Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
State v. Frias: Clarifying Proximate Causation and the “Criminal-Negligence” Threshold under Idaho Code § 18-7004 Introduction In State v. Frias, Docket No. 50950-2023 (Idaho Aug. 20, 2025), the...
“Unremembered” Strategy Is Not Enough: Brown v. State (2025) and Nevada’s Refined Ineffective-Assistance Doctrine 1. Introduction Brown v. State, No. 88860 (Nev. Aug. 19, 2025) is a Supreme Court of...
Medical Liens Under I.C. § 45-704B Are “Extraordinary Collection Actions”: Commentary on DeKlotz v. NS Support, LLC, 174 Idaho ___ (2025) 1. Introduction In DeKlotz v. NS Support, LLC the Idaho...
Idaho Supreme Court Abandons Statute-of-Limitations Bar for Easements by Necessity and Expands Discretion to Revisit “Law-of-the-Case” Doctrine: Detailed Commentary on Easterling v. Clark (2025) 1....
“No Shortcuts to Summary Judgment” – Rupp v. City of Pocatello and the Idaho Supreme Court’s Dual Message on Discovery Diligence and Rule 56 Analysis Introduction Rupp v. City of Pocatello, 174 Idaho...
The Temple Clarification on Cross-Jurisdiction Brady Obligations Introduction In G. Temple v. State, 2025 MT 185, the Supreme Court of Montana addressed whether a state prosecutor’s constitutional...
Boeshans v. Boeshans: Conditioning Parenting Rights on Court-Ordered Evaluations and Clarifying Ownership of Professional Limited Liability Companies Introduction The Supreme Court of Montana, in In...
Silence Isn’t Golden: Waiver of the Right to Compel Arbitration When Setting-Aside a Default — Commentary on Monarch Heating & Cooling, LLC v. Petra, Inc. I. Introduction The Supreme Court of...
State v. Barrus: Distinguishing “Knowing” from “Appreciating” Criminality in Post-Conviction Mental-Health Sentencing 1. Introduction State v. L. Barrus (2025 MT 183) required the Supreme Court of...
State v. Walton (2025 MT 186): Prosecutorial Limits on Parole-Restriction Recommendations When Plea Agreements Are Asymmetrical Introduction In State v. M. Walton the Supreme Court of Montana...
Commonwealth v. Walker (Pa. 2025): Re-defining the Limits of Voir Dire Questions on Legal Principles Introduction In Commonwealth v. Walker, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania—Western...
“No Unity Destroyed, No Severance Achieved” – The Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rejects Self-Conveyance as a Means of Terminating Joint Tenancy 1. Introduction Grant v. Grant (Pa. 2025) tackles a...
Defining Agency Records in the Social-Media Age: The “Penncrest Factors” under Pennsylvania’s Right-to-Know Law 1. Introduction Penncrest School District v. Cagle is the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s...
“A Special Class that Should Be Treated Differently”: The Connecticut Supreme Court Re-aligns Equal-Protection Doctrine for Insanity Acquittees – State v. Foster, 353 Conn. 1 (2025) 1. Introduction...
Clarifying “Imminent Dangerousness”: State v. Foster Sets a Strict Evidentiary Compass for the Continued Commitment of Insanity Acquittees 1. Introduction State v. Foster, --- Conn. --- (Aug. 19,...
Vacatur of Moot Commitment Orders for Insanity Acquittees: State v. Guild, 353 Conn. ____ (2025) Introduction State v. Guild confronts the Connecticut Supreme Court with an increasingly common...
“From Wellness-Check to Exigency” – Rhode Island Affirms a Broad, Totality-Driven Emergency-Aid Exception in State v. Nathan Cooper (2025) Introduction In State v. Nathan Cooper, the Rhode Island...
Mandamus, Faretta, and Jurisdiction: Denial of the Right to Self-Representation is a Non-Jurisdictional Error – State ex rel. Johnson v. McNamara (2025-Ohio-2891) Introduction State ex rel. Johnson...