Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

reinforcing-the-implied-covenant-of-good-faith-in-commercial-development-contracts:-anthony& Case Commentaries

No “Private Areas” Exception: Montana Supreme Court Reaffirms That Probation Home Visits—Including Bedroom Walkthroughs—Are Not Searches

No “Private Areas” Exception: Montana Supreme Court Reaffirms That Probation Home Visits—Including Bedroom Walkthroughs—Are Not Searches

Date: Sep 10, 2025
No “Private Areas” Exception: Montana Supreme Court Reaffirms That Probation Home Visits—Including Bedroom Walkthroughs—Are Not Searches Case: State v. Manyhides, 2025 MT 204 (Mont. Sept. 9, 2025)...
Implied Consent Opens the Door: Montana Supreme Court Affirms Post‑Trial Amendment and Third‑Party Parental Interest Under § 40‑4‑228, MCA (Marriage of Rehbein & Paddock, 2025 MT 201)

Implied Consent Opens the Door: Montana Supreme Court Affirms Post‑Trial Amendment and Third‑Party Parental Interest Under § 40‑4‑228, MCA (Marriage of Rehbein & Paddock, 2025 MT 201)

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Implied Consent Opens the Door: Montana Supreme Court Affirms Post‑Trial Amendment and Third‑Party Parental Interest Under § 40‑4‑228, MCA Case: In re the Marriage of Rehbein and Paddock (2025 MT...
No Amendment After Final Adjudication: Montana’s Strict Bar on Successive Post‑Conviction Petitions and the Narrow Actual‑Innocence Exception

No Amendment After Final Adjudication: Montana’s Strict Bar on Successive Post‑Conviction Petitions and the Narrow Actual‑Innocence Exception

Date: Sep 10, 2025
No Amendment After Final Adjudication: Montana’s Strict Bar on Successive Post‑Conviction Petitions and the Narrow Actual‑Innocence Exception Nonprecedential Note: This is a memorandum opinion under...
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Retaliatory Refusal to Remedy Dangerous Prison Conditions as Actionable First Amendment Violation; Risk-Only COVID-19 Exposure Insufficient for Damages Standing

Sixth Circuit Clarifies Retaliatory Refusal to Remedy Dangerous Prison Conditions as Actionable First Amendment Violation; Risk-Only COVID-19 Exposure Insufficient for Damages Standing

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Retaliatory Refusal to Remedy Dangerous Prison Conditions as Actionable First Amendment Violation; Risk-Only COVID-19 Exposure Insufficient for Damages Standing Introduction...
No §1681i Liability Where Plaintiff’s Own Credit Report Refutes Inaccuracy: Exhibits Control Over Contrary Allegations in FCRA Pleadings

No §1681i Liability Where Plaintiff’s Own Credit Report Refutes Inaccuracy: Exhibits Control Over Contrary Allegations in FCRA Pleadings

Date: Sep 10, 2025
No §1681i Liability Where Plaintiff’s Own Credit Report Refutes Inaccuracy: Exhibits Control Over Contrary Allegations in FCRA Pleadings Introduction This commentary analyzes the Eleventh Circuit’s...
Content-Neutral, Not Content-Based: Second Circuit Holds New York’s UPL Restrictions on One-to-One Legal Advice Are Subject to Intermediate Scrutiny

Content-Neutral, Not Content-Based: Second Circuit Holds New York’s UPL Restrictions on One-to-One Legal Advice Are Subject to Intermediate Scrutiny

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Content-Neutral, Not Content-Based: Second Circuit Holds New York’s UPL Restrictions on One-to-One Legal Advice Are Subject to Intermediate Scrutiny Introduction In Upsolve, Inc. v. James, the United...
No Manufactured Diversity via Trust Appointments: Fifth Circuit Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1359 to Sham Trustees

No Manufactured Diversity via Trust Appointments: Fifth Circuit Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1359 to Sham Trustees

Date: Sep 10, 2025
No Manufactured Diversity via Trust Appointments: Fifth Circuit Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1359 to Sham Trustees Case: Fugedi v. Initram, No. 24-40283 (5th Cir. Sept. 9, 2025) Introduction The Fifth...
Third Circuit Reaffirms Strict Timeliness and Excusable-Neglect Limits on Rule 60 Relief in Bankruptcy Claim Expungements

Third Circuit Reaffirms Strict Timeliness and Excusable-Neglect Limits on Rule 60 Relief in Bankruptcy Claim Expungements

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Third Circuit Reaffirms Strict Timeliness and Excusable-Neglect Limits on Rule 60 Relief in Bankruptcy Claim Expungements Introduction In a non-precedential opinion, the United States Court of...
Ascertainability Is Not a Mandatory Prerequisite Under Montana Rule 23: Predominance and Early-Stage Deference Affirmed in Allied Waste v. LH Residential

Ascertainability Is Not a Mandatory Prerequisite Under Montana Rule 23: Predominance and Early-Stage Deference Affirmed in Allied Waste v. LH Residential

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Ascertainability Is Not a Mandatory Prerequisite Under Montana Rule 23: Predominance and Early-Stage Deference Affirmed in Allied Waste v. LH Residential Introduction In Allied Waste v. LH...
Imminent Harm Still Required: Voluntary Repeal and Binding Non‑Enforcement Pledge Defeat First Amendment Preliminary Injunctions; Credible‑Threat Standing Tightened in Limited Public Fora

Imminent Harm Still Required: Voluntary Repeal and Binding Non‑Enforcement Pledge Defeat First Amendment Preliminary Injunctions; Credible‑Threat Standing Tightened in Limited Public Fora

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Imminent Harm Still Required: Voluntary Repeal and Binding Non‑Enforcement Pledge Defeat First Amendment Preliminary Injunctions And: The Sixth Circuit tightens pre‑enforcement standing where a...
Walton v. Comfort Systems: Fire Alarm Testing and Inspection Is Covered “Maintenance” Under NYLL § 220; Second Circuit Certifies Whether the Prevailing-Wage Promise Is Implied in All Public Works Contracts and Whether One‑Year Limitations Clauses Bind Workers

Walton v. Comfort Systems: Fire Alarm Testing and Inspection Is Covered “Maintenance” Under NYLL § 220; Second Circuit Certifies Whether the Prevailing-Wage Promise Is Implied in All Public Works Contracts and Whether One‑Year Limitations Clauses Bind Workers

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Walton v. Comfort Systems: Fire Alarm Testing and Inspection Is Covered “Maintenance” Under NYLL § 220; Second Circuit Certifies Whether the Prevailing-Wage Promise Is Implied in All Public Works...
Neutral Laws Require Neutral Enforcement: Second Circuit Holds that Hostility-Tainted Discipline by a State Athletics Association Violates the Free Exercise Clause

Neutral Laws Require Neutral Enforcement: Second Circuit Holds that Hostility-Tainted Discipline by a State Athletics Association Violates the Free Exercise Clause

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Neutral Laws Require Neutral Enforcement: Second Circuit Holds that Hostility-Tainted Discipline by a State Athletics Association Violates the Free Exercise Clause Introduction In Mid Vermont...
Second Circuit Reaffirms Strict Pleading, Causation, and Timeliness Requirements for Hybrid § 301/Duty of Fair Representation Claims: Goodman v. Local 804 (IBT) & UPS

Second Circuit Reaffirms Strict Pleading, Causation, and Timeliness Requirements for Hybrid § 301/Duty of Fair Representation Claims: Goodman v. Local 804 (IBT) & UPS

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Second Circuit Reaffirms Strict Pleading, Causation, and Timeliness Requirements for Hybrid § 301/Duty of Fair Representation Claims: Goodman v. Local 804 (IBT) & UPS Note: This disposition is a...
First Amendment Shield, Not Sword: Protected Petitioning Cannot Supply the Overt Act in § 1983 Conspiracies—Yet May Evidence Agreement; and Government Litigation and Nonviolent “Threats” Are Not Clearly Established Retaliation

First Amendment Shield, Not Sword: Protected Petitioning Cannot Supply the Overt Act in § 1983 Conspiracies—Yet May Evidence Agreement; and Government Litigation and Nonviolent “Threats” Are Not Clearly Established Retaliation

Date: Sep 10, 2025
First Amendment Shield, Not Sword: Protected Petitioning Cannot Supply the Overt Act in § 1983 Conspiracies—Yet May Evidence Agreement; and Government Litigation and Nonviolent “Threats” Are Not...
“Adequately Supply” Means Quantity-Ambiguous, Not Quality-Certain: First Circuit Narrows Failure‑to‑Supply Limitations and Affirms Broad Duty to Defend for Reckless Product Decisions

“Adequately Supply” Means Quantity-Ambiguous, Not Quality-Certain: First Circuit Narrows Failure‑to‑Supply Limitations and Affirms Broad Duty to Defend for Reckless Product Decisions

Date: Sep 10, 2025
“Adequately Supply” Means Quantity-Ambiguous, Not Quality-Certain: First Circuit Narrows Failure‑to‑Supply Limitations and Affirms Broad Duty to Defend for Reckless Product Decisions Introduction In...
Pleading Conclusory Conspiracies Won’t Do: Good-Faith Reliance on a Facially Valid Warrant and Video-Verified Decorum Enforcement Defeat First and Fourth Amendment Claims — Story v. Gravell (5th Cir. 2025)

Pleading Conclusory Conspiracies Won’t Do: Good-Faith Reliance on a Facially Valid Warrant and Video-Verified Decorum Enforcement Defeat First and Fourth Amendment Claims — Story v. Gravell (5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Pleading Conclusory Conspiracies Won’t Do: Good-Faith Reliance on a Facially Valid Warrant and Video-Verified Decorum Enforcement Defeat First and Fourth Amendment Claims — Story v. Gravell (5th Cir....
Personal Guaranty and Owner-Occupation Do Not Convert Commercial Loans into Consumer Debts; Non-Judicial Foreclosure Is Not State Action — Okorie v. University Mall (5th Cir. 2025)

Personal Guaranty and Owner-Occupation Do Not Convert Commercial Loans into Consumer Debts; Non-Judicial Foreclosure Is Not State Action — Okorie v. University Mall (5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Personal Guaranty and Owner-Occupation Do Not Convert Commercial Loans into Consumer Debts; Non-Judicial Foreclosure Is Not State Action — Okorie v. University Mall (5th Cir. 2025) Introduction In...
Kessler and the Due Process Floor at Sentencing: No Resentencing Absent Reliance on Materially False Information; Clerical Correction of Offense Level under § 45-6-301(7)(b)(i), MCA

Kessler and the Due Process Floor at Sentencing: No Resentencing Absent Reliance on Materially False Information; Clerical Correction of Offense Level under § 45-6-301(7)(b)(i), MCA

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Kessler and the Due Process Floor at Sentencing: No Resentencing Absent Reliance on Materially False Information; Clerical Correction of Offense Level under § 45-6-301(7)(b)(i), MCA Court: Supreme...
Subject-Matter, Not Structure: Fifth Circuit Declares Church Autonomy a Merits Immunity Shielding Non‑Hierarchical Ministries and Third‑Party Partners

Subject-Matter, Not Structure: Fifth Circuit Declares Church Autonomy a Merits Immunity Shielding Non‑Hierarchical Ministries and Third‑Party Partners

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Subject-Matter, Not Structure: Fifth Circuit Declares Church Autonomy a Merits Immunity Shielding Non‑Hierarchical Ministries and Third‑Party Partners Introduction In McRaney v. North American...
All Defendants in Hybrid Product Liability Suits Are “Parties” for Comparative Responsibility; the One‑Year Contribution Period Runs from Appellate Finality (HBWS v. Wang)

All Defendants in Hybrid Product Liability Suits Are “Parties” for Comparative Responsibility; the One‑Year Contribution Period Runs from Appellate Finality (HBWS v. Wang)

Date: Sep 10, 2025
All Defendants in Hybrid Product Liability Suits Are “Parties” for Comparative Responsibility; the One‑Year Contribution Period Runs from Appellate Finality Introduction In Health Body World Supply,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert