Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

protected-advice-at-life’s-end:-seventh-circuit-holds-indiana’s-funeral-licensing-ban-on-death-doula-counseling-fails-even-under-intermediate-scrutiny—and-consent-orders-don’t-waive-federal-rights Case Commentaries

Tennessee “Statutory Employer” Doctrine: Vendors Are Not “Subcontractors” Under Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-113(a) Absent Predominantly Service-Based Work

Tennessee “Statutory Employer” Doctrine: Vendors Are Not “Subcontractors” Under Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-113(a) Absent Predominantly Service-Based Work

Date: Dec 23, 2025
Tennessee “Statutory Employer” Doctrine: Vendors Are Not “Subcontractors” Under Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-113(a) Absent Predominantly Service-Based Work 1. Introduction Case: Brian Coblentz et al. v....
Nonreceipt of Alternative-Service Citation Satisfies Craddock’s “No Conscious Indifference” Element Despite Knowledge of the Lawsuit

Nonreceipt of Alternative-Service Citation Satisfies Craddock’s “No Conscious Indifference” Element Despite Knowledge of the Lawsuit

Date: Dec 23, 2025
Nonreceipt of Alternative-Service Citation Satisfies Craddock’s “No Conscious Indifference” Element Despite Knowledge of the Lawsuit I. Introduction JENNA TABAKMAN v. GARY TABAKMAN is a...
Rule 29.3 Stays Against the State: Appellate Courts Must Consider Likely Merits, Balance Harms, and Have Reasonable Time to Decide

Rule 29.3 Stays Against the State: Appellate Courts Must Consider Likely Merits, Balance Harms, and Have Reasonable Time to Decide

Date: Dec 23, 2025
Rule 29.3 Stays Against the State: Appellate Courts Must Consider Likely Merits, Balance Harms, and Have Reasonable Time to Decide I. Introduction Case: In re Ken Paxton and the Office of the...
Tennessee Workers’ Compensation: (1) De Novo Review of Factual Findings Regardless of Deposition vs. Live Proof; (2) “Aggravation” Is Compensable Without Permanent Worsening if Statutory >50% Causation Is Met

Tennessee Workers’ Compensation: (1) De Novo Review of Factual Findings Regardless of Deposition vs. Live Proof; (2) “Aggravation” Is Compensable Without Permanent Worsening if Statutory >50% Causation Is Met

Date: Dec 23, 2025
Tennessee Workers’ Compensation: (1) De Novo Review of Factual Findings Regardless of Deposition vs. Live Proof; (2) “Aggravation” Is Compensable Without Permanent Worsening if Statutory >50%...
People v. Havens (2025 CO 65): No Crim. P. 16 “Failure-to-Record” Report Requirement and Mandatory Opportunity to Rebut BWC Inadmissibility Presumption

People v. Havens (2025 CO 65): No Crim. P. 16 “Failure-to-Record” Report Requirement and Mandatory Opportunity to Rebut BWC Inadmissibility Presumption

Date: Dec 23, 2025
People v. Havens (2025 CO 65): No Crim. P. 16 “Failure-to-Record” Report Requirement and Mandatory Opportunity to Rebut BWC Inadmissibility Presumption Court: Colorado Supreme Court (en banc) Date:...
Craddock Relief When a Defendant Lacks Actual Notice After Alternative Service and Appears Before the Decree Is Signed

Craddock Relief When a Defendant Lacks Actual Notice After Alternative Service and Appears Before the Decree Is Signed

Date: Dec 23, 2025
Craddock Relief When a Defendant Lacks Actual Notice After Alternative Service and Appears Before the Decree Is Signed Supreme Court of Texas (Per Curiam) — Default divorce; alternative service;...
Faulk v. Owens Corning: Fifth Circuit Clarifies Limits on Title VII Protected Activity and Comparator Evidence

Faulk v. Owens Corning: Fifth Circuit Clarifies Limits on Title VII Protected Activity and Comparator Evidence

Date: Dec 22, 2025
Faulk v. Owens Corning: Fifth Circuit Clarifies Limits on Title VII Protected Activity and Comparator Evidence 1. Introduction In Faulk v. Owens Corning Roofing and Asphalt, L.L.C., No. 25‑10356 (5th...
Moral Victories Are Not Merits Victories: The Fifth Circuit Narrows ERISA Fee Awards in Cloud v. NFL Player Retirement Plan

Moral Victories Are Not Merits Victories: The Fifth Circuit Narrows ERISA Fee Awards in Cloud v. NFL Player Retirement Plan

Date: Dec 22, 2025
Moral Victories Are Not Merits Victories: The Fifth Circuit Narrows ERISA Fee Awards in Cloud v. NFL Player Retirement Plan I. Introduction The Fifth Circuit’s decision in Cloud v. Bert Bell/Pete...

    Reasonable Diligence Without Formal Extradition:
    The Fourth Circuit’s Speedy Trial Framework for Defendants Imprisoned Abroad in United States v. Umar Chaudhry

Reasonable Diligence Without Formal Extradition: The Fourth Circuit’s Speedy Trial Framework for Defendants Imprisoned Abroad in United States v. Umar Chaudhry

Date: Dec 22, 2025
Reasonable Diligence Without Formal Extradition: The Fourth Circuit’s Speedy Trial Framework for Defendants Imprisoned Abroad in United States v. Umar Chaudhry I. Introduction In United States v....
Nicholson v. Durant: Fair-Notice Pleading and Supplemental Jurisdiction for Alternative State-Law Gross Negligence Theories

Nicholson v. Durant: Fair-Notice Pleading and Supplemental Jurisdiction for Alternative State-Law Gross Negligence Theories

Date: Dec 22, 2025
Nicholson v. Durant: Fair-Notice Pleading and Supplemental Jurisdiction for Alternative State-Law Gross Negligence Theories I. Introduction The Fourth Circuit’s published decision in Jawone D....
Intended Loss, Sophisticated Means, and Multi‑Object Money‑Laundering Conspiracies in the Fourth Circuit: Commentary on United States v. Anyanwu

Intended Loss, Sophisticated Means, and Multi‑Object Money‑Laundering Conspiracies in the Fourth Circuit: Commentary on United States v. Anyanwu

Date: Dec 22, 2025
Intended Loss, Sophisticated Means, and Multi‑Object Money‑Laundering Conspiracies in the Fourth Circuit: A Commentary on United States v. Kaodichimma Anyanwu (4th Cir. Dec. 18, 2025) (Unpublished)...
Rescission, Status Quo Ante, and Nominal Damages: The Delaware Supreme Court’s Remedial Turn in In re Tesla, Inc. Derivative Litigation

Rescission, Status Quo Ante, and Nominal Damages: The Delaware Supreme Court’s Remedial Turn in In re Tesla, Inc. Derivative Litigation

Date: Dec 22, 2025
Rescission, Status Quo Ante, and Nominal Damages: The Delaware Supreme Court’s Remedial Turn in In re Tesla, Inc. Derivative Litigation I. Introduction The Delaware Supreme Court’s en banc decision...
Limiting the Domestic‑Violence Custody Presumption to Custody Cases: Harris v. DSCYF and Due Process in Delaware Termination of Parental Rights Proceedings

Limiting the Domestic‑Violence Custody Presumption to Custody Cases: Harris v. DSCYF and Due Process in Delaware Termination of Parental Rights Proceedings

Date: Dec 22, 2025
Limiting the Domestic‑Violence Custody Presumption to Custody Cases: Roy Harris v. DSCYF and Due Process in Delaware Termination of Parental Rights I. Introduction The Delaware Supreme Court’s order...
Limits on Delaware’s Long-Arm Jurisdiction Over Out-of-State Auto Insurers in First-Party UIM Claims: Commentary on James E. Berry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Limits on Delaware’s Long-Arm Jurisdiction Over Out-of-State Auto Insurers in First-Party UIM Claims: Commentary on James E. Berry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Date: Dec 22, 2025
Limits on Delaware’s Long-Arm Jurisdiction Over Out-of-State Auto Insurers in First-Party UIM Claims: Commentary on James E. Berry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company I. Introduction...
No Forced Trade-Off Between Speedy Trial and Confrontation Rights: Commentary on Boykin v. State (Del. 2025)

No Forced Trade-Off Between Speedy Trial and Confrontation Rights: Commentary on Boykin v. State (Del. 2025)

Date: Dec 22, 2025
No Forced Trade-Off Between Speedy Trial and Confrontation Rights: A Commentary on Boykin v. State (Delaware Supreme Court, Dec. 17, 2025) I. Introduction The Delaware Supreme Court’s decision in...
State v. Sylvester: Vermont Tightens the Standard for Child-Witness Accommodations Under V.R.E. 807 and Clarifies Appellate Review

State v. Sylvester: Vermont Tightens the Standard for Child-Witness Accommodations Under V.R.E. 807 and Clarifies Appellate Review

Date: Dec 22, 2025
State v. Sylvester: Vermont Tightens the Standard for Child-Witness Accommodations Under V.R.E. 807 and Clarifies Appellate Review I. Introduction In State v. Anna Sylvester, 2025 VT 69 (Dec. 19,...
Public-Information Officers as Non‑Delegable Records Custodians under Ohio’s Public Records Act: Commentary on State ex rel. Whitfield v. Burkhart

Public-Information Officers as Non‑Delegable Records Custodians under Ohio’s Public Records Act: Commentary on State ex rel. Whitfield v. Burkhart

Date: Dec 22, 2025
Public-Information Officers as Non‑Delegable Records Custodians under Ohio’s Public Records Act: Commentary on State ex rel. Whitfield v. Burkhart, 2025‑Ohio‑5612 I. Introduction In State ex rel....
Clarifying Redaction Exemptions and Remedies under Ohio’s Public Records Act: Commentary on State ex rel. Mauk v. Sheldon, 2025-Ohio-5611

Clarifying Redaction Exemptions and Remedies under Ohio’s Public Records Act: Commentary on State ex rel. Mauk v. Sheldon, 2025-Ohio-5611

Date: Dec 22, 2025
Clarifying Redaction Exemptions and Remedies under Ohio’s Public Records Act: Commentary on State ex rel. Mauk v. Sheldon, 2025-Ohio-5611 I. Introduction The Supreme Court of Ohio’s decision in State...
Self-Admitted Error Is Not Enough: Strategic Trial Decisions and Ineffective Assistance After State v. Keadle

Self-Admitted Error Is Not Enough: Strategic Trial Decisions and Ineffective Assistance After State v. Keadle

Date: Dec 22, 2025
Self-Admitted Error Is Not Enough: Strategic Trial Decisions and Ineffective Assistance After State v. Keadle I. Introduction The Nebraska Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Keadle, 320 Neb. 583...
No Appellate Jurisdiction Without a Single Written Judgment Covering All Parties: Commentary on Continental Indemnity Co. v. Starr Indemnity & Liability Co.

No Appellate Jurisdiction Without a Single Written Judgment Covering All Parties: Commentary on Continental Indemnity Co. v. Starr Indemnity & Liability Co.

Date: Dec 21, 2025
No Appellate Jurisdiction Without a Single Written Judgment Covering All Parties: A Commentary on Continental Indemnity Co. v. Starr Indemnity & Liability Co., 320 Neb. 574 (2025) I. Introduction The...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert