Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

state Case Commentaries

BJORKMAN v. NOBLE (2025 OK 62): Attorney Abandonment and No-Hearing Damages/Fee Awards as “Unavoidable Casualty or Misfortune” Requiring Vacation of Judgment

BJORKMAN v. NOBLE (2025 OK 62): Attorney Abandonment and No-Hearing Damages/Fee Awards as “Unavoidable Casualty or Misfortune” Requiring Vacation of Judgment

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Attorney Abandonment Plus No-Hearing, Unsupported Damages/Fee Awards Constitute “Unavoidable Casualty or Misfortune” Warranting Vacation of Judgment Case: BJORKMAN v. NOBLE, 2025 OK 62 (Supreme Court...
Agencies Need Not Run New Database Queries: Ohio Supreme Court Clarifies “Creation of a New Record” Under the Public Records Act

Agencies Need Not Run New Database Queries: Ohio Supreme Court Clarifies “Creation of a New Record” Under the Public Records Act

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Agencies Need Not Run New Database Queries: Ohio Supreme Court Clarifies “Creation of a New Record” Under the Public Records Act Introduction In State ex rel. Huwig v. Department of Health,...
Rule 5 Forbids Continuances for Pending Criminal Bond Proceedings; Acknowledgment of Neglect Is Prerequisite to Improvement Period — Commentary on In re N.S. (W. Va. 2025)

Rule 5 Forbids Continuances for Pending Criminal Bond Proceedings; Acknowledgment of Neglect Is Prerequisite to Improvement Period — Commentary on In re N.S. (W. Va. 2025)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Rule 5 Forbids Continuances for Pending Criminal Bond Proceedings; Acknowledgment of Neglect Is Prerequisite to Improvement Period — Commentary on In re N.S. (W. Va. 2025) Introduction In a...
Refusal to Engage in Reunification Services and Violations of Court Orders Permit Termination Without Less-Restrictive Alternatives and Justify Denial of Post‑Termination Visitation — In re G.J. (W. Va. 2025)

Refusal to Engage in Reunification Services and Violations of Court Orders Permit Termination Without Less-Restrictive Alternatives and Justify Denial of Post‑Termination Visitation — In re G.J. (W. Va. 2025)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Refusal to Engage in Reunification Services and Violations of Court Orders Permit Termination Without Less-Restrictive Alternatives and Justify Denial of Post‑Termination Visitation Introduction This...
Reaffirming Montana’s Ariegwe Speedy‑Trial Framework: Defendant‑Caused Continuances Control the Balance; Evidence‑Anchored “Guilt” Statements in Closing Are Not Plain Error

Reaffirming Montana’s Ariegwe Speedy‑Trial Framework: Defendant‑Caused Continuances Control the Balance; Evidence‑Anchored “Guilt” Statements in Closing Are Not Plain Error

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Reaffirming Montana’s Ariegwe Speedy‑Trial Framework: Defendant‑Caused Continuances Control the Balance; Evidence‑Anchored “Guilt” Statements in Closing Are Not Plain Error Introduction This...
Crawford v. State: Clarifying the Admissibility of Non‑Eyewitness Lay Opinions on a Defendant’s State of Mind and the Demanding Outcome‑Effect Requirement in Plain‑Error Review

Crawford v. State: Clarifying the Admissibility of Non‑Eyewitness Lay Opinions on a Defendant’s State of Mind and the Demanding Outcome‑Effect Requirement in Plain‑Error Review

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Crawford v. State: Clarifying the Admissibility of Non‑Eyewitness Lay Opinions on a Defendant’s State of Mind and the Demanding Outcome‑Effect Requirement in Plain‑Error Review Introduction In...
Continued Relationship with a Co‑Abusive Partner Can Defeat an Improvement Period and Support Termination Despite Service Compliance

Continued Relationship with a Co‑Abusive Partner Can Defeat an Improvement Period and Support Termination Despite Service Compliance

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Continued Relationship with a Co‑Abusive Partner Can Defeat an Improvement Period and Support Termination Despite Service Compliance Introduction In In re I.R. and E.B., No. 24-496 (W. Va. Sept. 30,...
Reasonable Efforts in Repeat Abuse-Neglect Cases: Prior Services and Targeted Evaluations Can Satisfy DHS’s Obligation When Recurrence Shows Futility — In re D.G. and L.G. (W. Va. 2025)

Reasonable Efforts in Repeat Abuse-Neglect Cases: Prior Services and Targeted Evaluations Can Satisfy DHS’s Obligation When Recurrence Shows Futility — In re D.G. and L.G. (W. Va. 2025)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Reasonable Efforts in Repeat Abuse-Neglect Cases: Prior Services and Targeted Evaluations Can Satisfy DHS’s Obligation When Recurrence Shows Futility — In re D.G. and L.G. (W. Va. 2025) Introduction...
Strict Enforcement of the Fifteen-of-Twenty-Two-Month Foster Care Cap Absent Clear and Convincing Compelling Circumstances: In re B.S. (W. Va. 2025)

Strict Enforcement of the Fifteen-of-Twenty-Two-Month Foster Care Cap Absent Clear and Convincing Compelling Circumstances: In re B.S. (W. Va. 2025)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Strict Enforcement of the Fifteen-of-Twenty-Two-Month Foster Care Cap Absent Clear and Convincing Compelling Circumstances: In re B.S. (W. Va. 2025) Introduction In In re B.S., No. 24-732 (W. Va....
Reaffirming the Rule 8 Presumption and Evidentiary Limits in Abuse–Neglect Adjudications: No Due Process Right to Confront Child Victims; Rape Shield and Discovery Constraints Clarified

Reaffirming the Rule 8 Presumption and Evidentiary Limits in Abuse–Neglect Adjudications: No Due Process Right to Confront Child Victims; Rape Shield and Discovery Constraints Clarified

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Reaffirming the Rule 8 Presumption and Evidentiary Limits in Abuse–Neglect Adjudications: No Due Process Right to Confront Child Victims; Rape Shield and Discovery Constraints Clarified Introduction...
Visitation Alone Does Not Defeat “Failure to Plan” in Termination of Parental Rights: Delaware Supreme Court Affirms TPR Where Parent Declines Case-Plan Services and Lacks Capacity for Medically Complex Care

Visitation Alone Does Not Defeat “Failure to Plan” in Termination of Parental Rights: Delaware Supreme Court Affirms TPR Where Parent Declines Case-Plan Services and Lacks Capacity for Medically Complex Care

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Visitation Alone Does Not Defeat “Failure to Plan” in Termination of Parental Rights: Delaware Supreme Court Affirms TPR Where Parent Declines Case-Plan Services and Lacks Capacity for Medically...
Miller v. State: Misstated Felony Class at Plea Is Not Plain Error When the Substantive Charge Matches the Reindictment and the Defendant Receives a Substantial Benefit; Remand for Possible Sentence Reduction

Miller v. State: Misstated Felony Class at Plea Is Not Plain Error When the Substantive Charge Matches the Reindictment and the Defendant Receives a Substantial Benefit; Remand for Possible Sentence Reduction

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Miller v. State: Misstated Felony Class at Plea Is Not Plain Error When the Substantive Charge Matches the Reindictment and the Defendant Receives a Substantial Benefit; Remand for Possible Sentence...
No Second Bite at the Apple under Montana’s MHRA: Exclusive Administrative Pathways, Strict 30/90-Day Deadlines, and Mailing Suffices for Due-Process Notice

No Second Bite at the Apple under Montana’s MHRA: Exclusive Administrative Pathways, Strict 30/90-Day Deadlines, and Mailing Suffices for Due-Process Notice

Date: Oct 1, 2025
No Second Bite at the Apple under Montana’s MHRA: Exclusive Administrative Pathways, Strict 30/90-Day Deadlines, and Mailing Suffices for Due-Process Notice Note: The Montana Supreme Court designated...
Reverse Adverse Possession of Ditch Easements Requires Uniform, Conspicuous Exclusion; “Prevailing Party” Fees Under § 70‑17‑112, MCA, Turn on Statutory Claims Alone

Reverse Adverse Possession of Ditch Easements Requires Uniform, Conspicuous Exclusion; “Prevailing Party” Fees Under § 70‑17‑112, MCA, Turn on Statutory Claims Alone

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Reverse Adverse Possession of Ditch Easements Requires Uniform, Conspicuous Exclusion; “Prevailing Party” Fees Under § 70‑17‑112, MCA, Turn on Statutory Claims Alone Introduction In Apecella v....
No Executive Exception to Civil Wage Theft Liability Under Labor Law §§ 193 and 198 After the No Wage Theft Loophole Act

No Executive Exception to Civil Wage Theft Liability Under Labor Law §§ 193 and 198 After the No Wage Theft Loophole Act

Date: Oct 1, 2025
No Executive Exception to Civil Wage Theft Liability Under Labor Law §§ 193 and 198 After the No Wage Theft Loophole Act Patel v. Maybank Kim Eng Securities USA Inc., 2025 NY Slip Op 05194 (1st Dep’t...
No Plain Error for Unrequested Lesser-Offense Instructions; Single-Witness Identification Suffices: Commentary on Lewis v. State (Ga. 2025)

No Plain Error for Unrequested Lesser-Offense Instructions; Single-Witness Identification Suffices: Commentary on Lewis v. State (Ga. 2025)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
No Plain Error for Unrequested Lesser-Offense Instructions; Single-Witness Identification Suffices Commentary on Lewis v. State, Supreme Court of Georgia (Sept. 30, 2025) Introduction In Lewis v....
Evans v. State: Georgia Supreme Court Affirms Forfeiture-by-Wrongdoing Based on Prison-Intimidation Evidence and Requires Merger of Assault and Aggravated Battery into Malice Murder

Evans v. State: Georgia Supreme Court Affirms Forfeiture-by-Wrongdoing Based on Prison-Intimidation Evidence and Requires Merger of Assault and Aggravated Battery into Malice Murder

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Evans v. State: Georgia Supreme Court Affirms Forfeiture-by-Wrongdoing Based on Prison-Intimidation Evidence and Requires Merger of Assault and Aggravated Battery into Malice Murder Court: Supreme...
Home Rule Applies to Zoning: Georgia Electors May Repeal County Zoning Ordinances by Referendum

Home Rule Applies to Zoning: Georgia Electors May Repeal County Zoning Ordinances by Referendum

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Home Rule Applies to Zoning: Georgia Electors May Repeal County Zoning Ordinances by Referendum Introduction In Bailey v. McIntosh County (consolidated with Webster v. McIntosh County and McIntosh...
Oral Requests Are Not Enough: West Virginia Reaffirms Written-Motion Requirement for Additional Improvement Periods and Permits Direct Termination When No Reasonable Likelihood of Correction (In re G.A.)

Oral Requests Are Not Enough: West Virginia Reaffirms Written-Motion Requirement for Additional Improvement Periods and Permits Direct Termination When No Reasonable Likelihood of Correction (In re G.A.)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Oral Requests Are Not Enough: West Virginia Reaffirms Written-Motion Requirement for Additional Improvement Periods and Permits Direct Termination When No Reasonable Likelihood of Correction (In re...
In re B.N.: Continued-Association Visitation May Be Ordered Without a Grandparent Visitation Act Motion; Non‑Intervenor Grandparents Cannot Challenge Reunification

In re B.N.: Continued-Association Visitation May Be Ordered Without a Grandparent Visitation Act Motion; Non‑Intervenor Grandparents Cannot Challenge Reunification

Date: Oct 1, 2025
In re B.N.: Continued-Association Visitation May Be Ordered Without a Grandparent Visitation Act Motion; Non‑Intervenor Grandparents Cannot Challenge Reunification Introduction In In re B.N., No....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert