470 Despite Mandatory §2260A Term

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Guidelines as Starting Point; Public Protection as Dominant Factor: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Substantial Upward Variance for §1470 Despite Mandatory §2260A Term Introduction In United States v. Imran...
Third Circuit Declines En Banc Review, Leaving Intact Anderson–Burdick Invalidation of Pennsylvania’s Mail‑In Ballot Date Requirement Despite New State Notice‑and‑Cure Mandate

Third Circuit Declines En Banc Review, Leaving Intact Anderson–Burdick Invalidation of Pennsylvania’s Mail‑In Ballot Date Requirement Despite New State Notice‑and‑Cure Mandate

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Third Circuit Declines En Banc Review, Leaving Intact Anderson–Burdick Invalidation of Pennsylvania’s Mail‑In Ballot Date Requirement Despite New State Notice‑and‑Cure Mandate Case: Bette Eakin v....
Parker v. NJMVC: Essential Eligibility Controls Title II and §504; No Pre‑Deprivation Hearing Required for Safety‑Driven CDL Passenger/School‑Bus Endorsement Revocations

Parker v. NJMVC: Essential Eligibility Controls Title II and §504; No Pre‑Deprivation Hearing Required for Safety‑Driven CDL Passenger/School‑Bus Endorsement Revocations

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Parker v. NJMVC: Essential Eligibility Controls Title II and §504; No Pre‑Deprivation Hearing Required for Safety‑Driven CDL Passenger/School‑Bus Endorsement Revocations Introduction In a...
Post-Answer Rule 12(b)(6) Motions Permissible as Rule 12(c); Preliminary-Injunction Denials Do Not Make Amendment Futile — Oxford House, Inc. v. Township of North Bergen (3d Cir. 2025)

Post-Answer Rule 12(b)(6) Motions Permissible as Rule 12(c); Preliminary-Injunction Denials Do Not Make Amendment Futile — Oxford House, Inc. v. Township of North Bergen (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Post-Answer Rule 12(b)(6) Motions Permissible as Rule 12(c); Preliminary-Injunction Denials Do Not Make Amendment Futile — Oxford House, Inc. v. Township of North Bergen (3d Cir. 2025) Introduction...
United States v. Hernandez-Adame: Fifth Circuit Confirms that “Entry” Under § 1326 Requires Freedom from Official Restraint, but Treats It as a Definitional Concept Within Trial Courts’ Instructional Discretion

United States v. Hernandez-Adame: Fifth Circuit Confirms that “Entry” Under § 1326 Requires Freedom from Official Restraint, but Treats It as a Definitional Concept Within Trial Courts’ Instructional Discretion

Date: Oct 28, 2025
United States v. Hernandez-Adame: Fifth Circuit Confirms that “Entry” Under § 1326 Requires Freedom from Official Restraint, but Treats It as a Definitional Concept Within Trial Courts’ Instructional...
No Federal Power to Compel Arbitration of Ongoing State Probate Asset Proceedings: The Sixth Circuit’s “Look‑Through plus In‑Rem” Bar under FAA § 4

No Federal Power to Compel Arbitration of Ongoing State Probate Asset Proceedings: The Sixth Circuit’s “Look‑Through plus In‑Rem” Bar under FAA § 4

Date: Oct 28, 2025
No Federal Power to Compel Arbitration of Ongoing State Probate Asset Proceedings: The Sixth Circuit’s “Look‑Through plus In‑Rem” Bar under FAA § 4 Introduction In Amos C. Johnson, M.D., and Johnson...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies: Post‑Judgment Discovery That Attacks the Merits Is a Successive § 2254 Petition Requiring § 2244(b) Authorization and a COA

Tenth Circuit Clarifies: Post‑Judgment Discovery That Attacks the Merits Is a Successive § 2254 Petition Requiring § 2244(b) Authorization and a COA

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Tenth Circuit Clarifies: Post‑Judgment Discovery That Attacks the Merits Is a Successive § 2254 Petition Requiring § 2244(b) Authorization and a COA Introduction In Johnson v. Patton, No. 25-6084...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert