Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Krueger v. Crockett (10th Cir. 2025): Prolonged Prone Restraints, Post-Restraint Tasers, and the Expansive Duty to Intervene Introduction In Krueger v. Crockett, the United States Court of Appeals...
“No Officer May Ignore the Danger”: Krueger v. Orr and the Tenth Circuit’s Firm Ban on Prolonged Prone Restraints and Failure-to-Intervene Introduction In Krueger v. Orr, ___ F.4th ___ (10th Cir....
“Notwithstanding” Does Not Trump the Default Sourcing Rule: Liberty Global v. Commissioner and the Limits of I.R.C. § 904(f)(3) Introduction In Liberty Global, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal...
“No Presumptive Incompetence”: Martinez v. Martinez and the Evidentiary Threshold for Competency-Based §2254 Claims Introduction Martinez v. Martinez, No. 24-2105 (10th Cir. Aug. 22, 2025), is a...
Conflicts, Collateral Orders, and Screening: The Supreme Court Clarifies When Prosecutorial Conflicts Disqualify the Office of the Attorney General Introduction Case: Commonwealth v. Torres (2025 MP...
Due-Process Notice to Corporate Landowners and the Finality of Decertified Irrigated Acres: A Commentary on State ex rel. Seeman v. Lower Republican NRD, 319 Neb. 681 (2025) 1. Introduction The...
“No-Offset” Rule for Significantly Excessive Earnings In re Application of Dayton Power & Light Co. (2025-Ohio-2953) Introduction The Supreme Court of Ohio, in In re Application of Dayton Power &...
Therapeutic Suspension of Visitation as a “Reasonable Effort” in Alaska CINA Cases Commentary on Kash B. (Father) v. State of Alaska, Department of Family and Community Services, Office of Children’s...
The Invited-Error Bar to Mid-Litigation Shifts in Contract-Damages Theories: Nebraska Supreme Court Clarifies Party Concessions in D&M Roofing & Siding v. Distribution, Inc. (319 Neb. 707) 1....
Mandamus as the Tool to Correct PILOT Fund Misallocations: The Treasurer’s Ministerial Duty under Article VIII § 11 and Neb. Rev. Stat. § 70-651.04 Introduction In State ex rel. Douglas Cty. Sch....
“When the Water Shuts Off”: Due-Process Notice to Corporate Landowners and the Finality of Irrigated-Acre Reductions under Neb. Rev. Stat. §46-746(1) A Comprehensive Commentary on State ex rel....
Cross-Border Equitable Contribution: Wyoming Endorses Florida’s 50/50 Presumption for Joint Mortgage Obligors Commentary on Katya Hutton v. Michael L. Dykes & J. Christopher Dykes, Co-PRs of the...
“Timeliness and Prejudice” – The Third Circuit’s Refined Boundaries for Late Amendments, Rule 403, and Trial Discretion in Employment Discrimination Litigation I. Introduction Case: Carl Williams v....
“Thrown a Lifeline”: Fifth Circuit Holds Marine Life-Rafts Are “Equipment” under the Texas Dealer Act 1. Introduction In Fire Protection Service, Inc. v. Survitec Survival Products, Inc., No....
Clarifying Same-Sex Harassment Pleadings After Texas’s 2021 Amendments: A Commentary on Lanier v. Wise County (5th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction Chad Lewis Lanier, a retired deputy sheriff for Wise...
“Dual-Trigger” Disarmament after Bruen: Violence or Probation Status Suffices – A Commentary on United States v. Clark (5th Cir. 2025) Introduction United States v. Clark, decided on 21 August 2025...
Rule 32(h) Notice through a Presentence Report and the Upholding of Significant Upward Departures – A Commentary on United States v. Ricky Artis (4th Cir., Aug. 21 2025) 1. Introduction United States...
Possession Equals Exposure: Tenth Circuit Affirms Full-Scheme Forfeiture and Refines Rules on Co-Participant Pleas – Commentary on United States v. Cline (2025) I. Introduction The Tenth Circuit’s...
United States v. Cline – The Tenth Circuit Endorses “Full-Scheme” Forfeiture and Clarifies the Reach of Honeycutt and Peterman Introduction In United States v. Cline, Nos. 24-1119 & 24-1137 (10th...