Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

protected-advice-at-life’s-end:-seventh-circuit-holds-indiana’s-funeral-licensing-ban-on-death-doula-counseling-fails-even-under-intermediate-scrutiny—and-consent-orders-don’t-waive-federal-rights Case Commentaries

Anonymous Juries and Gang-Affiliation Evidence Reaffirmed; Limits on Rule 804(b)(3) Clarified in Second Circuit’s Murder-for-Hire Ruling

Anonymous Juries and Gang-Affiliation Evidence Reaffirmed; Limits on Rule 804(b)(3) Clarified in Second Circuit’s Murder-for-Hire Ruling

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Anonymous Juries and Gang-Affiliation Evidence Reaffirmed; Limits on Rule 804(b)(3) Clarified in Second Circuit’s Murder-for-Hire Ruling Introduction In a summary order dated November 10, 2025, the...
Counsel Need Not “Shop” for Experts: Eleventh Circuit Upholds Phone-Based Expert Vetting and Cross-Examination Strategy Under AEDPA’s Double Deference

Counsel Need Not “Shop” for Experts: Eleventh Circuit Upholds Phone-Based Expert Vetting and Cross-Examination Strategy Under AEDPA’s Double Deference

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Counsel Need Not “Shop” for Experts: Eleventh Circuit Upholds Phone-Based Expert Vetting and Cross-Examination Strategy Under AEDPA’s Double Deference Introduction In Clark Mackendrick v. Secretary,...
Consent to Marketing ≠ Consent to Arbitrate: Eleventh Circuit Demands Conspicuous Terms and Explicit Assent for Online Arbitration Agreements

Consent to Marketing ≠ Consent to Arbitrate: Eleventh Circuit Demands Conspicuous Terms and Explicit Assent for Online Arbitration Agreements

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Consent to Marketing ≠ Consent to Arbitrate: Eleventh Circuit Demands Conspicuous Terms and Explicit Assent for Online Arbitration Agreements Introduction In Heriberto Valiente v. NexGen Global, LLC...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies No § 851(b) Colloquy Is Required When § 851(e)’s Five-Year Bar Forecloses Attacks on Prior Convictions

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies No § 851(b) Colloquy Is Required When § 851(e)’s Five-Year Bar Forecloses Attacks on Prior Convictions

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies No § 851(b) Colloquy Is Required When § 851(e)’s Five-Year Bar Forecloses Attacks on Prior Convictions Introduction In United States v. Adal Antonio Navas Feliciano, the...
Publication Starts the Clock: Tenth Circuit Confirms Colorado’s One-Year Defamation Limitations and Allows Anti-SLAPP Dismissal on Time-Bar Grounds in Hoid v. Gray Media Group

Publication Starts the Clock: Tenth Circuit Confirms Colorado’s One-Year Defamation Limitations and Allows Anti-SLAPP Dismissal on Time-Bar Grounds in Hoid v. Gray Media Group

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Publication Starts the Clock: Tenth Circuit Confirms Colorado’s One-Year Defamation Limitations and Allows Anti-SLAPP Dismissal on Time-Bar Grounds in Hoid v. Gray Media Group Introduction In Hoid v....
Tenth Circuit Expands State Opt-Out Power Under DIDA: “Loans Made In” Includes Either Borrower or Lender Located in the Opt-Out State

Tenth Circuit Expands State Opt-Out Power Under DIDA: “Loans Made In” Includes Either Borrower or Lender Located in the Opt-Out State

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Tenth Circuit Expands State Opt-Out Power Under DIDA: “Loans Made In” Includes Either Borrower or Lender Located in the Opt-Out State Introduction In National Association of Industrial Bankers v....
Partial § 1631 Transfers Do Not Strip Jurisdiction Over Non‑Transferred Claims: The Tenth Circuit’s Clarification in SeedX v. Lincoln Strategy

Partial § 1631 Transfers Do Not Strip Jurisdiction Over Non‑Transferred Claims: The Tenth Circuit’s Clarification in SeedX v. Lincoln Strategy

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Partial § 1631 Transfers Do Not Strip Jurisdiction Over Non‑Transferred Claims SeedX, Inc. v. Lincoln Strategy Group LLC, Fortified Consulting LLC, Nathan Sproul, and Kanye 2020 Court: U.S. Court of...
Shelton v. City of Locust Grove (10th Cir. 2025): Abandonment Is a Merits Question, and Objective Abandonment Defeats Fourth Amendment Pet-Seizure Claims

Shelton v. City of Locust Grove (10th Cir. 2025): Abandonment Is a Merits Question, and Objective Abandonment Defeats Fourth Amendment Pet-Seizure Claims

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Shelton v. City of Locust Grove (10th Cir. 2025): Abandonment Is a Merits Question, and Objective Abandonment Defeats Fourth Amendment Pet-Seizure Claims Introduction In Shelton v. City of Locust...
JASTA’s “Mere Negligence” Excludes Only Ordinary Negligence; Omissions Are Categorically Barred; Proximate Cause Governs “Caused By” — Eleventh Circuit Partially Lifts Saudi Arabia’s FSIA Immunity in the Pensacola NAS Shooting

JASTA’s “Mere Negligence” Excludes Only Ordinary Negligence; Omissions Are Categorically Barred; Proximate Cause Governs “Caused By” — Eleventh Circuit Partially Lifts Saudi Arabia’s FSIA Immunity in the Pensacola NAS Shooting

Date: Nov 11, 2025
JASTA’s “Mere Negligence” Excludes Only Ordinary Negligence; Omissions Are Categorically Barred; Proximate Cause Governs “Caused By” — Eleventh Circuit Partially Lifts Saudi Arabia’s FSIA Immunity in...
Ambiguous “Occurrence” Under Florida Law Must Be Construed in Favor of the Insured: Parkland Mass Shooting Is a Single Occurrence; Early Declaratory Actions Are Justiciable; No “Sophisticated Insured” Exception; Threatened Denials Trigger Fee-Shifting

Ambiguous “Occurrence” Under Florida Law Must Be Construed in Favor of the Insured: Parkland Mass Shooting Is a Single Occurrence; Early Declaratory Actions Are Justiciable; No “Sophisticated Insured” Exception; Threatened Denials Trigger Fee-Shifting

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Ambiguous “Occurrence” Under Florida Law Must Be Construed in Favor of the Insured: Parkland Mass Shooting Is a Single Occurrence; Early Declaratory Actions Are Justiciable; No “Sophisticated...
Ambiguity Controls: Eleventh Circuit Holds Parkland Mass Shooting Is a Single “Occurrence” Under Florida Law; Early Declaratory Actions Are Justiciable and Fee-Shifting Applies to Threatened Denials

Ambiguity Controls: Eleventh Circuit Holds Parkland Mass Shooting Is a Single “Occurrence” Under Florida Law; Early Declaratory Actions Are Justiciable and Fee-Shifting Applies to Threatened Denials

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Ambiguity Controls: Eleventh Circuit Holds Parkland Mass Shooting Is a Single “Occurrence” Under Florida Law; Early Declaratory Actions Are Justiciable and Fee-Shifting Applies to Threatened Denials...
Florida’s TBE Presumption Survives: Only an Express Anti‑TBE Writing Defeats It; “Writing” Need Not Be on the Signature Card

Florida’s TBE Presumption Survives: Only an Express Anti‑TBE Writing Defeats It; “Writing” Need Not Be on the Signature Card

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Florida’s TBE Presumption Survives: Only an Express Anti‑TBE Writing Defeats It; “Writing” Need Not Be on the Signature Card Case: Storey Mountain v. Carlos C. Del Amo (with Trustee Marcia T. Dunn) |...
Seventh Circuit (Nonprecedential) Reaffirms Limits on § 1985(3) Private Conspiracies and Confirms § 1915(e)(2) Screening Applies to Fee-Paying Litigants; No FDCPA or Fraud Liability for Authorized Eviction Filing or Ordinance-Based Notice

Seventh Circuit (Nonprecedential) Reaffirms Limits on § 1985(3) Private Conspiracies and Confirms § 1915(e)(2) Screening Applies to Fee-Paying Litigants; No FDCPA or Fraud Liability for Authorized Eviction Filing or Ordinance-Based Notice

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Seventh Circuit (Nonprecedential) Reaffirms Limits on § 1985(3) Private Conspiracies and Confirms § 1915(e)(2) Screening Applies to Fee-Paying Litigants; No FDCPA or Fraud Liability for Authorized...
De Minimis Detention and the Heck Bar: Seventh Circuit Affirms Dismissal While Sidestepping the Summers Arrest‑Warrant Split

De Minimis Detention and the Heck Bar: Seventh Circuit Affirms Dismissal While Sidestepping the Summers Arrest‑Warrant Split

Date: Nov 11, 2025
De Minimis Detention and the Heck Bar: Seventh Circuit Affirms Dismissal While Sidestepping the Summers Arrest‑Warrant Split Introduction In David E. Jackson, III and Nickole A. Jackson v. Richard...
Inadvertent BOP Release Does Not Extinguish an Undischarged Consecutive Term: Limits of the “Installment Punishment” Rule in McKinney v. Lauritsen (7th Cir. 2025)

Inadvertent BOP Release Does Not Extinguish an Undischarged Consecutive Term: Limits of the “Installment Punishment” Rule in McKinney v. Lauritsen (7th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Inadvertent BOP Release Does Not Extinguish an Undischarged Consecutive Term: Limits of the “Installment Punishment” Rule in McKinney v. Lauritsen (7th Cir. 2025) Court: United States Court of...
Delegating Courtroom Security Decisions Is Error but Harmless Absent Prejudice; Departmental Policies Do Not Define Fourth Amendment Standards

Delegating Courtroom Security Decisions Is Error but Harmless Absent Prejudice; Departmental Policies Do Not Define Fourth Amendment Standards

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Delegating Courtroom Security Decisions Is Error but Harmless Absent Prejudice; Departmental Policies Do Not Define Fourth Amendment Standards Case: Joshua Lee Vinson, Sr. v. Jason DeBruin, et al....
Accrual Ends at the Last Denial: Seventh Circuit Confirms Wisconsin’s Split Limitations Regime and Rejects Continuing‑Violation Tolling for Lingering Pain in § 1983 Medical‑Indifference Claims

Accrual Ends at the Last Denial: Seventh Circuit Confirms Wisconsin’s Split Limitations Regime and Rejects Continuing‑Violation Tolling for Lingering Pain in § 1983 Medical‑Indifference Claims

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Accrual Ends at the Last Denial: Seventh Circuit Confirms Wisconsin’s Split Limitations Regime and Rejects Continuing‑Violation Tolling for Lingering Pain in § 1983 Medical‑Indifference Claims...
Reaffirming TVPA Restitution as “Gross Income” with No Forfeiture Offset and Upholding Recording-Device Supervised-Release Conditions: United States v. Austin Koeckeritz (7th Cir. 2025)

Reaffirming TVPA Restitution as “Gross Income” with No Forfeiture Offset and Upholding Recording-Device Supervised-Release Conditions: United States v. Austin Koeckeritz (7th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Reaffirming TVPA Restitution as “Gross Income” with No Forfeiture Offset and Upholding Recording-Device Supervised-Release Conditions: United States v. Austin Koeckeritz (7th Cir. 2025) Note: This is...
No Conviction, No Heck: First Circuit Declines to Extend Heck Bar to Massachusetts § 87 Pretrial Probation Dismissals

No Conviction, No Heck: First Circuit Declines to Extend Heck Bar to Massachusetts § 87 Pretrial Probation Dismissals

Date: Nov 11, 2025
No Conviction, No Heck: First Circuit Declines to Extend Heck Bar to Massachusetts § 87 Pretrial Probation Dismissals Introduction In Aprileo v. Clapprood, No. 24-2081 (1st Cir. Nov. 10, 2025), the...
No Plenary Power Without Constitutional Warrant: Justice Gorsuch’s Dissent in Veneno v. United States

No Plenary Power Without Constitutional Warrant: Justice Gorsuch’s Dissent in Veneno v. United States

Date: Nov 11, 2025
No Plenary Power Without Constitutional Warrant: Justice Gorsuch’s Dissent in Veneno v. United States Introduction In Veneno v. United States, 607 U.S. ___ (2025), the Supreme Court denied a petition...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert