Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
State v. Lavoie: Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi Restricts Expert-Fee Entitlements at Regular Sentencing and Adopts the “Aggregate” Test for HRS § 706-609 Resentencing Challenges 1. Introduction In State v....
Safeguarding the Residential Status Quo: Byron v. Rainbow Estates HOA and the Stringent Application of Montana’s Preliminary-Injunction Test in Covenant–Enforcement Disputes 1. Introduction Byron v....
Montana Supreme Court Clarifies Curative Effect of Post-Hearing Findings on Premature Ex Parte Third-Party Parenting Orders A Commentary on In re Parenting of D.C.S., 2025 MT 179 (DA 24-0547) 1....
Jackson v. Jackson: Montana High Court Confirms Right to Discovery & Hearing Once “Changed Circumstances” Are Plausibly Alleged in Child-Support Modifications 1. Introduction The Montana Supreme...
“Public-Interest Override” After the 2017 Amendments – Supreme Court of Montana Clarifies Judicial Discretion to Require Lifetime Sex-Offender Registration for Juveniles 1. Introduction The Supreme...
2025 MT 178 – When “No Reasonable Efforts” Meets Prior Terminations: Clarifying the Department’s Obligation and Defining “Chronic, Severe Neglect” Introduction In Matter of S.W. & D.W., 2025 MT 178,...
State v. Songer (2025 MT 176): Re-affirming the Unavailability Requirement for Remote Testimony and the Necessity of Re-Sentencing When Dependent Convictions Are Vacated Introduction In State v. J....
The “Songer Standard” – Mandatory Proof of Witness Unavailability Before Playing Preserved Testimony Introduction State v. J. Songer, 2025 MT 176, is a multi-issue decision from the Montana Supreme...
State v. Songer: Montana Supreme Court Demands Strict Proof of Witness “Unavailability” Before Video Testimony Is Admitted Introduction In State v. Jory Jerae Songer, 2025 MT 176, the Supreme Court...
Assignment-as-Cancellation Doctrine: Montana Supreme Court Redefines Policy Transfers in Victory Insurance v. State (2025 MT 180) 1. Introduction Victory Insurance Company (“Victory”), a Montana...
Blaker v. Kroger – Reaffirming the Independence of Kentucky Workers’ Compensation Adjudications from Social-Security Disability Findings Introduction In Robert Blaker, Jr. v. The Kroger Company, the...
Minor v. Commonwealth: Clarifying Kentucky’s Domestic-Violence Parole Exemption and the “In-Custody Video” Prejudice Test Introduction In Devin J. Minor v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, the Supreme Court...
The “Paintsville Standard”: Qualified Official Immunity Bars Vicarious-Liability and Special-Relationship Claims Against Kentucky Public Entities Introduction City of Paintsville v. Haney,...
Affirmation of Trial Courts’ Discretion to Amend Penalty-Phase Instructions Mid-Deliberation: Commentary on Bobby Anderson v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (Ky. 2025) Introduction The Supreme Court of...
Restitution and Candor as Absolute Conditions for Bar Reinstatement – Supreme Court of Kentucky Defines the Outer Limits in In Re: Travis Olen Myles, Jr. 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of...
No Advantage Through Threats: Kentucky Supreme Court Re-Affirms that Subjective Belief Cannot Excuse Violations of SCR 3.130(3.4)(f) and 8.2(a) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of Kentucky’s opinion...
“When the Defendant Tells His Own Story” – Kentucky Clarifies the Scope of the “Inextricably Intertwined” Exception to KRE 404(b) Introduction In Damon R. Cruse v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (Supreme...