Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

protected-advice-at-life’s-end:-seventh-circuit-holds-indiana’s-funeral-licensing-ban-on-death-doula-counseling-fails-even-under-intermediate-scrutiny—and-consent-orders-don’t-waive-federal-rights Case Commentaries

Civil Investigative Demand (CID) Litigation Equitably Tolls Limitations Periods for Minnesota Attorney General § 8.31 Enforcement Actions

Civil Investigative Demand (CID) Litigation Equitably Tolls Limitations Periods for Minnesota Attorney General § 8.31 Enforcement Actions

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Civil Investigative Demand (CID) Litigation Equitably Tolls Limitations Periods for Minnesota Attorney General § 8.31 Enforcement Actions Introduction In State of Minnesota Office of the Attorney...
Pleading Self-Defense to Overcome Probable Cause in § 1983 False-Arrest Claims (Illinois Battery)

Pleading Self-Defense to Overcome Probable Cause in § 1983 False-Arrest Claims (Illinois Battery)

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Pleading Self-Defense to Overcome Probable Cause in § 1983 False-Arrest Claims (Illinois Battery) Introduction In Malcolm Brogsdale v. Annette Torres-Corona, an off-duty Chicago police officer,...
Third-Party Notice May Be “On the Insured’s Behalf,” But Timeliness Is Measured From the Insured’s Occurrence-Based Duty

Third-Party Notice May Be “On the Insured’s Behalf,” But Timeliness Is Measured From the Insured’s Occurrence-Based Duty

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Third-Party Notice May Be “On the Insured’s Behalf,” But Timeliness Is Measured From the Insured’s Occurrence-Based Duty Introduction In A. B. v. David Jacobs Barrow (11th Cir. Jan. 7, 2026), the...
DMCA § 512(c) Safe Harbor: Hash-Matching Outputs and Algorithmic Curation Do Not Create “Red Flag” Knowledge or “Right and Ability to Control” Without Specific Infringement and Substantial Influence

DMCA § 512(c) Safe Harbor: Hash-Matching Outputs and Algorithmic Curation Do Not Create “Red Flag” Knowledge or “Right and Ability to Control” Without Specific Infringement and Substantial Influence

Date: Jan 8, 2026
DMCA § 512(c) Safe Harbor: Hash-Matching Outputs and Algorithmic Curation Do Not Create “Red Flag” Knowledge or “Right and Ability to Control” Without Specific Infringement and Substantial Influence...
Conspiracy Is Not Automatically Coextensive with “Jointly Undertaken Criminal Activity” for Loss and Restitution

Conspiracy Is Not Automatically Coextensive with “Jointly Undertaken Criminal Activity” for Loss and Restitution

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Conspiracy Is Not Automatically Coextensive with “Jointly Undertaken Criminal Activity” for Loss and Restitution Case: United States v. Abdoulaye Barry (11th Cir. Jan. 7, 2026) | Court: United States...
Standard Sentencing Remarks Do Not Create Procedural Error When Followed by Case-Specific § 3553(a) Analysis

Standard Sentencing Remarks Do Not Create Procedural Error When Followed by Case-Specific § 3553(a) Analysis

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Standard Sentencing Remarks Do Not Create Procedural Error When Followed by Case-Specific § 3553(a) Analysis Introduction In United States v. DeRosse (2d Cir. Jan. 7, 2026) (summary order), the...
Reasoned Consideration Is Satisfied When the BIA Affirms Dispositive IJ Findings Unchallenged in Substance (Nexus and CAT Acquiescence)

Reasoned Consideration Is Satisfied When the BIA Affirms Dispositive IJ Findings Unchallenged in Substance (Nexus and CAT Acquiescence)

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Reasoned Consideration Is Satisfied When the BIA Affirms Dispositive IJ Findings Unchallenged in Substance (Nexus and CAT Acquiescence) 1. Introduction Case: Edinson Isaias Cruz-Yanes v. U.S....
Compassionate Release: Tapia Does Not Limit § 3582(c)(1)(A) Courts from Considering In-Prison Treatment and Public Safety

Compassionate Release: Tapia Does Not Limit § 3582(c)(1)(A) Courts from Considering In-Prison Treatment and Public Safety

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Compassionate Release: Tapia Does Not Limit § 3582(c)(1)(A) Courts from Considering In-Prison Treatment and Public Safety Case: United States v. Antonio Easterly (11th Cir. Jan. 7, 2026)...
Federal-Sector Title VII Retaliation in the Eleventh Circuit: No Liability Without a “Personnel Action” and a Work Environment That Would Dissuade a Reasonable Worker

Federal-Sector Title VII Retaliation in the Eleventh Circuit: No Liability Without a “Personnel Action” and a Work Environment That Would Dissuade a Reasonable Worker

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Federal-Sector Title VII Retaliation in the Eleventh Circuit: No Liability Without a “Personnel Action” and a Work Environment That Would Dissuade a Reasonable Worker I. Introduction In Bobby Lett v....
U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(c) Limits Only Acquitted Conduct: Uncharged/Unadjudicated Relevant Conduct May Still Drive RICO Fraud Loss, Restitution, and Forfeiture

U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(c) Limits Only Acquitted Conduct: Uncharged/Unadjudicated Relevant Conduct May Still Drive RICO Fraud Loss, Restitution, and Forfeiture

Date: Jan 8, 2026
U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(c) Limits Only Acquitted Conduct: Uncharged/Unadjudicated Relevant Conduct May Still Drive RICO Fraud Loss, Restitution, and Forfeiture I. Introduction In United States v. Phillip...
Passing Reference to Incarceration: When a Mistrial Is Not Required (Byrd v. State)

Passing Reference to Incarceration: When a Mistrial Is Not Required (Byrd v. State)

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Passing Reference to Incarceration: When a Mistrial Is Not Required Under Georgia’s Mistrial Discretion Standard Introduction In Byrd v. THE STATE (Supreme Court of Georgia, Jan. 5, 2026), appellant...
Scott v. State (Ga. 2026): Voluntary Stationhouse Interview Is Noncustodial for Miranda; Cumulative Other-Acts Proof Renders Error Harmless; “Thirteenth Juror” Rulings Receive Strong Appellate Deference

Scott v. State (Ga. 2026): Voluntary Stationhouse Interview Is Noncustodial for Miranda; Cumulative Other-Acts Proof Renders Error Harmless; “Thirteenth Juror” Rulings Receive Strong Appellate Deference

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Scott v. State (Ga. 2026): Voluntary Stationhouse Interview Is Noncustodial for Miranda; Cumulative Other-Acts Proof Renders Error Harmless; “Thirteenth Juror” Rulings Receive Strong Appellate...
Government Breaches Plea Agreement by Advocating Restitution Contrary to “Restitution: N/A”; Restitution Vacated and Remand to a Different Judge

Government Breaches Plea Agreement by Advocating Restitution Contrary to “Restitution: N/A”; Restitution Vacated and Remand to a Different Judge

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Government Breaches Plea Agreement by Advocating Restitution Contrary to “Restitution: N/A”; Restitution Vacated and Remand to a Different Judge Introduction In United States v. Apolinaris (2d Cir....
United States v. Blake: Criminal History Points for DWAI and CREAMMA “Expungements” Stand Absent Preserved, Developed Guidelines Arguments; Minor-Role Relief Denied Where Defendant Admits Agreement to Sell

United States v. Blake: Criminal History Points for DWAI and CREAMMA “Expungements” Stand Absent Preserved, Developed Guidelines Arguments; Minor-Role Relief Denied Where Defendant Admits Agreement to Sell

Date: Jan 8, 2026
United States v. Blake: Criminal History Points for DWAI and CREAMMA “Expungements” Stand Absent Preserved, Developed Guidelines Arguments; Minor-Role Relief Denied Where Defendant Admits Agreement...
Willful-and-Malicious Trade-Secret Misappropriation Supports Fee Awards Even With Zero Damages; Fee Appeal Cannot Revive Untimely Merits Appeal

Willful-and-Malicious Trade-Secret Misappropriation Supports Fee Awards Even With Zero Damages; Fee Appeal Cannot Revive Untimely Merits Appeal

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Willful-and-Malicious Trade-Secret Misappropriation Supports Fee Awards Even With Zero Damages; Fee Appeal Cannot Revive Untimely Merits Appeal I. Introduction Equity Resources, Inc. v. T2 Financial,...
Sixth Circuit: CJA Investigative Funding Requires Specific, Defense-Tied Necessity; No Evidentiary Hearing Absent Contested Facts

Sixth Circuit: CJA Investigative Funding Requires Specific, Defense-Tied Necessity; No Evidentiary Hearing Absent Contested Facts

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Sixth Circuit: CJA Investigative Funding Requires Specific, Defense-Tied Necessity; No Evidentiary Hearing Absent Contested Facts I. Introduction In United States v. Udell Carroll, III (6th Cir. Jan....
United States v. Hill: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms (1) No Reversal for Single-to-Multiple Conspiracy Variance Without Proof of Prejudice, (2) Constructive Possession via Dominion Over Drug Premises, and (3) No Presumed Jury Prejudice After a Full Remmer Hearing

United States v. Hill: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms (1) No Reversal for Single-to-Multiple Conspiracy Variance Without Proof of Prejudice, (2) Constructive Possession via Dominion Over Drug Premises, and (3) No Presumed Jury Prejudice After a Full Remmer Hearing

Date: Jan 8, 2026
United States v. Hill: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms (1) No Reversal for Single-to-Multiple Conspiracy Variance Without Proof of Prejudice, (2) Constructive Possession via Dominion Over Drug Premises, and...
Dills v. Weaver: Prior Representation of a Co-Defendant Creates an “Actual Conflict” When It Forecloses Blame-Shifting and Cross-Examination; Ineffective Appellate Counsel Can Supply Cause-and-Prejudice to Overcome Procedural Default

Dills v. Weaver: Prior Representation of a Co-Defendant Creates an “Actual Conflict” When It Forecloses Blame-Shifting and Cross-Examination; Ineffective Appellate Counsel Can Supply Cause-and-Prejudice to Overcome Procedural Default

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Dills v. Weaver: Prior Representation of a Co-Defendant Creates an “Actual Conflict” When It Forecloses Blame-Shifting and Cross-Examination; Ineffective Appellate Counsel Can Supply...
Murray v. State: Totality-of-the-Circumstances Controls Post-Sentencing Guilty-Plea Withdrawal Despite Non-Strict Rule 33.8/Boykin Colloquy

Murray v. State: Totality-of-the-Circumstances Controls Post-Sentencing Guilty-Plea Withdrawal Despite Non-Strict Rule 33.8/Boykin Colloquy

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Murray v. State: Totality-of-the-Circumstances Controls Post-Sentencing Guilty-Plea Withdrawal Despite Non-Strict Rule 33.8/Boykin Colloquy 1. Introduction In Murray v. The State (Supreme Court of...
Rhode Island Codifies a Non-Waivable Five-Bar-Exam Failure Cap and Tightens Exam/UBE-Transfer Pathways for Admission

Rhode Island Codifies a Non-Waivable Five-Bar-Exam Failure Cap and Tightens Exam/UBE-Transfer Pathways for Admission

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Rhode Island Codifies a Non-Waivable Five-Bar-Exam Failure Cap and Tightens Exam/UBE-Transfer Pathways for Admission 1. Introduction In In re Amendments to Board of Bar Examiners Rules of Practice...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert