Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

tenth-circuit-upholds-stringent-&amp Case Commentaries

Proper Parties, Proper Relief: Fourth Circuit Bars State Standing to Enjoin Federal Workforce Reductions Based on Missed RIF Notice

Proper Parties, Proper Relief: Fourth Circuit Bars State Standing to Enjoin Federal Workforce Reductions Based on Missed RIF Notice

Date: Sep 9, 2025
Proper Parties, Proper Relief: Fourth Circuit Bars State Standing to Enjoin Federal Workforce Reductions Based on Missed RIF Notice Case: State of Maryland v. USDA (consolidated appeals Nos. 25-1248...
Medication-Compliance Clarifications and Reasonable‑Suspicion Digital‑Search Conditions on Supervised Release: The Second Circuit’s Guidance in United States v. Woods (Summary Order)

Medication-Compliance Clarifications and Reasonable‑Suspicion Digital‑Search Conditions on Supervised Release: The Second Circuit’s Guidance in United States v. Woods (Summary Order)

Date: Sep 9, 2025
Medication-Compliance Clarifications and Reasonable‑Suspicion Digital‑Search Conditions on Supervised Release: The Second Circuit’s Guidance in United States v. Woods (Summary Order) Court: U.S....
Nevada Supreme Court bars “comparable verdicts” in excessive-damages review and reaffirms full contingency-fee recovery under NRCP 68: Bellomo v. Roybal

Nevada Supreme Court bars “comparable verdicts” in excessive-damages review and reaffirms full contingency-fee recovery under NRCP 68: Bellomo v. Roybal

Date: Sep 9, 2025
Nevada Supreme Court bars “comparable verdicts” in excessive-damages review and reaffirms full contingency-fee recovery under NRCP 68: Bellomo v. Roybal Introduction In Bellomo v. Roybal, the Supreme...
No Texas Insurance Tort Recovery After Full Appraisal Payment Absent Independent Injury; “Excusable Neglect” Can Save a Late Notice of Appeal — Commentary on Wilhite v. Ark Royal (5th Cir. 2025)

No Texas Insurance Tort Recovery After Full Appraisal Payment Absent Independent Injury; “Excusable Neglect” Can Save a Late Notice of Appeal — Commentary on Wilhite v. Ark Royal (5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 9, 2025
No Texas Insurance Tort Recovery After Full Appraisal Payment Absent Independent Injury; “Excusable Neglect” Can Save a Late Notice of Appeal — Commentary on Wilhite v. Ark Royal (5th Cir. 2025)...
Rudolph’s Rules: Tenth Circuit Defines § 3238 Venue for Extraterritorial Crimes and Confirms Forfeiture of Interest, Dividends, and Appreciation

Rudolph’s Rules: Tenth Circuit Defines § 3238 Venue for Extraterritorial Crimes and Confirms Forfeiture of Interest, Dividends, and Appreciation

Date: Sep 9, 2025
Rudolph’s Rules: Tenth Circuit Defines § 3238 Venue for Extraterritorial Crimes and Confirms Forfeiture of Interest, Dividends, and Appreciation Introduction In United States v. Rudolph, No. 23-1278...
Invited Error Bars Challenge to Mislabeling a Georgia First Offender Disposition; Prior Methamphetamine Possession Admissible Under Rule 404(b) to Prove Intent

Invited Error Bars Challenge to Mislabeling a Georgia First Offender Disposition; Prior Methamphetamine Possession Admissible Under Rule 404(b) to Prove Intent

Date: Sep 9, 2025
Invited Error Bars Challenge to Mislabeling a Georgia First Offender Disposition; Prior Methamphetamine Possession Admissible Under Rule 404(b) to Prove Intent Case: United States v. Jorge Rodriguez...
Almentero: No Fundamental Error from “And/Or” Predicate Felonies or Multi‑Victim Aiding‑and‑Abetting; Second‑Degree Not Required to Supply Causation in Felony‑Murder Instructions

Almentero: No Fundamental Error from “And/Or” Predicate Felonies or Multi‑Victim Aiding‑and‑Abetting; Second‑Degree Not Required to Supply Causation in Felony‑Murder Instructions

Date: Sep 9, 2025
Almentero: No Fundamental Error from “And/Or” Predicate Felonies or Multi‑Victim Aiding‑and‑Abetting; Second‑Degree Not Required to Supply Causation in Felony‑Murder Instructions Case: State v....
UTPA Administrative Subpoenas in Alaska: Probable Cause Not Required; Anonymous Tip With Corroboration Suffices To Support Attorney General’s Subpoena

UTPA Administrative Subpoenas in Alaska: Probable Cause Not Required; Anonymous Tip With Corroboration Suffices To Support Attorney General’s Subpoena

Date: Sep 8, 2025
UTPA Administrative Subpoenas in Alaska: Probable Cause Not Required; Anonymous Tip With Corroboration Suffices To Support Attorney General’s Subpoena Case: Business Doe, LLC v. State of Alaska, No....
Connecticut High Court Clarifies Broker’s Post‑Placement Duties: No Duty to Relay Nonrenewal Absent Undertaking; Longstanding Relationship Alone Is Insufficient

Connecticut High Court Clarifies Broker’s Post‑Placement Duties: No Duty to Relay Nonrenewal Absent Undertaking; Longstanding Relationship Alone Is Insufficient

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Connecticut High Court Clarifies Broker’s Post‑Placement Duties: No Duty to Relay Nonrenewal Absent Undertaking; Longstanding Relationship Alone Is Insufficient Introduction In Deer v. National...
Connecticut Supreme Court Clarifies: No Post‑Procurement Common‑Law Duty for Insurance Agents To Warn of Impending Cancellation/Nonrenewal; Dissent Proposes a Continuing Duty To Inform

Connecticut Supreme Court Clarifies: No Post‑Procurement Common‑Law Duty for Insurance Agents To Warn of Impending Cancellation/Nonrenewal; Dissent Proposes a Continuing Duty To Inform

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Connecticut Supreme Court Clarifies: No Post‑Procurement Common‑Law Duty for Insurance Agents To Warn of Impending Cancellation/Nonrenewal; Dissent Proposes a Continuing Duty To Inform Note: This...
Hawai‘i Supreme Court Clarifies Condo Resale Disclosures: Managing Agents Must Provide Online Downloads at No Cost and Must Produce Resale-Specific Documents

Hawai‘i Supreme Court Clarifies Condo Resale Disclosures: Managing Agents Must Provide Online Downloads at No Cost and Must Produce Resale-Specific Documents

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Hawai‘i Supreme Court Clarifies Condo Resale Disclosures: Managing Agents Must Provide Online Downloads at No Cost and Must Produce Resale-Specific Documents Introduction In Caven, Jr. v. Certified...
CZMA’s Statewide Reach Defines Environmental Due Process: Agencies Must Hold Contested Case Hearings Before Renewing Revocable Permits; Environmental Courts May Modify Permits on HRS § 91‑14 Review

CZMA’s Statewide Reach Defines Environmental Due Process: Agencies Must Hold Contested Case Hearings Before Renewing Revocable Permits; Environmental Courts May Modify Permits on HRS § 91‑14 Review

Date: Sep 8, 2025
CZMA’s Statewide Reach Defines Environmental Due Process: Agencies Must Hold Contested Case Hearings Before Renewing Revocable Permits; Environmental Courts May Modify Permits on HRS § 91‑14 Review...
No Constructive Amendment From Alternative MNPI Inferences; SDNY Venue Firmly Grounded for Nasdaq Trades: Commentary on United States v. Dagar (2d Cir. 2025)

No Constructive Amendment From Alternative MNPI Inferences; SDNY Venue Firmly Grounded for Nasdaq Trades: Commentary on United States v. Dagar (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 8, 2025
No Constructive Amendment From Alternative MNPI Inferences; SDNY Venue Firmly Grounded for Nasdaq Trades: Commentary on United States v. Dagar (2d Cir. 2025) Note on precedential status: The decision...
Oral Pronouncement or Express Incorporation Required for “Standard” Supervised Release Conditions; Defendant-Requested Special Conditions Are Waived: Commentary on United States v. Wilson (2d Cir. 2025)

Oral Pronouncement or Express Incorporation Required for “Standard” Supervised Release Conditions; Defendant-Requested Special Conditions Are Waived: Commentary on United States v. Wilson (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Oral Pronouncement or Express Incorporation Required for “Standard” Supervised Release Conditions; Defendant-Requested Special Conditions Are Waived: Commentary on United States v. Wilson (2d Cir....
De Novo Review of Equitable Tolling Diligence and No Tolling for Pending Rehearing/Certiorari in Immigration Motions to Reopen

De Novo Review of Equitable Tolling Diligence and No Tolling for Pending Rehearing/Certiorari in Immigration Motions to Reopen

Date: Sep 8, 2025
De Novo Review of Equitable Tolling Diligence and No Tolling for Pending Rehearing/Certiorari in Immigration Motions to Reopen Introduction In Sylvestre Esteeven Point du Jour v. U.S. Attorney...
Charge-Specific Probable Cause Not Clearly Established Pre‑Chiaverini: Third Circuit Affirms Dismissal, Applying Any‑Crime Rule to False Arrest and Qualified Immunity to Malicious Prosecution and False Imprisonment

Charge-Specific Probable Cause Not Clearly Established Pre‑Chiaverini: Third Circuit Affirms Dismissal, Applying Any‑Crime Rule to False Arrest and Qualified Immunity to Malicious Prosecution and False Imprisonment

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Charge-Specific Probable Cause Not Clearly Established Pre‑Chiaverini: Third Circuit Affirms Dismissal, Applying Any‑Crime Rule to False Arrest and Qualified Immunity to Malicious Prosecution and...
Disclosed Destination Charges Are Not Deceptive Per Se: Third Circuit Affirms Futility of Consumer‑Protection and Unjust‑Enrichment Claims Without Plausible Causation or Direct Benefit

Disclosed Destination Charges Are Not Deceptive Per Se: Third Circuit Affirms Futility of Consumer‑Protection and Unjust‑Enrichment Claims Without Plausible Causation or Direct Benefit

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Disclosed Destination Charges Are Not Deceptive Per Se: Third Circuit Affirms Futility of Consumer‑Protection and Unjust‑Enrichment Claims Without Plausible Causation or Direct Benefit Introduction...
No State “Need” Veto of FERC–Approved RTO Projects: Third Circuit Clarifies Supremacy Clause Limits on Siting Decisions

No State “Need” Veto of FERC–Approved RTO Projects: Third Circuit Clarifies Supremacy Clause Limits on Siting Decisions

Date: Sep 8, 2025
No State “Need” Veto of FERC–Approved RTO Projects: Third Circuit Clarifies Supremacy Clause Limits on Siting Decisions Introduction This precedential decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the...
Brito Guevara v. Francisco Castro: Fifth Circuit Reaffirms De Novo Review of the Hague Convention’s “Well‑Settled” Defense and Elevates Immigration Instability as a Weighty Consideration

Brito Guevara v. Francisco Castro: Fifth Circuit Reaffirms De Novo Review of the Hague Convention’s “Well‑Settled” Defense and Elevates Immigration Instability as a Weighty Consideration

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Brito Guevara v. Francisco Castro: Fifth Circuit Reaffirms De Novo Review of the Hague Convention’s “Well‑Settled” Defense and Elevates Immigration Instability as a Weighty Consideration Introduction...
Indictment Surplusage Is Not an Element on Federal Habeas; Circumstantial Digital Evidence Can Prove “Receipt” and Venue: Commentary on Lowe v. Mills

Indictment Surplusage Is Not an Element on Federal Habeas; Circumstantial Digital Evidence Can Prove “Receipt” and Venue: Commentary on Lowe v. Mills

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Indictment Surplusage Is Not an Element on Federal Habeas; Circumstantial Digital Evidence Can Prove “Receipt” and Venue: Commentary on Lowe v. Mills Introduction In Lowe v. Mills, the United States...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert