Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

state Case Commentaries

“Any Means Any”: Idaho Code § 49-456 Applies to All Vehicles Driven in Idaho — An In-Depth Commentary on State v. Sherwood (2025)

“Any Means Any”: Idaho Code § 49-456 Applies to All Vehicles Driven in Idaho — An In-Depth Commentary on State v. Sherwood (2025)

Date: Jul 4, 2025
“Any Means Any”: Idaho Code § 49-456 Applies to All Vehicles Driven in Idaho — A Comprehensive Commentary on State v. Sherwood (Idaho 2025) 1. Introduction Background. In State v. Sherwood, the Idaho...
Gallegos v. Gallegos – Wyoming Supreme Court Re-Affirms Strict Procedural Compliance for Pro Se Appellants

Gallegos v. Gallegos – Wyoming Supreme Court Re-Affirms Strict Procedural Compliance for Pro Se Appellants

Date: Jul 4, 2025
Gallegos v. Gallegos – Wyoming Supreme Court Re-Affirms Strict Procedural Compliance for Pro Se Appellants Introduction The Wyoming Supreme Court’s decision in Latoya L. Adams f/k/a Latoya L....
State v. Fletcher: Idaho Supreme Court Declares Drug-Dog “Free-Air” Sniffs Non-Searches and Re-Affirms the Bright-Line Automobile Exception

State v. Fletcher: Idaho Supreme Court Declares Drug-Dog “Free-Air” Sniffs Non-Searches and Re-Affirms the Bright-Line Automobile Exception

Date: Jul 4, 2025
State v. Fletcher: Idaho Supreme Court Declares Drug-Dog “Free-Air” Sniffs Non-Searches Under Article I § 17 and Re-Affirms the Bright-Line Automobile Exception 1. Introduction State v. Fletcher,...
State v. Popp: Narrowing “Reasonable Suspicion” When the Predicate Offense is Littering under Idaho Code § 18-7031

State v. Popp: Narrowing “Reasonable Suspicion” When the Predicate Offense is Littering under Idaho Code § 18-7031

Date: Jul 4, 2025
State v. Popp (2025): Narrowing “Reasonable Suspicion” When the Predicate Offense is Littering under Idaho Code § 18-7031 1. Introduction State v. Popp is the Idaho Supreme Court’s most recent...
“Finality & Forfeiture”: The Indiana Supreme Court’s Reinforcement of Strict Appellate Deadlines in Juvenile Delinquency Matters – Comment on State of Indiana v. B.H. (2025)

“Finality & Forfeiture”: The Indiana Supreme Court’s Reinforcement of Strict Appellate Deadlines in Juvenile Delinquency Matters – Comment on State of Indiana v. B.H. (2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“Finality & Forfeiture”: The Indiana Supreme Court’s Reinforcement of Strict Appellate Deadlines in Juvenile Delinquency Matters – Comment on State of Indiana v. B.H. (2025) 1. Introduction In State...
State v. Hamilton: Foundation Requirements for Uncooperative Witnesses and the Inclusion of Adopted Statements Under the Whelan Doctrine

State v. Hamilton: Foundation Requirements for Uncooperative Witnesses and the Inclusion of Adopted Statements Under the Whelan Doctrine

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Clarifying Whelan: Foundation for Inconsistency and the Admissibility of Witness-Adopted Statements – A Commentary on State v. Hamilton (Conn. 2025) Introduction On 1 July 2025 the Supreme Court of...
Steffen Precedent Commentary – Retroactive License Revocation for Prosecutorial Sexual Misconduct

Steffen Precedent Commentary – Retroactive License Revocation for Prosecutorial Sexual Misconduct

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Retroactive License Revocation for Prosecutorial Sexual Misconduct: A Commentary on Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel P. Steffen, 2025 WI 31 1. Introduction Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel...
“One Case, One Conviction … Eventually” – State v. McAdory and the Reinstatement Power under Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(c)

“One Case, One Conviction … Eventually” – State v. McAdory and the Reinstatement Power under Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(c)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“One Case, One Conviction … Eventually” – State v. McAdory and the Reinstatement Power under Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(c) Introduction State v. Carl Lee McAdory, 2025 WI 30, presented the Supreme Court...
Adams v. State: Georgia Supreme Court Re-Enforces the Edge Limits—Felon-in-Possession Felony-Murder Stands Outside the Modified Merger Rule and Sets Fresh Guidance on Plain-Error Review

Adams v. State: Georgia Supreme Court Re-Enforces the Edge Limits—Felon-in-Possession Felony-Murder Stands Outside the Modified Merger Rule and Sets Fresh Guidance on Plain-Error Review

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Adams v. State: Georgia Supreme Court Re-Enforces the Edge Limits—Felon-in-Possession Felony-Murder Stands Outside the Modified Merger Rule and Sets Fresh Guidance on Plain-Error Review 1....
Chapman v. State (2025): Clarifying Judicial Commentary under OCGA § 17-8-57 and Witness-Based Authentication of Firearm Evidence

Chapman v. State (2025): Clarifying Judicial Commentary under OCGA § 17-8-57 and Witness-Based Authentication of Firearm Evidence

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Chapman v. State (2025): Clarifying Judicial Commentary under OCGA § 17-8-57 and Witness-Based Authentication of Firearm Evidence 1. Introduction In Chapman v. The State and its companion case Watson...
Clarifying Waiver of the Defendant’s Right to be Present During Jury Viewings: A Commentary on Jacobs v. State (Ga. 2025)

Clarifying Waiver of the Defendant’s Right to be Present During Jury Viewings: A Commentary on Jacobs v. State (Ga. 2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Clarifying Waiver of the Defendant’s Right to be Present During Jury Viewings: A Commentary on Jacobs v. State (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2025) Case: Jacobs v. State, S25A0570, Supreme Court of...
Kitchens v. State: Georgia High Court Demands Precise Fact-Finding and Distinct Barker–Doggett Analysis in Speedy-Trial Claims

Kitchens v. State: Georgia High Court Demands Precise Fact-Finding and Distinct Barker–Doggett Analysis in Speedy-Trial Claims

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Kitchens v. State: Georgia High Court Demands Precise Fact-Finding and Distinct Barker–Doggett Analysis in Speedy-Trial Claims Introduction On 1 July 2025, the Supreme Court of Georgia delivered a...
State v. Haynes: The Connecticut Supreme Court’s Robust Re-Endorsement of the Harris Impeachment Exception and Independent-Source Doctrine

State v. Haynes: The Connecticut Supreme Court’s Robust Re-Endorsement of the Harris Impeachment Exception and Independent-Source Doctrine

Date: Jul 3, 2025
State v. Haynes: The Connecticut Supreme Court’s Robust Re-Endorsement of the Harris Impeachment Exception and Independent-Source Doctrine Introduction State v. Haynes, 345 Conn. ___ (July 1, 2025),...
State v. Haynes: Connecticut Re-Affirms the Full Harris Impeachment Exception under its State Constitution

State v. Haynes: Connecticut Re-Affirms the Full Harris Impeachment Exception under its State Constitution

Date: Jul 3, 2025
State v. Haynes (2025): Connecticut Re-Affirms the Full Harris Impeachment Exception under its State Constitution Introduction State v. Haynes presented the Connecticut Supreme Court with a chance to...
State v. Ramsey (2025): Clarifying the Appellate Test for Sufficiency of the Evidence where Self-Defense is Asserted

State v. Ramsey (2025): Clarifying the Appellate Test for Sufficiency of the Evidence where Self-Defense is Asserted

Date: Jul 3, 2025
State v. Ramsey (Conn. 2025): Clarifying the Appellate Test for Sufficiency of the Evidence where Self-Defense is Asserted Introduction In State v. Ramsey, 208 A.3d ___ (Conn. 2025), the Supreme...
“Corrected Before Counted” — Alaska Supreme Court Validates Post-Filing Corrections to Initiative Petition Certifications

“Corrected Before Counted” — Alaska Supreme Court Validates Post-Filing Corrections to Initiative Petition Certifications

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“Corrected Before Counted” — Alaska Supreme Court Validates Post-Filing Corrections to Initiative Petition Certifications 1. Introduction In Medicine Crow v. Beecher, No. 7775 (Alaska June 27 2025),...

        Anchoring Notice: Alaska Supreme Court Requires Insurers to Obtain a USPS Certificate of Mailing for Non-Renewal Notices—Strict Statutory Compliance under AS 21.36.260 and New Guidance on Pre-Judgment Interest in Workers’ Compensation Policies

Anchoring Notice: Alaska Supreme Court Requires Insurers to Obtain a USPS Certificate of Mailing for Non-Renewal Notices—Strict Statutory Compliance under AS 21.36.260 and New Guidance on Pre-Judgment Interest in Workers’ Compensation Policies

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Anchoring Notice: Alaska Supreme Court Requires Insurers to Obtain a USPS Certificate of Mailing for Non-Renewal Notices—Strict Statutory Compliance under AS 21.36.260 and New Guidance on...
“The Voluntary-Acceptance Rule”: Supreme Court of West Virginia Clarifies When Failure to File Financial Disclosure Will Not Upset a Divorce Settlement (Anne Y. v. Daniel Y., 2025)

“The Voluntary-Acceptance Rule”: Supreme Court of West Virginia Clarifies When Failure to File Financial Disclosure Will Not Upset a Divorce Settlement (Anne Y. v. Daniel Y., 2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“The Voluntary-Acceptance Rule” Supreme Court of West Virginia Clarifies When Failure to File Financial Disclosure Will Not Upset a Divorce Settlement Introduction Anne Y. v. Daniel Y., decided on 27...
In re A.T., B.T., and N.T.:  Harmless-Error Review of Improperly Dismissing Parents Who Have Retained Rights from Post-Disposition Permanency Proceedings

In re A.T., B.T., and N.T.: Harmless-Error Review of Improperly Dismissing Parents Who Have Retained Rights from Post-Disposition Permanency Proceedings

Date: Jul 3, 2025
In re A.T., B.T., and N.T.: The Supreme Court of West Virginia Clarifies that Erroneously Excluding Parents (Whose Rights Are Intact) from Abuse-and-Neglect Permanency Hearings May Constitute...
Gilhuys v. Hardy County 911 Center: When Lack of Comparators Justifies Summary Judgment Despite Ongoing Discovery in WVHRA Actions

Gilhuys v. Hardy County 911 Center: When Lack of Comparators Justifies Summary Judgment Despite Ongoing Discovery in WVHRA Actions

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Gilhuys v. Hardy County 911 Center: When Lack of Comparators Justifies Summary Judgment Despite Ongoing Discovery in WVHRA Actions Introduction In Gilhuys v. Hardy County 911 Center, the Supreme...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert