Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
“From Wellness-Check to Exigency” – Rhode Island Affirms a Broad, Totality-Driven Emergency-Aid Exception in State v. Nathan Cooper (2025) Introduction In State v. Nathan Cooper, the Rhode Island...
Mandamus, Faretta, and Jurisdiction: Denial of the Right to Self-Representation is a Non-Jurisdictional Error – State ex rel. Johnson v. McNamara (2025-Ohio-2891) Introduction State ex rel. Johnson...
“No Discharge Without Restitution” – The Supreme Court of Ohio Clarifies that Restitution Remains a Criminal Sanction for Record-Sealing Purposes (State v. T.W.C., 2025-Ohio-2890) 1. Introduction...
Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Clarifies Mandatory Director Indemnification and “Fees-on-Fees” Recovery Loyalty Development Company, Ltd. v. Ching, 154 Haw. 256 (2025) Introduction In Loyalty Development...
Delaware Supreme Court Extends Rite Aid’s “Specific-and-Individualized Injury” Test to Property Damage and Endorsements Introduction In In re CVS Opioid Insurance Litigation, No. 482, 2024 (Aug. 18,...
Smith v. State: Defining the Limits of “Counsel Abandonment” and Pro-Se Filings in Idaho Post-Conviction Practice 1. Introduction The Idaho Supreme Court’s 2025 decision in Smith v. State, Docket No....
“Beyond Propensity”: State v. Montero and the New Latitude for Admitting Uncharged Sexual-Misconduct Evidence under R.I. R. Evid. 404(b) Introduction In State v. Miguel Montero, No. 2023-92-C.A....
“Truthful-but-Misleading” Communications, Limited Proximate Cause, and Line-and-Scope Constraints: The Alabama Supreme Court’s New Framework for Tortious Interference in Flickinger v. King (2025)...
Supreme Court of Alabama Clarifies Enforceability of Text-Message Settlements: Definiteness and the Mirror-Image Rule Remain Paramount Introduction In iWTNS, Inc.; Leveraged, LLC; and Bradley Lewis...
Severe, Unexplained Abuse Supports Sibling Neglect; Appellate Courts Cannot Raise Unpreserved Theories in Juvenile Cases — In re E.H. (N.C. 2025) Introduction In In re E.H., the Supreme Court of...
State v. Bobian: Kansas draws a bright line on “we know” prosecutorial rhetoric and reaffirms the low threshold for voluntary intoxication instructions Introduction In State v. Bobian (Kansas Supreme...
Context Controls the Sentence: Oral Pronouncements Are Read in Light of the Entire Hearing; Clarification of Domestic Violence Designation, Fees, and DNA Assessment in State v. Peterson Introduction...
Delegating the Temporal Reach of Arbitration Agreements: Cerna v. Pearland Urban Air, LLC (Tex. 2025) Introduction In Abigail Dalila Cerna, as Next Friend of R.W. v. Pearland Urban Air, LLC, the...
Escrow Is Not an Operating Account: First Department Clarifies Rule 1.15 and Rejects Preclusive Effect of Vacated Admonition Introduction This commentary examines the Appellate Division, First...
No Stayed Probationary Suspensions and Narrow Nunc Pro Tunc Relief in Reciprocal Discipline: Matter of Barocas (2025 NY Slip Op 04750) Introduction In Matter of Barocas (2025 NY Slip Op 04750), the...
Iloff v. LaPaille: Employers Must Make a Reasonable Legal Inquiry to Invoke the §1194.2 Good‑Faith Defense; Paid Sick Leave Claims Are Cognizable in Berman Appeals Introduction In Iloff v. LaPaille,...
Windom v. Florida: No Sixth Amendment “Evolving Standards of Decency”; Rule 3.112 Not Retroactive; Strict Limits on Successive Capital Postconviction Relief Reaffirmed Introduction In Curtis Windom...
“Once Recused, Still Disqualified”: Arizona Supreme Court Requires Disclosure and Opportunity to Object Before a Judge Re‑Enters a Case After Recusal Introduction In Contreras v. Bourke, the Arizona...
The Excessive Fines Clause Meets Executive Law § 63(12): Appellate Division Vacates Disgorgement, Affirms Injunctive Remedies in People v. Trump Introduction People v. Trump, 2025 NY Slip Op 04756...