Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

restricting-general-jurisdiction:-second-circuit& Case Commentaries

United States v. Barnes: Tenth Circuit Confirms Unconditional Guilty Plea Waives Post-Conviction Statutory Challenges to § 924(c) Predicate Offenses

United States v. Barnes: Tenth Circuit Confirms Unconditional Guilty Plea Waives Post-Conviction Statutory Challenges to § 924(c) Predicate Offenses

Date: Jun 29, 2025
United States v. Barnes: Tenth Circuit Confirms Unconditional Guilty Plea Waives Post-Conviction Statutory Challenges to § 924(c) Predicate Offenses 1. Introduction On 25 June 2025, the United States...
United States v. Butler: Tenth Circuit Re-Affirms § 111(b) as a “Crime of Violence” after Borden and Clarifies Harmless-Error Limits on Jury Instructions

United States v. Butler: Tenth Circuit Re-Affirms § 111(b) as a “Crime of Violence” after Borden and Clarifies Harmless-Error Limits on Jury Instructions

Date: Jun 29, 2025
United States v. Butler Commentary on the Tenth Circuit’s Published Opinion (June 25, 2025) Introduction On 25 June 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit delivered a...
Abrogation of the “Cavalier Disregard” Standard in Wisconsin’s Speedy-Trial Jurisprudence – A Commentary on State v. Luis A. Ramirez, 2025 WI 28

Abrogation of the “Cavalier Disregard” Standard in Wisconsin’s Speedy-Trial Jurisprudence – A Commentary on State v. Luis A. Ramirez, 2025 WI 28

Date: Jun 28, 2025
Abrogation of the “Cavalier Disregard” Standard in Wisconsin’s Speedy-Trial Jurisprudence A Comprehensive Commentary on State v. Luis A. Ramirez, 2025 WI 28 1. Introduction State v. Ramirez presented...
Iowa Supreme Court Declares: “No Guns While Criming” – State v. Woods and the Constitutional Limits on Firearm Possession During Criminal Conduct

Iowa Supreme Court Declares: “No Guns While Criming” – State v. Woods and the Constitutional Limits on Firearm Possession During Criminal Conduct

Date: Jun 28, 2025
Iowa Supreme Court Declares: “No Guns While Criming” – State v. Woods and the Constitutional Limits on Firearm Possession During Criminal Conduct 1. Introduction State v. Kevin Dwayne Woods, Jr. (No....
EES Placement Requires Reasonably Foreseeable Admissibility and Tailored Due Process Where No Prior Adjudication: Commentary on Pivero v. Attorney General & a.

EES Placement Requires Reasonably Foreseeable Admissibility and Tailored Due Process Where No Prior Adjudication: Commentary on Pivero v. Attorney General & a.

Date: Jun 28, 2025
EES Placement Requires Reasonably Foreseeable Admissibility and Tailored Due Process Where No Prior Adjudication: Commentary on Pivero v. Attorney General & a. Introduction In Anthony Pivero v....
Michigan Narrows Election-Interference Statute to Intentional Falsehoods About Voting Requirements or Procedures; Denial of Leave Leaves “Vote-by-Mail” as a Covered Procedure

Michigan Narrows Election-Interference Statute to Intentional Falsehoods About Voting Requirements or Procedures; Denial of Leave Leaves “Vote-by-Mail” as a Covered Procedure

Date: Jun 28, 2025
Michigan Narrows Election-Interference Statute to Intentional Falsehoods About Voting Requirements or Procedures; Denial of Leave Leaves “Vote-by-Mail” as a Covered Procedure Introduction This...
Arbitrary-Enforcement Vagueness Challenges Are Inherently Facial and Defendants Have Standing: State v. Stubbs Recasts Kansas Standing Doctrine

Arbitrary-Enforcement Vagueness Challenges Are Inherently Facial and Defendants Have Standing: State v. Stubbs Recasts Kansas Standing Doctrine

Date: Jun 28, 2025
Arbitrary-Enforcement Vagueness Challenges Are Inherently Facial and Defendants Have Standing: State v. Stubbs Recasts Kansas Standing Doctrine Introduction In State v. Stubbs, No. 125,003 (Kan. June...
Open Area Means Open to the Public: Kansas Supreme Court Affirms Recreational-Use Immunity for Indoor Libraries and Integral Areas, and Bars New Issues in Post‑Grant Supplemental Briefs

Open Area Means Open to the Public: Kansas Supreme Court Affirms Recreational-Use Immunity for Indoor Libraries and Integral Areas, and Bars New Issues in Post‑Grant Supplemental Briefs

Date: Jun 28, 2025
Open Area Means Open to the Public: Kansas Supreme Court Affirms Recreational-Use Immunity for Indoor Libraries and Integral Areas, and Bars New Issues in Post‑Grant Supplemental Briefs Introduction...
No Prudential Exceptions: Mootness Is a Jurisdictional Bar in Kansas — Commentary on State v. Phipps (Kan. 2025)

No Prudential Exceptions: Mootness Is a Jurisdictional Bar in Kansas — Commentary on State v. Phipps (Kan. 2025)

Date: Jun 28, 2025
No Prudential Exceptions: Mootness Is a Jurisdictional Bar in Kansas — State v. Phipps (Kan. 2025) Introduction In State v. Phipps, the Kansas Supreme Court announced a sweeping recalibration of the...
“Sovereign Immunity After Burnett” –  Sikora v. State of Iowa and the Closing of Iowa’s Common-Law Door to Wrongful-Imprisonment Damages

“Sovereign Immunity After Burnett” – Sikora v. State of Iowa and the Closing of Iowa’s Common-Law Door to Wrongful-Imprisonment Damages

Date: Jun 28, 2025
“Sovereign Immunity After Burnett” – Sikora v. State of Iowa and the Closing of Iowa’s Common-Law Door to Wrongful-Imprisonment Damages 1. Introduction On 27 June 2025 the Iowa Supreme Court,...
Refining Electoral Speech Crimes: The Michigan Supreme Court’s Narrow Construction of MCL 168.932(a) and Its Unsettled First-Amendment Boundaries

Refining Electoral Speech Crimes: The Michigan Supreme Court’s Narrow Construction of MCL 168.932(a) and Its Unsettled First-Amendment Boundaries

Date: Jun 28, 2025
Refining Electoral Speech Crimes: The Michigan Supreme Court’s Narrow Construction of MCL 168.932(a) and Its Unsettled First-Amendment Boundaries 1. Introduction The consolidated matters of People of...
State v. Wash: Strict Limits on Prosecutorial Argument—Violations of Orders in Limine and “We Know” Statements Are Error; Timely Objection Required for Evidentiary-Based Missteps

State v. Wash: Strict Limits on Prosecutorial Argument—Violations of Orders in Limine and “We Know” Statements Are Error; Timely Objection Required for Evidentiary-Based Missteps

Date: Jun 28, 2025
State v. Wash: Strict Limits on Prosecutorial Argument—Violations of Orders in Limine and “We Know” Statements Are Error; Timely Objection Required for Evidentiary-Based Missteps Introduction In...
State v. Cole: Waiver of Firearm Rights Through Consent Protective Orders & Limits on Consecutive Sentencing After Probation Revocation

State v. Cole: Waiver of Firearm Rights Through Consent Protective Orders & Limits on Consecutive Sentencing After Probation Revocation

Date: Jun 28, 2025
State v. Cole: Waiver of Firearm Rights Through Consent Protective Orders & Limits on Consecutive Sentencing After Probation Revocation 1. Introduction In State of Iowa v. Jordan Kevin Cole,...
State v. Ninh: “Overcome by Force or Fear” Is a Single Unified Means; Subjective Fear Suffices; and “Grooming-as-Force” Requires Evidentiary Support

State v. Ninh: “Overcome by Force or Fear” Is a Single Unified Means; Subjective Fear Suffices; and “Grooming-as-Force” Requires Evidentiary Support

Date: Jun 28, 2025
State v. Ninh: “Overcome by Force or Fear” Is a Single Unified Means; Subjective Fear Suffices; and “Grooming-as-Force” Requires Evidentiary Support Introduction In State v. Ninh, No. 122,782 (Kan....
State v. Green: Premeditation’s Time-and-Consideration Test Bars Arbitrary-Enforcement Vagueness Claims; Evidentiary Proof Required for Witness “Unavailability”; No Renewed Faretta Colloquy Absent Changed Circumstances

State v. Green: Premeditation’s Time-and-Consideration Test Bars Arbitrary-Enforcement Vagueness Claims; Evidentiary Proof Required for Witness “Unavailability”; No Renewed Faretta Colloquy Absent Changed Circumstances

Date: Jun 28, 2025
State v. Green: Premeditation’s Time-and-Consideration Test Bars Arbitrary-Enforcement Vagueness Claims; Evidentiary Proof Required for Witness “Unavailability”; No Renewed Faretta Colloquy Absent...
State v. Ford: Tethering “Force” to the Sexual Act and Upholding Kansas’s Rape Statute Against Vagueness

State v. Ford: Tethering “Force” to the Sexual Act and Upholding Kansas’s Rape Statute Against Vagueness

Date: Jun 28, 2025
State v. Ford: Tethering “Force” to the Sexual Act and Upholding Kansas’s Rape Statute Against Vagueness Court: Supreme Court of Kansas Date: June 27, 2025 Docket No.: 124,236 Introduction This...
First Circuit Narrows Judicial Review of “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” Findings After Wilkinson v. Garland

First Circuit Narrows Judicial Review of “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” Findings After Wilkinson v. Garland

Date: Jun 27, 2025
First Circuit Narrows Judicial Review of “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” Findings After Wilkinson v. Garland Introduction In Xiquin Xirum v. Bondi, the United States Court of Appeals for...
“Speak Now or Lose Later” – The Third Circuit’s Firm Stance on Appellate Forfeiture and FTCA Timeliness in Manivannan v. Department of Energy

“Speak Now or Lose Later” – The Third Circuit’s Firm Stance on Appellate Forfeiture and FTCA Timeliness in Manivannan v. Department of Energy

Date: Jun 27, 2025
“Speak Now or Lose Later” – The Third Circuit’s Firm Stance on Appellate Forfeiture and FTCA Timeliness in Manivannan v. Department of Energy 1. Introduction Ayyakkannu Manivannan, a former materials...
Clarifying the Threshold for Court-Appointed Counsel and Pleading Specificity in Pro Se Litigation: A Commentary on Weems v. City of Philadelphia (3d Cir. 2025)

Clarifying the Threshold for Court-Appointed Counsel and Pleading Specificity in Pro Se Litigation: A Commentary on Weems v. City of Philadelphia (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 27, 2025
Clarifying the Threshold for Court-Appointed Counsel and Pleading Specificity in Pro Se Litigation: A Commentary on Weems v. City of Philadelphia (3d Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction Weems v. City of...
Post-Removal Settlement Offers Do Not Defeat Diversity Jurisdiction – A Commentary on Sergei Kovalev v. WalMart Inc. (3d Cir. 2025)

Post-Removal Settlement Offers Do Not Defeat Diversity Jurisdiction – A Commentary on Sergei Kovalev v. WalMart Inc. (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 27, 2025
Post-Removal Settlement Offers Do Not Defeat Diversity Jurisdiction: In-Depth Commentary on Sergei Kovalev v. WalMart Inc. (3d Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction The United States Court of Appeals for the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert