Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

state Case Commentaries

Statute of Limitations and Tolling in Accounting Malpractice: NRS 11.2075 Interpreted

Statute of Limitations and Tolling in Accounting Malpractice: NRS 11.2075 Interpreted

Date: May 30, 2025
Statute of Limitations and Tolling in Accounting Malpractice: NRS 11.2075 Interpreted Introduction In Tricarichi v. PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP (Nos. 86317/87375/87835, May 29, 2025), the Supreme...
Jurisdiction Unaffected by Name Errors and Sentence Ambiguities: Limits on Habeas Corpus Relief

Jurisdiction Unaffected by Name Errors and Sentence Ambiguities: Limits on Habeas Corpus Relief

Date: May 30, 2025
Jurisdiction Unaffected by Name Errors and Sentence Ambiguities: Limits on Habeas Corpus Relief Introduction In State ex rel. Dodson v. Smith, Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-1878, the Supreme Court of...
Permissibility of Lay Vehicle Identification and Prior Bad Acts Evidence: State v. Chandanoeuth Hay

Permissibility of Lay Vehicle Identification and Prior Bad Acts Evidence: State v. Chandanoeuth Hay

Date: May 30, 2025
Permissibility of Lay Vehicle Identification and Prior Bad Acts Evidence: State v. Chandanoeuth Hay Introduction State v. Chandanoeuth Hay was decided by the Supreme Court of Rhode Island on May 29,...
Clarification of Interim Suspension Due Process and Disbarment Sanction Protocols in Attorney Discipline

Clarification of Interim Suspension Due Process and Disbarment Sanction Protocols in Attorney Discipline

Date: May 30, 2025
Clarification of Interim Suspension Due Process and Disbarment Sanction Protocols in Attorney Discipline Introduction This commentary examines the landmark decision in Robert Brech, as Executive...
Analyst Testimony Requirement for Forensic Evidence: Enforcing the Confrontation Clause in State v. Hall-Haught

Analyst Testimony Requirement for Forensic Evidence: Enforcing the Confrontation Clause in State v. Hall-Haught

Date: May 30, 2025
Analyst Testimony Requirement for Forensic Evidence: Enforcing the Confrontation Clause in State v. Hall-Haught Introduction State v. Hall-Haught is a landmark decision of the Washington Supreme...
Virtual Certainty Standard for Latent Disease Under Washington's Industrial Insurance Act

Virtual Certainty Standard for Latent Disease Under Washington's Industrial Insurance Act

Date: May 30, 2025
Virtual Certainty Standard for Latent Disease Under Washington's Industrial Insurance Act Introduction Cockrum v. C.H. Murphy/Clark-Ullman, Inc. (Howmet Aerospace, Inc.) marks a pivotal shift in...
Jurisdictional Limits on State Interlocutory Appeals Under Ark. R. App. P.-Crim. 3(a)

Jurisdictional Limits on State Interlocutory Appeals Under Ark. R. App. P.-Crim. 3(a)

Date: May 30, 2025
Jurisdictional Limits on State Interlocutory Appeals Under Ark. R. App. P.-Crim. 3(a) Introduction The case of State of Arkansas v. Ronald Russell (2025 Ark. 89) arises from a pretrial order in a...
Statute of Limitations in Accounting Malpractice: Accrual at Service Completion or Inquiry Notice; Standards for NRCP 60(b) and 68 Awards

Statute of Limitations in Accounting Malpractice: Accrual at Service Completion or Inquiry Notice; Standards for NRCP 60(b) and 68 Awards

Date: May 30, 2025
Statute of Limitations in Accounting Malpractice: Accrual at Service Completion or Inquiry Notice; Standards for NRCP 60(b) and 68 Awards Introduction In Tricarichi v. PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP...
“Directory, Not Mandatory” – The 20-Day Hearing Rule under 12 NYCRR 300.23(b)(2) Re-Defined

“Directory, Not Mandatory” – The 20-Day Hearing Rule under 12 NYCRR 300.23(b)(2) Re-Defined

Date: May 30, 2025
“Directory, Not Mandatory” – The 20-Day Hearing Rule under 12 NYCRR 300.23(b)(2) Re-Defined Introduction In Matter of Juncal v. Maspeth Remodeling Co., 238 A.D.3d 1441 (3d Dep’t 2025), the Appellate...
Refining Confession Admissibility: Interpreting “Slightest Hope of Benefit” and “Remotest Fear of Injury” under OCGA § 24-8-824

Refining Confession Admissibility: Interpreting “Slightest Hope of Benefit” and “Remotest Fear of Injury” under OCGA § 24-8-824

Date: May 29, 2025
Refining Confession Admissibility: Interpreting “Slightest Hope of Benefit” and “Remotest Fear of Injury” under OCGA § 24-8-824 Introduction In Short v. State, decided May 28, 2025, the Supreme Court...
Exclusivity Requirement of Paragraph V: Suits for Declaratory Relief Must Be Brought Against the County Alone

Exclusivity Requirement of Paragraph V: Suits for Declaratory Relief Must Be Brought Against the County Alone

Date: May 29, 2025
Exclusivity Requirement of Georgia Constitution Article I, Section II, Paragraph V: Declaratory Relief Actions Must Be Brought Exclusively Against the County Introduction In Tussahaw Reserves, LLC et...
Clarifying “Absconded Supervision” in Probation Revocation: Standards for Reporting and Treatment Compliance

Clarifying “Absconded Supervision” in Probation Revocation: Standards for Reporting and Treatment Compliance

Date: May 29, 2025
Clarifying “Absconded Supervision” in Probation Revocation: Standards for Reporting and Treatment Compliance Introduction In State of West Virginia v. Douglas G. Hill, Jr., No. 23-368 (W. Va. May 28,...
Spinoff Carve-Out for Equity Award Amendments and Demand Futility Clarified by Delaware Supreme Court

Spinoff Carve-Out for Equity Award Amendments and Demand Futility Clarified by Delaware Supreme Court

Date: May 29, 2025
Spinoff Carve-Out for Equity Award Amendments and Demand Futility Clarified by Delaware Supreme Court Introduction This commentary examines the Supreme Court of Delaware’s decision in Vladimir...
Reasonable Response Time Under Ohio’s Public Records Act in High-Volume Contexts

Reasonable Response Time Under Ohio’s Public Records Act in High-Volume Contexts

Date: May 29, 2025
Reasonable Response Time Under Ohio’s Public Records Act in High-Volume Contexts Introduction In State ex rel. Robinson v. Wesson, Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-1874 (May 28, 2025), the Supreme Court of...
Autonomy in Firearm Regulation Under Georgia’s Constitution: Upholding Paragraph VIII’s “Manner Clause”

Autonomy in Firearm Regulation Under Georgia’s Constitution: Upholding Paragraph VIII’s “Manner Clause”

Date: May 29, 2025
Autonomy in Firearm Regulation Under Georgia’s Constitution: Upholding Paragraph VIII’s “Manner Clause” 1. Introduction Stephens v. State of Georgia, decided May 28, 2025 by the Supreme Court of...
Beyond Expiration: Appellate Review of Expired Extreme Risk Protection Orders – A Commentary on Matter of Orangetown Police Dept. v. Cashell

Beyond Expiration: Appellate Review of Expired Extreme Risk Protection Orders – A Commentary on Matter of Orangetown Police Dept. v. Cashell

Date: May 29, 2025
Beyond Expiration: Appellate Review of Expired Extreme Risk Protection Orders – A Commentary on Matter of Orangetown Police Dept. v. Cashell 1. Introduction In Matter of Orangetown Police Department...
Establishment of One-Year Suspension Standard for Client Abandonment Under Georgia Professional Conduct Rules

Establishment of One-Year Suspension Standard for Client Abandonment Under Georgia Professional Conduct Rules

Date: May 29, 2025
Establishment of One-Year Suspension Standard for Client Abandonment Under Georgia Professional Conduct Rules Introduction In In the Matter of Nathaniel Watson Cochran (Supreme Court of Georgia,...
Consent-Based License Revocation Under SCR 22.19 for Criminal Acts Reflecting on Attorney Fitness

Consent-Based License Revocation Under SCR 22.19 for Criminal Acts Reflecting on Attorney Fitness

Date: May 29, 2025
Consent-Based License Revocation Under SCR 22.19 for Criminal Acts Reflecting on Attorney Fitness Introduction Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Leslie M. Smith, 2025 WI 19, represents a watershed in...
Montgomery v. King: Prejudice Requirement for Rule 11 Advisement of Supervised Release

Montgomery v. King: Prejudice Requirement for Rule 11 Advisement of Supervised Release

Date: May 29, 2025
Montgomery v. King: Prejudice Requirement for Rule 11 Advisement of Supervised Release Introduction In Ryan Lloyd Montgomery v. Timothy King, Superintendent, Southwestern Regional Jail and...
Waiver of Restitution Challenges and Ex Post Facto Constraints on Inmate Garnishment: State v. Widmyer

Waiver of Restitution Challenges and Ex Post Facto Constraints on Inmate Garnishment: State v. Widmyer

Date: May 29, 2025
Waiver of Restitution Challenges and Ex Post Facto Constraints on Inmate Garnishment: State v. Widmyer Introduction State of West Virginia v. William Trampus Widmyer is a 2025 decision of the West...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert